Supporting factors and factory employee’s behaviour in the use of public transportation mode in Jakarta

• Autorzy: Herdiansyah Herdis , Edyson Hudy Prabowo , Mangkara Sessario Bayu , Hindami Zulfahmi Ilman

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.20858/tp.2019.14.1.12

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The tendency for people in Jakarta to use public transportation is still relatively low. A study from Jabodetabek Transportation Management Agency shows that only 24 percent of road users chose public land transportation modes (Transjakarta bus and train) from a total of 47.5 million trips in Jabodetabek by 2015. Public transportation trips in Jabodetabek are all people's journeys or the journey to employee work destination located in buffer towns around Jakarta. Employees are among the elements of society that use public transportation. The economic conditions of factory employees that encourage them to work overtime cause differences in attitudes between factory employees and office employees toward using public transportation modes. This study aims to determine the factors that encourage factory employees to choose the mode of transportation to the workplace and analyze their attitude toward using public transportation mode. The results show that the number of factory employees who prefer public transportation mode is still little. However, their potential to move into public transportation is substantial due to the belief in the commitment of the Jakarta government to fixing the public transportation system. Most factory employees also agree that public transport can reduce congestion in Jakarta. There is a need to apply a strategy of the transit development (TOD) to reach public places and places of work.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

behavior; public transportation; employee; overtime; Jakarta

PL

zachowanie; transport publiczny; pracownik; godziny nadliczbowe; Jakarta

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Transport Problems
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: T. 14, z. 1
• Strony: 127--139
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 44 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Herdiansyah Herdis

• School of Environmental Science, Universitas Indonesia, Salemba Campus, Building C, 5th & 6th floor, Jl. Salemba Raya No. 4, Central Jakarta, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia

autor

Edyson Hudy Prabowo

• School of Environmental Science, Universitas Indonesia, Salemba Campus, Building C, 5th & 6th floor, Jl. Salemba Raya No. 4, Central Jakarta, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia

autor

Mangkara Sessario Bayu

• School of Environmental Science, Universitas Indonesia, Salemba Campus, Building C, 5th & 6th floor, Jl. Salemba Raya No. 4, Central Jakarta, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia

autor

Hindami Zulfahmi Ilman

• School of Environmental Science, Universitas Indonesia, Salemba Campus, Building C, 5th & 6th floor, Jl. Salemba Raya No. 4, Central Jakarta, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia

Bibliografia

• 1. Yang, Q. & Wang, J. & Song, X. & et al. Urban Traffic Congestion Prediction Using Floating Car Trajectory Data. Algorithms and Architectures for Parallel Processing Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2015. P. 18-30.
• 2. Isa, N. & Yusoff, M. & Mohamed, A. A Review on Recent Traffic Congestion Relief Approaches. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence with Applications in Engineering and Technology. 2014. P. 121-126.
• 3. Cheng, Y. & Chen, S. Perceived Accessibility, Mobility, and Connectivity of Public Transportation Systems. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2015. Vol. 77. P. 386-403.
• 4. Noordegraaf, D.M.V. & Annema, J.A. Employer Attitudes Towards Peak Hour Avoidance. EJTIR. 2012. Vol. 12. P. 373-390.
• 5. Irvine, D. & Budd, L. & Ison, S. & Kitching, G. The Environmental Effects of Peak Hour Air Traffic Congestion: The Case of London Heathrow Airport. Research in Transportation Economics. 2016. Vol. 55. P. 67-73.
• 6. Tanaboriboon, Y. Demand Management an Alternative Approach to Relieve Traffic Congestion in the Developing Countries: Asian Metropolises Context. Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu. 1994. Vol. 488. P. 11-19.
• 7. Jain, V. & Sharma, A. & Subramanian, L. Road Traffic Congestion in the Developing World. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Symposium on Computing for Development-ACM DEV. 2012. Vol. 12. 10 p.
• 8. Yang, X. & Zhang, D. & An, J. & Liu, H. Passengers Perception Based Public Transportation Service Quality Evaluating Methodology. In: 6th Advanced Forum on Transportation of China. 2010. P. 155-160.
• 9. Arifin, Z.N. & Axhausen, K.W. Investigating Commute Mode and Route Choice Variabilities in Jakarta Using Multi-Day GPS Data. International Journal of Technology. 2012. Vol. 3. No. 1. P. 45-55.
• 10. Berawi, M.A. & Berawi, A.R. & Prajitno, I.S. & et al. Developing Conceptual Design of High-Speed Railways Using Value Engineering Method: Creating Optimum Project Benefits. International Journal of Technology. 2015. Vol. 6. No. 4. P. 670-679.
• 11. Olyvia, F. Pengguna Transportasi Umum di Jakarta Masih Rendah. 2017. Available at: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20170523091500-20-216597/pengguna-transportasiumum-di-jakarta-masih-rendah.
• 12. Joewono, T.B. & Tarigan, A.K. & Susilo, Y.O. Road-Based Public Transportation in Urban Areas of Indonesia: What Policies Do Users Expect to Improve the Service Quality? Transport Policy. 2016. Vol. 49. P. 114-124.
• 13. Dharmowijoyo, D.B. & Susilo, Y.O. & Karlström, A. Relationships Among Discretionary Activity Duration, its Travel Time Spent and Activity Space Indices in the Jakarta Metropolitan Area, Indonesia. Journal of Transport Geography. 2016. Vol. 54. P. 148-160.
• 14. Susilo, Y.O. & Santosa, W. & Joewono, T.B. & Parikesit, D. A Reflection of Motorization and Public Transport in Jakarta Metropolitan Area. IATSS Research. 2007. Vol. 31. No. 1. P. 59-68.
• 15. Dhanani, S. Indonesian Labour Market: Changes and Challenges. New York: Routledge. 2014.
• 16. Nada, I. & Anita, A.R. & Eqbal, Z.S. & et al. A Study of Organizational Factors in Occupational Stress Problems Among Workers in a Polymer Manufacturing Factory. In: 2012 Southeast Asian Network of Ergonomics Societies Conference (SEANES). 2017.
• 17. Wibowo, S.S. The Development of Walking Environment Measures for Indonesia Cities. Journal of Technology and Social Science. 2017. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 49-54.
• 18. Rochadiyat, Y. Jakarta dalam Angka 2016. Jakarta: BPS-Statistics of DKI Jakarta Province. 2017. Available at: https://jakarta.bps.go.id/backend/pdf_publikasi/Jakarta-Dalam-Angka-2016.pdf.
• 19. Hernandez, D. Uneven mobilities, uneven opportunities: Social distribution of public transport accessibility to jobs and education in Montevideo. Journal of Transport Geography. 2017. Vol. 0966-6923. P. 5-6.
• 20. Johnson, D. & Ercolani, M. & Mackie, P. Econometric analysis of the link between public transport accessibility and employment. Transport Policy. 2017. Vol. 60. P. 1-9.
• 21. Tahir, A. Angkutan Massal Sebagai Alternatif Mengatasi Persoalan Kemacetan Lalu Lintas Kota Surabaya. Jurnal SMARTek. 2005. Vol. 3. No. 3. P. 169-182.
• 22. Tamin, O.Z. Konsep Manajemen Kebutuhan Transportasi (MKT) Sebagai Alternatif Pemecahan Masalah Transportasi Perkotaan di DKI Jakarta. Jurnal PWK. 1999. Vol. 2.
• 23. Gustina, S.B. Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Transportasi Umum di Jabodetabek. In: Temu Ilmiah IPLBI. 2016. P. E123.
• 24. Aminah, S. Transportasi Publik dan Aksesibilitas Masyarakat Perkotaan. Journal Unair. 2007. Vol. 20. No. 1. P. 35-52.
• 25. Sukarto, H. Pemilihan Model Transportasi di DKI Jakarta dengan Analisis Kebijakan “Proses Hirarki Analitik”. Jurnal Teknik Sipil. 2006. Vol. 3. No. 1. P. 25-36.
• 26. Ge, Y. & Jabbari, P. & MacKenzie, D. & Tao, J. Effects of a Public Real-Time Multi-Modal Transportation Information Display on Travel Behaviour and Attitudes. Journal of Public Transportation. 2017. Vol. 20. No. 2. P. 40-65.
• 27. Rasyid, R.B.F.Al. Kualitas Pelayanan transportasi Publik (Studi Deskriptif tentang Kualitas elayanan Jasa Angkutan Umum Perum Damri Unit Angkutan Bus Khusus Gresik-Bandara Juanda). Ilmu Administrasi Negara. 2015. Vol. 3. No. 2. P. 97-105.
• 28. Rodrigue, J.-P. & Contois, C. & Slack, B. The Geography of Transport Systems, 2nd edition. New York: Routledge, 2009.
• 29. Ismail, R. & Hafezi, M.H. & Nor, R.M. & Ambak, K. Passengers preference and satisfaction of public transport in Malaysia. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 2012. Vol. 6. No. 8. P. 410-416.
• 30. Collins, C. & Chambers, S. Psychological and situational influences on commuter transport-mode choice. Environment and Behavior. 2005. Vol. 37. P. 640-661.
• 31. Anable, J. ‘Complacent car addicts’ or ‘aspiring environmentalists’? Identifying travel behawior segments using attitude theory. Transport Policy. 2005. Vol. 12. No. 1. P. 65-78.
• 32. Hagman, O. Mobilizing meanings of mobility: car users’ constructions of the goods and bads of car use. Transportation Research Part D. 2003. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 1-9.
• 33. Jensen, M. Passion and heart in transport-a sociological analysis on transport behavior. Transport Policy. 1999. Vol. 6. No. 1. P. 19-33.
• 34. STIMULUS. Segmentation for transport in markets using latent user psychological structures. Transport Research Fourth Framework Programme, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. 1999.
• 35. Hensher, D.A. & Stopher, P. & Bullock, P. Service quality—developing a service quality index in the provision of commercial bus contracts. Transportation Research Part A. 2003. Vol. 37. No. 6. P. 499-517.
• 36. Taylor, B.D. & Miller, D. & Iseki, H. & Fink, C. Nature and/or nurture? Analyzing the determinants of transit ridership across US urbanized areas. Transportation Research Part A. 2009. Vol. 43. No. 1. P. 60-77.
• 37. Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions. Transport choices of car users in rural and urban areas. London: HMSO. 2001.
• 38. Fenwick, I. & Heeler, R. & Simmie, P. Switching commuters from car to public transit: A micromodelling approach. Journal of Economic Psychology. 1983. Vol. 3. P. 333-345.
• 39. Mierzejewski, E.A. & Ball W.L. New findings on factors related to transit use. ITE Journal. 1990. Vol. 60. P. 34-39.
• 40. De Vries, P. & Aarts, H. & Midden, C.J.H. Changing simple energy-related consumer behaviors: How the enactment of intention is thwarted by acting and non-acting habits. Environment and Behavior. 2011. Vol. 43. P. 612-633.
• 41. Verplanken, B. & Aarts, H. & Knippenberg, A. van & Moonen, A. Habit versus planned behavior: A field experiment. British Journal of Social Psychology. 1998. Vol. 37. P. 111-128.
• 42. Verplanken, B. & Walker, I. & Davis, A. & Jurasek, M. Context change and travel mode choice: Combining the habit discontinuity and self-activation hypotheses. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2008. Vol. 28. P. 121-127.
• 43. Fujii, S. & Gärling, T. & Kitamura, R. Changes in drivers’ perceptions and use of public transport during a freeway closure. Environment and Behavior. 2001. Vol. 36. P. 796-808.
• 44. Donald, I. & Canter, D. Intentionality and fatality during the King's Cross underground fire. European Journal of Social Psychology. 1992. Vol. 22. P. 203-218.