Instruments used to improve the betterment of products quality

• Autorzy: Hajduk-Stelmachowicz Marzena , Bełch Paulina , Siwiec Dominika , Bednárová Lucia , Pacana Andrzej

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2022.157.10

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The main goal of the research was to determine the spectrum of instruments supporting management processes that are used to improve the quality of products in terms of sustainable development. We analyzed the degree of their use in the practical functioning of the surveyed enterprises. In addition, the aim of the research was to determine the scope of application of the indicated instruments or the possibility of their use in the decision-making process relating to the improvement of the broadly understood quality of products. Design/methodology/approach: The research method applied are: 1) standardized survey research making based on a survey conducted in contact and remote way conducted in 78 enterprises in south-eastern Poland; 2) analysis of the source documentation and in-depth interviews. It is a component of broader research. Findings: The following methods were used in decision-making processes with varying frequency: the Delphi method by 58% of respondents, Tree of Failure Analysis (by 52%), Event Tree Analysis (by 44%), and the QFD method (by 41% respondents). The surveyed companies that have implemented a vapour management system based on ISO standards tend to use 5 methods out of 25 cited in this study (these are a survey, brainstorming, 5Why and/or 5W2H, benchmarking, and the Delphi method). As a result of using mainly the above mentioned methods in decision-making processes, 74% (out of all) of the respondents indicated an increase in the quality level of products, and 39% of respondents indicated the enhancement of the pro-ecological impact of products on the natural environment. Research limitations/implications: Most of the analysed enterprises from SMEs are tried integrating qualitative-environmental actions as part of improving the quality of products. This approach is crucial when improving the quality of products in SMEs. Practical implications: It is necessary to develop a multidimensional modl enabling the optimization of decision-making processes with the possibility of making full use of the available instruments for improving the quality of the product in such a way as to meet the rapidly changing requirements of stakeholders. Originality/value: The article has cognitive value for development of knowledge, science, quality, and environmental in the area of management of products.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

quality management; sustainable decision support; production engineering; quality of products; mechanical engineering

PL

zarządzanie jakością; trwałe wsparcie decyzji; inżynieria produkcji; jakość produktów; inżynieria mechaniczna

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: z. 157
• Strony: 151--171
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 40 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Hajduk-Stelmachowicz Marzena

• Rzeszow University of Technology, Faculty of Management, Rzeszow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4945-7207

autor

Bełch Paulina

• Rzeszow University of Technology, Faculty of Management, Rzeszow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6877-2870

autor

Siwiec Dominika

• Rzeszow University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6663-6621

autor

Bednárová Lucia

• Technical University of Technology, Faculty of Mining, Ecology, Process Control and Geotechnologies, Košice, Slovak Republic

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8582-0643

autor

Pacana Andrzej

• Rzeszow University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1121-6352

Bibliografia

• 1. Adamkiewicz-Drwiłło, H.G., Jankowska-Mihułowicz, M. (2008). Intuicja menedżera. Ekonomika i organizacja przedsiębiorstwa, Vol. 2(697), pp. 37-44.
• 2. Bełch, P., Bełch, P. (2020). Controlling of logistics in production enterprises with separated processes of logistics in the context of empirical research. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu Nauki o zarządzaniu i jakości, Vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 131-140. doi:10.15611/pn.2020.3.11.
• 3. Bełch, P., Bełch, P. (2021). The economic performance of logistical processes in Polish production companies. European Research Studies Journal, Vol. XXIV, Iss. 4, pp. 342-350.
• 4. Bernardo, S.M., Rampasso, I.S., Quelhas, O.L.G., Leal Filho, W., Anholon, R. (2022). Method to integrate management tools aiming organizational excellence. Production, Vol. 32, https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20210101.
• 5. Brzeziński, M. (2007). Podstawy zarządzania. In: M. Brzeziński (Ed.). Wprowadzenie do nauki o przedsiębiorstwie. Warszawa: Difin.
• 6. Czerwińska, K., Bełch, P., Hajduk-Stelmachowicz, M., Siwiec, D., Pacana, A. (2021). Doskonalenie procesu grafitowania wyrobów aluminiowych. Przemysł chemiczny, Vol. 100/12, pp. 1034-1036, DOI: 10.15199/62.2021.12.X.
• 7. Davenport, T.H. (2011). Make Better Decisions. In: D. Kahneman, R. Charan, J.E. Thomas (Eds.), On Making Smart Decisions (pp. 185-198). Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.
• 8. Deqiang, S., Zhijun, Ch., Hajduk-Stelmachowicz, M., Larik, A.R., Rafique, M.Z. (2021). The Role of the Global Value Chain in Improving Trade and the Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Evidence From China’s Manufacturing Industry. Frontiers in Environmental Science, Vol. 9, p. 508. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.779295.
• 9. DiLeo, C. (2019). Creating Quality Methods. In: Clean Ruby. Berkeley: Apress, CA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-5546-9_3.
• 10. Drucker, P.F. (2005). Podejmowanie skutecznych decyzji. Warszawa: Onepress.
• 11. Dückers, M.L., Wagner, C., Groenewegen, P.P. (2008). Developing and testing an instrument to measure the presence of conditions for successful implementation of quality improvement collaboratives. BMC Health Serv. Res., 8, 172 https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-172.
• 12. Ejdys, J., Kobylińska, U., Lulewicz-Sas, A. (2012). Zintegrowane Systemy Zarządzania Jakością, Środowiskiem i Bezpieczeństwem Pracy. Białystok: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Białostockiej.
• 13. Ferreira Gregorio, V, Pié, L, Terceño, A. (2018). A Systematic Literature Review of Bio, Green and Circular Economy Trendsin Publications in the Field of Economics and Business Management. Sustainability, Vol. 10(11), 4232, https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114232.
• 14. Frąś, J., Frąś, T., Frąś, M. (2017). Model instrumentów zarządzania jakością w procesach produkcyjnych. Problemy Nauk Stosowanych, Tom 6.
• 15. Griffin, R.W. (1996). Podstawy zarządzania organizacjami. Warszawa: PWN.
• 16. Günter, E. (2022). Quality Management. In: Industrial Coloration od Plastics. Pigments, Dyestuffs, Fillers, and Nanomaterials. Munich: Hanser, https://doi.org/10.3139/9781569908532.015.
• 17. Gunther, R.E. (2008). The Truth about Making Smart Decisions. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc., FT Press.
• 18. Hajduk-Stelmachowicz, M. (2014), Integration of management systems in the context of strategic thinking in enterprises implementing organizational ecoinnovations. The International Conference Hradec Economic Days 2014, Economic Development and Management of Regions, Hradec Králové, February 4th and 5th, 2014, Peer – Reviewed Conference Proceedings Part IV, Edited by Pavel Jedlička. University of Hradec Kralove, Faculty of Informatics and Management.
• 19. Hajduk-Stelmachowicz, M. (2016). Pułapki decyzyjne a system zarządzania środowiskowego. In: D. Dziawgo, Rachunkowość na rzecz zrównoważonego rozwoju. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, Vol. 436. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu.
• 20. Helmold, M. (2021). Change Management Tools. In: Successful Management Strategies and Tools. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77661-9_19.
• 21. Helmold, M. (2021). Supply Management Tools. In: Successful Management Strategies and Tools. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77661-9_9.
• 22. Jankowska-Mihułowicz, M. (2008). Intuicja w podejmowaniu decyzji strategicznych. Ekonomika i organizacja przedsiębiorstwa, Vol. 3(698), pp. 43-50.
• 23. Jankowska-Mihułowicz, M., Chudy-Laskowska, K. (2019). Factors influencing investors’ decisions in Polish companies as demonstrated by RFID systems. Hradec Economic Days 2019, Vol. 9(1), Double-blind peer-reviewed proceedings part I. of the international scientific conference, P. Jedlička, P. Marešová and I. Soukal (Eds.), Hradec Králové: University of Hradec Králové, pp. 317-328.
• 24. Jonek-Kowalska, I., Wolniak, R. (2022). Sharing Economies’ Initiatives in Municipal Authorities’ Perspective: Research Evidence from Poland in the Context of Smart Cities’ Development. Sustainability, 14(4), 2064. DOI:10.3390/su14042064.
• 25. Mechitov, A., Moshkovich, H., Klimberg, R. (2022). Verbal decision analysis for strategic decisions. International Journal of Business Research, 22(1), 26-37. DOI: 10.18374/IJBR 35 22-1.4.
• 26. Mentel, U., Hajduk-Stelmachowicz, M. (2020). Does standardization have an impact on innovation activity in different countries? Problems and Perspectives in Management, Vol. 18(4), pp. 486-503. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(4).2020.39.
• 27. Migała-Warchoł, A. (2021). Modeling of socio-economic development in European Union Countries. Rzeszów: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Rzeszowskiej.
• 28. Okrah, J., Hajduk-Stelmachowicz, M. (2020). Political Stability and Innovation in Africa. Journal of International Studies, Vol. 13(1), pp. 234-246 DOI: 10.14254/2071-8330.2020/13-1/15234-246.
• 29. Ostapenko, T.M., Kubetska, O.M., Antipova, V.P. (2020). Marketing as an Instrument for Managing the Solvency of Trade Enterprises. Business Inform., 11, pp. 442-447, https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2020-11-442-447.
• 30. Ostasz, G., Siwiec, D., Pacana, A. (2022). Universal Model to Predict Expected Direction of Products Quality Improvement. Energies, 15, 1751. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1505175.
• 31. Pacana, A., Siwiec, D. (2021). Uniwersalny model wspierania poprawy jakości produktów i materiałów przemysłowych, 14, 7872. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247872.
• 32. Pacana, A., Siwiec, D., Bednárová, L. (2020). Method of Choice: A Fluorescent Penetrant Taking into Account Sustainability Criteria. Sustainability, 12, 5854. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145854.
• 33. Piecuch, T., Chudy-Laskowska, K., Szczygieł, E. (2019). The living standard of the inhabitants of the Carpathian Euroregion. In: B. Mihalčová, P. Szaryszová, L. Štofová, M. Pružinský, B. Gontkovičová (Eds.), Production Management and Business Development (pp. 179-184). London-New York-Leiden: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton.
• 34. Siwiec, D., Hajduk-Stelmachowicz, M., Bełch, P., Czerwińska, K., Pacana, A. (2021). Sposób doboru farb przemysłowych z wykorzystaniem analizy wzajemnego wpływu kryteriów. Przemysł Chemiczny, Vol. 100/12, pp.1187-1190. DOI: 10.15199/62.2021.12.7.
• 35. Siwiec, D., Pacana, A. (2021). Method of improve the level of product quality. Production Engineering Archives, Vol. 27(1), pp. 1-7.
• 36. Stoner, J.A., Wankel, Ch. (1996). Kierowanie. Warszawa: PWN.
• 37. Szydełko, M., Kołodziejczuk, B. (2016). Benchmarking jako fakultatywny instrument doskonalenia znormalizowanych systemów zarządzania jakością. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, Rachunkowość a controlling, Vol. 440. E. Nowak, M. Kowalewski, M. Nieplowicz (Eds.). Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, pp. 501-512.
• 38. Świrk,J. (2020). Ekologiczna odpowiedzialność przedsiębiorstw w kontekście zapewnienia dobrego stanu środowiska. Kwartalnik Nauk O Przedsiębiorstwie, 57(4), pp. 69-79. https://doi.org/10.33119/KNoP.2020.57.4.6.
• 39. Velikikh, K. (2021). Strategic planning as a management tool. Municipal Economy of Cities, 7(167), pp. 34-39.
• 40. Wyrwa, D., Ziółkowski, B. (2015). Quality management systems in competitive strategies of Polish enterprises. In: Production Management and Engineering Sciences. Tatranská Štrba: Taylor&Francis Group, pp. 327-332.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).