Determinants of organizational agility in social work in the light of own research

• Autorzy: Kocot Maria , Pál Pápay György

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2025.218.18

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: This article explores the determinants of organizational agility in social work and identifies how agile practices enhance the effectiveness and adaptability of organizations in this field. The study provides theoretical insights and practical recommendations to improve the responsiveness of social work organizations to dynamic social challenges. Design/methodology/approach: The research is based on a survey conducted in April-May 2023 with 303 respondents representing organizations involved in social work. A structured questionnaire was used to gather data on key agility factors, and Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) was applied to identify relationships between variables and dimensions of agility. Findings: The study reveals that agility in social work organizations is driven by quick responses to beneficiary needs, flexibility in adapting activities, collaboration with diverse institutions, continuous communication, and the use of technology. Continuous improvement of methods and inclusion of beneficiaries’ voices are also critical. These factors collectively shape organizations' capacity to adapt and innovate in complex environments. Research limitations/implications: The study is limited by its reliance on a single method (survey) and cross-sectional design, which captures a snapshot of agility but not long-term trends. Future research could include longitudinal studies or mixed-method approaches for a more comprehensive understanding. Practical implications: Organizations can enhance agility by fostering collaborative networks, integrating technological solutions, and prioritizing beneficiary engagement to align strategies with evolving social needs. Social implications: Improving agility in social work can enhance service quality and accessibility for vulnerable populations, enabling organizations to address pressing social issues and foster resilient, inclusive communities. Originality/value: This study offers a novel perspective on the intersection of organizational agility and social work, a topic with limited exploration in the literature. By combining empirical data with theoretical analysis, it contributes to understanding and implementing agility in social work organizations.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

social work; organizational agility; organizational; corporate social responsibility; social sector

PL

praca socjalna; zwinność przedsiębiorstwa; organizacyjny; społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu; sektor społeczny

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2025
• Tom: z. 218
• Strony: 337--351
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 30 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Kocot Maria

• University of Economics in Katowice

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5150-3765

autor

Pál Pápay György

• National Louis University

• https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1866-6357

Bibliografia

• 1. Aguinis, H., Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don't know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932-968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079
• 2. Aguinis, H., Glavas, A. (2019). On corporate social responsibility, sensemaking, and the search for meaningfulness through work. Journal of Management , 45(3), 1057-1086.
• 3. Anderson, S., Wilson, T. (2017). Decentralization and Organizational Agility: A Comparative Study. Journal of Strategic Management, (1)42.
• 4. Carroll, A.B., Brown, J.A. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Current Concepts, Research, and Issues. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1177-1199.
• 5. Chen, X., Siau, K. (2020). Business Analytics/Business Intelligence and IT Infrastructure: Impact on Organizational Agility. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing. DOI: 10.4018/joeuc.2020100107
• 6. Chen, Y., Li, X. (2021). The Role of Organizational Agility in Managing the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Two Chinese Hospitals. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 70. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18010070.
• 7. He, H., Harris, L. (2021). The impact of organizational agility on crisis management and firm performance: A moderation analysis. Journal of Business Research, 122, 698-708. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.026.
• 8. Joiner, B. (2019). Leadership Agility for organizational agility. Journal of Creating Value, 5(2), 194-208. Available at: journals.sagepub.com
• 9. Kamiński, T. (2017). Social work in the enterprise: New challenges and perspectives. Social Work, 3(34), 29-38.
• 10. Kijak, R., Podgórska-Jachnik, D., Stec, K. (2019). Disability. Challenges. Social Work. Warsaw: Difin.
• 11. Kt, M.A., Sivasubramanian, C. (2023). Workforce Agility: A Review on Agility Drivers and Organizational Practices. Karyavattom: Researchers' Forum, Department of Commerce. University of Kerala. DOI: 10.59640/cbr.v14i2.1-8
• 12. Kurnia, S., Chien, S. W. (2020). Building organizational agility through strategic management accounting: A case study of an Indonesian manufacturing company. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 14(4), 591-612. DOI: 10.1108/JABS-09-2019-0253.
• 13. Ministry of Family, Labor and Social Policy (2015). Social entrepreneurship and social work. Warsaw: Department of Social Assistance and Integration.
• 14. Młyński, J. (2021). Humanistic theories and methods of social work. Kraków: Institute of Animal Production State Research Institute.
• 15. Mrugalska, B., Ahmed, J. (2021). Organizational agility in industry 4.0: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 13(15), 8272. Available at: mdpi.com
• 16. PGE. (2023). Social report of the PGE Capital Group. PGE Polska Grupa Energetyczna. Retrieved from: https://www.gkpge.pl
• 17. Pillars of Business. (2023). 80% of Polish companies use agile work methods. Pillars of Business. Retrieved from: https://filarybiznesu.pl
• 18. Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92. https://hbr.org/2006/12/strategy-and-society-the-link-between-competitive-advantage-and-corporate-social-responsibility
• 19. Prieto, L., Talukder, M.F. (2023). Resilient Agility: A Necessary Condition for Employee and Organizational Sustainability. Sustainability. DOI: 10.3390/su15021552.
• 20. Ramadhana, R. (2021). Employee Agility. Center for Open Science. DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/vrwnq.
• 21. Raschke, R.L. (2010). Process-based view of agility: The value contribution of IT and the effects on process outcomes. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 11(4), 297-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2010.09.005
• 22. Smolińska-Theiss, B. (2014). Childhood as a social status: Educational privileges of middle-class children. Warsaw: APS Publishing House.
• 23. Sobczak, A. (2018). Implementation of CSR strategies in Polish enterprises. Biblioteka Nauki. Retrieved from: https://bibliotekanauki.pl
• 24. Stolarska-Ślązak, A. (2023). Organizational agility in enterprise management. Exante.
• 25. Szczepkowski, J. (2018). Social Work - Solution Focused Approach. Warsaw: Human Resources Development Center.
• 26. Szmagalski, J. (2007). Methods of social work in the context of the praxeological function of social pedagogy. In: E. Marynowicz-Hetka (Ed.), Social pedagogy, Vol. 1 (pp. 381-424). Warsaw: PWN.
• 27. Szmagalski, J. (2012). Perspectives of social work. Is it time to start being afraid? Problemy Polityki Społecznej, 17, 129-139.
• 28. Sztumski, J. (1995). Introduction to methods and techniques of social research. Katowice: Śląsk.
• 29. Telecom Italia (2020). Agile management and internal communication tools. Telecom Italia. Retrieved from: https://www.telecomitalia.com
• 30. Włodarkiewicz-Klimek, H. (2018). The concept and models of an agile enterprise. Scientific Papers of the Poznań University of Technology. Organization and Management, 77, 213-223.