Comparative analysis of the empirical seismic vulnerability of typical structures in multiple intensity zones

• Autorzy: Li S. Q. , Yu T. L. , Chen Y. S.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/ace-2019-0042

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

To study the difference in seismic vulnerability of multiple typical structures in multiple intensity zones, the seismic damage of 7099 buildings of Dujiangyan masonry structure (MS), reinforced concrete structure (RC) and bottom frame seismic wall masonry (BFM) in the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China is summarized and analysed. First, a statistical analysis of the data is carried out, the empirical seismic vulnerability matrix and model curves are established by considering the number of storeys, the age and the fortification factors.The vulnerability curves of the cumulative exceeding probability of the empirical seismic damage and the grade of the seismic damage in multiple intensity zones are shown. The mean damage index vulnerability matrix model is proposed and verified using the empirical seismic damage matrix of typical structures.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

seismicity; vulnerability comparison; vulnerability analysis; empirical data; seismic database; MDI; typical structure

PL

sejsmiczność; porównanie podatności; analiza podatności; dane empiryczne; baza danych sejsmicznych; MDI; struktura typowa

• Wydawca: Komitet Inżynierii Lądowej i Wodnej PAN ; Politechnika Warszawska, Wydział Inżynierii Lądowej
• Czasopismo: Archives of Civil Engineering
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 65, nr 3
• Strony: 167--183
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 22 poz., il., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Li S. Q.

• Northeast Forestry University, School of Civil Engineering, Harbin, China

autor

Yu T. L.

• Northeast Forestry University, School of Civil Engineering, Harbin, China

autor

Chen Y. S.

• Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, China

Bibliografia

• 1. Civil and Structural Groups of Tsing Hua University, XI Nan jiao tong University and Bei Jing Jiao tong University, “Analysis on seismic damage of buildings in the Wen chuan earthquake”, Journal of building structures 29(4): 1-9, 2008.
• 2. H.N. Li, S.Y. Xiao, L.S. Huo, “Damage investigation and analysis of engineering structures in the Wen chuan earthquake”, Journal of Building Structure 29(4): 10-19, 2008.
• 3. B.T. Sun, G.X. Zhang, “Statistical analysis of the seismic vulnerability of various types of structures in Wen chuan M8.0 earthquake”, China Civil Engineering Journal 45(5): 26-30, 2012.
• 4. J.J. Sun, Y.H. Tang, Z.X. Sun, C. Zheng, H.B. Shi, L. Lin, “Damage to urban buildings in zones with intensity VIII or VII during Wen chuan earthquake and discussion on some typical damage”, Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 29(6): 65-73, 2009.
• 5. L.S. Huo, H.N. Li, S.Y. Xiao, D.S. Wang, “Earthquake damage investigation and analysis of reinforced concrete frame structures in Wenchuan earthquake”, Journal of Dalian University of Technology 49(5): 718-723, 2009.
• 6. H.Y. Gao, D.M. Bie, J.J. Ma, Q.G. Qu, “A research on vulnerability for brick-residence buildings in Wen chuan earthquake areas”, World Earthquake Engineering 26(4): 73-77, 2010.
• 7. L. Su, H.J. He, “Seismic vulnerability assessment for RC frame structure based on SVM”, J. Huazhong Univ. of Sci and Tech (Natural Science Edition) 46(5): 115-120, 2018.
• 8. C. Xu, Z.P. Wen, “Seismic vulnerability analysis of Reinforced Concrete frame structures based on ground motion parameters”, China Earthquake Engineering Journal 38(2): 201-211, 2016.
• 9. B.T. Sun, G.X. Zhang, “Statistical analysis of seismic vulnerability for various types of building structures in Wenchuan earthquake”, Key Engineering Materials. 452-453: 461-464, 2011.
• 10. S.L. Lin, S.R. Uma, A. King, “Empirical Fragility Curves for Non-Residential Buildings from the 2010-2011 Canterbury Earthquake Sequence”, Journal of Earthquake Engineering 22(5): 749-777, 2018.
• 11. J. Schwarz, L. Abrahamczyk, M. Leipold, T. Wenk, “Vulnerability assessment and damage description for R.C. frame structures following the EMS-98 principles”, Bulletin Earthquake Engineering 13(4): 1141-1159, 2015.
• 12. A. Rosti, M. Rota, A. Penna, “Damage classification and derivation of damage probability matrices from L’Aquila (2009) post-earthquake survey data”, Bulletin Earthquake Engineering 16(9): 3687-3720, 2018.
• 13. E. Dumova-jovanoska, “Fragility curves for reinforced concrete structures in Skopje (Macedonia) region”, Soil Dynamic and Earthquake Engineering 19(6): 455-466, 2000.
• 14. A.K. Eleftheriadou, A I. Karabinis, “Evaluation of damage probability matrices from observational seismic damage data. Earthquakes and Structures”, 4(3): 299-324, 2013.
• 15. D. Gautam, G. Fabbrocino, F.S. De magistris, “Derive empirical fragility functions for Nepali residential buildings. Engineering Structures”, 171, 617-628, 2018.
• 16. M. Naguit, P. Cummins, M. Edwards, H. Ghasemi, B. Bautista, H. Ryu, M. Haynes, “From Source to Building Fragility: Post-Event Assessment of the 2013 M7.1 Bohol, Philippines, Earthquake”, Earthquake Spectra 33(3): 999-1027, 2017.
• 17. Q. Xu, S.S. Zheng, Y.Z. Han, “Steel frame seismic vulnerability based on a global structural damage index”, Journal of Vibration and Shock 33(11): 78-106, 2014.
• 18. X.H. Yu, ”Probabilistic seismic fragility and risk analysis of reinforced concrete frame structures”, Doctor thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 2012.
• 19. K. Faraji, M. Miri, “Correlation Between Damage Indexes in Knee Bracing Frames Subjected to Earthquakes” Advanced Materials Research 255-260, 2350-2354, 2011.
• 20. V.M. Zobin, F. Ventura-ramírez, C.L. Gutiérrez-andrade, L.H. Cruz, S. Santibáñez-ibáñez, “The Mw 7.4 Colima, Mexico, Earthquake of 21 January 2003: The Observed Damage Matrix in Colima City and its Comparison with the Damage Probability Matrix”, Natural Hazards 38: 391-410, 2006.
• 21. T.M. Ferreira, R. Vicente, J.A.R. Mendesdasilva, H.V. Aníbalcosta, “Seismic vulnerability assessment of historical urban centres: case study of the old city centre in Seixal, Portugal”, Bulletin Earthquake Engineering 11(5): 1753-1773, 2013.
• 22. GB/T 17742. The Chinese seismic intensity scale (in Chinese), 2008.