PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Assessing the Competitiveness of Serbian Textile and Apparel Industry Exports Using RCA Index and TPI Indicators

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Ocena konkurencyjności eksportu serbskiego przemysłu tekstylnego i odzieżowego za pomocą wskaźnika RCA i wskaźników TPI
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Due to the paucity of relevant research, little is known about emerging patterns of competitiveness in the textile and apparel (T&A) industry in Balkan countries. Research focused on the Serbian T&A industry after 2006, when the country renewed its independence, is particularly sparse. The purpose of this research is to contribute to a greater understanding of emerging competitiveness and its main determinants in the Serbian T&A industry, in the time period between 2007 and 2019, and in the context of the EU-28 market. Balassa’s Revealed Comparative Advantage index and the Trade Performance Index instruments were used to assess export competitiveness, while the key competitiveness determinants were explored drawing on Porter’s (1990) theory of the Competitive Advantage of Nations. Findings confirmed that Serbia, a low-income country and not an EU member, retained a distinguished and strong T&A export potential, which confirms that the country is a competitive player in international trade.
PL
Ze względu na brak odpowiednich badań niewiele wiadomo na temat pojawiających się wzorców konkurencyjności w przemyśle tekstylnym i odzieżowym (T&A) w krajach bałkańskich. Badania skoncentrowane na serbskiej branży RCP po 2006 r., kiedy kraj odzyskał niepodległość, są szczególnie skąpe. Celem badania było przyczynienie się do lepszego zrozumienia pojawiającej się konkurencyjności i jej głównych determinantów w serbskim przemyśle T&A w okresie 2007-2019 oraz w kontekście rynku UE-28. Do oceny konkurencyjności eksportu wykorzystano Revealed Comparative Advantage Index Balassy oraz Trade Performance Index, podczas gdy kluczowe determinanty konkurencyjności zostały zbadane w oparciu o teorię Portera (1990) dotyczącą przewagi konkurencyjnej narodów. Na podstawie wyników stwierdzono, że Serbia, kraj o niskich dochodach i niebędący członkiem UE, zachowała znaczący i silny potencjał eksportowy T&A, co potwierdza, że kraj ten jest konkurencyjnym graczem w handlu międzynarodowym.
Rocznik
Strony
15--23
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 52 poz., tab.
Twórcy
autor
  • Novi Pazar State University, Department of Economics, Serbia
  • University of North Texas, Department of Merchandising and Digital Retailing, Denton, Texas
Bibliografia
  • 1. Arrighetti A, Ninni A. German and Italian Manufacturing Performances: A Premise to a Comparison. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics 2012; 39(2): 5-16.
  • 2. Archer R, Musić G. Approaching the Socialist Factory and its Workforce: Considerations from Fieldwork in (Former) Yugoslavia. Labor History 2017; 58(1): 44-66.
  • 3. Balassa B. Trade Liberalization and 'Revealed' Comparative Advantage. Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 1965; 33: 90-123.
  • 4. Baldone S, Sdogati F, Tajoli L. Patterns and Determinants of International Fragmentation of Production: Evidence from Outward Processing Trade between the EU and Central Eastern European countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 2001; 137(1): 80-104.
  • 5. Begg B, Pickles J, Smith A. Cutting it: European Integration, Trade Regimes, and the Reconfiguration of East – Central European Apparel Production. Environment and Plannin 2003; 35(12): 2191-2207.
  • 6. Bekerman M, Dulcich F. The International Trade Position of Argentina. Towards a Process of Export Diversification? Cepal Review 2013; 110: 151-174.
  • 7. Bonfiglioli C. Gendering Social Citizenship: Textile Workers in Post-Yugoslav States. University of Edinburgh-Cities Working Papers Series 2013; 30: 1-33.
  • 8. Buckley PJ, Pass CL, Prescott K. In Smith B. Jones (Eds.). The Meaning of Competitiveness. Servicing International Markets: Competitive Strategy of Firms. Blackwell Publisher, 1992. p. 175-200.
  • 9. Chi T, Kilduff P. An Assessment of Trends in China’s Comparative Advantages in Textile Machinery, Man-Made Fibers, Textiles and Apparel. Journal of the Textile Institute 2006; 97(2): 173-191.
  • 10. Chi T, Kilduff P, Dyer C. An Assessment of US Comparative Advantage in Technical Textiles from a Trade Perspective. Journal of Industrial Textiles 2005; 35(1); 17-37.
  • 11. Ćorović E. Uloga tekstilne industrie u procesu strukturnog prilagođavanja privrede Srbije (The Role of the Serbian Textile Industry in The Process of Economic Transitioning) [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Economic Sciences, Niš-Serbia, 2012.
  • 12. Corovic E, Jovanovic P, Ristic L. Current Trends on the World Textile Market and the Competitiveness of the Serbian Textile Industry. FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe 2013; 21, 5(101): 8-12.
  • 13. Corovic E, Gligorijevic Z, Kostadinovic I. Export Competitiveness of Textile and Clothes of Western Balkan Countries. FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe 2020; 28, 4(142): 8-14. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0014.0927.
  • 14. Đorđević D., Ćoćkalo D.,Urošević S.,Đekić V.; Clusters and Competitive Ability of Small and Medium Enterprises in the Textile and Clothing Industry: Serbian Economy Review. FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe 2011; 19, 5(88): 12-16.
  • 15. Fortis M, Corradini S, Carminati M. Italy’s Top Products in World Trade: The Fortis-Corradini Index. Springer, 2015.
  • 16. Fortis M. Competitiveness and Export Performance of Italy. Milano: Fondazione Edison, Universita Cattolica and Dipartimento del Tesoro, 2009.
  • 17. Gligorijević Ž, Ćorović E. Strukturne promene i novi model rasta Republike Srbije. Niš: Ekonomski fakultet, 2019.
  • 18. Grossman G M, Helpman E. Trade Wars and Trade Talks. Journal of Political Economy 1995; 103(4): 675-708.
  • 19. Hämäläinen T J. National Competitiveness and Economic Growth: The Changing Determinant of Economic Performance in the World Economy. Edwald Elgar, 2003.
  • 20. Hanzl-Weiß D. Enlargement and the Textiles, Clothing and Footwear Industry. World Economy 2004; 27(6): 923-945.
  • 21. Helleiner GK. Increasing International Competitiveness: A Conceptual Framework. In Increasing the International Competitiveness of Exports from Caribbean Countries, Yin Kann Wen (Ed.). Collected Papers from an EDI Policy Seminar held in Bridgetown, Barbades, EDI Seminar Series, 1991, p.17-26.
  • 22. Jin B, Moon H C. The Diamond Approach to the Competitiveness of Korea’s Apparel Industry. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 2006; 10(2): 195-208.
  • 23. Kalim R, Nawaz A. Changing Revealed Comparative Advantage of Textile and Clothing Sector of Pakistan: Pre and Post Quota Analysis. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences 2013; 7(3): 520-544.
  • 24. Kilduff P, Ting C. Analysis of Comparative Advantage in The Textile Complex. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management 2007; 11(1): 82.
  • 25. Krugman P. Differences in Income Elasticities and Trends in Real Exchange Rates. European Economic Review 1989; 33(5): 1031-1046.
  • 26. Kumar D, Singh D. Export Competitiveness of Indian Textile Industry. Abhinav-National Monthly Refereed Journal of Research in Commerce & Management (Online ISSN 2277-1166) 2015; 4:1-5.
  • 27. Krugman PR, Hatsopoulos GN. The Problem of US Competitiveness in Manufacturing. New England Economic Review 1987; 1(1): 18-29.
  • 28. Lafay G. The Measurement of Revealed Comparative Advantages. In Motamen-Scobie, (Ed.). International Trade Modelling, Springer, 1992; p. 209-234.
  • 29. Laursen K. Revealed Comparative Advantage and the Alternatives as Measures of International Specialization. Eurasian Business Review 2015; 5(1): 99-115.
  • 30. Lee J, Karpova E. The US and Japanese Apparel Demand Conditions: Implications for Industry Competitiveness. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal 2011; 15(1): 76-90.
  • 31. Ohlin B. Interregional and International Trade. Harvard University Press, 1933.
  • 32. Patterson PH. Bought and Sold: Living and Losing the Good Life in Socialist Yugoslavia. Cornell University Press, 2011.
  • 33. Porter M. The Competitive Advantages of Nations. McMillan, 1990.
  • 34. Serbian Textile Industry-RAS. Development agency of Serbia. Cited (updated 2016; cited May 2020). Available from https://ras.gov.rs/en/export-promotion/free-trade-agreements
  • 35. Serbian Association of International Road Haulers. Poslovno udruzenje (cited May 2020). Available from http://www.pumedtrans.com/
  • 36. Scheffer M. Trading Places: Fashion, Retailers and the Changing Geography of Clothing Production [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Utrecht, Utrecht, 1992.
  • 37. Siggel E. Concepts and Measurements of Competitiveness: Toward an Integrated Approach. in Grauwe, P (Ed.) Dimensions of Competitiveness, MIT, 2010; p. 95-120.
  • 38. Siudek T, Zawojska A. Competitiveness in the Economic Concepts, Theories and Empirical Research. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Oeconomia 2014; 13(1): 91-108.
  • 39. Shimbov B, Alguacil M, Suárez C. International Production Networks and Economic Growth: The Case of the Western Balkan Countries. Eastern European Economics 2016; 54(1): 49-70.
  • 40. Smith A, Pickles J. Global Value Chains and Business Models in the Central and Eastern European Clothing Industry. In Galgoczi B, Drahokoupil J and Bernaciak M (Eds.), Foreign investment in Eastern and Southern Europe after 2008, Etui, 2015; p. 319-353.
  • 41. Sunhilde CUC, Tripa S. The Evaluation of Balkan Countries’ Clothing Trade with EU-28 Based on the Analysis of Comparative Advantages Indices. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon 2018; 28(3): 178-181.
  • 42. Trade Statistics for International Business Development-Trade Map ITC Geneva (cited, May 2020). Available from trademap.org
  • 43. Tamindžija B, Aleksic S, Musiolek B. Country profile Serbia: Clean Clothes Campaign, 2017 (cited, May 2020). Available from file:///C:/Users/16145/Downloads/CCC-CountryProfile-serbia_engl2017_Web%20(4).pdf
  • 44. UN International standard industrial classification of all economic activities – ISIC revision 4, 2008. United Nations New York (cited, May 2020). Available from https://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/seriesM/seriesm_4rev4e.pdf
  • 45. UNCTAD/WTO, The Trade Performance Index: Technical notes, 2007, (cited, May 2020). Available from https://unctad.org/en/docs/tdr2007_en.pdf
  • 46. USAID, Tekstilna industrija u Srbiji, GTZ/WBF Srbija i Privredna komora Srbije. USAID, 2014.
  • 47. Urošević S., Stamatović M.; Role of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Enhancement of the Serbian Textile Industry in Times of Crisis. FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe 2011; 19, 4(87): 14-19.
  • 48. Uvalić M. The Rise and Fall of Market Socialism in Yugoslavia. DOC Research Institute, 2018.
  • 49. Vollrath TL. A Theoretical Evaluation of Alternative Trade Intensity Measures of Revealed Comparative Advantage. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 1991; 127(2): 265-280.
  • 50. WCO. HS Nomenclature and Classification of Goods, 2017, (cited, May 2020). Available from http://www.wcoomd.org/en/topics/nomenclature.aspx
  • 51. Watchravesringkan KT, Karpova E, Hodges NN, Copeland R. The Competitive Position of Thailand’s Apparel Industry. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal 2010; 14(4): 576-597.
  • 52. Table 1. RCA and TPI Indicators of the Competitiveness of Serbia’s textile industry exports in the EU-28 market (cumulative score 2007-2019).
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-d50db099-0341-4a36-8c70-ae9eba403ad2
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.