Chemical and morphological characterization of PM2.5 samples collected over an urban industrial region Raipur, Chhattisgarh

• Autorzy: Khobragade Pallavi Pradeep , Ahirwar Ajay Vikram

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s11600-023-01127-z

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Estimating the direct radiative forcing (DRF) by air particles is challenging because of uncertainty in the morphology (shape and size), mixing states, and chemical properties of fine particulates. To improve numerically estimated optical and radiative properties, a region-specific database of the aforementioned physico-chemical properties (at individual particle level) is required. PM2.5 samples were examined using scanning electron microscopy-energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS). SEM-EDS was utilized to investigate the differences in forms, morphology, and elemental composition of PM2.5 particles, as well as to relate them to a potential source as a cause of pollution and pollution emissions and transit from various polluted places. SEM micrographs identified a wide range of PM morphologies, including spherical, irregular, angular, cluster, flaky, rod-like, crystalline, and agglomerate structures, indicating natural and anthropogenic causes and creation. The sources of PM2.5 pollution episodes in Raipur were identified employing observed pollution levels and meteorological data, backward air mass trajectories, correlation, and PMF analysis. In addition, positive matrix factorization has been used to source-apportion the data and five significant source/pollution types including industrial emissions (37%), vehicular exhaust (13.8%), coal combustion (12.4%), ionic factor (11.3%), and crustal dust (25.5%) were detected. Using a backward trajectory analysis, the influence of air pollutant transmission on regional particle pollution was investigated. A significant connection between Fe-Mn, Mn-Ni, Ni-Al, and Cl- and NH4+ indicates that the contaminants share a similar source. It was revealed that unfavorable climatic circumstances, such as low wind speed, low humidity, low temperature, and surface layer inversions, increase the risk of large PM2.5 concentrations in the region.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

PM2.5; SEM-EDS; morphological characterization; positive matrix factorization; back-trajectory analysis

• Wydawca: Instytut Geofizyki PAN ; Springer
• Czasopismo: Acta Geophysica
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 71, no. 6
• Strony: 3057--3076
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 94 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Khobragade Pallavi Pradeep

• Rungta College of Engineering & Technology, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0861-1709

autor

Ahirwar Ajay Vikram

• National Institute of Technology, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India

Bibliografia

• 1. Adachi K, Chung SH, Buseck PR (2010) Shapes of soot aerosol particles and implications for their effects on climate. J Geophys Res 115:D15206
• 2. Alleman LY, Lamaison L, Perdrix E, Robache A, Galloo J-C (2010) PM10 metal concentrations and source identification using positive matrix factorization and wind sectoring in a French industrial zone. Atmos Res 96:612–625
• 3. Begum BA, Biswas SK, Hopke PK (2007) Source apportionment of air particulate matter by chemical mass balance (cmb) and comparison with positive matrix factorization (PMF) Model. Aerosol Air Qual Res 7:446–468
• 4. Behera SN, Sharma M, Aneja VP, Balasubramanian R (2013) Ammonia in the atmosphere: a review on emission sources, atmospheric chemistry and deposition on terrestrial bodies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:8092–8131
• 5. Bell ML, Dominici F, Ebisu K, Zeger SL, Samet JM (2007) Spatial and temporal variation in PM 2.5 chemical composition in the united states for health effects studies. Environ Health Perspect 115:989–995
• 6. Bera B, Bhattacharjee S, Sengupta N, Saha S (2022) Variation and dispersal of PM10 and PM2.5 during COVID-19 lockdown over Kolkata metropolitan city, India investigated through HYSPLIT model. Geosci Front 13:101291
• 7. Bernabé JM, Carretero MI, Galán E (2005) Mineralogy and origin of atmospheric particles in the industrial area of Huelva (SW Spain). Atmos Environ 39:6777–6789
• 8. Bora J, Deka P, Bhuyan P, Sarma KP, Hoque RR (2021) Morphology and mineralogy of ambient particulate matter over mid-Brahmaputra Valley: application of SEM–EDX, XRD, and FTIR techniques. SN Appl Sci 3:137
• 9. Chakraborty A, Gupta T (2010) Chemical characterization and source apportionment of submicron (PM1) aerosol in Kanpur Region. India Aerosol Air Qual Res 10:433–445
• 10. Chan YC, Simpson RW, Mctainsh GH, Vowles PD, Cohen DD, Bailey GM (1997) Characterisation of chemical species in PM2.5 and PM10 aerosols in Brisbane Australia. Atmos Environ 31(22):3773–3785
• 11. Chandra S (2004) Can the state of mixing of black carbon aerosols explain the mystery of ‘excess’ atmospheric absorption? Geophys Res Lett 31:L19109
• 12. Chandu K, Dasari M (2020) Variation in concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 during the four seasons at the port City of Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh India. NEPT 19:1187–1193
• 13. Chen LC, Maciejczyk P, Thurston GD (2022) Metals and air pollution. Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals. Academic Press, pp 137–182
• 14. Chueinta W, Hopke PK, Paatero P (2000) Investigation of sources of atmospheric aerosol at urban and suburban residential areas in Thailand by positive matrix factorization. Atmos Environ 34:3319–3329
• 15. Cohen AJ et al (2017) Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015. The Lancet 389:1907–1918
• 16. Contini D et al (2010) Characterisation and source apportionment of PM10 in an urban background site in Lecce. Atmos Res 95:40–54
• 17. Dai QL, Bi XH, Wu JH, Zhang YF, Wang J, Xu H et al (2015) Characterization and source identification of heavy metals in ambient PM10 and PM2. 5 in an integrated iron and steel industry zone compared with a background site. Aerosol Air Qual Res 15(3):875–887
• 18. Dall'Osto M, Querol X, Amato F, Karanasiou A, Lucarelli F, Nava S et al (2013) Hourly elemental concentrations in PM 2.5 aerosols sampled simultaneously at urban background and road site during SAPUSS–diurnal variations and PMF receptor modelling. Atmos Chem Phy 13(8):4375–4392
• 19. De Miranda RM, de Fátima Andrade M, Worobiec A, Grieken RV (2002) Characterisation of aerosol particles in the São Paulo Metropolitan Area. Atmos Environ 36:345–352
• 20. Duan F et al (2006) Concentration and chemical characteristics of PM2.5 in Beijing, China: 2001–2002. Sci Total Environ 355:264–275
• 21. Duan X et al (2021) Seasonal variations, source apportionment, and health risk assessment of trace metals in PM2.5 in the typical industrial city of changzhi China. Atmos Pollut Res 12:365–374
• 22. Garg A, Gupta NC (2020) Short-term variability on particulate and gaseous emissions induced by fireworks during Diwali celebrations for two successive years in outdoor air of an urban area in Delhi, India. SN Appl Sci 2:1–14
• 23. Ghio AJ, Devlin RB (2001) Inflammatory lung injury after bronchial instillation of air pollution particles. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164:704–708
• 24. Guan Q et al (2018) Source apportionment of heavy metals in agricultural soil based on PMF: a case study in Hexi Corridor, northwest China. Chemosphere 193:189–197
• 25. Guan Q et al (2019) Source apportionment of heavy metals in farmland soil of Wuwei, China: comparison of three receptor models. J Clean Prod 237:117792
• 26. Guo G, Wang Y, Zhang D, Lei M (2021) Source-specific ecological and health risks of potentially toxic elements in agricultural soils in Southern Yunnan Province and associated uncertainty analysis. J Hazard Mater 417:126144
• 27. Harrison RM, Yin J (2000) Particulate matter in the atmosphere: which particle properties are important for its effects on health? Sci Total Environ 249:85–101
• 28. Hassan H, Latif MT, Juneng L, Amil N, Khan MF, Yik DJ, Abdullah NA (2020) Interaction of PM10 concentrations with local and synoptic meteorological conditions at different temporal scales. Atmos Res 241:104975
• 29. Hopke PK, Cohen DD (2011) Application of receptor modeling methods. Atmos Pollut Res 2(2):122–125
• 30. Hopke PK, Hidy G (2022) Changing emissions results in changed PM2.5 composition and health impacts. Atmosphere 13:193
• 31. Hopke PK et al (2006) PM source apportionment and health effects: 1. Intercomparison of source apportionment results. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 16:275–286
• 32. Hu M et al (2002) Seasonal variation of ionic species in fine particles at Qingdao China. Atmos Environ 36:5853–5859
• 33. Huang W et al (2012) Seasonal variation of chemical species associated with short-term mortality effects of PM2.5 in Xi’an, a central city in China. Am J Epidemiol 175:556–566
• 34. Ito K, Xue N, Thurston G (2004) Spatial variation of PM2.5 chemical species and source-apportioned mass concentrations in New York City. Atmos Environ 38:5269–5282
• 35. Jacobson MZ (2006) Effects of externally-through-internally-mixed soot inclusions within clouds and precipitation on global climate. J Phys Chem A 110:6860–6873
• 36. Jain S et al (2019) Source apportionment of PM10 over three tropical urban atmospheres at indo-gangetic plain of india: an approach using different receptor models. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 76:114–128
• 37. Jain S, Sharma SK, Vijayan N, Mandal TK (2020a) Seasonal characteristics of aerosols (PM2.5 and PM10) and their source apportionment using PMF: a four year study over Delhi India. Environ Pollut 262:114337
• 38. Johansson C, Norman M, Burman L (2009) Road traffic emission factors for heavy metals. Atmos Environ 43(31):4681–4688
• 39. Juda-Rezler K, Reizer M, Oudinet J-P (2011) Determination and analysis of PM10 source apportionment during episodes of air pollution in Central Eastern European urban areas: the case of wintertime 2006. Atmos Environ 45:6557–6566
• 40. Katrinak KA, Anderson JR, Buseck PR (1995) Individual particle types in the aerosol of phoenix Arizona. Environ Sci Technol 29:321–329
• 41. Kocbach A, Johansen BV, Schwarze PE, Namork E (2005) Analytical electron microscopy of combustion particles: a comparison of vehicle exhaust and residential wood smoke. Sci Total Environ 346:231–243
• 42. Kulshreshtha N, Kumar S, Vaishya RC (2021) Assessment of trace metal concentration in the ambient air of the Prayagraj City during Diwali festival—a case study. Environ Monit Assess 193:149
• 43. Kulshrestha A, Satsangi PG, Masih J, Taneja A (2009) Metal concentration of PM2.5 and PM10 particles and seasonal variations in urban and rural environment of Agra India. Sci Total Environ 407:6196–6204
• 44. Kumar A, Yadav IC, Shukla A, Devi NL (2020) Seasonal variation of PM2.5 in the central Indo-Gangetic Plain (Patna) of India: chemical characterization and source assessment. SN Appl Sci 2:1366
• 45. Lee KK, Miller MR, Shah ASV (2018) Air pollution and stroke. J Stroke 20:2–11
• 46. Lewis CW, Norris GA, Conner TL, Henry RC (2003) Source Apportionment of Phoenix PM 2.5 aerosol with the Unmix receptor model. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 53:325–338
• 47. Li W et al (2011) Morphology evolution of Cu2−xS nanoparticles: from spheres to dodecahedrons. Chem Commun 47:10332
• 48. Li, J. et al. (2021) Geochemical characterization and heavy metal sources in PM10 in Arequipa, Peru. 14
• 49. Liu FK, Ko FH, Huang PW, Wu CH, Chu TC (2005) Studying the size/shape separation and optical properties of silver nanoparticles by capillary electrophoresis. J Chromatogr A 1062(1):139–145
• 50. Liu Z et al (2018) Characteristics of PM_2.5 mass concentrations and chemical species in urban and background areas of China: emerging results from the CARE-China network. Atmos Chem Phys 18:8849–8871
• 51. Liu L et al (2020b) Source identification of trace elements in PM2.5 at a rural site in the north China Plain. Atmosphere 11:179
• 52. Luo L et al (2019) Spatial distributions and sources of inorganic chlorine in PM2.5 across China in Winter. Atmosphere 10:505
• 53. Lv J, Wang Y (2019) PMF receptor models and sequential Gaussian simulation to determine the quantitative sources and hazardous areas of potentially toxic elements in soils. Geoderma 353:347–358
• 54. Mazziotti Tagliani S et al (2017) Content, mineral allocation and leaching behavior of heavy metals in urban PM2.5. Atmos Environ 153:47–60
• 55. Mishra SK et al (2017) Morphology, mineralogy and mixing of individual atmospheric particles over Kanpur (IGP): relevance of homogeneous equivalent sphere approximation in radiative models. Mapan 32:229–241
• 56. Mohanraj R, Solaraj G, Dhanakumar S (2011) Fine particulate phase PAHs in ambient atmosphere of Chennai metropolitan city India. Environ Sci Pollut Res 18:764–771
• 57. Muyemeki, L. et al. (2021a) Source apportionment of ambient PM10−2.5 and PM2.5 for the Vaal Triangle, South Africa. S Afr J Sci 117
• 58. Neupane BB, Sharma A, Giri B, Joshi MK (2020) Characterization of airborne dust samples collected from core areas of Kathmandu Valley. Heliyon 6:e03791
• 59. Oucher N, Kerbachi R, Ghezloun A, Merabet H (2015) Magnitude of air pollution by heavy metals associated with aerosols particles in Algiers. Energy Procedia 74:51–58
• 60. Panda S et al (2016) Organic and elemental carbon variation in PM2.5 over megacity Delhi and Bhubaneswar, a semi-urban coastal site in India. Nat Hazards 80:1709–1728
• 61. Pipal AS, Kulshrestha A, Taneja A (2011) Characterization and morphological analysis of airborne PM2.5 and PM10 in Agra located in north central India. Atmos Environ 45:3621–3630
• 62. Prabhakar G, Sorooshian A, Toffol E, Arellano AF, Betterton EA (2014) Spatiotemporal distribution of airborne particulate metals and metalloids in a populated arid region. Atmos Environ 92:339–347
• 63. Rahman MdS et al (2021) How air quality and COVID-19 transmission change under different lockdown scenarios? A case from Dhaka city Bangladesh. Sci Total Environ 762:143161
• 64. Raja J, Rajan CCA, Suresh S (2010) PSO based robust frequency control of wind-diesel power plant using BES. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research pp 1–7 (IEEE). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIC.2010.5705837
• 65. Ravindra K et al (2021) Appraisal of regional haze event and its relationship with PM2.5 concentration, crop residue burning and meteorology in Chandigarh India. Chemosphere 273:128562
• 66. Reist PC (1993) Aerosol science and technology
• 67. Sahu RK et al (2018) Temporal and spatial variations of PM2.5 organic and elemental carbon in Central India. Environ Geochem Health 40:2205–2222
• 68. Salma I, Maenhaut W, Zemplén-Papp É, Záray G (2001) Comprehensive characterisation of atmospheric aerosols in Budapest, Hungary: physicochemical properties of inorganic species. Atmos Environ 35:4367–4378
• 69. Samet J, Krewski D (2007) Health effects associated with exposure to ambient air pollution. J Toxicol Environ Health, Part A 70(3–4):227–242
• 70. Shaltout AA, Boman J, Alsulimane ME (2017) Identification of elemental composition of PM 2.5 collected in Makkah, Saudi Arabia, using EDXRF: PM2.5 in Makkah Saudi Arabia. X-Ray Spectrom 46:151–163
• 71. Shaltout AA et al (2019) Correlation between inorganic pollutants in the suspended particulate matter (SPM) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) collected from industrial and residential areas in Greater Cairo Egypt. Air Qual Atmos Health 12:241–250
• 72. Shanavas AK, Zhou C, Menon R, Hopke PK (2020) PM10 source identification using the trajectory based potential source apportionment (TraPSA) toolkit at Kochi. India Atmos Pollut Res 11:1535–1542
• 73. Shao L, Li J, Zhang M, Wang X, Li Y, Jones T et al (2021) Morphology, composition and mixing state of individual airborne particles: effects of the 2017 Action Plan in Beijing. China. J Clean Prod 329:129748
• 74. Sharma SK, Mandal TK, Sharma A, Jain S, Saraswati (2018) Carbonaceous species of PM2.5 in megacity Delhi, India during 2012–2016. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 100:695–701
• 75. Shi Z et al (2003) Characterization of airborne individual particles collected in an urban area, a satellite city and a clean air area in Beijing, 2001. Atmos Environ 37:4097–4108
• 76. Singh BP, Singh D, Kumar K, Jain VK (2021b) Study of seasonal variation of PM2.5 concentration associated with meteorological parameters at residential sites in Delhi India. J Atmos Chem 78:161–176
• 77. Squizzato S, Masiol M, Rich DQ, Hopke PK (2018) PM2.5 and gaseous pollutants in New York state during 2005–2016: spatial variability, temporal trends, and economic influences. Atmos Environ 183:209–224
• 78. Srimuruganandam B, Shiva Nagendra SM (2012) Source characterization of PM10 and PM2.5 mass using a chemical mass balance model at urban roadside. Sci Total Environ 433:8–19
• 79. Stelson AW, Seinfeld JH (1982) Relative humidity and temperature dependence of the ammonium nitrate dissociation constant. Atmos Environ 16(5):983–992
• 80. Sulaymon ID et al (2020) PM2.5 in Abuja, Nigeria: chemical characterization, source apportionment, temporal variations, transport pathways and the health risks assessment. Atmos Res 237:104833
• 81. Sun X et al (2019) Spatio-temporal variations and factors of a provincial PM2.5 pollution in eastern China during 2013–2017 by geostatistics. Sci Rep 9:3613
• 82. Teixeira EC, Meira L, de Santana ERR, Wiegand F (2009) Chemical composition of PM10 and PM2.5 and seasonal variation in South Brazil. Water Air Soil Pollut 199:261–275
• 83. Tiwari S et al (2015) Study of the carbonaceous aerosol and morphological analysis of fine particles along with their mixing state in Delhi, India: a case study. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:10744–10757
• 84. Vargas FA, Rojas NY, Pachon JE, Russell AG (2012) PM10 characterization and source apportionment at two residential areas in Bogota. Atmos Pollut Res 3:72–80
• 85. Vijay Bhaskar B, Jeba Rajasekhar RV, Muthusubramanian P, Kesarkar AP (2010) Ionic and heavy metal composition of respirable particulate in Madurai, India. Environ Monit Assess 164:323–336
• 86. Wagner J, Wang Z-M, Ghosal S, Wall S (2019) Source identification on high PM2.5 days using SEM/EDS, XRF, Raman, and Windblown dust modeling. Aerosol Air Qual Res 19:2518–2530
• 87. Wang J, Hu Z, Chen Y, Chen Z, Xu S (2013) Contamination characteristics and possible sources of PM10 and PM2.5 in different functional areas of Shanghai, China. Atmos Environ 68:221–229
• 88. Wang G et al (2015) Source apportionment and seasonal variation of PM2.5 carbonaceous aerosol in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region of China. Environ Monit Assess 187:143
• 89. Watson JG et al (2012) Elemental and morphological analyses of filter tape deposits from a beta attenuation monitor. Atmos Res 106:181–189
• 90. Wu J et al (2015) Applying land use regression model to estimate spatial variation of PM2.5 in Beijing China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:7045–7061
• 91. Xie RK, Seip HM, Leinum JR, Winje T, Xiao JS (2005) Chemical characterization of individual particles (PM10) from ambient air in Guiyang city China. Sci Total Environ 343:261–272
• 92. Yuanan H, He K, Sun Z, Chen G, Cheng H (2020) Quantitative source apportionment of heavy metal(loid)s in the agricultural soils of an industrializing region and associated model uncertainty. J Hazard Mater 391:122244
• 93. Yue DL et al (2013) Comparison of particle number size distributions and new particle formation between the urban and rural sites in the PRD region China. Atmos Environ 76:181–188
• 94. Zeb B, Alam K, Sorooshian A, Blaschke T, Ahmad I, Shahid I (2018) On the morphology and composition of particulate matter in an urban environment. Aerosol Air Qual Res 18(6):1431

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).