Voice Traces of Anxiety : Acoustic Parameters Affected by Anxiety Disorder

• Autorzy: Özseven T. , Düğenci M. , Doruk A. , Kahraman H. İ.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/aoa.2018.125156

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Although the emotions and learning based on emotional reaction are individual-specific, the main features are consistent among all people. Depending on the emotional states of the persons, various physical and physiological changes can be observed in pulse and breathing, blood flow velocity, hormonal balance, sound properties, face expression and hand movements. The diversity, size and grade of these changes are shaped by different emotional states. Acoustic analysis, which is an objective evaluation method, is used to determine the emotional state of people’s voice characteristics. In this study, the reflection of anxiety disorder in people’s voices was investigated through acoustic parameters. The study is a case-control study in cross-sectional quality. Voice recordings were obtained from healthy people and patients. With acoustic analysis, 122 acoustic parameters were obtained from these voice recordings. The relation of these parameters to anxious state was investigated statistically. According to the results obtained, 42 acoustic parameters are variable in the anxious state. In the anxious state, the subglottic pressure increases and the vocalization of the vowels decreases. The MFCC parameter, which changes in the anxious state, indicates that people can perceive this situation while listening to the speech. It has also been shown that text reading is also effective in triggering the emotions. These findings show that there is a change in the voice in the anxious state and that the acoustic parameters are influenced by the anxious state. For this reason, acoustic analysis can be used as an expert decision support system for the diagnosis of anxiety.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

anxiety; acoustic analysis; signal processing; speech processing

• Wydawca: Instytut Podstawowych Problemów Techniki PAN ; Komitet Akustyki PAN ; Polskie Towarzystwo Akustyczne
• Czasopismo: Archives of Acoustics
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: Vol. 43, No. 4
• Strony: 625--636
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 32 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Özseven T.

• Department of Computer Engineering, Gaziosmanpaşa University, Tokat, Turkey

autor

Düğenci M.

• Departmant of Industrial Engineering, Karabük University, Karabük, Turkey

autor

Doruk A.

• Psychiatry, Health Science University, Ankara, Turkey

autor

Kahraman H. İ.

• Psychiatry, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

Bibliografia

• 1. Banse R., Scherer K. R. (1996), Acoustic profiles in vocal emotion expression, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 3, 614.
• 2. Beck A. T., Steer R. A. (1993), Beck anxiety inventory manual. San Antonio, TX: The psychological corporation, Harcourt Brace & Company.
• 3. Beck A. T., Epstein N., Brown G., Steer R. A. (1988), An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 6, 893.
• 4. Diamond G. M., Rochman D., Amir O. (2010), Arousing primary vulnerable emotions in the context of unresolved anger: “Speaking about” versus “speaking to”, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 4, 402.
• 5. Drioli C., Tisato G., Cosi P., Tesser F. (2003), Emotions and voice quality: experiments with sinusoidal modeling, [in:] ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Voice Quality: Functions, Analysis and Synthesis, retrieved from http://www.iscaspeech.org/archive_open/voqual03/voq3_127.html.
• 6. Ersöz F. (2014), Statistical Data Analysis with IBM SPSS [in Turkish: IBM SPSS ile İstatistiksel Veri Analizi], Ankara: Sage Yayıncılık.
• 7. Escalona Mena M. (2012), Emotion recognition from speech signals (Master thesis), Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, retrieved from http://upcommons.upc.edu/handle/2099.1/15362.
• 8. Fuller B. F., Horii Y., Conner D. A. (1992), Validity and reliability of nonverbal voice measures as indicators of stressor-provoked anxiety, Research in Nursing & Health, 15, 5, 379-389.
• 9. Gerçeker M., Yorulmaz İ., Ural A. (2000), Voice and speech [in Turkish: Ses ve konuşma, K. B. B. ve Baş Boyun Cerrahisi Dergisi], Journal of Ear Nose Throat and Head Neck Surgery, 8, 1, 71-78.
• 10. Goberman A. M., Hughes S., Haydock T. (2011), Acoustic characteristics of public speaking: anxiety and practice effects, Speech Communication, 53, 6, 867-876.
• 11. Hagenaars M. A., van Minnen A. (2005), The effect of fear on paralinguistic aspects of speech in patients with panic disorder with agoraphobia, Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 19, 5, 521-537.
• 12. Hamilton M. A. X. (1959), The assessment of anxiety states by rating, British Journal of Medical Psychology, 32, 1, 50-55.
• 13. Home | APA DSM-5. (n.d.), retrieved November 23, 2016, from http://www.dsm5.org/Pages/Default.aspx.
• 14. Karagöz Y. (2010), The power and effectiveness of nonparametric techniques [in Turkish: Nonparametrik tekniklerin güç ve etkinlikleri, Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi], Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 9, 33, 18-40.
• 15. Laukka P. et al. (2008), In a nervous voice: acoustic analysis and perception of anxiety in social phobics’ speech, Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 32, 4, 195-214.
• 16. Murray I. R., Arnott J. L. (1993), Toward the simulation of emotion in synthetic speech: A review of the literature on human vocal emotion, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 2, 1097-1108.
• 17. Okur E. K. M. (2001), Comparison of fundamental frequency and perturbation data analyzed by CSL and Dr. speech systems [in Turkish: CSL ve Dr. Speech ile ölçülen temel frekans ve pertürbasyon değerlerinin karşılaşstırılması, KBB İhtisas Dergisi], KBB Specialization Magazine, 8, 152-157.
• 18. Özseven T., Düğenci M. (2016), The effects of digital filters on acoustic parameters, gender, age, and emotion [in Turkish: Sayısal Filtrelerin Akustik Parametreler, Cinsiyet Yaş Ve Duygu Durumu Üzerindeki Etkileri, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi], Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences.
• 19. Özseven T., Düğenci M., Doruk A. (2016), The effect of age and gender on the acoustic analysis of anxious sound, International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 3, 12, 21-25.
• 20. Paulmann S., Pell M. D., Kotz S. A. (2008), How aging affects the recognition of emotional speech, Brain and Language, 104, 3, 262-269, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.03.002.
• 21. Protopapas A., Lieberman P. (1997), Fundamental frequency of phonation and perceived emotional stress, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 4, 2267-2277.
• 22. Rezaei N., Salehi A. (2006), An Introduction to Speech Sciences (Acoustic Analysis of Speech), Iranian Rehabilitation Journal, 4, 4, 5-14.
• 23. Ruiz R., Absil E., Harmegnies B., Legros C., Poch D. (1996), Time-and spectrum-related variabilities in stressed speech under laboratory and real conditions, Speech Communication, 20, 1, 111-129.
• 24. Sarıca S. (2012), Acoustic parameters that used in voice analysis [in Turkish: Ses Analizinde Kullanılan Akustik Parametreler] (Medical Specialization Thesis), Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, School of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş.
• 25. Sataloff R.T. (2005), Treatment of Voice Disorders, Plural Publishing, San Diego.
• 26. Scherer K. R., Johnstone T., Klasmeyer G. (2003), Vocal expression of emotion, [in:] Handbook of affective sciences, pp. 433-456.
• 27. Sethu V. (2009), Automatic emotion recognition: an investigation of acoustic and prosodic parameters (Doctoral dissertation), The University of New South Wales, retrieved from http://www2.ee.unsw.edu.au/~speechgroup/vidhya/pdf/phd.pdf.
• 28. Smith C. A., Lazarus R. S. (1990), Emotion and adaptation, [In:] Handbook of personality: theory and research, pp. 609-637, Guilford, New York, retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1990-98135-023.
• 29. Ulusoy M., Sahin N. H., Erkmen H. (1998), Turkish version of the Beck Anxiety Inventory: psychometric properties, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 12, 2, 163-172.
• 30. Ververidis D., Kotropoulos C. (2006), Emotional speech recognition: resources, features, and methods, Speech Communication, 48, 9, 1162-1181, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2006.04.003.
• 31. Weeks J. W. et al. (2012), “The sound of fear”: Assessing vocal fundamental frequency as a physiological indicator of social anxiety disorder, Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 26, 8, 811-822.
• 32. Yazıcı M. K., Demir B., Tanriverdi N., Karaağaoğlu E., Yolac P. (1998), Hamilton anxiety rating scale: interrater reliability and validity study, Turk Psikiyatri Derg, 9, 114-117.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).