The voice of conservation-restoration on multi-disciplinary restoration projects

• Autorzy: Røskar Tanja

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35784/odk.1098

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

As conservator-restorers we should be „a voice of reason”, an advocate that speaks for the cultural heritage values of our built heritage. However, we are often only one voice in a large group consisting of everything from structural engineers, geologists and carpenters to economic advisors and bureaucrats. Being a conservator-restorer in such settings often turns out to be a great balancing act. On the one hand, we are supposed to protect the buildings against any intervention that will compromise its authenticity and cultural values. On the other hand, we must allow as much protective work as possible to ensure the buildings’ future. Questions that can arise for a conservator-restorer during and after discussions in multi-disciplinary groups are many. Questions that needs answering before work starts. Are the conservator-restorer and the master craftsperson really on each end of the scale in a project, or is it just that we use different words? Is it conservation ethics versus the practical view of the engineer, or can both sides be pragmatic and find a new and possibly better solution? Is it possible that the conservator-restorer and the funding body can meet in the middle, or can that jeopardize the project?

Słowa kluczowe

EN

building restoration; multi-disciplinary work; conservation-restoration; conservation-restoration ethics; cooperation

• Wydawca: Polski Komitet Narodowy Międzynarodowej Rady Ochrony Zabytków ICOMOS ; Wydawnictwo Politechniki Lubelskiej
• Czasopismo: Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Nr 8
• Strony: 281--290
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 5 poz., fig.

Twórcy

autor

Røskar Tanja

• Multiconsult, Rigedalen 15, 4626 Kristiansand, Norway Norwegia

Bibliografia

• 1. Ashely-Smith, J. (2016). Losing the edge: the risk of a decline in practical conservation skills. Journal of the Institute of Conservation, volume 39, pp.119-132.
• 2. English Heritage (2008). Conservation principles policies and guidance for the sustainable management of the historic environment. English Heritage.
• 3. Muñoz Viñaz, S. (2005): Contemporary Theory of Conservation. Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
• 4. Røskar, T. (2010). Enghavehuset – restaurering av hus og hage. Aust-Agder museet. Internal report.
• 5. The Venice Charter. International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (1964). In: MONUMENTA I, Internationale Grundsätze und Richtlinien der Denkmalpflege/Principes et directives internationaux pour la conservation/International Principles and Guidelines of Conservation (pp. 47-52), herausgegeben von/édités par/edited by ICOMOS Deutschland, ICOMOS Luxemburg, ICOMOS Österreich, ICOMOS Schweiz (2012). Stuttgart: Fraunhofer IRB Verlag.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).