Identifying elements that code the organization’s genome with the spider web model to determine business development potential

• Autorzy: Gorzelany-Dziadkowiec Magdalena , Machaczka Krzysztof

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2024.198.7

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The paper aims to elaboration and discuss the spider web model and identify elements that code an organization's genome to determine its development potential and design changes. Design/methodology/approach: The first step was a literature review and elaboration and discuss the spider web model. Next, a survey questionnaire with closed questions was developed and used for research. The survey was a pilot addressed to purposefully sampled organisations. Through our choice of the sample—enterprises, an NGO, and a public institution—we emphasised the tool's versatility and demonstrated that identifying elements that codify an organisation's genome to determine its development potential applies to more than just businesses. An auxiliary in-depth interview was also conducted. Responses were collected using the CAWI technique. Findings: Elaboration and discuss the spider web model. It was established that all the investigated organisations have their specific genomes, sets of information, which characterise and guide their development. The case studies demonstrated that diagnosing and assessing the spider web model parameters is necessary to determine the organisation's development potential and find potential change opportunities. Research limitations/implications: The research was limited by a small sample of arbitrarily selected organisations. Still, the selection of organisations for the case studies was purposeful. We demonstrated that the spider web model can diagnose and assess parameters that codify an organisation's DNA in all types of organisations, enterprises, NGOs, and public institutions. It may also help identify areas in need of change to maintain the development potential. In light of the above, future research should include a more in-depth study of selected sectors to conduct a comparative analysis and offer generalised conclusions. Practical implications: The use of a questionnaire to diagnose the parameters of the spider web model in the design of changes within organizations. Social implications: Increase awareness among managers and people in organizations of the impact of DNA genome on organizational development. Originality/value: Discussing of the spider web model, indication of the parameters that build the DNA genome. Indication of integration and reconfiguration mechanisms in management systems consisting in the development and implementation of model solutions facilitating adaptation to dynamic exogenous and endogenous conditions.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

spider web model; organisation's DNA; change management; organization development; development potential

PL

model pajęczej sieci; DNA organizacji; zarządzanie zmianą; rozwój organizacji; potencjał rozwojowy

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: z. 198
• Strony: 123--143
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 27 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Gorzelany-Dziadkowiec Magdalena

• Cracow University of Economics

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9062-5984

autor

Machaczka Krzysztof

• Cracow University of Economics

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7345-122X

Bibliografia

• 1. Barney, J. (1986). Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 656-665, https://doi.org/10.2307/258317
• 2. Bochenek, M. (2017). Znaczenie współpracy międzyorganizacyjnej w sektorze publicznym. Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, Nr 341, 21-34.
• 3. Buschgens, T., Bausch, A., Balkin, D.B. (2013). Organizational Culture and Innovation: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30, 763-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12021
• 4. Ejdys, J., Kobylińska, U., Lulewicz-Sas, A. (2012). Zintegrowane systemy zarządzania jakością, środowiskiem i bezpieczeństwem pracy. Białystok: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Białostockiej.
• 5. Fralinger, B., Olson, V. (2007). Organizational culture at the university level: A study using the OCAI instrument. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 4(11), 85-97. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v4i11.1528
• 6. Gorzelany, J., Gorzelany–Dziadkowiec, M., Luty, L., Firlej, K., Gaisch, M., Dudziak, O., et al. (2021). Finding links between organisation’s culture and innovation. The impact of organisational culture on university innovativeness. PLoS ONE 16(10), e57962. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257962
• 7. Gouillart, F.J., Kelly, J.N. (1996). Transforming the Organization. McGraw-Hill.
• 8. Guevara, A.J.H., Terra D.M., Portes, J.H., Silva, J.D.A., Magalhães, K.E. (2020). A ranking of countries concerning progress towards a Society 5.0. Risus. Journal on Innovation and Sustainability, vol. 11, 4, https://doi.org/10.23925/2179-3565.2020v11i4p188-199
• 9. Habuda, L. (2017). Centralizacja vs decentralizacja w hierarchicznej, spiętrzonej strukturze państwowej administracji. Chorzowskie Studia Polityczne, nr 13, 177-195.
• 10. Harmon, P. (2018). The State of Business Process Management. http://www.bp- trends.com, 2019.10.1.
• 11. Harrison, T.L., Frakes, M.H. (2005). Instinct: Tapping Your Entrepreneurial DNA to Achieve Your Business Goals Hardcover. Grand Central Pub.
• 12. Hofstede, G. (1998). Attitudes, Values and Organizational Culture: Disentangling the Concepts. Organization Studies, 19, 477-492.
• 13. Hogan, S.J., Coote, L.V. (2014). Organisational culture, innovation, and performance: a test of Schein’s model. Journal of Business Research, 67, 1609-1621. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.09.007
• 14. Kirby, D.A., Ibrahim, N. (2011). Entrepreneurship education and the creation of an enterprise culture: provisional results from an experiment in Egypt. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7, 181-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11365-010-0153-0
• 15. Kożuch, B., Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek, K. (2013). Mierzenie skuteczności współpracy międzyorganizacyjnej w zarządzaniu bezpieczeństwem publicznym. Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Wydziałowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, nr 168, 82-95.
• 16. Kruger, W., Buchholz, W., Bach, N. (2000). Organizing for the future – Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence. Arbeitspapier, 2, 72-86.
• 17. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 5-55.
• 18. Machaczka, K. (2011). Rozwój organizacji opartych na wiedzy w aspekcie zmian systemów zarządzania. Ekonomiczne Problemy Usług, 68, 387-395.
• 19. Mohd, J., Abid, H. (2020). Critical Components of Industry 5.0 Towards a Successful Adoption in the Field of Manufacturing. Journal of Industrial Integration and Management, Vol. 5, 3, 327-348. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424862220500141
• 20. Neilson, G.L., Pasternack, B.A. (2005). Results: Keep What's Good, Fix What's Wrong, and Unlock Great Performance Hardcover. Crown Business.
• 21. Pettigrew, A.M. (1979). On studying organizational cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 570-581.
• 22. Pfeifer, M.R. (2021). Development of a Smart Manufacturing Execution System Architecture for SMEs: A Czech Case Study. Sustainability, 13, 10181. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810181
• 23. Quinn, R.E., Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29(3), 363-377. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.3.363
• 24. Salgues, B. (2018). Society 5.0: Industry of the Future. Technologies, Methods and Tools [M]. ISTE ltd. and John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
• 25. Sánchez-Cañizares, S.M., Munoz, M.A.A., López-Guzmán, T. (2007). Organizational culture and intellectual capital: a new model. Journal of intellectual capital, 8(3), 409-430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14691930710774849
• 26. Slater, S.F., Olson, E.M. (2011). Finnegan C. Business strategy, marketing organization culture, and performance. Marketing Letters, 22(3), 227-242. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41488535
• 27. Storey, C., Kahn, K.B. (2010). The role of knowledge management strategies and task knowledge in stimulating service innovation. Journal of Service Research, 13(4), 397-410. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670510370988 28. Zakrzewska-Bielawska, A. (2010). Technologia, innowacje i wiedza a strategia przedsiębiorstw high tech. In: A. Kaleta, K. Moszkowicz (eds.), Zarządzanie strategiczne w praktyce i teorii. Prace Naukowe UE we Wrocławiu, nr 116. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo UE we Wrocławiu.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).