Management changes in MRO business through product lifecycle

• Autorzy: Sivusuo J. , Takala J.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/mper-2016-0028

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Nowadays organizations and entire industries have faced the challenges of globalization and rapid technological development. These changes have brought new kind of competition and it has shaped and mixed organizations traditional business logic. This research is based on multiple case studies where the focus is on management changes through product lifecycle management. Emphasis is on MRO (Maintenance, repair, overhaul) providers and how they implement dynamic capabilities through product life cycle management. MRO is abbreviation for Maintenance, repair and overhaul and it is a commonly used in Aerospace industry. The study identifies several products in various stages of the life-cycle and thus identify the essential changes related to management. The stages that study identifies are Learning phase, Productisation phase and PBL phase. These phases can be used for clarifying dynamic capabilities in MRO markets.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

dynamic capabilities; service business; MRO business; business model; aerospace

• Wydawca: Production Engineering Committee of the Polish Academy of Sciences ; Polish Association for Production Management
• Czasopismo: Management and Production Engineering Review
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 7, No. 3
• Strony: 87--93
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 24 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Sivusuo J.

• University of Vaasa, Department of Production, Finland

autor

Takala J.

• University of Vaasa, Department of Production, Finland

Bibliografia

• [1] Schneider S., Spieth P., Clauss T., Business model innovation in the aviation industry, International Journal of Product Development, 18, 3/4, 286-310, 2013.
• [2] Helfat C.E., Finkelstein S., Mitchell W., Peteraf M.A., Singh H., Teece D.J., Winter S.G., Dynamic capabilities: understanding strategic change in organizations, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 2007.
• [3] Teece D.J., Pisano G., Shuen A., Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 7, 509-533, 1997.
• [4] Agripino M., Cathcart T., Mathaisel D., A lean sustainment enterprise model for military systems, Acquisition Review Quarterly - Fall, 2002.
• [5] Ayeni P., Baines T.S., Lightfoot H., Ball P.D., Stateof-the-art of “Lean” in the aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul industry, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2108-2123, 2011.
• [6] Teece D.J., Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance, Strategic Management Journal, 28, 13, 1319-1350, 2007.
• [7] Eisenhardt K.M., Martin J.A., Dynamic capabilities: what are they?, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 10-11, 1105-1121, 2000.
• [8] Barney J., Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, 1991.
• [9] Winter S.G., Understanding Dynamic Capabilities - Presentation, Strategic Management Journal, 24, 991-995, 2003.
• [10] Zollo M., Winter S.G., it Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities, Organization Science, 2002.
• [11] Ellonen H.K., Wikström P., Jantunen A., Linking dynamic-capability portfolios and innovation outcomes, Technovation, 29, 11, 753-762, 2009.
• [12] Jantunen A., Ellonen H.K., Johansson A., Beyond appearances - Do dynamic capabilities of innovative firms actually differ?, European Managent Journal, 30, 2, 141-155, 2012.
• [13] Koskinen J., A dynamic business model for hightech industry in a global environment - The origin of operational patterns by means of social selection, University of Vaasa, 2014.
• [14] Lee S.G., Ma Y.S., Thimm G.L., Verstraeten J., Product lifecycle management in aviation maintenance, repair and overhaul, Computers in Industry, 59, 2-3, 296-303, 2008.
• [15] Choo B.S., Best practices in aircraft engine MRO: A study of commercial and military systems, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2004.
• [16] Knotts R.M.H., Civil aircraft maintenance and support Fault diagnosis from a business perspective, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 5, 4, 335-347, 1999.
• [17] Al-kaabi H., Potter A., Naim M., Insights Into the Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul Configurations of European Airlines, Journal of Air Transportation, 12, 2, 27-42, 2007.
• [18] Kinnison H.A., Aviation Maintenance Management, McGraw-Hill, 72-75, 2004.
• [19] Tsang A.H.C., Strategic dimensions of maintenance management, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, vol. 8, 2002.
• [20] Yin R.K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, vol. 5, 2002.
• [21] Hyötyläinen R., Nuutinen M., Mahdollisuuksien kenttä, palveluliiketoiminta ja vuorovaikutteinen johtaminen, Helsinki: Teknologiateollisuus ry, 2010.
• [22] Randall W.S., Nowicki D.R., Hawkins T.G., Explaining the effectiveness of performance-based logistics: a quantitative examination, The International Journal of Logistics Management, 2011.
• [23] Gansler J., Lucyshyn W., Evaluation of performance based logicstics, 2006.
• [24] Gourley M., The current state of performance based logistics, 2014.

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.