PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Evidence of heterogeneous and unstable anisotropic settings beneath the Northeast Indian lithosphere from characterization of null splitting measurements

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Characterization of null splitting measurements obtained from nine broadband stations from the northeast Indian region using core-refracted seismic phases suggests a better understanding of the geometry and strength of anisotropy of the medium and solves the critical aspects of these null splitting effects in this highly anisotropic area. The null splitting results establish a certain connection with their azimuthal origins and emphasize upon the large and complex tectonic forces as major sources to control the deformation patterns and null effects of this region. Though in majority of the studies, the null measurements are not emphasized or neglected for discussion, their proper distribution and interpretation suggests a better understanding of the geometry, strength and distribution of the heterogeneity. The present study emphasizes only on the null characteristics of the northeast Indian region and solves their dependency on the back azimuthal distribution of events, source polarization and fast/slow axis of rotation, to decipher a particular function with each other. This study allows recognizing and characterizing the nulls according to their origin and focuses on their relations with the reliable splitting measurements from the same region of study. This helps in obtaining a better understanding of the occurrence of null splitting and clear geometry of heterogeneity for this region. Apart from the azimuthal distribution, the presence of complex geological features, collision tectonics, lithospheric strains, absolute plate motion related asthenosphere drag and fossil vertical lineation of olivine, play major roles in creation of unstable layers of settings beneath the northeast Indian region leading to null measurements.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Strony
2035--2050
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 54 poz.
Twórcy
  • Geosciences and Technology Division, CSIR - North East Institute of Science and Technology, Jorhat, Assam, India
  • Academy of Scientifc and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, India
  • Geosciences and Technology Division, CSIR - North East Institute of Science and Technology, Jorhat, Assam, India
Bibliografia
  • 1. Angelier J, Baruah S (2009) Seismotectonics in Northeast India: a stress analysis of focal mechanism solutions of earthquakes and its kinematic implications. Geophys J Int 178(1):303–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04107.x
  • 2. Barruol G, Silver P, Vauchez A (1997) Seismic anisotropy in the eastern US: deep structure of a complex continental plate. J Geophys Res 102(B4):8329–8348. https://doi.org/10.1029/96JB03800
  • 3. Bilham R, England P (2001) Plateau ‘“pop-up”’ in the great 1897 Assam earthquake. Nature 410(6830):806–809. https://doi.org/10.1038/35071057
  • 4. Biswas S, Grasemann B (2005) Quantitative morphotectonics of the southern Shillong Plateau (Bangladesh/India). Aust J Earth Sci 97:82–93
  • 5. Biswas S, Coutland I, Grujic D, Hager C, Stöckli D, Grasemann B (2007) Exhumation and uplift of the Shillong Plateau and its influence on the eastern Himalayas: new constraints from apatite and zircon (U–Th–[Sm])/He and apatite fission track analyses. Tectonics. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007TC002125
  • 6. Bowman JR, Ando M (1987) Shear-wave splitting in the upper-mantle wedge above the Tonga subduction zone. Geophys J Int 88(1):25–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1987.tb01367.x
  • 7. Clark MK, Bilham R (2008) Miocene rise of the Shillong Plateau and the beginning of the end for the Eastern Himalaya. Earth Planet Sci Lett 269(3–4):337–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EPSL.2008.01.045
  • 8. Currie CA, Cassidy JF, Hyndman RD, Bostock MG (2004) Shear wave anisotropy beneath the Cascadia subduction zone and western North American craton. Geophys J Int 157(1):341–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02175.x
  • 9. DeMets C, Gordon RG, Argus DF, Stein S (1994) Effect of recent revisions to the geomagnatic reversal timescale on estimates of current plate motions. Geophys Res Lett 21(20):2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL02118
  • 10. Evans P (1964) The tectonic framework of Assam. J Geol Soc India 5:80–96
  • 11. Fouch MJ, Fischer KM, Parmentier EM, Wysession ME, Clarke TJ (2000) Shear wave splitting, continental keels, and patterns of mantle flow. J Geophys Res 105(B3):6255–6275. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JB900372
  • 12. Fukao Y (1984) Evidence from core-reflected shear waves for anisotropy in the earth’s mantle. Nature 309(5970):695–698. https://doi.org/10.1038/309695a0
  • 13. Hazarika D, Yadav DK, Sriram V, Rai A (2013) Upper mantle anisotropy beneath northeast India-Asia collision zone from shear-wave splitting analysis. Int J Earth Sci 102:2061–2076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-013-0922-4
  • 14. Holt WE, Ni JF, Wallace TC, Haines AJ (1991) The active tectonics of the eastern Himalayan syntaxis and surrounding regions. J Geophys Res 96(B9):14595–14632. https://doi.org/10.1029/91JB01021
  • 15. Johnson SY, Alam AMN (1991) Sedimentation and tectonics of the Sylhet trough, Bangladesh. Geol Soc Am Bull 103(11):1513–1527. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1991)103%3c1513:SATOTS%3e2.3.CO;2
  • 16. Karato SI, Wu P (1993) Rheology of the upper mantle: a synthesis. Science 260(5109):771–778. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.260.5109.771
  • 17. Kaviris G, Fountoulakis I, Spingos I, Millas C, Papadimitriou P (2018b) Mantle dynamics beneath Greece from SKS and PKS seismic anisotropy study. Acta Geophys 66(6):1341–1357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-018-0225-z
  • 18. Kaviris G, Millas C, Spingos I, Kapetanidis V, Fountoulakis I, Papadimitriou P, Voulgaris N, Makropoulos K (2018) Observations of shear-wave splitting parameters in the Western Gulf of focusing on the 2014 Mw = 5.0 earthquake. Phys Earth Planet Inter 282:60–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2018.07.005
  • 19. Kaviris G, Spingos I, Kapetanidis V, Papadimitriou P, Voulgaris N, Makropoulos K (2017) Upper crust seismic anisotropy study and temporal variations of shear-wave splitting parameters in the western Gulf of Corinth (Greece) during 2013. Phys Earth Planet Int 269:148–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2017.06.006
  • 20. Kayal JR (1987) Microseismicity and source mechanism study: Shillong plateau and northeast India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 77(1):184–194
  • 21. Kayal JR, De R (1991) Microseismicity and tectonics in northeast India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 81(1):131–138
  • 22. Khattri K, Wyss M, Gaur VK, Saha SN, Bansal VK (1983) Local seismic activity in the region of the Assam Gap, Northeast India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73(2):4
  • 23. Long MD, Becker TW (2010) Mantle dynamics and seismic anisotropy. Earth Planet Sci Lett 297(3–4):341–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2010.06.036
  • 24. Long MD, Silver PG (2009) Shear wave splitting and mantle anisotropy: measurements, interpretations, and new directions. Surv Geophys 30(4–5):407–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-009-9075-1
  • 25. Mahanta R, Sarma D, Choudhury A (2013) Heavy rainfall occurrences in Northeast India. Int J Climatol 33(6):1456–1469. https://doi.org/10.1002/JOC.3526
  • 26. Mohanty D, Mondal P (2020) Disparate behaviour of deformation patterns beneath northeast Indian lithosphere inferred from shear wave splitting analysis. Phys Earth Planet Inter 298:106315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2019.106315
  • 27. Mohanty DD, Singh A, O’Driscoll LJ, Kumar MR, Srinagesh D, Humphreys ED (2016) P wave velocity structure below India and Tibet incorporating anisotropic delay time effects. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 17(3):725–738. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GC006064
  • 28. Molnar P, Tapponnier P (1975) Cenozoic tectonics of Asia: effects of a continental collision. Science 189(4201):419–426. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.189.4201.419
  • 29. Mondal P, Mohanty DD (2021) Mantle deformation and seismic anisotropy beneath Northeast India inferred from SKKS birefringence. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 65:36–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-020-1121-y
  • 30. Murthy MVN, Talukdar SC, Bhattacharya AC (1969) The Dauki fault of Assam. Bull Oil Nat Gas Comm 6:57–64
  • 31. Olympa B, Kumar A (2015) A review on the tectonic setting and seismic activity of the Shillong plateau in the light of past studies. Disaster Adv 8(7):34–45
  • 32. Rajendran C, Rajendran K, Duarah B, Baruah S, Earest A (2004) Interpreting the style of faulting and paleoseismicity associated with the 1897 Shillong, northeast India, earthquake: implications for regional tectonism. Tectonics. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003TC001605
  • 33. Rao NP, Kumar MR (1997) Uplift and tectonics of the Shillong Plateau, north-eastern India. J Phys Earth 45(3):167–176. https://doi.org/10.4294/jpe1952.45.167
  • 34. Raoof J, Mukhopadhyay S, Koulakov I, Kayal JR (2017) 3-D seismic tomography of the lithosphere and its geodynamic implications beneath the northeast India region. Tectonics 36:962–980. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016TC004375
  • 35. Roy SK, Kumar MR, Srinagesh D (2014) Upper and lower mantle anisotropy inferred from comprehensive SKS and SKKS splitting measurements from India. Earth Planet Sci Lett 392:192–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.02.012
  • 36. Saikia D, Kumar MR, Singh A, Roy SK, Raju PS, Lyngodoh AC (2018) Mantle deformation in the Eastern Himalaya, Burmese Arc and adjoining regions. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 19(11):4420–4432. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GC007691
  • 37. Saltzer R, Gaherty J, Jordan T (2000) How are vertical shear wave splitting measurements affected by variations in the orientation azimuthal anisotropy with depth? Geophys J Int 141(2):374–390. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.2000.00088.x
  • 38. Sandvol E, Ni J, Kind R, Zhao W (1997) Seismic anisotropy beneath the southern Himalayas-Tibet collision zone. J Geophys Res 102(B8):17813–17823. https://doi.org/10.1029/97JB01424
  • 39. Savage MK (1999) Seismic anisotropy and mantle deformation: What have we learned from shear wave splitting? Rev Geophys 37(1):65–106. https://doi.org/10.1029/98RG02075
  • 40. Savage MK, Wessel A, Teanby NA, Hurst AW (2010) Automatic measurement of shear wave splitting and applications to time varying anisotropy at Mount Ruapehu volcano, New Zealand. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 115:B12321. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JB007722
  • 41. Silver PG (1996) Seismic anisotropy beneath the continents- probing the depths of geology. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 24:385–432. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.24.1.385
  • 42. Silver PG, Chan WW (1988) Implications for continental structure and evolution from seismic anisotropy. Nature 335:34–39. https://doi.org/10.1038/335034a0DO
  • 43. Silver PG, Chan WW (1991) Shear wave splitting and subcontinental mantle deformation. J Geophys Res 96(B10):16429–16454. https://doi.org/10.1029/91JB00899
  • 44. Singh A, Kumar MR, Raju PS, Ramesh DS (2006) Shear wave anisotropy of the Northeast Indian lithosphere. Geophys Res Lett 33:L16302. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026106
  • 45. Singh A, Kumar MR, Raju PS (2007) Mantle deformation in Sikkim and adjoining Himalaya: evidence for a complex flow pattern. Phys Earth Planet Inter 164(3–4):232–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2007.07.003
  • 46. Singh A, Eken T, Mohanty DD, Saikia D, Singh C, Kumar MR (2016) Significant seismic anisotropy beneath southern Tibet inferrd from splitting of direct S-waves. Phys Earth Planet Inter 250:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2015.11.001
  • 47. Singh A, Kumar MR, Mohanty DD, Singh C, Biswas R, Srinagesh D (2017) Crustal structure beneath India and Tibet: new constraints from inversion of receiver functions. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 122(10):7839–7859. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB013946
  • 48. Singh C, Mondal P, Singh S, Mohanty DD, Jaiswal N, Kumar MR (2015) Lg attenuation tomographic models of Himalaya and southern Tibet. Tectonophysics 664:176–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2015.09.009
  • 49. Srinivasan V (2003) Deciphering differential uplift in Shillong Plateau using remote sensing. J Geol Soc India 62(6):773–777
  • 50. Vinnik LP, Farra V, Romanowicz B (1989) Azimuthal anisotropy in the earth from observations of SKS at GEOSCOPE and NARS broadband stations. Bull Seismol Soc Am 79(5):1542–1558
  • 51. Vinnik LP, Makeyeva LI, Milev A, Usenko AY (1992) Global patterns of azimuthal anisotropy and deformations in the continental mantle. Geophys J Int 111(3):433–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1992.tb02102.x
  • 52. Wessel P, Smith WHF (1998) New, improved version of generic mapping tools released. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 79(47):579–579. https://doi.org/10.1029/98EO00426
  • 53. Wüstefeld A, Bokelmann G (2007) Null detection in shear-wave splitting measurements. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97(4):1204–1211. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060190
  • 54. Wüstefeld A, Bokelmann G, Zaroli C, Barruol G (2008) SplitLab: a shear-wave splitting environment in Matlab. Computer and Geosciences 34(5):515–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.08.002
Uwagi
Korekta artykułu w Acta Geophysica Vol. 70, no. 1/ 2022. Nr DOI korekty: 10.1007/s11600-022-00732-8
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-d8b34c00-aaaf-4176-9742-503644273f1a
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.