Creativity and effectiveness in organizations. A new approach to an old question

Bratnicka, K.

doi:10.1515/manment-2015-0003

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Creativity and effectiveness in organizations. A new approach to an old question

Autorzy

Bratnicka K.

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

https://www.management-poland.com/

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/manment-2015-0003

Warianty tytułu

Twórczość i efektywność w organizacjach. Nowe podejście do starego pytania

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Juxtaposing the important insights of previous multilevel research, the following overarching question emerges as the central concern of this article: How do emergent processes and top- management initiatives affect the impact of organizational creativity on organizational effectiveness? To shed light on this question, I direct attention to bottom- up emergent processes and top down management initiatives, which, I argue, offers important opportunities for the genesis of additional creativity effects. In all, the purpose of this article has been to address to recent theories and debates about the nature of organizational creativity and to highlight the crude beginnings of an alternative, multilevel approach. I explore how the dimensions of organizational creativity generated through emergent processes and top management initiatives plays a significant role in the leveraging organizational effectiveness.

Celem niniejszego artykułu jest znalezienie odpowiedzi na pytanie jak emergentne procesy i inicjatywy kadry zarządzającej wpływają na oddziaływanie twórczości organizacyjnej na efektywność organizacyjną? Wykorzystując dotychczasowy dorobek badań wielopoziomowych, skoncentrowano uwagę na oddolnych procesach emergencji i odgórnych inicjatywach menedżerskich, które oferują dodatkowe możliwości wzrostu efektów twórczości organizacyjnej. Ogólniej biorąc, odwołano się do współczesnych teorii i dyskusji odnoszących się do natury twórczości organizacyjnej i zarysowano wstępnie nowe podejście teoretyczne. W szczególności wyjaśniono, rolę procesów emergencji i inicjatyw kadry zarządzającej w podwyższaniu efektywności organizacyjnej zarówno w wymiarze twórczej nowości, jak i twórczej użyteczności.

Słowa kluczowe

organizational creativity multilevel approach emergent processes creative resourcing managers

twórczość organizacyjna efektywność organizacyjna procesy emergencji kształtowanie zasobów kadra zarządzająca

Wydawca

University of Zielona Góra, Faculty of Economics and Management

Czasopismo

Management

Rocznik

2015

Tom

Vol. 19, no. 1

Strony

33--45

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 30 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Bratnicka K.

University of Economies in Katowice, Department of Entrepreneurship and Innovative Management

Bibliografia

1. Allport F. (1954), The structuring of events: Outline of a general theory with applications to psychology, “Psychology Review”, 61: 281-303.
2. Amabile T.M. (1996), Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity, Westwiev, Boulder.
3. Cao Q., Gedajlovic E., & Zhan H. (2009), Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects, “Organization Science”, 20: 781-796.
4. Choi J.N. (2004), Person-environment fit and creative behavior. Different impacts of supplies-values and demand-abilities version of fi t, “Human Relations”, 57: 531-552.
5. Dutton J. E., Worline M. C., Frost P. J., & Lilius J. (2006), Explaining compassion organizing, “Administrative Science Quarterly”, 51: 59–96.
6. Felin T. (2012), Cosmologies of capability, markets, and wisdom of crowds: Introduction and comparative agenda, “Managerial and Decision Economics”, 33: 283- 294.
7. George J.M. (2007), Creativity in organizations, “The Academy of Management Annals”, 3:439-477.
8. Glynn M .A., & Wrobel K. (2006), My family, my firm: How family relationships function as endogenous organizational resources, in J. Dutton & B. Ragins (Eds.), Exploring positive relationships at work: Building a theoretical and research agenda: 307– 324. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
9. Hargadon A.B., & Bechky B.A. (2006), When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A fi eld study of problem solving at work, “Organization Science”, 17: 484-500.
10. Hitt M.A., Beamish P.W., Jackson S.E. & Mathieu J.E. (2007), Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management, “Academy of Management Journal”, 50: 1385 – 1399.
11. Hodgson G.M. (2012), Meanings of methodological individualism, “Journal of Economic Methodology”, 14: 211-26.
12. Humphreys P. (1997), How properties emerge, “Philosophy of Science”, 64: 53–70.
13. Katz D. & Kahn R.L. (1966), The social psychology of organizations, Wiley, New York.
14. Kaufman J.C., & Beghetto R.A. (2009), Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity, “Review of General Psychology”, 13: 1-12.
15. Kazanjian R.K., & Drazin R. (2012), Organizational learning, knowledge management and creativity, in M.D. Mumford (Ed.) Handbook of Organizational Creativity, 547-568. Academic Press/Elsevier, London/Waltham/San Diego.
16. Kozlowski S.W.J., & Klein K.J. (2000), A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes, in K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions: 3-90). Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
17. Kozlowski S.W.J., Chao G.T., Grand J.A., Braun M.T., & Kuljanin G. (2013), Advancing multilevel research design: Capturing the dynamics of emergence, “Organizational Research Methods”, 16: 581-615.
18. Locke K.D., Golden-Biddle K., & Feldman M.S. (2008), Making doubt generative: Rethinking the role of doubt in the research process, “Organization Science”, 19: 907–918.
19. Liu X., Bai Y., & Zhang R. (2011), Development and validation of the organizational creativity inventory in a Chinese context. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, San Antonio.
20. Montuori A. (2011), Systems approach, in M. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), The encyclopedia of creativity: 414-421. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
21. Mumford M.D., & Gustafson S.B. (1988), Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation, “Psychological Bulletin”, 103: 27-43.
22. Nag R., & Gioia D.A. (2012), From common to uncommon knowledge: Foundations of firm-specificuse of knowledge as a resource, “Academy of Management Journal”, 55: 421–457.
23. Quinn R.W., & Worline M.C. (2008), Enabling courageous collective action: Conversations from United Airlines flight 93, “Organization Science”, 19: 497– 516.
24. Sonnenshein S. (2014), How organizations foster the creative use of resources, “Academy of Management Journal”, 57: 814–848.
25. Sue-Chan C., & Hempel P.S. (2010), Disentangling the novel from the useful. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Montreal.
26. Sulivan D.M., & Ford C.M. (2010), The alignment of measures and constructs in organizational research: The case of testing measurement models of creativity, “Journal of Business and Psychology”, 25: 505-521.
27. Taggar S. (2002), Individual creativity and group ability to utilize creative resources: A multilevel model, “Academy of Management Journal”, 45: 315-330.
28. Unsworth K. (2001), Unpacking creativity, “Academy of Management Review”, 26: 289–297.
29. Wellman B. (1983), Network analysis: Some basic principles, “Sociological Theory”, Vol. 1 (1983), 155-200
30. Woodman R.W., Sawyer J.E., & Griffin R.W. (1993), Toward a theory of organizational creativity, “Academy of Management Review”, 18: 293-321.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-d7caae14-610b-4612-9265-5f86e8d45396