PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Common situational awareness in the process of building social resilience to a health crisis – the example of the covid-19 pandemic

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The research problem undertaken by the authors focuses on increasing resilience in the event of a threat or crisis, taking into account two pillars of activity: civil planning and public education. The crisis caused by the Covid-19 pandemic has shown that the developed anti-epidemic plans and procedures were not compatible with the development and dynamics of the spread of the SARS-Cov-2 virus. Moreover, actions aimed at building resilience proposed in many European documents concern primarily institutional structures, leaving citizens themselves somewhat on the sidelines. According to the authors, this is clearly an unfavourable approach, because citizens also need to be prepared for crises through educating and increasing their social awareness in the context of potential threats. The article presents selected aspects of survey research conducted in a group of academic youth (n=138). The survey comprised students of subjects related to security in its broadest sense. The designed research tool – A questionnaire for examining students’ opinions on health safety during the pandemic – is intended to identify students’ opinions on selected aspects of institutional activities, as well as personal beliefs, opinions and activities undertaken in the context of the Sars-Cov-2 virus pandemic. The research results presented in the article refer to detailed research questions and answer questions about students’ preferred sources of knowledge about threats, especially health threats. The research revealed a clear lack of trust in the content provided at university and a preference for the Internet as a source of knowledge, which should be considered a disturbing phenomenon, especially among people responsible for ensuring public safety in the future. The authors hope to spark a discussion among experts.
Rocznik
Strony
157--176
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 26 poz., tab., wykr.
Bibliografia
  • 1. Act of 26 April 2997 on crisis management (i.e Polish Journal of Laws/Dz.U. of 2023, item 122).
  • 2. Afelt, A., (2022), Pandemia SARS-CoV-2. Zagrożenie epidemiologiczne z perspektywy antropocenu. In: M. Tomaszyk, D. Dymek (eds.) Środowisko bezpieczeństwa w zagrożeniach epidemiologicznych. Doświadczenia COVID-19 w Wielkopolsce. Poznań: University of Adam Mickiewicz.
  • 3. Bahadur, A.V., Ibrahim, M., Tanner, T., (2010), The Resilience Renaissance? Unpacking of Resilience for Tackling Climate Change and Disasters, Strengthening Climate Resilience Discussion Paper 1. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
  • 4. Building Resilience: The EU’s Approach, EU Factsheet Resilience – March 2014, European Commission, www.ec.europa.eu [28.09.2023].
  • 5. Brydak, B., (2023). Provincial anti-epidemic plans, review of Magdalena Kucharska’s doctoral dissertation, Warsaw.
  • 6. Consilium (2022). How does the EU respond to crises and build resilience? https://www.consilium. europa.eu/pl/policies/eu-crisis-response-resilience/ [01.10.2023].
  • 7. Crichton, M.T., Lauche, K., Flin, R., (2005). Incident Command Skills in the Management of an Oil Industry Drilling Incident: A Case Study, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 13(3).
  • 8. Dekker, S., (2014), The Field Guide to Understanding Human Error, 3rd Edition. New Jersey, US: Kazan Books.
  • 9. Decision No. 1313/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the Union Civil Protection Mechanism, Official Journal of the European Union L347 of 20/12/2013, p. 925.
  • 10. Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the resilience of critical entities and repealing Council Directive 2008/114/EC, 2020/0365 (COD) PE-CONS 51/22.
  • 11. Ewertowski, T., Güldoğuş, B.Ç., Kuter, S., Akyüz, S., Weber, W.W., Sadłowska-Wrzesińska, J., Racek, E., (2023). The use of machine learning techniques for assessing the potential of organizational resilience. Cent Eur J Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-023-00875-z
  • 12. Grocki, R., (2012). Crisis management. Good practices. Warsaw: Difin.
  • 13. Hallegatte, S., (2004). Economic Resilience. Definition and Measurement, Policy Research Working Paper No. 6852, The World Bank.
  • 14. IFRC (2012). International Federation of National Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), The road to resilience: Bridging relief and development for a more sustainable future IFRC discussion paper on resilience, June 2012, p. 7.
  • 15. Konieczny, J., (2022), Środowisko bezpieczeństwa zdrowotnego w badaniach transdyscyplinarnych. Poznań: FNCE.
  • 16. Kosowicz, K., Budowanie odporności jako możliwość zapobiegania przyszłym kryzysom, [online], Polska Akcja Humanitarna, www.pah.org.pl.
  • 17. Ledesma, J., (2014), Conceptual frameworks and research models on resilience in leadership. Sage Open, 4(3).
  • 18. Masten, A.S., (2011). Resilience in children threatened by extreme adversity: Frameworks for research, practice, and translational synergy. Development and Psychopathology, No. 23.
  • 19. Nowak, T., (2022). Budowa odporności na obecne i przyszłe zagrożenia o charakterze hybrydowym. Rekomendacje dla Polski. The Yearbook of Social Sciences (Rocznik Nauk Społecznych), Vol. 14 (50), No. 4-2022.
  • 20. Pieczywok, A., (2012). Education for security in the face of contemporary threats and challenges. Warsaw: National Defence Academy.
  • 21. Regibeau, P., Rockett, K., (2013). Economic Analysis of resilience: a framework for Local Policy Response Based on new Case Studies. Journal of Innovation Economics &Management, No. 11.
  • 22. Roth, WM., Jornet, A., (2015). Situational Awareness as an Instructable and Instructed Matter in Multi-Media Supported Debriefing: a Case Study from Aviation. Comput Supported Coop Work, 24, 461–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-015-9234-5
  • 23. Sadłowska-Wrzesińska M. et al., (2022). Badanie opinii studentow na temat bezpieczeństwa zdrowotnego w stanie pandemii. Budowa i zasady stosowania autorskiego kwestionariusza ankiety. In: Tomaszyk, M., Dymek, D., (eds), Środowisko bezpieczeństwa w zagrożeniach epidemiologicznych. Doświadczenia Covid-19 w Wielkopolsce. Poznań: UAM.
  • 24. Shea, J., (2016). Resilience: A key element of collective defense, https://www.nato.int/docu/review/index.html. [03/12/2023]
  • 25. Stępień, R., (2011). Education for safety. In: R. Jakubczak, J. Marczak (eds.), Bezpieczeństwo narodowe Polski w XXI wieku. Wyzwania i strategie. Warsaw: Bellona.
  • 26. Xiao, L., Cao, H., (2017). Organizational Resilience: The Theoretical Model and Research Implication, ITM Web of Conferences 12.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-d6a9543f-6910-46e2-a4ce-5d4459ea4b69
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.