Operationalising Responsible Research and Innovation – tools for enterprises

• Autorzy: Nazarko Łukasz , Melnikas Borisas

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/emj-2019-0017

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) is an emerging paradigm and a novel approach to governing science and innovation with the aim of making them ethically acceptable and socially desirable. RRI concept has become a popular term as a result of making it a cross-cutting theme for the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme. Up to date, research on the topic has focused on conceptual problems (relation with similar concepts as well as ethical, moral, philosophical, cultural underpinnings and assumptions) and on the possibilities of making the concept relevant to the Research & Innovation community in Europe and worldwide. Despite some initial efforts, there is still a need to further develop methods and techniques that could make RRI a useful framework for conducting innovation activities, especially in the business environment. The aim of this paper is to propose a range of approaches that help operationalise RRI. The approaches employ methods such as weighted indicators, maturity models and scorecards.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Responsible Research and Innovation; responsibility; innovation; engineering; technology management; Technology Assessment

PL

odpowiedzialne badania i innowacje; odpowiedzialność; innowacja; Inżynieria; zarządzanie technologią; ocena technologii

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Białostockiej
• Czasopismo: Engineering Management in Production and Services
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 11, no. 3
• Strony: 21--28
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 43 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Nazarko Łukasz

• Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Lithuania

autor

Melnikas Borisas

• Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Lithuania

Bibliografia

• Chodakowska, E., & Nazarko, J. (2017). Network DEA Models for Evaluating Couriers and Messengers. Procedia Engineering, 182, 106-111. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.130
• Ceicyte, J. (2019). Implementing responsible innovation at the firm level. Kaunas, Lithuania: Kaunas University of Technology.
• Ejdys, J., & Nazarko, Ł. (2014). Foresight gospodarczy - instrumentem orientacji na przyszłość [Economic foresight as an instrumentof a future-oriented strategy]. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 340, 651-664.
• Ejdys, J., Nazarko, J., Nazarko, L., & Halicka, K. (2015). Foresight application for transport sector. In M. Fiorini (Ed.), Clean Mobility and Intelligent Transport Systems (pp. 379-402). London, Great Britain: The Institution of Engineering and Technology. doi: 10.1049/PBTR001E_ch17
• Flipse, S.M., Van Dam, K.H., Stragier, J., Oude Vrielink, T.J.C., & Van der Sanden, M.C.A. (2015). Operationalizing responsible research innovation in industry through decision support in innovation practice. Journal of Chain and Network, 15(2), 135-146. doi: 10.3920/JCNS2015.x004
• Genus, A., & Iskandarova, M. (2018). Responsible innovation: its institutionalisation and a critique. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 128, 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.029
• Geoghegan-Quinn, M. (2012). Responsible Research and Innovation. Europe’s ability to respond to societal challenges. Proceedings of the Science in Dialogues – Towards a European Model for Responsible Research and Innovation. Odense, Denmark, 23-35.
• Gianni, R. (2016). Responsibility and Freedom. The Ethical Realm of RRI. London and Hoboken: ISTE and John Wiley & Sons.
• Goepel, K.D. (2018). Implementation of an Online Software Tool for the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHPOS). International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 10(3), 469-487. doi: 10.13033/ijahp.v10i3.590
• Grinbaum, A., & Groves, C. (2013) What is „responsible” about „responsible innovation”? In R. Owen, J. Bessant, & M. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible Innovation. Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society (pp. 119-142). Chichester, Great Britain: John Wiley & Sons.
• Grunwald, A. (2011). Responsible Innovation: Bringing together Technology Assessment, Applied Ethics, and STS research. Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies, 10, 9-31.
• Grunwald, A. (2014). Technology assessment for responsible innovation. In J. van den Hoven, N. Doorn, T. Swiestra, B.J. Koops, & H.A. Romijn (Eds.), Responsible Innovation 1 (pp. 15-31). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
• Gurzawska, A., Makinen, M., & Brey, P. (2017). Implementation of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) practices in industry: Providing the right incentives. Sustainability, 9(10), 1759. doi: 10.3390/su9101759
• Halicka, K. (2017). Main Concepts of Technology Analysis in the Light of the Literature on the Subject. Procedia Engineering, 182, 191-298. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.196
• Halme, M., & Korpela, M. (2014). Responsible innovation toward sustainable development in small and medium- sized enterprises: a resource perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(8), 547-566. doi: 10.1002/bse.1801
• Hedstrom, G.S. (2019). Sustainability: What It Is and How to Measure It. Boston-Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9781547400423-202
• Inzelt, A., & Csonka, L. (2017). The Approach of the Business Sector to Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI). Foresight and STI Governance, 11(4), 63-73. doi: 10.17323/2500-2597.2017.4.63.73
• KARIM (2014). Introduction to a guide to entrepreneurs and innovation support organization. Retrieved from http://www.nweurope.eu/media/1118/guide_online.pdf
• Kuhlman, S., Stegmaier, P., & Konrad, K. (2019). The tentative governance of emerging science and technology — A conceptual introduction. Research Policy, 48(5), 1091-1097. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.006
• MoRRI (2018). The evolution of Responsible Research and Innovation in Europe: The MoRRI indicators report. Retrieved from https://morri.netlify.com/
• Nazarko, J., Kuźmicz, K.A., Szubzda-Prutis, E., & Urban, J. (2009). The General Concept of Benchmarking and Its Application in Higher Education in Europe. Higher Education in Europe, 34(3&4), 497-510.
• Nazarko, J., Radziszewski, R., Dębkowska, K., Ejdys, J., Gudanowska, A., Halicka, K., Kilon, J., Kononiuk, A., Kowalski, K.J., Krol, J.B., Nazarko, Ł., Sarnowski, M., & Vilutienė ,T. (2015). Foresight Study of Road Pavement Technologies. Procedia Engineering, 122, 129-136. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.016
• Nazarko, L. (2019). Responsible Research and Innovation – a Conceptual Contribution to Theory and Practice of Technology Management. Business: Theory and Practice, 20, 342-351. doi: 10.3846/btp.2019.32
• OECD (2015). Daejeon Declaration on Science, Technology, and Innovation Policies for the Global and Digital Age. OECD Ministerial Meeting Daejeon 2015, World Science Forum. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/sti/daejeon-declaration-2015.htm
• OECD (2016). OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2016. Paris. doi:10.1787/sti_in_outlook-2016-en
• Owen, R., Stigloe, J., Macnaghten, P., Gorman, M., Fisher, E., & Guston, D. (2013). A framework for responsible innovation. In R. Owen, J. Bessant, & M. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible Innovation. Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society (pp. 27-50). Chichester, Great Britain: John Wiley & Sons.
• Pavie, X., & Carthy, D. (2013). Responsible-innovation in practice: How to implement responsibility across an organization. Cahier Innovation & Society, 33.
• Pavie, X., Scholten, V., & Carthy, D. (2014). Responsible innovation: From concept to practice. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
• ResAgorA (2016). Responsibility Navigator. Retrieved from https://responsibility-navigator.eu/navigator/
• Rohrbeck, R. (2011). Corporate Foresight: Towards a Maturity Model for the Future Orientation of a Firm. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
• RRI Tools (undated). Self-Reflection Tool. Retrieved from https://www.rri-tools.eu/self-reflection-tool
• Stahl, B. (2013). Responsible research and innovation: The role of privacy in an emerging framework. Science and Public Policy, 40(6), 708-716. doi:10.1093/scipol/sct067
• Stahl, B.C. (2017). The ORBIT Self-Assessment Tool. ORBIT Journal, 1(2). doi: 10.29297/orbit.v1i2.59
• Stahl, B.C., Obach, M., Yaghmaei, E., Ikonen, V., Chatfield, K., & Brem, A. (2017). The Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Maturity Model: Linking Theory and Practice. Sustainability, 9(6), 1-19. doi: 10.3390/su9061036
• Stigloe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework from responsible innovation. Research policy, 42(9), 1568-1580. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
• Sutcliffe, H. (2000). A Report on Responsible Research and Innovation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/rri-report-hilary-sutcliffe_en.pdf
• van de Poel, I., Asveld, L., Flipse, S., Klaassen, P., Scholten, V., & Yaghmaei, E. (2017). Company Strategies for Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI): A Conceptual Model. Sustainability, 9(11), 2045. doi: 10.3390/su9112045
• van den Hoven, M.J., Lokhorst, G., & van de Poel, I. (2012). Engineering and the problem of moral overload. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18, 1-13. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9277-z
• van den Hoven, J. (2013). Value sensitive design and responsible innvation. In R. Owen, J. Bessant, & H. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society (pp. 75-83). London, Great Britain: John Wiley.
• van den Hoven, J. (2014). Responsible Innovation: A new look at technology ethics. In J. van den Hoven, N. Doorn, T. Swiestra, B.J. Koops, & H.A. Romijn (Eds.), Responsible Innovation 1 (pp. 3-13). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
• von Schomberg, R. (2012). Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation. In M. Dusseldorp, & R. Beecroft (Eds.), Technikfolgen abschatzen lehren (pp. 39-61). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften.
• von Schomberg, R. (2013). A vision of responsible innovation. In R. Owen, J. Bessant, & H. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society (pp. 51-74). London, Great Britain: John Wiley.
• Wilford, S.H. (2015). What is required of requirements? A first stage process towards developing guidelines for responsible research. SIGCAS Computers and Society, 45(3), 348-355. doi: 10.1145/2874239.2874291