Dojrzałość społeczna łańcucha dostaw : próba ujęcia teoretycznego

• Autorzy: Rudnicka A.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Social maturity of supply chain : theoretical approach

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

Zagadnienia związane ze społeczną odpowiedzialnością dotyczą zarówno pojedynczych organizacji jak i całych łańcuchów dostaw. Standardy wyznaczające ramy działania dla firm społecznie odpowiedzialnych w większym stopniu zwracają uwagę na pojedyncze podmioty traktując dostawców jako jedną z grup interesariuszy. Już początkowe fazy życia produktu mogą rodzić problemy społeczne czy środowiskowe, co oznacza konieczność analizy procesów realizowanych w całym łańcuchu dostaw. W artykule zaprezentowano próbę ujęcia modelowego społecznej odpowiedzialności dla całego łańcucha dostaw. Zidentyfikowano kryteria istotne dla realizacji koncepcji społecznej odpowiedzialności oraz skategoryzowano poziomy odpowiedzialności w zależności od spełniania poszczególnych kryteriów. Zaprezentowane ujęcie modelowe ma charakter teoretyczny.

EN

Issues related to social responsibility may be analyzed in relations to single organization or to the whole supply chain. Standards that try to organize the framework for companies which act in a responsible way are focused mainly on single organization and treat suppliers as a one group of stakeholders. Initial stages of product life cycle may be the source of different social or environmental problems. It means that the processes should be analyzed in the whole supply chain instead of in single organization. The paper presents the theoretical model of social responsibility of supply chain. The criteria crucial for implementation and managing of social responsibility and levels of responsibility that might be taken into consideration in supply chains were identified.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

dojrzałość społeczna; łańcuch dostaw; społeczna odpowiedzialność; kryteria; poziom odpowiedzialności

EN

social maturity; supply chain; social responsibility; criteria; level of responsibility

• Wydawca: Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz - Poznański Instytut Technologiczny
• Czasopismo: Logistyka
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: nr 5
• Strony: 2051--2058
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 29 poz., rys., tab., pełen tekst na CD

Twórcy

autor

Rudnicka A.

• Uniwersytet Łódzki, Wydział Zarządzania, Katedra Logistyki, Matejki 22/26, 90-237 Łódź

Bibliografia

• 1. Amaeshi, K., Osuji, O. & Nnodim, P. 2008, Corporate Social Responsibility in Supply Chains of Global Brands: A BoundarylessResponsibility? Clarifications, Exceptions and Implications, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 81, no. 1, s. 223–234.
• 2. Ayuso S., Roca M., Colomé R., SMEs as “transmitters” of CSR requirements in the supply chain, Supply Chain Management. 2013, Vol. 18 Issue 5, s. 497–508.
• 3. Bask A., Kuula M., Measuring Supply Chain Level Environmental Sustainability – Case Nokia, International Journal of Business Insights & Transformation, Jan2011 Special Issuse, Vol. 3 Issue S3, s. 16–24.
• 4. Chen H., Patricia J. Daugherty P. J., Timothy D. Landry T. D., Supply Chain Process Integration: A Theoretical Framework, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2009.
• 5. Constangioara Alexandru, A Confirmatory Approach to Measuring Risks in Supply Chains.
• 6. Corporate Social Responsibility in Global Value Chains, Evaluation and Monitoring Challenges for Small and Medium Sized Suppliers in Developing Countries, United Nations Publication, Geneva 2012.
• 7. Galbreath J., The Impact of Strategic Orientation on Corporate Social Responsibility, International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 2010, Vol. 18, No. 1, s. 23–40.
• 8. Gallear D., Ghobadian A., Chen W., Corporate Responsibility, Supply Chain Partnership and Performance: An Empirical Examination, International Journal of Production Economics, Nov2012, Vol. 140 Issue 1, s. 83–91.
• 9. Gilbert Aryee and Mohamed M. Naim, Supply Chain Integration Using A Maturity Scale, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 19 No. 5, 2008, s. 559–575.
• 10. Gnoni M. G.,De Felice F., Petrillo A., A Multi-Criteria Approach for Strategic Evaluation of Environmental Sustainability in a Supply Chain, International Journal of Business Insights & Transformation, Jan2011 Special Issu, Vol. 3 Issue S3, s. 54–61.
• 11. Hall J., Matos S., Silvestre B., Understanding why Firms Should Invest in Sustainable Supply Chains: A Complexity Approach, International Journal of Production Research, Mar2012, Vol. 50 Issue 5, s. 1332–1348.
• 12. Hoejmose S., Brammer S., Millington A., An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Business Strategy And Socially Responsible Supply Chain Management, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2013, Vol. 33 Issue 5, s. 589–621.
• 13. Hollstein Ch., Himpel F., 2013, Supply Chain Risk Management, Log Forum, 2013 9 (1), s. 21–25.
• 14. Jonker J., Cramer J., Van der Heijden A., Developing Meaning in Action: (Re)constructing the Process of Embedding Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Companies, No. 16-2004 ICCSR Research Paper Series, Nottingham University, Nottingham 2004.
• 15. Jonker J., van Pijkeren M., In Search of Business Strategies for CSR, No. 41-2006 ICCSR Research Paper Series, Nottingham University, Nottingham 2006.
• 16. Lee T., Kashmanian R. M., Supply Chain Sustainability: Compliance- and Performance-Based Tools, Environmental Quality Management, Summer2013, Vol. 22 Issue 4, s. 1–23.
• 17. Lemke F., Petersen H. L., Teaching Reputational Risk Management in the Supply Chain, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 18 Issue: 4, 2013, s. 413–429.
• 18. Lockamy A., III, McCormack K., The Development of a Supply Chain Management Process Maturity Model Using The Concepts of Business Process Orientation, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Volume 9, Number 4, 2004, s. 272–278.
• 19. Machowiak W., Risk Management – Unappreciated Instrument of Supply Chain Management Strategy, 2012, LogForum 8 (4), s. 277–285.
• 20. Morsing M., Schultz M., Corporate Social Responsibility Communication: Stakeholder Information, Response and Involvement Strategies, Business Ethics: A European Review, 2006, Vol. 15, No. 4, s. 323–338.
• 21. Mueller M., dos Santos V., Seuring S., The Contribution of Environmental and Social Standards towards Ensuring Legitimacy in Supply Chain Governance, Journal of Business Ethics. Nov2009, Vol. 89 Issue 4, s. 509–523.
• 22. Okongwu U., Morimoto R., Lauras M., The Maturity of Supply Chain Sustainability Disclosure From A Continuous Improvement Perspective, International Journal of Productivity & Performance Management, 2013, Vol. 62 Issue 8, s. 827–855.
• 23. PN-ISO 26000:2012, Wytyczne dotyczące społecznej odpowiedzialności, PKN, Warszawa 2012
• 24. Podnar K., Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility, Journal of Marketing Communications, 2008, Vol. 14, No. 2, s. 75–81.
• 25. Seele, P., Lock, I., Instrumental and/or Deliberative? A Typology of CSR Communication Tools, Journal of Business Ethics, In Press, 18 July 2014.
• 26. Simangunsongy E., Hendry L. C., Stevenson M., Supply-Chain Uncertainty: A Review And Theoretical Foundation For Future Research, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 50, No. 16, 15 August 2012, s. 4493–4523.
• 27. Supply Chain Sustainability a Practical Guide for Continuous Improvement, UN Global Compact and Business for Social Responsibility, 2010.
• 28. Vikulov V., Butrin A., Risk Assessment And Management Logistics Chains, 2014, LogForum 10 (1), s. 43–49.
• 29. Wagner S. M., Neshat N., A Comparison of Supply Chain Vulnerability Indices for Different Categories of Firms, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 50, No. 11, 1 June 2012, s. 2877–2891.