Artificial intelligence in education: ChatGPT-based simulations in teachers’ preparation

• Autorzy: Drushlyak Marina , Lukashova Tetiana , Shamonia Volodymyr , Semenikhina Olena

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35784/iapgos.6180

Warianty tytułu

PL

Sztuczna inteligencja w edukacji: symulacje oparte na ChatGPT w przygotowaniu nauczycieli

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Today, the problem of using artificial intelligence (AI) in education is essential. Recent studies have detected several challenges in using AI for correct assessment, academic integrity, etc. So, the problem of finding positive practices for using AI in education needs to be studied more closely. We perceive ChatGPT as a digital tool for teacher training, which makes it possible to simulate students' problem-solving processes and analyze them critically. It is shown that ChatGPT makes mistakes in solutions, so the generated false answers become an essential training tool in teacher training. It became the base for experimental teaching. The research aims to substantiate the effectiveness of using ChatGPT as a simulation environment to develop pre-service teachers' critical thinking. The statistical analysis of the experiment results proved that ChatGPT is an effective digital tool for developing mathematics and computer science teachers' critical thinking.

PL

Obecnie problem wykorzystania sztucznej inteligencji (AI) w edukacji jest niezwykle istotny. Ostatnie badania wykryły kilka wyzwań związanych z wykorzystaniem sztucznej inteligencji do prawidłowej oceny, uczciwości akademickiej itp. Tak więc problem znalezienia pozytywnych praktyk w zakresie wykorzystania sztucznej inteligencji w edukacji wymaga dokładniejszego zbadania. Postrzegamy ChatGPT jako cyfrowe narzędzie do szkolenia nauczycieli, które umożliwia symulację procesu rozwiązywania problemów przez uczniów i jego krytyczną analizę. Wykazano, że ChatGPT popełnia błędy w rozwiązaniach, więc wygenerowane fałszywe odpowiedzi stają się niezbędnym narzędziem szkoleniowym w szkoleniu nauczycieli. Stało się to podstawą nauczania eksperymentalnego. Badanie ma na celu potwierdzenie skuteczności wykorzystania ChatGPT jako środowiska symulacyjnego do rozwijania krytycznego myślenia nauczycieli. Analiza statystyczna wyników eksperymentu dowiodła, że korzystanie z ChatGPT jest skutecznym narzędziem cyfrowym do rozwijania krytycznego myślenia nauczycieli matematyki i informatyki.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

artificial intelligence; ChatGPT; critical thinking; education

PL

sztuczna inteligencja; ChatGPT; krytyczne myślenie; edukacja

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Lubelskiej
• Czasopismo: Informatyka, Automatyka, Pomiary w Gospodarce i Ochronie Środowiska
• Rocznik: 2025
• Tom: T. 15, nr 1
• Strony: 144--152
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 46 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Drushlyak Marina

• Sumy State Pedagogical University named after A. S. Makarenko, Department of Mathematics, Physics and their Didactics, Sumy, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9648-2248+

autor

Lukashova Tetiana

• Sumy State Pedagogical University named after A. S. Makarenko, Department of Mathematics, Physics and their Didactics, Sumy, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1465-9530

autor

Shamonia Volodymyr

• Sumy State Pedagogical University named after A. S. Makarenko, Department of Computer Science, Sumy, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3201-4090++

autor

Semenikhina Olena

• Sumy State Pedagogical University named after A. S. Makarenko, Department of Computer Science, Sumy, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3896-8151+

Bibliografia

• [1] Adipat S.: An artificial intelligence-enhanced phenomenon-based learning approach for interdisciplinary understanding and speaking skills. International Journal of Instruction 16(3), 2023, 531–550 [https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16329a].
• [2] AlKanaan H. M. N.: Awareness regarding the implication of artificial intelligence in science education among pre-service science teachers. International Journal of Instruction 15(3), 2022, 895–912 [https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15348a].
• [3] Baibakova I. M., Hasko O. L.: Pros and cons of СhatGTP language model in the educational process. Innovative Pedagogy 64(1), 2020, 104–107 [https://doi.org/10.32782/2663-6085/2023/64.1.20].
• [4] Banić B., Konecki M., Konecki M.: Pair Programming Education Aided by ChatGPT. Proceedings of MIPRO 2023: 46th ICT and Electronics Convention, Opatija, Croatia 2023, 981–985.
• [5] Bogost I.: ChatGPT is dumber than you think. 2022 [https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/12/chatgpt-openai artificial-intelligence-writing-ethics/672386/] (available: 01.05.2024).
• [6] Chaffee J.: Thinking Critically. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning, 2014.
• [7] Chance P.: Thinking in the classroom: A survey of programs. Teachers College, Columbia University, New York 1986.
• [8] Cook D. A.: How much evidence does it take? A cumulative meta-analysis of outcomes of simulation-based education. Medical Education 48(8), 2014, 750–760 [https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12473].
• [9] Cotton D. R., Cotton P. A., Shipway J. R.: Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2023, 1–12 [https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148].
• [10] Cruz B. C., Patterson J.: Cross-Cultural Simulations in Teacher Education: Developing Empathy and Understanding. Multicultural Perspectives 7(2), 2005, 40–47 [https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327892mcp0702_7].
• [11] Dibble M.: Schools ban ChatGPT amid fears of artificial intelligence-assisted cheating. VOA News, 2023 [https://www.voanews.com/a/schools-banchatgpt amid-fears-of-artificial-intelligence-assisted-cheating/6949800.html] (available: 01.05.2024).
• [12] Dwivedi Y. K.: So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management 71, 102642, 2023, 1–63 [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642].
• [13] Elgohary H. K. A., Al-Dossary H. K.: The effectiveness of an educational environment based on artificial intelligence techniques using virtual classrooms on training development. International Journal of Instruction 15(4), 2023, 1133–1150 [https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15460a].
• [14] Facione P. A.: Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. The California Academic Press, Millbrae, CA 1990.
• [15] Farrokhnia M., Banihashem S. K., Noroozi O., Wals A.: A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 2023 [https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846].
• [16] Gao J., Zhao H., Yu C., Xu R.: Exploring the feasibility of ChatGPT for event extraction. arXiv, 2023 [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.03836].
• [17] Golub T. P. et al.: СhatGTP and its influence on modern higher education. Innovative Pedagogy 58(1), 2023, 201–204 [https://doi.org/10.32782/2663-6085/2023/58.1.40].
• [18] Kozachenko N. P.: Critical thinking: marginal approaches and optimal ways. Actual problems of spirituality 18, 2017, 165–178.
• [19] Lecler A., Duron L., Soyer P.: Revolutionizing radiology with GPT-based models: Current applications, future possibilities, and limitations of ChatGPT. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging 104(6), 2023, 269–274 [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2023.02.003].
• [20] Levin O., Flavian H.: Simulation-based learning in the context of peer learning from the perspective of pre-service teachers: a case study. European Journal of Teacher Education, 2020 [https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1827391].
• [21] Lim W. M. et al: Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnar¨ok or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. The International Journal of Management Education 21, 2023, 100790 [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790].
• [22] Lukpat A.: ChatGPT banned in New York City public schools over concerns about cheating, learning development. The Wall Street Journal, 2023 [https://www.wsj.com/articles/chatgpt-banned-in-new-york-city-public-schools over-concerns-about-cheating-learning-development-11673024059] (available: 01.05.2024).
• [23] Marche S.: The college essay is dead. Nobody is prepared for how AI will transform academia. The Atlantic, 2022[https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/12/chatgpt-ai-writingcollege-student-essays/672371] (available: 01.05.20
• [24] Melnyk Yu. B.: Using of ChatGPT in Psychology Research and Practice. International Journal of Science Annals 6(2), 2023, 5–8 [https://doi.org/10.26697/ijsa.2023.2.0].
• [25] Mertes L.: Thinking and writing. Middle School Journal 22, 1991, 24–25.
• [26] Mhlanga D.: Open AI in education, the responsible and ethical use of ChatGPT towards lifelong learning. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2023 [https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.4354422].
• [27] Nanovska V.: What you need to know about ChatGPT so that it becomes an effective assistant and not a trap. Mediamaker, 2023 [https://mediamaker.me/chat-bot-chatgpt-shho-potribno-znaty-vydavczyam 569].
• [28] Nurhasan Prahani B. K., Suprapto N., Al Ardha M. A.: Artificial intelligence research during covid-19 pandemic: contributed to future education. International Journal of Instruction 15(3), 2022, 229–248 [https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15313a].
• [29] Podlasov С. О., Matviichuk О. V.: Application of СhatGPT in the teaching of physics to bachelor’s students at a technical university. Information Technologies and Learning Tools 97(5), 2023, 149–166 [https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v97i5.5374].
• [30] Ruben B. D.: Simulations, Games, and Experience-based Learning: The Quest for a New Paradigm for Teaching and Learning. Simulation & Gaming 30(4), 1999, 498–505 [https://doi.org/10.1177/104687819903000409].
• [31] Rudolph J., Tan S., Tan Sh.: ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching 6(1), 2023, 1–22 [https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9].
• [32] Rusandi M. et al.: No worries with ChatGPT: building bridges between artificial intelligence and education with critical thinking soft skills. Journal of Public Health, 2023, fdad049 [https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdad049].
• [33] Shiri A.: ChatGPT and academic integrity. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2023 [https://doi.org/10.2139/ SSRN.4360052].
• [34] Shulzhenko Yu. M. et al.: СhatGTP in the philologists training: practical use scenarios analysis and development of a catalog of hint templates. Innovative Pedagogy 64, 2023, 35–43 [https://doi.org/10.32782/2663-6085/2023/64.2.7].
• [35] Shyshkina M., Nosenko Yu.: Promising technologies with elements of AI for professional development of teaching. Physical and Mathematical Education 38(1), 2023, 66–71 [https://doi.org/10.31110/2413-1571-2023-038-1-010].
• [36] Sisilitsyn Yu. О., Osadchyi V. V.: Using СhatGPT in distance learning for beginners in programming. Information Technologies and Learning Tools 97(5), 2023, 167–180 [https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v97i5.5277].
• [37] Stokel-Walker C., van Noorden R.: What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science, 2023 [https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00340-6] (available: 01.05.2024).
• [38] Stokel-Walker C.: AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays – should professors worry? Nature, 2022 [https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-04397-7].
• [39] Susnjak T.: ChatGPT: The end of online exam integrity? arXiv, 2022 [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.09292].
• [40] Tama C.: Critical thinking has a place in every classroom. Journal of Reading 33, 1989, 64–65.
• [41] The concept of artificial intelligence development in Ukraine, 2021 [https://ips.ligazakon.net/document/KR201556?an=61] (available: 01.05.2024).
• [42] Theelen H., van den Beemt A., den Brok P. D.: Classroom Simulations in Teacher Education to Support Preservice Teachers’ Interpersonal Competence: A Systematic Literature Review. Computers & Education 129, 2019, 14–26 [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.015].
• [43] Thornhill-Miller B. et al.: Creativity, Critical Thinking, Communication, and Collaboration: Assessment, Certification, and Promotion of 21st Century Skills for the Future of Work and Education. Journal of Intelligence 11(3), 2023, 54 [https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054].
• [44] World Economic Forum jobs report. 10 Top Job Skills for 2025, 2020 [https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2020.pdf] (available: 01.05.2024).
• [45] Yandola K. O.: Using СhatGTP in the educational process. Innovative Pedagogy 57 (2), 2023, 261–265 [https://doi.org/10.32782/2663-6085/2023/57.2.53].
• [46] Zhai X.: ChatGPT user experience: Implications for education. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching 6(1), 2023, 1–22 [https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9]