PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

The influence of selected factors on project performance in project-based organizations: a qualitative comparative analysis

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Previous research demonstrates the importance of social capital, environmental complexity, goal orientation, and project performance. However, the influence of these factors on project performance is unclear and was examined singly, i.e., each factor was studied separately in connection with project performance. The aim of this paper is to examine which configurations of selected factors, such as goal orientation, social capital, and environmental complexity, affect project performance in project-based organizations. This paper argues that these factors simultaneously affect project performance, in different configurations. This study applies fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fs/QCA), which points to three configurations of conditions that influence project performance in project-based organizations. These findings help complement some of the results of previous studies on project performance.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
43--57
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 81 poz.
Twórcy
  • Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Organization and Management, Gliwice
Bibliografia
  • 1. Akanni, P., Oke, A., and Akpomiemie, O. (2015). Impact of environmental factors on building project performance in Delta State, Nigeria. HBRC Journal, 11(1), 91-97.
  • 2. Aldrich, H.E., and Wiedenmayer, G. (1993). From traits to rates: An ecological perspective on organizational foundings. In J.A. Katz, R.H. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth, 1,145-195.
  • 3. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
  • 4. Aragón-Correa, J.A., and Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28, 1, 71-88.
  • 5. Arvidsson, N. (2009). Exploring tensions in projectified matrix organisations. Scandinavian Journal of Management 25, 97-107.
  • 6. Bartsch, V., Ebers, M., and Maurer, I. (2013). Learning in project-based organizations: the role of project teams’ social Capital for overcoming barriers to learning. International Journal of Project Management, 31(2), 239-251.
  • 7. Baum, J.R., Locke, E.A., and Smith, K.G. (2001). A multidimensional model of venture growth. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 292-303.
  • 8. Bhandar, M., Pan, S.L., and Tan, B. (2007). Towards understanding the roles of social Capital in knowledge integration: a case study of a collaborative information system project”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2), 263-274.
  • 9. Bocean, C. (2011). Project Based Organization – An Integrated Approach. Management and Marketing Journal, IX(2), 265-273.
  • 10. Bresnen, M. (1990). Organizing Construction: Project Organization and Matrix Management. London: Routledge.
  • 11. Bunderson, S., and Sutcliffe, K.M. (2003). Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 552-60.
  • 12. Cannon A.R., and John, C.H.St (2007). Measuring environmental complexity: a theoretical and empirical assessment. Organizational Research Method, 10(2), 296-321.
  • 13. Canonico, P., and Söderlund, J. (2010). Getting control of multi-project organizations: Combining contingent control mechanisms. International Journal of Project Management 28, 796-806.
  • 14. Cattani, G., Ferriani, S., Frederiksen, L., and Täube, F. (2011). Project-Based Organizing and Strategic Management: A Long-Term Research Agenda on Temporary Organizational Forms (Editorial). Advances in Strategic Management, 28.
  • 15. Cheng, C.F., Chang, M.L., and Li, C.S. (2013). Configural paths to successful product innovation. Journal of Business Research, 66(12), 2561-2573.
  • 16. Chi, N.W., and Huang, J.C. (2014). Mechanisms linking transformational leadership and team performance: the mediating roles of team goal orientation and group affective tone. Group & Organization Management, 39(3), 300-325.
  • 17. Colquitt, J.A., and Simmering, M.S. (1998). Conscientiousness, goalorientation, and motivation to learn during the learning process: Alongitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 654-665.
  • 18. Dess, G.G., and Beard, D.W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 52-73.
  • 19. Di Vincenzo, F., and Mascia, D. (2012). Social capital in project-based organizations: Its role, structure, and impact on project performance. International Journal of Project Management, 30, 5-14.
  • 20. Drury-Grogan, M.L. (2014). Performance on agile teams: relating iteration objectives and critical decisions to project management success factors. Information Software Technology 56, 506e515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2013.11.003.
  • 21. Duda, J.L. (2001). Achievement goal research in sport: Pushing the boundaries and clarifying some misunderstandings. In G.C. Roberts (ed.), Advances in motivation in sport and exercise. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Books.
  • 22. Dweck, C.S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
  • 23. Dweck, C.S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Ann Arbor, MI: Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
  • 24. Dweck, C.S., and Leggett, E.L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273. doi:10.1037/0033- 295X.95.2.256.
  • 25. Elliot, A.J., Church, M.A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218-232.
  • 26. Fiss, P.C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393-420. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5465/AMJ.2011.60263120.
  • 27. Gann, D., Salter, A. (2000). Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems. Research Policy, 29, 955-972.
  • 28. Ganter, A., and Hecker, A. (2014). Configurational paths to organizational innovation: qualitative comparative analyses of antecedents and contingencies. Journal of Business Research, 676), 1285-1292.
  • 29. Gareis, R. (1991). Management by projects: the management strategy of the “new” project-oriented company. International Journal of Project Management, 9, 71-76, doi:10.1016/ 0263-7863(91)90062-Z.
  • 30. Gareis, R., and Huemann, M. (2007). Maturity models for the project-oriented company. In J.R. Turner (ed.), The Gower Handbook of Project Management (pp. 183-208). Gower, Aldershot.
  • 31. Geraldi, J.G. (2009). Reconciling order and chaos in multi-project firms. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 2, 149-158. doi:10.1108/1753837091093057.
  • 32. Gong, Y., Kim, T.-Y., Lee, D.-R., and Zhu, J. (2013). A multilevel model of team goal orientation, information exchange, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 827-851. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0177.
  • 33. Gudiene, N., Banaitis, A., Banaitienė, N., and Lopes, J. (2013). Development of a conceptual critical success factors model for construction projects: A case of lithuania’. Procedia Engineering. Elsevier B.V., 57, 392-397.
  • 34. Hobday, M. (2000). The project-based organisation: an ideal form for managing complex products and systems? Research Policy, 29, 871-893. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00110-4.
  • 35. Huang, J.W., L, Y.H. (2012). Slack resources in team learning and project performance. Journal of Business Research, 65, 381-388.
  • 36. Huemann, M. (2015). Human Resource Management in the Project-oriented Organization: Towards a Viable System for Project Personnel. Gower, Aldershot.
  • 37. Hughes, W.P. (1989). Identifying environment of construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 7(1), 29-40.
  • 38. Jerbrant, A. (2013). Organising project-based companies: Management, control and execution of project-based industrial operations. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 6, 365-378. doi:10.1108/17538371311319070.
  • 39. Jones, M., Harrison, A. (1996). IS project performance: an empirical assessment. Information Management, 31(2), 57-65.
  • 40. Kaczorowska, A. (2017). Organizacje projektowe oparte na relacja kapitałowych i kontraktowych – wady, zalety, rekomendacje. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej, Seria Organizacja i Zarządzanie, 114, 179-192.
  • 41. Kang, S., Snell, S.A., and Swart, J. (2012). Options-based HRM, intellectual Capital and exploratory and exploitative learning in law firms’ practice groups. Human Resource Management, 51(4), 461-486.
  • 42. Kwiotkowska, A. (2018). Dynamism, hostility and complexity of the organisation's environment. Empirical verification of the construct. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej, Seria Organizacja i Zarządzanie, 3, 69-80.
  • 43. Lee, H., and Choi, B. (2003), Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: an integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 179-228.
  • 44. Leong, T.K., Zakuan, N., Mat Saman, M.Z., Ariff, M.S.M., and Tan, C.S. (2014). Using project performance to measure effectiveness of quality management system maintenance and practices in construction industry. The Scientific World Journal, 23, 1-9.
  • 45. Levin, D.Z., and Cross, R. (2004). Mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477-1490.
  • 46. Lindkvist, L. (2004). Governing project-based firms: Promoting market-like processes within hierarchies. Journal of Management and Governance, 8, 3-25. doi:10.1023/ B:MAGO.0000015392.75507
  • 47. Lundin, R.A., Arvidsson, N., Brady, T., Ekstedt, E., Midler, C., and Sydow, J. (2015). Managing and Working in Project Society: Institutional Challenges of Temporary Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, UK. doi:10.1007/9781139939454.
  • 48. Mehta, A., Feild, H., Armenakis, A., and Mehta, N. (2009). Team goal orientation and team performance: the mediating role of team planning. Journal of Management, 35(4), 1026-1046. doi:10.1177/0149206308326773.
  • 49. Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., Middleton, M., Maehr, M.L., Urdan, T., Anderman, L.H., Anderman, E., and Roeser, R. (1998). The development and validation of scales assessing students' achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 113-131.
  • 50. Mietrev, M., Mancini, M., and Turner, R. (2017). Towards a design for the project-based organization. International Journal of Project Management, 35, 479-491.
  • 51. Miller, D., Friesen, P.H. (1982). Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms: Two Models of Strategic Momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3, 1-25.
  • 52. Nahapiet, J.S., and Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital, intellectual Capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
  • 53. Patanakul, P., Pinto, J.K., and Pinto, M.B. (2016). Motivation to perform in a multiple-project environment: the impact of autonomy, support, goal clarity, and opportunities for learning. Journal of Engeneering and Technology Management, 39, 65-80.
  • 54. Pemsel, S., and Wiewiora, A. (2013). Project management office a knowledge broker in project-based organisations. International Journal of Project Management, 31, 31-42.
  • 55. Pinto, J.K., and Rouhiainen, P. (2001). Building Customer-Based Project Organizations. John Wiley and Sons.
  • 56. Pintrich, P.R., and Garcia, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In M.L. Maehr, & P.R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Goals and self-regulatory processes. 7, 371-402.
  • 57. Prencipe, A., and Tell, F. (2001). Inter-project learning: Processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms. Research Policy, 30, 1373-1394. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00157-3.
  • 58. Prencipe, A., Davies, A., and Hobday, M. (Eds.) (2003). The Business of Systems Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 59. Prieto-Pastor, I., Martín-Pérez, V., and Natalia Martín-Cruz, N. (2018). Social capital, knowledge integration and learning in project-based organizations: a CEO-based study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(8), 1803-1825.
  • 60. Ragin, C.C., and Fiss, P. (2008). Net effects versus configurations: an empirical demonstration. In C.C. Ragin (ed.), Redesigning Social Inquiry, 1, 190-212. Chicago-London: University of Chicago Press.
  • 61. Rihoux, B., and Ragin, C.C. (Eds.) (2009). Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • 62. Roberts, G.C., and Ommundsen, Y. (1996). Effect of goal orientation on achievement beliefs, cognition and strategies in team sport. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 6(1), 46-56.
  • 63. Schneider, M.R., Schulze-Bentrop, C., and Paunescu, M. (2010). Mapping the institutional capital of high-tech firms: A fuzzy-set analysis of capitalist variety and export performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 246-266.
  • 64. Shalley, C.E., Gilson, L.L., and Blum, T.C. (2009). Interactive effects of growth need strength, work context, and job complexity on self-reported creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 489-505.
  • 65. Skaaning, S.E. (2011). Assessing the robustness of crisp-set and fuzzy-set QCA results. Sociological Methods and Research, 40(2), 1-18.
  • 66. Skarmeas, D., Leonidou, C.N., and Saridakis, C. (2014). Examining the role of CSR skepticism using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Business Research, 67(9), 1796-1805.
  • 67. Spalek, S. (2014). Finding a New Way to Increase Project Management Efficiency in Terms of Time Reduction. Inzinerine Ekonomika – Engineering Economics, 25, 538-548.
  • 68. Stokke, O.S. (2007). Qualitative comparative analysis, shaming, and international regime effectiveness. Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 501-511.
  • 69. Sujan, H., Weitz, B.A., and Kumar, N. (1994). Learning orientation, working smart, and effective selling. Journal of Marketing 58, 39-52.
  • 70. Sundbo, J. (1997). Management of innovation in services. The Service Industries Journal 17(3), 432-455.
  • 71. Sydow, J., Lindkvist, L., and DeFillippi, R. (2004). Project-Based Organizations, Embeddedness and Repositories of Knowledge: Editorial. Organization Studies, 25, 1475-1489. doi:10.1177/0170840604048162.
  • 72. Thiry, M., and Deguire, M. (2007). Recent developments in project-based organisations. International Journal of Project Management, 25(7), 649-658.
  • 73. Trocki, M. (2014). Organizacja projektowa. Podstawy. Modele. Rozwiązania. Warszawa: PWE.
  • 74. Turner, J.R., and Keegan, A. (2000). The management of operations in the project-based organisation. Journal of Change Management, 1, 131-148. doi:10.1080/714042464.
  • 75. Turner, J.R., and Keegan, A. (2001). Mechanisms of governance in the project-based organization: Roles of the broker and steward. European Management Journal, 19, 254-267. doi:10.1016/S0263-2373(01)00022-6.
  • 76. Van de Walle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 995-1015.
  • 77. Van Yperen, N.W., and Janssen, O. (2002). Feeling fatiguedand dissatisfied or feeling fatigued but satisfied? Employees’goal orientations and their responses tohigh job demands. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 61-71.
  • 78. Verona, G., and Ravasi, D. (1999).Core competence per sviluppare nuovi prodotti con continuita. Economia & Management, 3, 107-126.
  • 79. Walker, A. (1989). Project Management in Construction. Oxford: BSP Professional Books.
  • 80. Westerveld, E. (2003). The Project Excellence Model: linking success criteria and critical success factors. International Journal of Project Management, 21, 411e418. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/ S0263-7863(02)00112-6.
  • 81. Whitley, R. (2006). Project-based firms: New organizational form or variations on a theme? Industrial and Corporate Change, 15, 77-99. doi:10.1093/icc/dtj003.
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-dbad98ce-bb8b-44d9-9b6c-54ed343cb6f9
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.