Methods, techniques and tools for identifying and valuing GIS assets for measuring security, quality and risk

• Autorzy: Stanik Jerzy , Kiedrowicz Maciej

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.57599/gisoj.2021.1.2.5

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper attempts to develop and characterize instruments and approaches to the problem of identification, protection and quality of information processed in GIS class systems. One of the issues that causes most problems in the process of identifying and valuing GIS resources for measuring security, quality and risk is the proper selection of methods, techniques and tools for collecting and compiling various types of data in relation to these resources. In the process of identifying and valuing GIS resources, there is no list of test methods and techniques „reserved” for GIS only. It uses all – quantitative, qualitative and mixed – approaches and methods used in various studies. When designing an appropriate set of methods, techniques and tools in the process of identifying and valuing GIS resources, it is also important to remember to collect only those data that are really necessary. Proposed methods, techniques and tools take into account all the features, characteristics and determinants of GIS resources necessary to measure their security, quality and risk. A set of GIS resource identification instruments has been proposed, the implementation of which will significantly contribute to an increase in the level of security, reliability and quality of these resources. The proposed elements of a set, which are theoretically justified, may be improved and the set may be extended to other elements of the security policy. Far-reaching flexibility is called for in the choice of methods, techniques and tools used to identify and value GIS resources.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

GIS; risk; information resource; security; quality

PL

GIS; ryzyko; zasoby informacyjne; bezpieczeństwo; jakość

• Wydawca: SILGIS Association ; Croatian-Polish Scientific Network
• Czasopismo: GIS Odyssey Journal
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 1, no. 2
• Strony: 5--20
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 19 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Stanik Jerzy

• Military University of Technology, Faculty of Cybernetics, Institute of Computer and Information Systems, Warsaw, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0162-2579

autor

Kiedrowicz Maciej

• Military University of Technology, Faculty of Cybernetics, Institute of Computer and Information Systems, Warsaw, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4389-0774

Bibliografia

• 1. Allen B.J., Loyear R., Noakes-Fry K. (2018). Enterprise Security Risk Management: Concepts and Applications. Connecticut, Publisher: Rothstein.
• 2. Au F., Baker S., Warren I., Dobbie G., (2008). Automated usability testing framework. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Australasian User Interface, AUIC 2008, vol. 76, pp. 55–64.
• 3. Bastien J. (2009). Usability testing: a review of some methodological and technical aspects of the method. International Journal of Medical Informatics, no. 79(4), pp. 18–23.
• 4. Denning D. (1982). Cryptography and Data Security. USA, Addison-Wesley.
• 5. Denning D. (1992). Kryptografia i ochrona danych (Cryptography and Data Security). Warsaw, Publisher: Wydawnictwo Naukowo-Techniczne.
• 6. Dzięcioł P. (2018). Proces wielowymiarowej analizy ryzyka w przedsiębiorstwie (The process of multidimensional risk analysis in an enterprise). In: Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, no. 541, pp. 19–38.
• 7. Fedulova I., Lanovska H. (2018). Identyfikacja ryzyka: Esencja i metody wykrywania (Risk identification: Essence and detection methods). In: Scientific articles Mykolo Romerio universitetas, no. 21, pp. 40–53.
• 8. Fitzpatrick R. (1998). Strategies for Evaluating Software Usability. Methods, vol. 353, no. 1, Publisher: Technological University Dublin.
• 9. Jedynak P., Bąk S. (2017). Przegląd standardów zarządzania ryzykiem (Review of risk management standards). In: E. Skrzypek, A. Piasecka, S. Sagan (ed.), Nowa jakość a zadowolenie interesariuszy (New quality and stakeholder satisfaction), pp. 49–68. Lublin, Publisher: Katedra Zarządzania Jakością i Wiedzą, Wydział Ekonomiczny UMCS w Lublinie.
• 10. Kuziak K. (2006). Metody analizy ryzyka operacyjnego (Methods of operational risk analysis). Prace Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu, no. 1133, pp. 254–265.
• 11. Kwaśniowski S., Zając P. (2004). Automatyczna identyfikacja w systemach logistycznych (Automatic identification in logistic systems). Publishing House of the Wrocław University of Technology, Wrocław.
• 12. Laskowski M. (2011). Czynniki zwiększające jakość użytkową interfejsów aplikacji internetowych (Factors increasing the usability of web application interfaces). Logistyka, vol. 6, pp. 2191–2199.
• 13. Lejuez C.W., Read J.P., Kahler C.W., Richards J.B., Ramsey S.E., Stuart G.L., Strong D.R., Brown R.A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, no. 8(2), pp. 75–84.
• 14. Robinson A. (2016). More advanced technology trends in logistics in 2016, http://cerasis.com/ [access: 28.08.2021].
• 15. Stanik J., Kiedrowicz M. (2018). An Information System Risk Model for the Risk Management System of an Organisation Processing Sensitive Data. Journal of Management and Finance, vol. 16, no. 3/1, pp. 207–227.
• 16. Stanik J., Protasowicki T., Kiedrowicz M. (2014). Wybrane aspekty standaryzacji w ochronie publicznych zasobów informacyjnych i świadczonych usług w kontekście społeczeństwa informacyjnego (Selected aspects of standardization in the protection of public information resources and provided services in the context of the information society). Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego – Ekonomiczne Problemy Usług, Szczecin, vol. 113, pp. 113–130.
• 17. Suchecka J., Nieszporska S. (2015). Koncepcja ryzyka w kontekście funkcji użyteczności (The concept of risk in the context of the utility function). Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Częstochowskiej Zarządzanie. Częstochowa, no. 19, pp. 103–115.
• 18. Zawiła-Niedźwiecki J. (2018). Od zarządzania ryzykiem operacyjnym do publicznego zarządzania kryzysowego. Wyzwania badawcze (From operational risk management to public crisis management. Research challenges). Kraków, Publisher: eduLibris.
• 19. Zikmund W.G., Scott J.E. (1977). An Investigation of the Role of Product Characteristics in Risk Perception. Review of Business and Economic Research, New Orleans, La, vol. 13(1), pp. 19–34.