Erotetic Reasoning Corpus. A data set for research on natural question processing

• Autorzy: Łupkowski P. , Urbański M. , Wiśniewski A. , Błądek W. , Juska A. , Kostrzewa A. , Pankow D. , Paluszkiewicz K. , Ignaszak O. , Urbańska J. , Żyluk N. , Gajda A. , Marciniak B.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15398/jlm.v5i3.190

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of this paper is to present the Erotetic Reasoning Corpus (ERC) which constitutes a data set for research on natural question processing. We describe the theoretical background, linguistic data and tags used for the annotation process. We also discuss the potential areas in which the ERC can be exploited.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

question; logic of question; question processing; erotetic reasoning; corpus annotation

• Wydawca: Instytut Podstaw Informatyki PAN
• Czasopismo: Journal of Language Modelling
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: Vol. 5, No. 3
• Strony: 607--631
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 31 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Łupkowski P.

• Institute of Psychology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań
• Reasoning Research Group, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań

autor

Urbański M.

• Institute of Psychology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań
• Reasoning Research Group, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań

autor

Wiśniewski A.

• Institute of Psychology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań

autor

Błądek W.

• Reasoning Research Group, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań

autor

Juska A.

• Reasoning Research Group, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań

autor

Kostrzewa A.

• Reasoning Research Group, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań

autor

Pankow D.

• Reasoning Research Group, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań

autor

Paluszkiewicz K.

• Institute of Psychology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań
• Reasoning Research Group, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań

autor

Ignaszak O.

• Reasoning Research Group, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań

autor

Urbańska J.

• Institute of Psychology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań

autor

Żyluk N.

• Institute of Psychology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań
• Reasoning Research Group, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań

autor

Gajda A.

• Institute of Psychology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań
• Reasoning Research Group, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań

autor

Marciniak B.

• Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Adam Mickiewicz University

Bibliografia

• [1] Nuel Belnap (1986), Approaches to the semantics of questions in natural language: part 1, in From models to modules, pp. 257-284, Ablex Publishing Corp.
• [2] Jean Carletta (1996), Assessing Agreement on Classification Tasks: The Kappa Statistic, Computational Linguistics, 22 (2): 249-254.
• [3] Paulo Rogério de Souza e Silva Filho and Rian Gabriel Santos Pinheiro (2010), Design and Preparation of Effective Scientific Posters using LATEX, The PracTEX Journal, 2010 (2), http://tug.org/pracjourn/2010-2/rogerio.html.
• [4] Peter Flom (2005), LATEX for academics and researchers who (think they) don’t need it, The PracTEX Journal, 2005 (4), http://tug.org/pracjourn/2005-4/flom/flom.pdf.
• [5] Andrzej Gajda and Paweł Łupkowski (2016), Using LATEX as an element of the Erotetic Reasoning Corpus interface, in Tomasz Przechlewski, Karl Berry, and Jerzy Ludwichowski, editors, BachoTeX 2016: Convergence, pp. 47-52, Polish TEX Users Group GUST, Bachotek.
• [6] M. Gamer, J. Lemon, and I. F. P. Singh (2012), irr: Various Coefficients of Interrater Reliability and Agreement. R package version 0.84, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=irr.
• [7] Jonathan Ginzburg (2012), The Interactive Stance: Meaning for Conversation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• [8] Adam Grobler (2012), Fifth part of the definition of knowledge, Philosophica, 86: 33-50.
• [9] Jeroen Groenendijk and Floris Roelofsen (2011), Compliance, in Alain Lecomte and Samuel Tronçon, editors, Ludics, Dialogue and Interaction, pp. 161-173, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
• [10] C. L. Hamblin (1958), Questions, The Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 36: 159-168.
• [11] David Harrah (2002), The Logic of Questions, in D. M. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, editors, Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Second Edition, pp. 1-60, Kluwer, Dordrecht/Boston/London.
• [12] Marius Hofert and Markus Kohm (2010), Scientific Presentations with LATEX, The PracTEX Journal, 2010 (2), http://tug.org/pracjourn/2010-2/hofert.html.
• [13] Paweł Łupkowski (2011), Human computation — how people solve difficult AI problems (having fun doing it), Homo Ludens, 3 (1): 81-94, ISSN 2080-4555.
• [14] Paweł Łupkowski (2015), Making your researcher’s life easier. How to prepare transparent and dynamic research reports with LATEX, in Tomasz Przechlewski, Karl Berry, Bogusław Jackowski, and Jerzy Ludwichowski, editors, BachoTeX 2015: various faces of typography, pp. 42-48, Polish TEX Users Group GUST, Bachotek.
• [15] Paweł Łupkowski (2016), Logic of Questions in the Wild. Inferential Erotetic Logic in Information Seeking Dialogue Modelling, College Publications, London.
• [16] Paweł Łupkowski and Jonathan Ginzburg (2013), A corpus-based taxonomy of question responses, in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS 2013), pp. 354-361, Association for Computational Linguistics, Potsdam, Germany, http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W13-0209.
• [17] Paweł Łupkowski and Jonathan Ginzburg (2016), Query Responses, Journal of Language Modelling, 4 (2): 245-293.
• [18] Paweł Łupkowski and Olivia Ignaszak (2017), Inferential Erotetic Logic in Modelling of Cooperative Problem Solving Involving Questions in the QuestGen Game, Organon F, 24 (2): 214-244, http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/2017/2/214-244.pdf.
• [19] Paweł Łupkowski and Mariusz Urbański (2013), Preparing for scientific conferences with LATEX: A short practical how-to, TUGboat, 34 (2): 184-189.
• [20] Paweł Łupkowski and Patrycja Wietrzycka (2015), Gamification for Question Processing Research — the QuestGen Game, Homo Ludens, 7 (1): 161-171.
• [21] Michal Peliš (2016), Inferences with Ignorance: Logics of Questions (Inferential Erotetic Logic & Erotetic Epistemic Logic), Acta Universtitatis Carolinae – Philosophica et Historica, Karolinum, Praha.
• [22] R Core Team (2013), R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org/, access 20.03.2017.
• [23] Mariusz Urbański, Katarzyna Paluszkiewicz, and Joanna Urbańska (2016a), Erotetic Problem Solving: From Real Data to Formal Models. An Analysis of Solutions to Erotetic Reasoning Test Task, in Fabio Paglieri, Laura Bonetti, and Silvia Fellett, editors, The Psychology of Argument: Cognitive Approaches to Argumentation and Persuasion, pp. 33-46, College Publications, London.
• [24] Mariusz Urbański and Natalia Żyluk (2016), Sets of situations, topics, and question relevance, Technical report, AMU Institute of Psychology.
• [25] Mariusz Urbański, Natalia Żyluk, Katarzyna Paluszkiewicz, and Joanna Urbańska (2016b), A Formal Model of Erotetic Reasoning in Solving Some what Ill-Defined Problems, in D. Mohammed and M. Lewiński, editors, Argumentation and Reasoned Action Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, pp. 973-983, College Publications, London.
• [26] Jan van Kuppevelt (1995), Discourse structure, topicality and questioning, Journal of Linguistics, 31: 109-147.
• [27] Anthony J. Viera and Joanne M. Garrett (2005), Understanding Interobserver Agreement: The Kappa Statistic, Family Medicine, 37 (5): 360-363.
• [28] Luis Von Ahn and Laura Dabbish (2008), Designing games with a purpose, Communications of the ACM, 51 (8): 58-67.
• [29] Andrzej Wiśniewski (1995), The Posing of Questions: Logical Foundations of Erotetic Inferences, Kluwer AP, Dordrecht, Boston, London.
• [30] Andrzej Wiśniewski (2013), Questions, Inferences and Scenarios, College Publications, London.
• [31] Andrzej Wiśniewski (2015), Semantics of Questions, in S. Lappin and Ch. Fox, editors, The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, 2nd Edition, pp. 273-313, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018).