PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Influence of electron donors and copper concentration on geochemical and mineralogical processes under conditions of biological sulphate reduction

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Sulphidogenous microorganism communities were isolated from soil polluted by crude oil. The study was focused on determining the influence of 1) copper (II) concentration on the activity of selected microorganism communities and 2) the applied electron donor on the course and evolution of mineral-forming processes under conditions favouring growth of sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB). The influence of copper concentration on the activity of selected microorganism communities and the type of mineral phases formed was determined during experiments in which copper (II) chloride at concentrations of 0.1, 0.2, 0.5 and 0.7 g/L was added to SRB cultures. The experiments were performed in two variants: with ethanol (4 g/L) or lactate (4 g/L) as the sole carbon source. In order to determine the taxonomic composition of the selected microorganism communities, the 16S rRNA method was used. Results of this analysis confirmed the presence of Desulfovibrio, Desulfohalobium, Desulfotalea, Thermotoga, Solibacter, Gramella, Anaeromyxobacter and Myxococcus sp. in the stationary cultures. The post-culture sediments contained covelline (CuS) and digenite (Cu9S5). Based on the results, it can be stated that the type of carbon source applied during incubation plays a crucial role in determining the mineral composition of the post-culture sediments. Thus, regardless of the amount of copper ion introduced to a culture with lactate as the sole carbon source, no copper sulphide was observed in the post-culture sediments. Cultures with ethanol as the sole carbon source, on the other hand, yielded covelline or digenite in all post-culture sediments.
Rocznik
Strony
129--137
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 27 poz., il.
Twórcy
autor
autor
  • University of Warsaw, Faculty of Geology, Żwirki i Wigury 93, 02-089 Warsaw. Poland
Bibliografia
  • 1. Borkowski, A. and Wolicka, D. 2007a. Geomicrobiological aspects of the oxidation of reduced sulfur com pounds by photosynthesizing bacteria. Polish Journal of Microbiology, 56 (1), 53–57.
  • 2. Borkowski, A. and Wolicka, D. 2007b. Isolation and characteristics of photosynthesizing bacteria and their utilization in sewage treatment. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 16 (3B), 38–42.
  • 3. Baas Becking, L.G.M. and Moore, D. 1961. Biogenic sulfides. Economic Geology, 56, 259–272.
  • 4. Collins, M.D., Wallbanks, S., Lane, D.J., Shah, J., Nietupski, R., Smida, J., Dorsch, M. and Stackebrandt, E. 1991. Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Listeria based on reverse transcriptase sequencing of 16S rRNA. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 41, 240–246.
  • 5. Fauque, G., Legall, J. and Barton, L.L. 1991. Sulfate-reducing and sulfur reducing bacteria. Variations in autotrophic life. Shively, J.M.I., Barton. L.L. (Eds), Academic Press Ltd. 120.
  • 6. Fauque, G., Moura, J.J.G., Huynh, B.H., Berlier, Y., Der-Vartanian, D.V., Teixeira, M., Przybyla, A.E., Lespinat, P.A., Moura, and LeGall, J. 1988. The three classes of hydrogenases from sulfate-reducing bac teria of the genes Desulfovibrio. FEMS Microbiology Review, 54, 299–344.
  • 7. Gibson, G.R. 1990. Physiology and ecology of the sulphatereducing bacteria. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 69, 769–797.
  • 8. Gould, W.D., Francis, M., Blowes, D.W. and Krouse, H.R. 1997. Biomineralization: Microbiological forma tion of sulfide minerals. Biological-Mineralogical Interaction, 25, 169–186.
  • 9. Gramp, J.P., Bigham, J.M., Jones, F.S. and Touvinen, O.H. 2010. Formation of Fe-sulfides in cultures of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 175, 1062–1067.
  • 10. Gramp, J.P., Sasaki, K., Bigham, J.M., Karnachuk, O.V. and Touvinen, O.H. 2006. Formation of covellite (CuS) under biological sulfate-reducing conditions. Geomicrobiology Journal, 23, 613–619.
  • 11. Hao, O.J., Chen, J.M., Huang, L. and Buglass, R.L. 1996. Sulfate-reducing bacteria. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 26, 155–187.
  • 12. Kleikemper, J., Pelz, O., Schroth Martin, H.and Zeyer, J. 2002. Sulfate-reducing bacterial comminity response to carbon source amendments in contaminated aquifer microcosms. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 42, 109–118.
  • 13. Lovley, D.R. 1991. Dissimilatory Fe(III) and Mn (IV) reduction. Microbiology Reviews, 55, 259–287.
  • 14. Lovley, D.R. 1995. Microbial reduction of iron, manganese, and other metals. Advances in Agronomy, 54, 175–231.
  • 15. Panchanadikar, V.V. and Kar, R.N. 1993. Participation of copper using Desulfovibrio sp., World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 9, 280–281.
  • 16. Popa, R., Kinkle, B.K. and Badescu, A. 2004. Pyrite framboids as biomarkers for iron-sulfur systems. Geomicrobiology Journal, 21, 193–206.
  • 17. Postgate, J.R. 1984. The sulphate reducing bacteria. Cambridge University Press.
  • 18. Rickard, D. and Luther III, G.W. 2007. Chemical Reviews (Washington, DC, United States) 107, 514–562.
  • 19. Rueter, P., Rabus, R., Wilkes, H., Aeckersberg, F., Rainey, F. A., Jannasch, H.W. and Widdel, F. 1994. Anaerobic oxidation of hydrocarbons in crude oil by new types of sulphate-reducing bacteria. Nature, 372, 455–458.
  • 20. Sani, R.K., Peyton, B.M. and Brown, L.T. 2001. Copper-induced inhibition of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans G20: assessment of its toxicity and correlation with those of zinc and lead. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67, 4765–4772.
  • 21. Sarradin, P.M., Lannuzei, D., Waeles, M., Crassous, P., Bris, N.L., Caprais, J.C., Forquet, Y., Fabin, M.C. and Riso, R. 2007. Dissolved and particulate metals (Fe, Zn, Cu, Cd, Pb) in two habitats from an active hydrothermal field on the EPR at 13 degrees N. Science of the Total Environment , 392, 119–129.
  • 22. Utgikar, V.P., Chen, B-Y., Chaudhary, N., Tabak, H.H., Hainjes, J.R. and Govind, R. 2001. Acute toxicity of heavy metals to acetate – utilizing mixed cultures of sulfate – reducing bacteria: EC100 and EC500. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 20, 2662–2669.
  • 23. Widdel, F. and Rabus, R. 2001. Anaerobic biodegradation of saturated and aromatic hydrocarbons. Biotechnology, 12, 259–276.
  • 24. Wolicka, D. 2009a. Application of sulphate reducing bacteria in bioremediation of soli polluted by petro leum products. IMOG 24th International Meeting on Organic geochemistry, p. 191. Bremen.
  • 25. Wolicka, D. 2009b. Application of sulphate reducing bacteria in remediation of environment contami nated by metals. 1st International Conference Biotechnology & Metals, pp. 105–108. Kosice.
  • 26. Wolicka, D. 2011. Biostimulation of geochemical processes under anoxic condition in soil contaminated by crude oil. In: Kozłowski, A. (Ed.), Mineralogical Sciences Committee of Polish Academy of Sciences, pp. 1–119. Univeristy of Warsaw; Warsaw. [In Polish]
  • 27. Wolicka, D. and Borkowski, A. 2008. Participation of sulphate reducing bacteria in formation of carbonates. International Kalkowsky-Symposium Göttingen, Germany. Abstract Volume (Göttingen University Press) Special Volume in a Geobiological Journal, 130–131 pp.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-db1c2e7d-252a-41a3-8685-4853e772dcd5
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.