Bacterial diseases of energy plants

• Autorzy: Kalinichenko A. , Pasichnyk L. , Osypenko S. , Patyka V. , Usmanova H.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2428/ecea.2017.24(2)16

Warianty tytułu

PL

Bakteryjne choroby roślin energetycznych

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The results of the study of the bacterial pathology of bioenergetic woody plants (poplar, birch), which lead to a significant reduction in harvest or death are described. Various bacterial diseases of these cultures and their pathogens, symptoms of diseases and characteristics of injuries, distribution and harmfulness of pathogens are described. The characteristics of the main bacterial diseases (bacterial cancer and bacterial necrosis of the bark) and less dangerous ones (wetwood, bacterial blight, root disease and tuberculosis) are presented. The causative agent of bacterial cancer is the Xanthomonas populi bacterium (syn. Aplanobacterium populi). As the accompanying microbiota of the causal agents of canker prevail bacteria of the genus Pseudomonas, Erwinia, Bacillus, Corynebacterium, Chromobacterium bergonzini and fungi. The causative agents of bacterial necrosis of the bark poplar are bacteria from genera Pseudomonas, Xanthomonas, Erwinia. It is showed that bacterial wetwood (dropsy) is caused by Erwinia nimipressuralis (according to the later classification the causal agent is renamed as Enterobacter nimipressuralis (according to the modern classification. – Lelliottia nimipressuralis. In addition to this pathogen from the birch trees from the wetwood symptoms was isolated bacterium Erwinia multivora Scz.-Parf. As related bacteria are involved in the pathological process identified as Pseudomonas syringae, Enterobacter ñancerogenus and bacteria of genera Xanthomonas and Bacillus. Methods of protection and prevention bacterial disease with used biopreparation “bio-gel” are given. It was proved the high effectivity of new preparation in process of biologization of agro-industrial.

PL

Przedstawiono wyniki badań bakteryjnych patogenów bioenergetycznych roślin drzewiastych (topoli, brzozy), prowadzących do znacznego zmniejszenia zbiorów lub zaginięcia. Opisano różne choroby bakteryjne i patogeny zaznaczonych roślin, objawy tych chorób, charakterystykę obrażeń, rozmieszczenie i szkodliwość patogenów. Przedstawiono charakterystykę głównych chorób bakteryjnych (rak bakteryjny i martwicę bakteryjną kory) oraz mniej niebezpiecznych (mokradła, zarazy bakteryjne, choroby korzeni i gruźlica). Czynnikiem sprawczym bakteryjnego raka jest bakteria Xanthomonas populi (syn. Aplanobacterium populi). Jako towarzysząca mikroflora czynników wywołujących raka przeważają bakterie z rodzaju Pseudomonas, Erwinia, Bacillus, Corynebacterium, Chromobacterium bergonzini i grzyby. Czynniki wywołujące martwicę bakteryjną kory topoli to bakterie typu Pseudomonas, Xanthomonas, Erwinia. Wykazano, że bakteryzacja mokrego drewno (obrzęk) jest spowodowana przez Erwinia nimipressuralis (zgodnie z późniejsz ą klasyfikacją czynnik przyczynowy został przemianowany na Enterobacter nimipressuralis), (zgodnie z nowoczesną klasyfikacją – Lelliottia nimipressuralis). Oprócz tego jako patogen mokrego drzewa z brzozy wyizolowano bakterię Erwinia multivora Scz.-Parf. Jako powiązane bakterie zaangażowane w proces patologiczny zidentyfikowano Pseudomonas syringae, Enterobacter ñancerogenus oraz bakterie rodzajów Xanthomonas i Bacillus. Podano metody ochrony i zapobiegania chorobom bakteryjnym przy zastosowaniu biopreparatu „biożel”. Udowodniono wysoką skuteczność nowego preparatu w procesie biologizacji agro-przemysłowej.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

bioenergetic cultures; phytopathogenic bacteria; poplar; birch; methods of protection

PL

rośliny bioenergetyczne; bakterie fitopatogenne; topola; brzoza; metody ochrony

• Wydawca: Towarzystwo Chemii i Inżynierii Ekologicznej
• Czasopismo: Ecological Chemistry and Engineering. A
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: Vol. 24, nr 2
• Strony: 169--191
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 28 poz., fot., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kalinichenko A.

• University of Opole, Dmowskiego 7–9, 45-365 Opole, Poland.

autor

Pasichnyk L.

• Institute of Microbiology and Virology named after D. K. Zabolotny National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Academic Zabolotny Str. 154, 03143 Kyiv, Ukraine

autor

Osypenko S.

• RPE “Institute «Tekmash»”, Perekopska Str. 177/2, office 77, 73036 Kherson, Ukraine

autor

Patyka V.

• Institute of Microbiology and Virology named after D. K. Zabolotny National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Academic Zabolotny Str. 154, 03143 Kyiv, Ukraine

autor

Usmanova H.

• Chernigiv National T. G. Shevchenko Pedagogical University, Hetman Polubotok Str. 53, 14034 Chernihiv, Ukraine

Bibliografia

• [1] Kalinichenko A, Malynska L, Kalinichenko W, Sazonova N. Energetyka odnawialna – problem czy szansa dla Ukrainy? Proc ECOpole. 2014;8(1):181-188. DOI: 10.2429/proc.2014.8(1)023.
• [2] Klement Z, Rudollf K, Sands D. Methods in phytobacteriology. Budapest: Academia Kiado; 1990. ISBN 978-9630549554.
• [3] Patyka V, Buletsa N, Pasichnyk L, Zhitkevich N, Kalinichenko A, Gnatiuk T et al. Specifics of pesticides effects on the phytopathogenic bacteria. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2016; 23(2): 311-331, DOI: 10.1515/eces-2016-0022.
• [4] Scott SE. Populations of bacteria in poplar stems. Forest Pathol. 1984;4(2):103-112. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1984.tb00158.x.
• [5] Schink B, Ward JC, Zeikus JG. Microbiology of Wetwood: Role of Anaerobic Bacterial Populations in Living Trees. Microbiology. 1981;123(2): 313-322. DOI: 10.1099/00221287-123-2-313.
• [6] Sinclair WA, Lyon HH. Diseases of Trees and Shrubs, 2nd ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2005. ISBN 978-0801443718.
• [7] Brady C, Cleenwerck I, Venter S, Coutinho T, De Vos P. Taxonomic evaluation of the genus Enterobacter based on multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA): proposal to reclassify E. nimipressuralis and E. amnigenus into Lelliottia gen. nov. as Lelliottia nimipressuralis comb. nov. and Lelliottia amnigena comb. nov., respectively, E. gergoviae and E. pyrinus into Pluralibacter gen. nov. as Pluralibacter gergoviae comb. nov. and Pluralibacter pyrinus comb. nov., respectively, E. cowanii, E. radicincitans, E. oryzae and E. arachidis into Kosakonia gen. nov. as Kosakonia cowanii comb. nov., Kosakonia radicincitans comb. nov., Kosakonia oryzae comb. nov. and Kosakonia arachidis comb. nov., respectively, and E. turicensis, E. helveticus and E. pulveris into Cronobacter as Cronobacter zurichensis nom. nov., Cronobacter helveticus comb. nov. and Cronobacter pulveris comb. nov., respectively, and emended description of the genera Enterobacter and Cronobacter. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2013;36(5):309-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.syapm.2013.03.005.
• [8] Ostry ME, Wilson LR, McNabb HSJr, Moore LM. A Guide to Insect, Disease, and Animal Pests of Poplars Agric. Handb. 677. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1988. https://naldc.nal.usda.gov/download/CAT89930507/PDF.
• [9] Interactive multimedia determinant of most disseminated diseases in the forestry fund, kennels and dendroparks. 2017. http://cd.intelico.info/diseasesOfTrees/diseasesOfForestPlantations.
• [10] Tatarintsev AI. Ecological-Coenotic characteristic of the bacterial dropsy infection rate in birch forest in the Southern part of middle Siberia (Krasnoyarsk group of area). Contemp Probl Ecol. 2014;(2):221-227. DOI: 10.1134/S1995425514020152.
• [11] Bacterial dropsy of birch. Control measures. 2015. http://vitusltd.ru/blog/lesozaschita/11012.
• [12] Mironenko ON, Kabanova SA, Baranov OYu, Danchenko MA. Bacterial Disease of Birch Forest in Kazakhstan. Vestnik of Volga State University of Technology. Ser: Forest Ecol. Nature Manage. 2016;3(31): 87-93. DOI: 10.15350/2306-2827.2016.3.87.
• [13] Shvets MV. Associated with Enterobacter nimipressuralis in the pathology of bacterial dropsy Betula pendula Roth. Scientific Bulletin of UNFU. 2017;27(3):66-70. http://nv.nltu.edu.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/375.
• [14] Betula pendula - Roth. Plants for a Future. 2017. https://www.pfaf.org/user/Plant.aspx?LatinName=Betula+pendula.
• [15] Burdekin DA. Bacterial canker of poplar. Annals Appl Biol. 1972;72(3):295–299. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1972.tb01296.x.
• [16] Ostry M, Ramstedt M, Newcombe G, Steenackers M. Poplars and Willows: Trees for Society and the Environment (eds J.G. Isebrands and J. Richardson). FAO 2014: 443-458. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i2670e.pdf
• [17] Buttimer, C., McAuliffe, O., Ross, R. P., Hill, C., O’Mahony, J., Coffey, A. Bacteriophages and Bacterial Plant Diseases. Frontiers in Microbiol 2017;8:34. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00034.
• [18] Whitbread R. Bacterial canker of poplars in Britain: The cause of the disease and the role of leaf-scars in infection. Annals Appl Biol. 1967;59(1):123-131. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1967.tb04423.x.
• [19] Sabet KA, Dowson WJ. Studies in the bacterial die-back and canker disease of poplar 1. The disease and its cause. Annals Appl Biol. 1952;39(4):609-616. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1952.tb01075.x.
• [20] Salk Institute. (2018, January 8). Unusual plant immune response to bacterial infection characterized. Sci Daily. 2018. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/01/180108130201.htm.
• [21] Li Y, He W, Wang T, Piao CG, Guo LM, Chang JP et al. Acinetobacter qingfengensis sp. nov., isolated from canker bark of Populus × euramericana. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64(3):1043-1050. DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.051995-0.
• [22] Li Y, Fang W, Xue H, Liang WX, Wang LF, Tian GZ. Brenneria populi sp. nov., isolated from symptomatic bark of Populus×euramericana canker. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015;65(2):432-437. DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.066068-0.
• [23] Zheng M, Piao C, Xue H, Guo M, Li Y. Brenneria populi subsp. brevivirga subsp. nov. isolated from symptomatic bark of Populus × euramericana canker, and description of Brenneria populi subsp. populi subsp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:3633-3638. DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002183.
• [24] Pests and diseases of forestry in New Zealand: poplar. 2018. http://www.nzffa.org.nz/farm-forestry-model/ the-essentials/forest-health-pests-and-diseases/poplar.
• [25] Urosevic B. A study on bacterial diseases of poplars. Praha; Publ. House of the Czech Acad Sci.:1973.
• [26] Danilewicz K. Etiology of some bacterial diseases of poplar in Poland. I. Bacteriosis caused by Pseudomonas Migula and Erwinia Winslow. Acta Microbiol Pol. 1967;16(1):73-81. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4166073.
• [27] De Kam M. Xanthomonas campestris pv. populi, the causal agent of bark necrosis in poplar. Netherlands J Plant Pathol. 1984;90(1):13–22. DOI: 10.1007/BF02014178.
• [28] Dankevych L., Leonova N., Dragovoz I., Patyka V., Kalinichenko A., Włodarczyk P. et al. The synthesis of plant growth stimulators by phytopathogenic bacteria as factor of pathogenicity. Appl Ecol Env Res. 2018; 16(2):1581-1593. DOI: 10.15666/aeer/1602_15811593.