Energy and environmental analysis of a CCHP system used in industrial facility

• Autorzy: Bugaj Andrzej

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.37190/epe200307

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper concentrates on problems of introducing a combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP) system into an industrial facility with well-defined demand profiles of cooling, heating, and electricity. Environmental and energy evaluation covering the proposed CCHP system (Case 2) and the reference system (Case 1) has been carried out. The conventional system consists of three typical methods of energy supply: a) electricity from an external grid, b) heat from gas-fired boilers, and c) cooling from vapor compression chillers run by electricity from the grid. The CCHP system contains the combined heat and power (CHP) plant with a gas turbine–compressor arrangement and water/lithium bromide absorption chiller of a single-effect type. Those two cases were analyzed in terms of annual primary energy consumption as well as annual emissions of CO₂, NO_x, and SO₂. The results of the analysis show the primary energy savings of the CCHP system in comparison with the reference system. Furthermore, the environmental impact of the CCHP application, in the form of pollutant emission reductions, compares quite favorably with the reference conventional system.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

CCHP; energy characteristics; CHP

PL

CCHP; charakterystyka energetyczna; CHP

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej
• Czasopismo: Environment Protection Engineering
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 46, nr 3
• Strony: 109--120
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 16 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Bugaj Andrzej

• Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Environmental Engineering, ul. Norwida 4/6, 50-373 Wrocław, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] EBRAHIMI M., KESHAVARZ A., Combined cooling, heating, and power, Elsevier, 2015.
• [2] SHI Y., LIU M., FANG F., Combined cooling, heating, and power systems: modelling, optimization and operation, Wiley, 2018.
• [3] JIANG X.Z., ZHENG D., MI Y., Carbon footprint analysis of a combined cooling heating and power system, Energy Conv. Manage., 2015, 103, 36–42.
• [4] MARAVER D., SIN A., SEBASTI F., Environmental assessment of CCHP systems based on biomass combustion in comparison to conventional generation, Energy, 2013, 57, 17–23.
• [5] CHO H., MAGO P.J., LUCK R., Evaluation of CCHP systems performance based on operational cost, primary energy consumption and carbon dioxide emission by utilizing an optional operation scheme, Appl. Energy, 2009, 86 (12), 2540–2549.
• [6] MAGO P.J., CHAMRA L.M., Analysis and optimization of CCHP systems based on energy, economic and environmental considerations, Energy Build., 2009, 41, 1099–1106.
• [7] WANG J., ZHAI Z., JING Y., ZHANG C., Optimization design of CCHP system to maximize to save energy and reduce environmental impact, Energy, 2010, 35, 3388–3398.
• [8] MOHAMMADKHANI N., SEDIGHIZADEH M., ESMAILI M., Energy and emission management of CCHP with electric and thermal energy storage, Therm. Sci. Eng. Progress, 2018, 8, 494–508.
• [9] BUGAJ A., Energy and environmental evaluation of combined cooling heating and power system, International Conference on Advances in Energy Systems and Environmental Engineering (ASEE17), Wrocław, Poland, July 2–5, 2017.
• [10] FENG I., DAI X., MO J., MAY Y., Analysis of energy matching performance between CCHP and users based on different operation modes, Energy Conv. Manage., 2019, 182, 60–71.
• [11] LI I., MU H., GAO W., Optimization and analysis of CCHP system based on energy loads coupling of residential and office buildings, Appl. Energy, 2014, 136, 206–216.
• [12] MAGO P.J., CHAMRA L.M., RAMSAY J., Micro-combined cooling, heating and power systems hybrid electric-thermal load following operation, Appl. Therm. Eng., 2010, 30, 800–806.
• [13] HAN G., YOU S., YE T., SUN P., ZHANG H., Analysis of CCHP system under compromised electricthermal load strategy, Energy Build., 2014, 84, 586–594.
• [14] REN H., GAO W., Economic and environmental evaluation of CHP systems with different operating modes for residential buildings in Japan, Energy Build., 2010, 42, 853–861.
• [15] XU D., QU M., Energy, environmental and economic evaluation of a CCHP system for data center based on operational data, Energy Build., 2013, 67, 176–186.
• [16] CALISE F., D’ACCARDIA M.D., LIBERTINI I., A novel tool for thermoeconomic analysis and optimization of trigeneration systems: a case study for a hospital building in Italy, Energy, 2017, 126, 298–306.