Induction Sounding of the Earth's Mantle at a New Russian Geophysical Observatory

• Autorzy: Moilanen J. , Pushkarev P.Yu.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/s11600-014-0245-2

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Deep magnetotelluric (MT) sounding data were collected and processed in the western part of the East European Craton (EEC). The MT sounding results correspond well with impedances obtained by magnetovariation (MV) sounding on the new geophysical observatory situated not far from the western border of Russia. Inversion based on combined data of both induction soundings let us evaluate geoelectrical structure of the Earth’s crust and upper and mid-mantle at depths up to 2000 km, taking into account the harmonics of 11-year variations. Results obtained by different authors and methods are compared with similar investigations on the EEC such as international projects CEMES in Central Europe and BEAR in Fennoscandia.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

mantle; geoelectrical structure; East European Craton

PL

osłona; struktura geoelektryczna; platforma wschodnioeuropejska

• Wydawca: Instytut Geofizyki PAN ; Springer
• Czasopismo: Acta Geophysica
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 63, no. 2
• Strony: 385--397
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 44 poz., rys., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Moilanen J.

• Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

autor

Pushkarev P.Yu.

• Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

Bibliografia

• [1] Anisimov, S.V., E.M. Dmitriev, N.K. Sycheva, A.N. Sychev, V.P. Shcherbakov, and Y.K. Vinogradov (2008), Information technology in geomagnetic measurements perfomed in the Borok Geophysical Observatory, Geofiz. Icc. 9, 3, 62-76 (in Russian).
• [2] Banks, R.J. (1969), Geomagnetic variations and the electrical conductivity of the upper mantle, Geophys. J. Int. 17, 5, 457-487, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1969.tb00252.x.
• [3] Banks, R.J. (1981), Strategies for improved global electromagnetic response estimates, J. Geomagn. Geoelectr. 33, 11, 569-585, DOI: 10.5636/jgg.33.569.
• [4] Berdichevsky, M.N., and V.I. Dmitriev (2002), Magnetotellurics in the Context of the Theory of Ill-Posed Problems, Investigations in Geophysics, No. 11, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, 215 pp.
• [5] Berdichevsky, M.N.,and V.I. Dmitriev (2008), Models and Methods of Magnetotellurics, Springer, Berlin, 563 pp.
• [6] Berdichevsky, M.N., L.L. Vanyan, and E.B. Fainberg (1969), The frequency sounding of the Earth by spherical analysis of electromagnetic variations, Geomagn. Aeronomy 9, 2, 372-374 (in Russian).
• [7] Cagniard, L. (1953), Basic theory of the magneto-telluric method of geophysical prospecting, Geophysics 18, 3, 605-635, DOI: 10.1190/1.1437915.
• [8] Constable, S.C., R.L. Parker, and C.G. Constable (1987), Occam’s inversion: A practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data, Geophysics 52, 3, 289-300, DOI: 10.1190/1.1442303.
• [9] Fujii, I., and A. Schultz (2002), The 3D electromagnetic response of the Earth to ring current and auroral oval excitation, Geophys. J. Int. 151, 3, 689-709, DOI:10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01775.x.
• [10] Gamble, T.D., W.M. Goubau, and J. Clarke (1979), Magnetotellurics with a remote magnetic reference, Geophysics 44, 1, 53-68, DOI: 10.1190/1.1440923.
• [11] Guglielmi, A.V., and M.B. Gokhberg (1987), On the magnetotelluric sounding in the seismically active areas, Izv. – Phys. Solid Earth 33, 11, 122-123 (in Russian).
• [12] Korepanov, V., A. Best, B. Bondaruk, H.-J. Linthe, J. Marianiuk, K. Pajunpää, L. Rakhlin, and J. Reda (1998), Experience of observatory practice with LEMI-004 magnetometers, Rev. Geofis. 48, 31-40.
• [13] Larsen, J.C., R.L. Mackie, A. Manzella, A. Fiordelisi, and S. Rieven (1996), Robust smooth magnetotelluric transfer functions, Geophys. J. Int. 124, 3, 801-819, DOI:10.1111/j.1365-246X.1996.tb05639.x.
• [14] Narsky, N.V. (1994), Robust methods of processing magnetotelluric variation, Ph.D. Thesis, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, 130 pp. (in Russian).
• [15] Naudy, H., and H. Dreyer (1968), Essai de filtrage non-linéaire appliqué aux profils aéromagnétiques, Geophys. Prospect. 16, 2, 171-178, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1968.tb01969.x (in French).
• [16] Nowożyński, K. (2004), Estimation of magnetotelluric transfer functions in the time domain over a wide frequency band, Geophys. J. Int. 158, 1, 32-41, DOI:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02288.x.
• [17] Olsen, N. (1998), The electrical conductivity of the mantle beneath Europe derived from C-responses from 3 to 720 hr, Geophys. J. Int. 133, 2, 298-308, DOI:10.1046/j.1365-246X.1998.00503.x.
• [18] Parker, R.L. (1980), The inverse problem of electromagnetic induction: Existence and construction of solutions based on incomplete data, J. Geophys. Res. 85, B8, 4421-4428, DOI: 10.1029/JB085iB08p04421.
• [19] Parkinson, W.D. (1983), Introduction to Geomagnetism, Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh, 433 pp.
• [20] Reddy, I.K., and D. Rankin (1974), Coherence functions for magnetotelluric analysis, Geophysics 39, 3, 312-320, DOI: 10.1190/1.1440430.
• [21] Reilly, W.I. (1979), Anisotropy tensors in magnetotelluric application, Tech. Rep., Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Wellington, New Zealand.
• [22] Rikitake, T. (1948), Notes on electromagnetic induction within the Earth, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. 24, 1/4, 1-9.
• [23] Rytov, S.E. (1940), Calculation of the skin-effect by the perturbation method, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 10, 2, 180-189 (in Russian).
• [24] Schmucker, U. (1970), Anomalies of Geomagnetic Variations in the Southwestern United States, University of California Press, Berkeley.
• [25] Schmucker, U. (2003), Horizontal spatial gradient sounding and geomagnetic depth sounding in the period range of daily variations. In: A. Hördt and J.B. Stoll (eds.), Protokoll über das Kolloquium Elektromagnetische Tiefenforschung, 29.09.-3.10.2003, Königstein, Deutschland, 306-317.
• [26] Semenov, V.Yu. (1985), Processing of Magnetotelluric Sounding Data, Nedra, Moscow, 133 pp. (in Russian).
• [27] Semenov, V.Yu. (2000), On the apparent resistivity in magnetotelluric sounding, Izv. – Phys. Solid Earth 36, 1, 99-100.
• [28] Semenov, V.Yu., and W. Jozwiak (2006), Lateral variations of the mid-mantle conductance beneath Europe, Tectonophysics 416, 1-4, 279-288, DOI: 10.1016/ j.tecto.2005.11.017.
• [29] Semenov, V.Yu., and V.N. Shuman (2010), Impedances for induction soundings of the Earth’s mantle, Acta Geophys. 58, 4, 527-542, DOI: 10.2478/s11600-010-0003-z.
• [30] Semenov, V.Yu., J. Pek, A. Ádám, W. Jóźwiak, B. Ladanyvskyy, I.M. Logvinov, P. Pushkarev, and J. Vozar (2008), Electrical structure of the upper mantle beneath Central Europe: Results of the CEMES project, Acta Geophys. 56, 4, 957-981, DOI: 10.2478/s11600-008-0058-2.
• [31] Semenov, V.Yu., B. Ladanivskyy, and K. Nowożyński (2011), New induction sounding tested in central Europe, Acta Geophys. 59, 5, 815-832, DOI:10.2478/s11600-011-0030-4.
• [32] Senior, T.B., and J.L. Volakis (1995), Approximate Boundary Conditions in Electromagnetics, IEE Press, London, 353 pp.
• [33] Shimizu, H., A. Yoneda, K. Baba, H. Utada, and N.A. Palshin (2011), Sq effect on the electromagnetic response functions in the period range between 104 and 105 s, Geophys. J. Int. 186, 1, 193-206, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05036.x.
• [34] Shuman, V.N. (2007), Imaginary surface vectors in multidimensional inverse problems of geoelectrics, Izv. – Phys. Solid Earth 43, 3, 205-210, DOI: 10.1134/S1069351307030044.
• [35] Shuman, V., and S. Kulik (2002), The fundamental relations of impedance type in general theories of the electromagnetic induction studies, Acta Geophys. Pol. 50, 4, 607-618.
• [36] Shustov, N.L., V.A. Kulikov, E.V. Moilanen, A.Yu. Polenov, P.Yu. Pushkarev, V.K. Khmelevskoi, and A.G. Yakovlev (2012), The creation of a geophysical observatory at the Aleksandrovka research base of the Geological Faculty of Moscow State University in the Kaluga Region, Moscow Univ. Geol. Bull. 67, 4, 253-258, DOI: 10.3103/S0145875212040096.
• [37] Sims, W.E., F.X. Bostick, and H.W. Smith (1971), The estimation of magnetotelluric impedance tensor elements from measured data, Geophysics 36, 5, 938-942, DOI:10.1190/1.1440225.
• [38] Sokolova, E.Yu., and I.M. Varentsov (2007), Deep array electromagnetic sounding on the Baltic Shield: External excitation model and implications for upper mantle conductivity studies, Tectonophysics 445, 1-2, 3-25, DOI: 10.1016/ j.tecto.2007.07.006.
• [39] Tikhonov, A.N. (1950), On determining electrical characteristics of the deep layers of the Earth’s crust, Doklady 73, 2, 295-297.
• [40] Vanyan, L.L., V.A. Kuznetsov, T.V. Lyubetskaya, N.A. Palshin, T. Korja, I. Lahti, and BEAR Working Group (2002), Electrical conductivity of the crust beneath Central Lapland, Izv. – Phys. Solid Earth 38, 10, 798-815.
• [41] Varentsov, I.M. (2007), Arrays of simultaneous electromagnetic soundings: design, data processing and analysis. In: V.V. Spichak (ed.), Electromagnetic Sounding of the Earth’s Interior, Methods in Geochemistry and Geophysics, Vol. 40, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 259-275.
• [42] Varentsov, I.M., M. Engels, T. Korja, M.Yu. Smirnov, and the BEAR Working Group (2002), A generalised geoelectric model of Fennoscandia: A challenging database for long-period 3D modelling studies within the Baltic Electromagnetic Array Research (BEAR) Project, Izv. – Phys. Solid Earth 38, 11, 855-896.
• [43] Vozar, J., and V.Yu. Semenov (2010), Compatibility of induction methods for mantle soundings, J. Geophys. Res. 115, B3, B03101, DOI: 10.1029/2009JB006390.
• [44] Weckmann, U., O. Ritter, and V. Haak (2003), Images of the magnetotelluric apparent resistivity tensor, Geophys. J. Int. 155, 2, 456-468, DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.02062.x