Barriers to using of quintuple helix model to create innovations in Polish regions

Łącka, Irena

doi:10.29119/1641-3466.2020.146.18

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Barriers to using of quintuple helix model to create innovations in Polish regions

Autorzy

Łącka Irena

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2020.146.18

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Purpose: The main purpose of the paper is to present and discuss the assumptions of the model and indicate whether the regional innovativeness can be improved with the help of multi-branch co-operation oriented so as to form new solutions to contemporary development problems. An additional purpose of the paper is to indicate barriers that hinder the application of this form of co-operation in Polish regions. Design/methodology/approach: The paper has theoretical and reviewing nature. It was drawn up based on an analysis of the literature on the topic and the results of foreign authors’ research along with the information obtained from practicians (management board members of the cluster active in the West Pomeranian region). Findings: Quintuple Helix model is a concept which explains the principles and effects of co-operation for the improvement of regional innovativeness and development in the conditions of the natural environment challenges and sustainable development. This co-operation is built between regional partners of innovative processes. The experience of highly developed countries shows that such organized cooperation is effective. In Poland, this concept is very rarely used, and its implementation encounters significant barriers. Practical implications: The presented considerations are important for entities of regional innovative networks. They will gain knowledge of the Quintuple Helix concept in the light of the challenges of the modern world (economic, ecological, demographic, cultural and others). In addition, they learn the essence and scope of barriers to introducing effective innovative cooperation. This will allow them to reduce barriers. In the future, new solutions to problems of the development of society and economy will appear in Polish regions faster. Originality/value: The added value of the article is the presentation of the Quintuple Helix model as a tool to solve sustainable development problems in the region. This concept is not widely known in Poland, nor used in the mesoscale. This is due to the lack of interdisciplinary research on this issue and very strong barriers to such cooperation. They are found in all elements of this model. Its practical implementation requires their removal. In the article, the author diagnosed and described them.

Słowa kluczowe

Quintuple Helix model innovativeness region challenges barriers

Model Quintuple Helix innowacyjność region wyzwania bariery

Wydawca

Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej

Czasopismo

Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska

Rocznik

2020

Tom

z. 146

Strony

233--251

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 58 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Łącka Irena

irena.lacka@zut.edu.pl

West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin

Bibliografia

1. Arnikil, R., Järvensivu, A., Koski, P., and Piirainen, T. (2010). Exploring the Quadruple Helix. Outlining user-oriented innovation models. Final Report of Quadruple Helix Research for CLIQ Project University of Tampere. Work Paper, 85.
2. Baccarne, B., Logghe, S., Schuurman, D., and De Marez, L. (2016). Socio-Ecological Entrepreneurship. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6, 3, 22-30.
3. Barth, T.D. (2011). The idea of a green new deal in a Quintuple helix Model of knowledge, know-how and innovation. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1, 2, 1-14.
4. Binczyk, E. (2018). Epoka człowieka. Retoryka i marazm antropocenu. Warszawa: PWN.
5. Bloedon, R.V., and Stokes, D.R. (1994). Making university/industry collaborative research succeed. Research-Technology Management, 37, 2, 44-48.
6. Bojar, M., and Machnik-Słomka, J. (2014). Model potrójnej i poczwórnej helisy w budowaniu współpracy sieciowej dla rozwoju innowacyjnych projektów regionalnych. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej. Seria: Organizacja i Zarządzanie, 76, 99-111.
7. Carayannis, E.G., and Campbell, D.F.J. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41-69. Retrieved from http: //www.igi-global.com/bookstore/article.aspx?titleid= 41959, 12.09.2019.
8. Carayannis, E.G., and Campbell, D.F.J. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46, 3/4, 201-234.
9. Carayannis, E.G., Grigoroudis, E., Campbell, D.F.J., Meissner, D., and Stamati, D. (2018). The ecosystem as helix: an exploratory theory-building study of regional co-opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Innovation Models. R&D Management, 48, 1, 148-162.
10. Carrayanis, E.G., and Campbell, D.F.J. (2014). Developed democracies versus emerging autocracies: art, democracy, and innovation in Quadruple Helix innovation systems. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 3:12. Retrieved from http://www.innovation-entrepreneurship.co/content/3/1/12, 29.08.2019.
11. Carrayanis, E.G., Barth, T.D., and Campbell, D.F.J. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1:2. Retrieved from http://www.innovation-entrepreneurship.co/ content/1/1/2, 28.08.2019.
12. Chesbrough, H.W. (2006). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
13. Cooke, P. (1992). Regional Innovation System: Competitive Regulation in the New Europe. Geoforum, 23, 365-382.
14. Cooke, P. (1998). Introduction: origins of the concept. In: H-J. Braczyk, P. Cooke, and M. Heidenreich (Eds.), Regional Innovation Systems: The role of governances in a globalized world (pp. 2-25). London: UCL Press.
15. Cooke, P. (2001). Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters and the Knowledge Economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 4, 945-974.
16. Cooke, P., Uranga, M.G., Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26, 4-5, 475-491.
17. De Mello, J.M.C., and Etzkowitz, H. (2008). New directions in Latin American university-industry-government interactions. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 7, 3, 193-204.
18. Dolińska, M. (2010). Innowacje w gospodarce oparte na wiedzy. Warszawa: PWE.
19. Dzisah, J. (2011). Mobilizing for development: putting the Triple Helix into action in Ghana. In: M. Saad, and G. Zawdie (Eds.), Theory and Practice of Triple Helix Model in Developing Countries: Issues and Challenges (pp. 146-160). New York: Routledge.
20. Etzkowitz, H., and Klofsten, M. (2005). The innovating region: toward of theory of knowledge-based regional development. R&D Management, 35, 3, 243-255.
21. Etzkowitz, H., and Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge-Based Economic Development. EASST Review, 14, 14-19.
22. Etzkowitz, H., and Leydesdorff, L. (1998). The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy, 25, 195-2013.
23. Fournier, A. (2019). My Starbucks Idea: an Open Innovation Case-Study. Retrieved from https://www.braineet.com/blog/my-starbucks-idea-case-study/, 1.09.2019.
24. Giddings, B., Hopwood, B., and Brien, G.O. (2002). Environment, economy and society: Fitting them together into sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 10, 4, 187-196.
25. Grooten, M., and Almond, R.E.A. (Eds.) (2018). Living Planet Report – 2018, WWF, Switzerland: Gland.
26. Grundel, I., and Dahlström, M. (2016). A Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Approach to Regional Innovation Systems in the Transformation to a Forestry-Based Bioeconomy. Journal Knowledge Economy, 7, 963-983.
27. IPCC (2018). Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization.
28. Irawati, D. (2011). Bridging the gaps in the Triple Helix: A demand or a challenge for Indonesian case study? In: M. Saad, and G. Zawdie (Eds.), Theory and Practice of Triple Helix Model in Developing Countries: Issues and Challenges (pp. 161-175). New York: Routledge.
29. Kimatu, J.N. (2016). Evolution of strategic interactions from the triple to quad helix innovation models for sustainable development in the era of globalization. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 5:16, DOI: 10.1186/s13731-016-0044-x.
30. Kondratiuk-Nierodzińska, M. (2013). Regionalne systemy innowacji a konkurencyjność województw w Polsce. Białystok: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku.
31. Łącka, I. (2011). Współpraca technologiczna polskich instytucji naukowych i badawczych z przedsiębiorstwami jako czynnik wzrostu innowacyjności polskiej gospodarki. Szczecin: Wydawnictwo Uczelniane Zachodniopomorskiego Uniwersytetu Technologicznego.
32. Łącka, I. (2013). Efektywność powiązań nauki z przemysłem w procesach innowacyjnych. Szczecin: Stowarzyszenie Naukowe Instytut Gospodarki i Rynku.
33. Leydesdorff, L. (1997). The new communication regime of university–industry-government relations. In: H. Etzkowitz, and L. Leydesdorff (Eds.), Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. London: Cassel Academic.
34. Leydesorff, L. (2000). The Triple Helix: an evolutionary model of innovations. Research Policy, 29, 2, 243-255.
35. Leydesorff, L. (2012). The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, …, and an N-tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge–based Economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3, 1, 25-35.
36. Marszowski, R. (2019). Innovation in the context of strengthening active social policy development and its importance for the process urban community organizing. Scientific Papers of the Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series, 134, 153-170.
37. Martin, J. (2007). The Meaning of the 21st Century: A Vital Blueprint for Ensuring Our Future. New York: Riverhead Books.
38. Martin, M. (Ed.) (2000). The Management of University-industry Relations: Five Institutional Case Studies from Africa, Europe, Latin America and the Pacific Region. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning, UNESCO.
39. Matusiak, K. (ed.) (2005). Innowacje i transfer technologii. Słownik pojęć. Warszawa: PARP.
40. Morawska-Jancelewicz, J. (2016). Innowacje społeczne w miastach europejskich. Przykłady dobrych praktyk. Studia Miejskie, 23, 65-79.
41. Nieminen, M., and Kaukonen, E. (2001). Universities and R&D Networking in a knowledge-based economy. SITRA Reports Series, 11, Helsinki.
42. Nowakowska, A. (2010). Budowanie regionalnych systemów innowacji: polskie doświadczenia. Ekonomiczne Problemy Usług, 48, 143-157.
43. Provenzano, V., Arnone, M., and Seminara, M.R. (2016). Innovation in the rural areas and the linkage with the Quintuple Helix Model. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 442-447.
44. Prystom, J. (2012). Innowacje w procesie rozwoju gospodarczego. Istota i uwarunkowania. Warszawa: Difin.
45. Puślecki, Z.W. (2017). Model potrójnej helisy (Triple Helix) we wzroście efektów innowacyjnych i konkurencyjności. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 475, 238-257.
46. Ranga, M., and Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple Helix systems: an analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the Knowledge Society. Industry & Higher Education, 27, 3, 237-262.
47. Ranga, M., and Etzkowitz, H. (2011). Creative reconstruction: a Triple Helix-based Innovation strategy in Central and Eastern Europe Countries. In: M. Saad, and G. Zawdie (Eds.), Theory and Practice of Triple Helix Model in Developing Countries: Issues and Challenges (pp. 249-283). New York: Routledge.
48. Razak, A.A., and White, G.R.T. (2015). The Triple Helix model for innovation: a holistic exploration of barrier and enablers. International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, 7, 3, 278-291.
49. Rivera, M. (2011). Innovation systems interactions and technology transfer and assimilation for industrial development: the cases of South Korea and Mexico. In: M. Saad, and G. Zawdie (Eds.), Theory and Practice of Triple Helix Model in Developing Countries: Issues and Challenges (pp. 25-51). New York: Routledge.
50. Saad, M. (2004). Issues and challenges arising from the application of innovation strategies based on the Triple Helix culture: experience of the incubation system in Algeria. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 3, 1, 17-35.
51. Saad, M., and Zawdie, G. (Eds.) (2011). Theory and Practice of Triple Helix Model in Developing Countries: Issues and Challenges. New York: Routledge.
52. Sieniawska, B. (2014). Trudności we współpracy uczelni z biznesem w zakresie komercjalizacji wiedzy w świetle badań naukowych. Studia Ekonomiczne. Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach, 199, 270-281.
53. Skowroński, A. (2006). Zrównoważony rozwój perspektywą dalszego postępu cywilizacyjnego. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 1, 2, 50.
54. Solesvik, M.Z. (2017). The Triple Helix model for regional development and innovation: context of Nordic countries. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 5, 4, 5-21.
55. Sunina, L., and Rivza, B. (2016). The Quintuple Helix Model: Way of Regional Development Centres in Latvia to Smart Public Administration. Research for Rural Development, 2, 135-142.
56. Sutz, J. (2000). The university-industry-government relations in Latin America. Research Policy, 29, 2, 279-290.
57. Szczepaniak, M. (2014). Znaczenie sieci współpracy w rozwoju innowacji społecznych. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej. Seria: Organizacja i Zarządzanie, 76, 155-166.
58. Zalasiewicz, J., Waters, C., and Head, M.J. (2017). Anthropocene: its straigraphic basis. Nature, 541, 289.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-dae48887-04b6-44c0-8b65-fb843a6d27f3