The Role of the European Maritime Simulator Network in Assessing Dynamic Sea Traffic Management Principles

• Autorzy: Rizvanolli A. , Burmeister H.C. , John O.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12716/1001.09.04.13

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The MONALISA 2.0 (ML 2.0) project aims to define the Sea Traffic Management concept (STM), where information is shared amongst all stakeholders in the maritime transport chain, including nautical officers, ports, administrations, etc. Thus, a communication and information centered approach for data exchange by System Wide Information Management principles changing from surface-based- to voyage-based-operations has been proposed. Amongst others, testing and verifying the feasibility and benefits of STM and its solutions shall be done in the European Maritime Simulator Network (EMSN), a macro simulation environment for ship handling simulators. This is an open IEEE 1278 standard network protocol enabling interactive communication between distributed simulation environments. Based on an introduction into ML 2.0, the proposed STM concept is introduced, its expected impacts are listed and Key Performance Objectives are derived. The backgrounds on the EMSN are given and it is shown how it can assist in assessing the impact of STM’s Key Performance Indicators.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Maritime Simulator; Sea Traffic; Sea Traffic Management (STM); Simulators Network; Ship Handling; Manoeuvring; European Maritime Simulator Network (EMSN)

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 9, no. 4
• Strony: 559--564
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 24 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Rizvanolli A.

• Fraunhofer Center for Maritime Logistics and Services, Hamburg, Germany

autor

Burmeister H.C.

• Fraunhofer Center for Maritime Logistics and Services, Hamburg, Germany

autor

John O.

• Fraunhofer Center for Maritime Logistics and Services, Hamburg, Germany

Bibliografia

• 1 Burmeister, H.C.; Bruhn, W.C.; Rødseth, T.E.; Porathe, T.(2014): Autonomous Unmanned Merchant Vessel and its Contribution towards the e‐Navigation Implementation: The MUNIN Perspective. In International Journal of e‐Navigation and Maritime Economy Volume 1: 01‐13.
• 2 Burmeister, H.C; Rødseth, Ø.J. (2015): Risk assessment for an unmanned merchant ship
• 3 Correa, S. V.; Martínez de Osés F. X.; la Castells M.; Svedberg, U. (2014): MONALISA 2.0 and The Sea Traffic Management ‐ a concept creating the need for new maritime information standards and software solutions
• 4 Falnes,S.T. (unpubl.):Concept Description‐Strategic Voyage Management (working document in the MONALISA 2.0 project)
• 5 Flow Management TaskForce (unpubl.): Flow Management Concept Description (working document in the MONALISA 2.0 project)
• 6 Fujii, Yahei (1983): Integrated Study on Marine Traffic Accidents. In: IABSE Reports 42, S. 91–98. Online verfügbar unter http://dx.doi.org/10.5169/seals‐32407, zuletzt ge‐prüft am 11.10.2012.
• 7 IALA 2009: IALA Recommendation O‐134 on the IALA Risk Management Tool for Ports and Restricted Waterways. In‐ternational Association of Marine Aids to Navigation and Lighthouse Authorities.
• 8 IEEE 1278: Standard for Distributed Interactive Simulation (DIS)
• 9 IMO 2007: Formal Safety Assessment. Consolidated text of the Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rule‐making process (MSC/Circ.1023−MEPC/Circ.392). International Maritime Organization.
• 10 In De Waard, D., Brookhuis, K., Wiczorek, R., Di Nocera, F., Barham, P., Weikert, C., Kluge, A., Gerbino, W., and Toffetti, A., (Eds.) (2014): Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Europe Chapter 2013 mAnnual Conference.
• 11 Jahn, C., Burmeister, H.‐C. and John, O. (2012): Potential of on board information systems for ashore ship management and logistics processes. ISIS 2012.
• 12 John, O., Burmeister, H.C., Brödje, A., Bornhorst, C., Grube,C. (2014): Assessing the MONALISA 2.0 Concept: Establishment of the European Maritime Simulation Network. ISIS 2014
• 13 Kula, T. (2015):Konzeption operationeller Daten fuer eine effiziente Kommunikation im Sea Traffic Management (Bachelorarbeit an der Jade Hochschule Elsfleth und Fraunhofer CML)
• 14 Pedersen, P.T. (2010): Review and application of ship collision and grounding analysis procedures. Marine Structures 23: 241–262.
• 15 Pedersen, P. T. (1995): Probability of Grounding and Collision Events. In: Technical University of Denmark (Hg.): Accidental Loadings on Marine Structures: Risk and Response. 22nd WEGEMT Graduate School. London
• 16 Porathe, T., De Vries, L. and Prison, J. (2014): Ship voyage plan coordination in the MONALISA project: user tests of a prototype ship traffic management system.
• 17 Port CDM Task Force, (unpubl.): Concept Description‐Port CDM (working document in the MONALISA 2.0 project)
• 18 Rothblum, A.M. (n.d.): Human Error and Marine Safety. USCG.http://www.bowles‐langley.com/wpcontent/files_mf/humanerrorandmarinesafety26.pdf .[Accessed 28.02.2013].
• 19 Sanquist, T. F. (1992): Human Factors in Maritime Applications: A New Opportunity for Multi‐Modal Transportation Research.In Proceedings of the Human Factors 36th Annual Meeting‐1992:1123‐1127. Sage Publications
• 20 Sea SWIM Task Force (unpubl.): Sea System Wide Information System Concept Description (working document in the MONALISA 2.0 project)
• 21 SESAR (2001): SWIM Concept of Operations
• 22 STM Performance Targets‐TaskForce (unpubl.): STM Performance Targets (working document in the MONALISA 2.0 project)
• 23 Svedberg, U. (unpubl.): Dynamic Voyage Management Concept Description (working document in the MONALISA 2.0 project)
• 24 Weber Reto (unpubl.): Chalmers MONALISA2.0: Base Line Exercise