Judicial reporting as a guarantor of the rule of law

• Autorzy: Boczek Michał

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2022.158.5

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: is to show judicial reporting in relation to the rule of law. The text focuses on the considerations and analysis of the relativity of judicial reporting to the rule of law as a kind of values and subjective rights of civil society. An additional assumption is to indicate the essence of the issue in an interdisciplinary perspective, drawing attention to its importance, multidimensionality, connection and social significance, leaving room for own research. Design/methodology/approach: The research method used in the article is the analysis of scientific studies, supplemented by the author's observations and experience. The research procedure included a review of Polish and foreign literature, an analysis of legal acts and court decisions, a case study and deductive reasoning. The above text evokes, in the author's opinion, a separate understanding and application, more and more commonly, also by journalists, of the concepts of justice, the rule of law and law. Findings: A high level of influence of judicial reporting on the rule of law has been demonstrated. Great demand for this type of message and its values, which should be implemented by the rule of law - judgments of common courts, to be considered the most desirable form of the system. Social development in the face of values as an interdisciplinary concept in terms of direction and field allows you to maintain what is with what should happen in the future. It is important not only what intentions people have, but also what competences they have and according to what values they operate. The conducted analysis shows that the correctness of the message and the understanding of the meaning of the rule of law in the area of law are important and vice versa. An autocratically governed society can be fully governed by law, the courts can issue judgments and the court rapporteurs publicly present them, which does not necessarily mean that we are dealing with the rule of law and the rule of law. Research limitations/implications: Limitations of the obtained results may result from a limited text sample, small text size. Originality/value: The presented research and conclusions provide practical tips not only to people of science, but above all to average citizens, mainly those who are not aware that the world of values surrounds people, but depends on them, what values they pay attention to and to which he remains indifferent. Man has the freedom to choose what suits him best, but is rarely able to use it rationally and in an appropriate form and time. Among values, man does not have to do anything and can do much. The less complex and understandable the forensic message, the closer to the concept of simple principles of human life and action. Every aspect of judicial reporting contributes to strengthening the rule of law in the spirit of a democratic rule of law. Like the world to the world, there were processes and comments, and what resulted from them socially (...).

Słowa kluczowe

EN

reporting; value; rule of law; awareness

PL

raportowanie; wartość; praworządność; świadomość

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: z. 158
• Strony: 73--83
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 25 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Boczek Michał

• SWPS Uniwersytet Humanistycznospołeczny (SWPS Warsaw University of Humanities and Social Sciences), Warszawa

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2784-5973

Bibliografia

• 1. Borucka-Arctowa, M. (1967). O społecznym działaniu prawa [On the social operation of law]. Warszawa: PWN.
• 2. Gómez-Arostegui, H.T. (2000). Defining Private Life Under the European Convention on Human Rights by Referring to Reasonable Expectations. California Western International law Journal Spring, Vol., 35, No. 2.
• 3. Gryniuk, A. (1979). Świadomość prawna: (studium teoretyczne) [Legal awareness: (Theoretical study)]. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
• 4. Henley, K. (1992). The Impersonal Rule of Law. The Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 299-308. doi:10.1017/S0841820900001430.
• 5. Hobbes, Th. (1954). Lewiatan [Leviathan or the Matter, Forme, and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil]. Warszawa: Fundacja Aletheia.
• 6. Kardasiewicz, B. (1991). Jednostka wobec środków masowego przekazu. Ossolineum.
• 7. Kojder, A. (2001). Godność i siła prawa. Szkice socjologicznoprawne [Dignity and the power of law. Sociological and legal sketches]. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa Ewa Pajestka-Kojder.
• 8. Kondziela, J. (1972). Filozofia społeczna. Zagadnienia wybrane [Social philosophy. Selected issues]. Lublin: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski.
• 9. Kuzior, A. (2020). Contemporary European Cultural Values in the Context of Axiology of Sustainable Development. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology, Organization and Management, vol. 148, pp. 351-363.
• 10. Kuzior, A., Kwiliński, A. (2021). Zarządzane refleksyjne - prolegomena. In: A. Kuzior, D. Krawczyk (eds.), Wybrane aspekty komunikacji i zarządzania w turbulentnym środowisku (pp. 89-106). Katowice: Wyd. Naukowe Śląsk.
• 11. Leibniz, G.W. (1991). Monadologia [Monadology]. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
• 12. Leibniz, G.W. (1998) Korespondencja z Antoine'em Arnauldem [Correspondence with Antoine Arnauld]. Warszawa: PWN.
• 13. Łojko, E. (2013). Prawnicy i dziennikarze - współpraca, rywalizacja, manipulacja [Lawyers and journalists - cooperation, competition, manipulation]. Warszawa: Stowarzyszenie Absolwentów Wydziału Prawa i Administracji UW.
• 14. Marks, K. (1966). Przedmowa. Przyczynek do krytyki ekonomii politycznej [Preface. A contribution to the criticism of political economy]. In: K. Marks, F. Engels, Dzieła, vol. 13. Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza.
• 15. Olechnicki, K., Załecki, P. (2004). Słownik socjologiczny [Dictionary of sociology]. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Graffiti BC.
• 16. Raz, J. (1979). Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship.
• 17. Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.
• 18. Sobczak, J. (2000). Dziennikarz - sprawozdawca sądowy: prawa i obowiązki [Journalist - court rapporteur: rights and obligations]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Prawnicze.
• 19. Studnicki, F. (1965). Przepływ wiadomości o normach prawa [The flow of information about legal norms]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
• 20. Studnicki, F. (1969). Cybernetyka i prawo [Cybernetics and law]. Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna.
• 21. Tiersma, M. (1987). The Language of Defamation. Texas Law Review, Vol. 66.
• 22. Tischner, J., Kłoczkowski, A. (2001). Wobec wartości [Against the value]. Poznań: w Drodze.
• 23. Treiger, L.K. (1992). Protecting Satire Against Libel Claims: A. New Reading pf the First Amendment zs Opinion Privilege. Yale Law Review, Vol. 98.
• 24. Wiatr, J. (1973). Społeczeństwo: wstęp do socjologii systematycznej [Society: an introduction to systematic sociology]. Warszawa: PWN.
• 25. Ziembiński, Z. (1998). Logika praktyczna [Practical logic]. Warszawa: PWN.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).