Corporate social responsibility concept

• Autorzy: Chwistecka-Dudek Halina , Korenkiewicz Aleksandra

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2021.151.7

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to present selected theoretical aspects of the concept of corporate social responsibility and the stakeholder theory that is closely related to it, targeted at liability with respect to specific stakeholder groups. Design/methodology/approach: The literature research and the critical analysis of both, the national and foreign subject literature have been used as the research methodology. Findings: Social responsibility is a concept in compliance with which companies, whilst designing their development strategy, take social groups, i.e. interests of selected groups of stakeholders, into account in their activities. This requires identification of diverse stakeholder groups, determination of the degree of their significance and proper management of relations with them. Thus, the concept of social responsibility is a process as part of which the companies manage their relations with stakeholders who may influence their economic success. Practical implications: The practical implications concern taking into consideration the application of the CSR principles in managers’ decisions and treating the conception in strategic aspects. Originality/value: The discussed issue belongs to one of the newest trends in management sciences and fits into the current conception of sustainable development. Proper integration of social values with the strategy allows developing and maintaining long-term competitive advantage. Therefore, the CSR conception is a long-term process of managing relations with groups of stakeholders in order to generate value for them and for enterprises’ owners.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

corporate social responsibility; concept; stakeholders; management; relations

PL

społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu; koncepcja; interesariusze; zarządzanie; relacje

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: z. 151
• Strony: 115--126
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 32 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Chwistecka-Dudek Halina

• AWSB University, Dąbrowa Górnicza

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8549-5844

autor

Korenkiewicz Aleksandra

• PhD student at AWSB University

Bibliografia

• 1. Adamczyk, J. (2009). Społeczna odpowiedzialność przedsiębiorstw. Warszawa: PWE.
• 2. Agle, B.R., Mitchell, R.K., Sonnenfeld, J.A. (1999). Who matters to CEO? An Investigation of Stakeholders Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, No. 42.
• 3. Andriof, J., Waddock, S. (2002). Unfolding Stakeholder Engagement. In: J. Andriof, S., Waddock, B., Husted, S.S. Rahma (eds.), Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.
• 4. Banks, M., Vera, D. (2007). Towards a Typology of Stakeholder Management Strategies. Philadelphia: Academy of Management Conference.
• 5. Bhattacharya, C.B., Sen, S., Korschun, D. (2011). Leveraging Corporate Responsibility. The Stakeholder Route to Maximazing Business and Social Value. Cambrigde: Cambrigde University Press.
• 6. Bukowska, U. (2008). Proces zarządzania interesariuszami. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego, nr 784. Kraków.
• 7. Carroll, A.B. (1999). Corporate Social responsibility. Evolution of a Definition Business & Society, 38, September.
• 8. Carroll, A.B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons.
• 9. Clark, S. (1999). Considering your stakeholders: Don't forget, you are not alone. Houston Business Journal, vol. 30.
• 10. Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How Corporate Social Resposibility is Defined: an Analysis of 37 Definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, No. 15.
• 11. Evan, W., Freeman, R.E. (1993). A stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation; Kantain Capitalism. In: G.D. Chryssides, J.H. Kaler (eds.), An Introduction to Business Ethics. London: Chapman and Hall.
• 12. Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. New York Times Magazine, September.
• 13. Freeman, E. (2010). Strategic Management. A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge University Press.
• 14. Freeman, R.E., Hasnaoui, A. (2011). The Meaning of Corporatesocial Responsibility: The vision of four nations. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 100.
• 15. Freeman, R.E. et al. (2010). Sakeholder Theory. The State of the Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• 16. Garriga, E., Mele, D. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics.
• 17. Harrison, St. John, C.H. (1994). Strategic Management of Organizations and Stakeholders: Theory and Cases. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.
• 18. Hąbek, P., Szewczyk, P. (2010). Społeczna odpowiedzialność a zarządzanie jakością. Gliwice: Wyd. Politechniki Śląskiej.
• 19. Jurek, M., Kornacka, D. (2000). Aktualność teorii społecznej odpowiedzialności przedsiębiorstwa. Przegląd Organizacji, 5.
• 20. Lavrence, A.T., Weber, J. (2008). Business &Society. Stakeholders, Ethics, Public Policy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• 21. Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion. Journal of Business Ethics.
• 22. Marrewijk, M., Werre, M. (2003). Multiple Levels of Corporate Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics No. 44.
• 23. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate Social Responsiblility: a Theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, vol. 26.
• 24. Obłój, K. (2007). Strategia organizacji w poszukiwaniu trwałej przewagi konkurencyjnej. Warszawa: PWE.
• 25. Pfeffer, J., Salancik, G.R. (2003). The External Control of Organizations - A Resource Dependence Perspective. Stanford University Press.
• 26. Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R. (2003). The Competitie Advantage of Corporate Philantropy. Business Harvard Review on Corporate Responsibility. Harvard Business school Press.
• 27. Rainey, H. (1997). Understanding and Managing Public Organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• 28. Rok, B. (2001). Więcej niż zysk, czyli odpowiedzialny biznes. Programy, strategie, standardy. Warszawa: Forum Odpowiedzialnego Biznesu.
• 29. Savage, G.T., Nix, T.W., Whitehead, C.J., Blair, J.D. (1991). Strategies for Assessing and Managing Organizational Stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 5, No. 2.
• 30. Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C.B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 38.
• 31. Sokołowska, A. (2013). Społeczna odpowiedzialność małego przedsiębiorstwa. Identyfikacja - ocena - kierunki doskonalenia. Wrocław: Wyd. UE.
• 32. Xueming, L., Bhattacharya, C.B. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer