Simulation of turning manoeuvre of planing craft taking into account the running attitude change in a simplified manner

• Autorzy: Sadati Kazem , Zeraatgar Hamid , Moghaddas Aliasghar

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/pomr-2022-0040

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The modelling and simulation of planing craft manoeuvres requires coupled six degrees of freedom (6 DOF) motion equations. A coupled 6 DOF motion equation needs hundreds of manoeuvring hydrodynamic coefficients (MHCs) that are mostly determined using the planar motion mechanism (PMM) test. The number of test runs is too high, unless a kind of simplification is imposed to the motion equations. This study modifies 6 DOF motion equations to 4+2 DOF motion equations in which heave and pitch equations are replaced by dynamic draught and trim (so-called running attitude), respectively. The method is applicable for a manoeuvre that commences in the planing regime and ends in the same regime. On that basis, the PMM test is conducted and the model is restrained in the vertical plane at a certain running attitude, determined by a resistance test. The 4+2 DOF method, together with MHCs from the PMM test, are employed for the simulation of turning manoeuvres of a 25° prismatic planing hull. The results of the simulation indicate that the 4+2 DOF method reasonably predicts the path of the craft during the turning manoeuvre and cuts the number of PMM tests required at the same time. The PMM test results show that MHCs are highly related to forward speed and wetted surfaces. The turning manoeuvre simulation shows that the non-linear terms of MHCs cannot be ignored. The STD/L (Steady Turning Diameter divided by Length of the craft) for a planing craft is very large, compared to ships.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

mathematical modelling; turning manoeuvre; planing craft; 4+2 DOF method; PMM test; planing regime

• Wydawca: Gdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Ocean Engineering & Ship Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Maritime Research
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: nr 4
• Strony: 12--25
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 33 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Sadati Kazem

• Amirkabir University of Technology Department of Maritime Engineering Tehran Islamic Republic of Iran

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8164-403X

autor

Zeraatgar Hamid

• Amirkabir University of Technology Department of Maritime Engineering Tehran Islamic Republic of Iran

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4796-9674

autor

Moghaddas Aliasghar

• Amirkabir University of Technology Department of Maritime Engineering Tehran Islamic Republic of Iran

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1333-6059

Bibliografia

• 1. H. Yasukawa and Y. Yoshimura, “Introduction of MMG standard method for ship manoeuvering predictions”, Journal of Marine Science and Technology, Vol. 20, pp. 37–52, 2015, (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-014-0293-y).
• 2. ITTC manoeuvring group members, “Testing and extrapolation methods, manoeuvrability captive model test procedures”, ITTC–Recommended. 7.5-02-06–02, Revision 02, 2008.
• 3. S. Sutulo and G. Soares, “On the application of empiric methods for prediction of ship manoeuvring properties and associated uncertainties”, Journal of Ocean Engineering, Vol. 186, 2019, (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106111).
• 4. H. Yasukawa, “Manoeuvering hydrodynamic derivatives and course stability of a ship close to a bank”, Journal of Ocean Engineering, Vol. 188, 2019, (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. oceaneng.2019.106149).
• 5. G. Taimuri, J. Matusiak, T. Mikkola, P. Kujala and S. Hidaris, “A 6-DoF manoeuvring model for the rapid estimation of hydrodynamic actions in deep and shallow waters”, Journal of Ocean Engineering, Vol. 218, 2020, (DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108103).
• 6. S. Ni, Z. Liu, Y. Cai and T. Zhang, “A practical approach to numerically predicting a manoeuvring vessel in waves oriented to maritime simulator”, Journal of Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Article ID 8361951, 2020, (DOI:10.1155/2020/8361951).
• 7. L. Yiew, Y. Jin and A. Magee, “A practical approach to numerically predicting a manoeuvring vessel in waves oriented to maritime simulator”, Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1357, 2019, (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8361951).
• 8. R. Kołodziej and P. Hoffmann, “Numerical Estimation of Hull Hydrodynamic Derivatives in Ship Manoeuvring Prediction”, Polish Maritime Research, Vol. 28, pp. 46-53, 2021.
• 9. C.J. Henry, “Calm water equilibrium, directional stability and steady turning conditions for recreational planing crafts”, Davidson Laboratory, Stevens Institute of Technology report No. CG-D-8-76, 1976.
• 10. M. Plante, S.L. Toxopeus, J. Blok and J.A. Keuning, “Hydrodynamic manoeuvring aspects of planing craft”, International Symposium and Workshop on Forces Acting on a manoeuvring Vessel, Val de Reuil, France, 1998.
• 11. S.L. Toxopeus, J.A. Keuning and J.P. Hooft, “Dynamic stability of Planing Ships, International Symposium and Seminar on the Safety of High Speed Craft”, RINA, London, 1997.
• 12. Y. Ikeda, T. Katayama and H. Okumura, “Characteristics of hydrodynamic derivatives in manoeuvring equations for super high-speed planing hulls”, Proceedings of the 10th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, 2000.
• 13. T. Katayama, R. Kimoto and Y. Ikeda, “Effects of running attitudes on manoeuvring hydrodynamic forces for planing hulls”, 5th International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, FAST, St. Petersburg, Russia, 2005.
• 14. T. Katayama, T. Iida and Y. Ikeda, “Effects of change in running attitude on turning diameter of planing craft”, Proceedings of 2nd PAAMES and AMEC, Jeju Island, Korea, 2006.
• 15. T. Katayama, T. Taniguchi, H. Fuji and Y. Ikeda, “Development of manoeuvring simulation method for high speed craft using hydrodynamic forces obtained from model test”, 10th International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, FAST, Athens, Greece, 2009.
• 16. H. Yasukawa, N. Hirata and Y. Nakayama, “High-Speed Ship Manoeuvrability”, Journal of Ship Research, Vol. 60 (4), pp. 239-258, 2016, (DOI: https://doi.org/10.5957/ JOSR.60.4.160032).
• 17. A. Ircani, M. Martelli, M. Viviani, M. Altosole, C. PodenzanaBonvino and D. Grassi, “A simulation approach for planing boats propulsion and manoeuvrability”, Transaction RINA, International Journal of Small Craft Technology, Vol.158 (Part B1), 2016, (DOI:10.3940/rina.ijsct.2016.b1.180).
• 18. S. Hajizadeh, M.S. Seif and H. Mehdigholi, “Evaluation of planing craft manoeuvrability using mathematical modeling under the action of the rudder”, Journal of Scientia Iranica, Vol. 24 (1), pp. 293-301, 2017, (DOI: 10.24200/SCI.2017.4033).
• 19. E.M. Lewandowski, “The Dynamics of Marine Craft: Manoeuvring and Seakeeping”, Advanced Series on Ocean Engineering, 22, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore, 2004.
• 20. S. Tavakoli and A. Dashtimanesh, “A six-DOF theoretical model for steady turning manoeuver of a planing hull”, Journal of Ocean Engineering, Vol. 189, 2019, (DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106328).
• 21. S. Tavakoli and A. Dashtimanesh, “Mathematical simulation of planar motion mechanism test for planing hulls by using 2D+T theory”, Journal of Ocean Engineering, Vol. 169, pp. 651-672, 2018, (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. oceaneng.2018.09.045).
• 22. R. Algarin and A. Bula, “A numeric study of the manoeuvrability of planing hulls with six degrees of freedom”, Journal of Ocean Engineering, Vol. 221, pp. 1-16, 2021, (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108514).
• 23. E.V. Lewis, “Volume III of principles of naval architecture, motion in waves and controllability”, The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineering, revision 02, 1989.
• 24. K. Sadati, H. Zeraatgar and A. Moghaddas, “Investigation of planing craft manoeuvrability using full-scale tests”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part M Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 2022, (DOI: doi/abs/10.1177/14750902211030386).
• 25. D. Savitsky, “Hydrodynamic design of planing hulls”, Journal of Marine Technology, Vol. 32 (3), pp 78-88, 1964.
• 26. Topsystemdrive.com.
• 27. G. Fridsma, “A systematic study of the rough-water performance of planing boats”, Davidson Laboratory, Stevens Institute of Technology report No. 1275, 1969.
• 28. K. Sadati, H. Zeraatgar and S. Babuei, “Roll hydrodynamic coefficients of planing craft’s manoeuver using 2D+t approach”, Journal of Scientia Iranica, Vol. 29, Issue 3, pp. 1197-1209, 2022, (DOI: 10.24200/sci.2021.57379.5208).
• 29. H. Zeraatgar, A. Moghaddas and K. Sadati, “Analysis of surge added mass of planing hulls by model experiment”, Journal of Ships and Offshore Structures, Vol. 15 (3), pp. 310-317, 2019, (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2019.1615705).
• 30. O. Tascon, A. Troesh and K. Maki, “Numerical computation of the hydrodynamic forces acting on a manoeuvering planing hull via slender body theory-SBT and 2-D impact theory”, 10th International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, FAST, Athens, Greece, 2009.
• 31. M. Morabito, “Prediction of planing hull side forces in yaw using slender body oblique impact theory”, Journal of Ocean Engineering, Vol. 101, pp. 47-57, 2015, (https://doi. org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.014).
• 32. R. Algarin and O. Tascon, “Hydrodynamic modelling of planing boats with asymmetry and steady condition”, IX HSMV, Naples, 2011.
• 33. Y. Toyama, “Two dimensional water impact of unsymmetrical bodies”, Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan, Vol. 173, pp. 285-291, 1993, (DOI: https://doi.org/10.2534/ jjasnaoe1968.1993.285).

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).