Specifics of management of enterprise innovation activities in the Czech Republic – the decision-making mechanism

• Autorzy: Peterková J. , Franek J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The majority of Czech managers are aware that the long-term competitiveness of the company depends primarily on the use of innovative technical solutions and investments in new technologies. Despite awareness of the importance of innovation, many companies do not know how to manage, implement, and evaluate them. Empirical research showed that most innovation firms implement, but do not systematically manage the implementation of innovative projects and the allocation of funds. There is a contradiction between companies' ability to orientate themselves in the approaches available in the area of innovation management and the existence of a large number of approaches that can be used to address a particular type of innovation problem. A set of innovation concepts has been created to solve those challenges. Practical steps of the decision-making mechanism for selecting innovation concepts have been proposed. The decision-making mechanism is based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and serves primarily for managers of medium and large enterprises.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

AHP method; innovation activities; innovation concept; innovation management

• Wydawca: STE GROUP
• Czasopismo: Management Systems in Production Engineering
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: nr 3 (26)
• Strony: 137--142
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 32 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Peterková J.

• VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava Faculty of Economics Sokolská třída 33, 702 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic

autor

Franek J.

• VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava Faculty of Economics Sokolská třída 33, 702 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic

Bibliografia

• [1] J. Dvořák. Management inovací. Praha: Vysoká škola manažerské informatiky a ekonomiky, 2006.
• [2] M.T. Escobar, J. Aguarón and J.M. Moreno-Jimenez. “A note on AHP group consistency for the row geometric mean priorization procedure”. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 153, pp. 318- 322, 2004.
• [3] S. Few. Information Dashboard Design. Sebastopol: O´Reilly Media, 2006.
• [4] J. Franek and A. Kresta. “Competitive Strategy Decision Making Based On The Five Forces Analysis With AHP/ANP Approach”, in Economic Forum – 11th International Conference Liberec Proceedings, 2013, pp. 135-145.
• [5] L. Gala, J. Pour and Z. Šedivá. Podniková informatika. Praha: Grada, 2009.
• [6] P. Gupta and B.E. Trusko. Global Innovation Science Handbook. USA: McGraw-Hill Education, 2014.
• [7] J. Hauschildt. Innovations management. Mnichov: Vahlen Franz GmbH, 2004.
• [8] Ishizaka, and A. Labib. “Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process”. Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, pp. 14336-14345, 2011.
• [9] R.S. Kaplan and D.P. Norton. Efektivní systém řízení strategie. Nový nástroj zvyšování výkonnosti a vytváření konkurenční výhody. Praha: Management Press, 2010.
• [10] A. Kopčaj. Spirálový management. Praha: Alfa Publishing, 2007.
• [11] V. Koráb and P. Koudelková. “What determines innovation in small and medium enterprise? A Case study from the Czech Republic”. Transformations in Business & Economics, vol. 15, pp. 78-88, 2016.
• [12] J. Košturiak and J. Chal. Inovace vaše konkurenční výhoda! Brno: Computer Press, 2008.
• [13] J. Košturiak and Z. Frolík. Štíhlý a inovativní podnik. Praha: Alfa Publishing, 2006.
• [14] M. Kovač and D. Sabadka. “Model inovačního potenciálu podniku”. Transfér inovacií, vol. 7, pp. 3-6, 2004.
• [15] L. Ludvík and J. Peterková. “Management approaches of large and small enterprises in Czech Republic”. Actual Problems of Economics, vol. 155, pp. 36-45, 2014.
• [16] M. Mana. “Inovační activity podniků v ČR 2012- 2014”. Internet: https://www.czso.cz/documents/10180/23195482/kp_213003_16.pdf/03553 022-afae-43ef-85ca-ca6afb197333?version=1.1, Jun. 3, 2016 [Dec. 29, 2017].
• [17] L.D. Milles. Techniques of Value Analysis and Engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972.
• [18] Z. Mikoláš, J. Peterková, M. Tvrdíková et al. Konkurenční potenciál průmyslového podniku. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2011.
• [19] J. Mlčoch. Inovace a výnosnost podniku. Praha: Linde, 2002.
• [20] D. Parmenter. Key Performance Indicators. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2010.
• [21] M. Pearl. Grow Globally. New Jersey: Wiley, 2011.
• [22] J. Peterková. Využití konceptů inovací v průmyslovém podniku. Ostrava: VŠB-TU Ostrava, 2018.
• [23] J. Peterková and L. Ludvík. Řízení inovací v průmyslovém podniku. Ostrava: VŠB-TUO, 2015.
• [24] J. Peterková and Z. Wozniaková. “The Czech innovative enterprise”. Journal of Applied Economics Sciences, vol. 10, pp. 243-252, 2015.
• [25] Z. Pitra. Management inovačních aktivit. Praha: Professional Publishing, 2007.
• [26] T.L. Saaty and K. Peniwati. Group Decision Making: Drawing out and Reconciling Differences. Pitsburgh: RWS Publications, 2012.
• [27] M. Šulák and E. Vacík. Měření výkonnosti firem. Praha: EUPRESS, 2005.
• [28] J. Tidd and J. Bessant. Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2013.
• [29] R. Vlček. Strategie hodnotových inovací: tvorba, rozvoj a měřitelnost inovací. Praha: Professional Publishing, 2011.
• [30] R.C. Wolcott and M.J. Lippitz. “The Four Models of Corporate Entrepreneurship”. MITSloan Management Review, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 75-82, 2007.
• [31] Z. Zmeškal. “Application of decomposition multi-attribute methods AHP and ANP in financial decisionmaking”, in Managing and Modelling Of Financial Risks – 6th International Scientific Conference Proceedings, 2012, pp. 689-699.
• [32] O. Žižlavský. (2012). Hodnocení inovační výkonnosti. [On-line]. Available: www.inoinfra.cz/userfiles/file/ Hodnocení inovační výkonnosti.pdf [Oct. 28, 2017].

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018).