PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Investigating the role of structural factors in the performance of SMES by using structural equations technique

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) have plenty of competitive advantages compared to large companies. They are more capable of being original and innovative, and due to their flexibility, they can respond better to environmental changes and satisfy their customers’ emerging needs. They also have more opportunities to redesign or alter and improve their management tools and information systems. Moreover, the employees can improve their expertise in novel fields. Due to the significance of SMEs in countries’ economies, a great number of studies and investigations have been conducted on them. According to the previous studies of the researcher and review of the literature, relying on the three-dimensional model, three groups of structural, content, and environmental factors were identified as the most important factors affecting the performance of SMEs in Semnan province in Iran. Nevertheless, owing to the wide area of research and also in order to achieve better results, this study has focused only on investigating the role of structural factors in the performance of SMEs in Semnan province. The research method used in this study in terms of target is applied and in terms of data collection is analytical. The method used for data analysis is the technique of structural equations of second rank factor analysis . The results of the research revealed that structural factors affect SMEs performance to the amount of 3.99.
Twórcy
  • a Student of the Department of Management, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran
  • Department of Management, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran
Bibliografia
  • 1. Amin Aqae M., 2008. Study of factors affecting performance of small industries from rural development experts’ viewpoints. Village and Development, 11(4), 125-146.
  • 2. Aminbeidokhti A., Zargar M., 2011. Study of existing obstacles to SMEs development and presentation of a framework supporting them. Cultural, economic, social, and scientific monthly publication of work and society, issue 138.
  • 3. Azizi M., Vakilalroaya Y., Tavangar A., 2012. Evaluation of the factors affecting entrepreneurship in small and medium companies by utilizing balanced reward cards. Case study: Semnan’s industrial city. National conference of entrepreneurship and management of knowledge-based enterprises. Sari.
  • 4. Ballantine J., Levy M., Powell P. 1998. Evaluating information systems in small and medium-sized enterprises: issues and evidence. European Journal of Information Systems, 7(4), 241-255.
  • 5. Benzing C., Chu H.M., Kara O. 2009. Entrepreneurs in Turkey: A factor analysis of motivations, success factors, and problems. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(1), 58-91.
  • 6. Chorev S. and Anderson A.R. 2006. Success in Israeli high-tech start-ups; critical factors and process. Technovation, 26(2), 162-174.
  • 7. Halabisky D. 2006.The growth process in firms: job creation by firm age, small business policy branch industry. Canada.
  • 8. Karpak B. and Topcu I. 2010. Small medium manufacturing enterprises in Turkey: Ananalytic network process frame work for prioritizing factors affecting success. Int. J. Production Economics, 125, 60-70..
  • 9. Man T.W., Lau T., Chan K.F. 2002. The competitiveness of small and medium enterprises: A conceptualization with focus on entrepreneurial competencies. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 123-142.
  • 10. Nasehifar V., Saadat M., Masoumzadeh Zavvareh A., Ahmadi M., 2010. Strategies and policies in support of institutions of marketing services. Journal: Commercial Research Publication, iss. 55, 109-150.
  • 11. Organization of small industries and industrial cities, 2011. Successful policies in development of small industries in 20 industrial and developing countries. Tehran: publications of organization of Iran’s small industries.
  • 12. Piri A., Safaeshakib A., Hosseinzadeh A., 2013. Evaluation of performance of managers of manufacturing companies in response to competitive industrial forces in SMEs (Case study: Industrial cities and areas in Hamedan province). Conference of management, challenges and guidelines, Shiraz, 2013.
  • 13. Rogoff E.G., Lee M.S., Suh D.C. 2004. “Who done it?” Attributions by entrepreneurs and experts of the factors that cause and impede small business success. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(4), 364-376
  • 14. Sepehrdoost H., Kamran N. 2012. Evaluation of technical efficiency of small industries in Hamedan province. 4(4), 147-174.
  • 15. UNIDO 2003. Strategy of Increase in effective and competitive participation in small and medium industries in economy and industry of Islamic Republic of Iran. Translator: Abdoreza Sheghaghi and Masood Shafie (2004), 1st ed., Cultural Institution of Rasa, Tehran.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-de362bcd-9b41-40c7-b0aa-298949cd1629
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.