Powiadomienia systemowe
- Sesja wygasła!
Tytuł artykułu
Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Pełne teksty:
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Ryzyko geopolityczne, globalizacja i degradacja środowiska w Afryce Południowej: dowody z zaawansowanego podejścia kwantylowego
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Sustainable development involves the incorporation of socio-economic concerns and environmental protection into the economic decision-making process, in such a way that, any developmental effort would eventually be favorable to immediate and future generations. It is against this backdrop this study investigates the effects of geopolitical risk and globalization on environmental degradation in South Africa over the period 1985Q1-2018Q4. This study improves on existing studies and raises concerns on the potential twin-effect of geopolitical risk and globalization on the environment. We deviate from the existing studies that make use of the mean causality approaches that do not consider possible dependence in the conditional tail of the series distribution. To examine whether the causality exists among the series, we make use of the novel Troster (2018) Granger non-causality in condition quantiles, which captures the pattern of causality in various quantiles. Empirical results show that there is feedback causality nexus between geopolitical risk and CO2 emissions. In majority of the quantiles, feedback causality is also observed between globalization and CO2 emissions. We find a bidirectional Granger causality nexus between geopolitical risk and environmental degradation, and between globalization and environmental degradation. Globalization and geopolitical risk negatively influence environmental degradation. We conclude that environmental degradation is not driven by globalization and geopolitical risk in South Africa, among other policy suggestions.
Zrównoważony rozwój polega na włączeniu kwestii społeczno-ekonomicznych i ochrony środowiska do procesu podejmowania decyzji gospodarczych w taki sposób, aby wszelkie działania rozwojowe były ostatecznie korzystne dla najbliższych i przyszłych pokoleń. Na tym tle niniejsze badanie analizuje wpływ ryzyka geopolitycznego i globalizacji na degradację środowiska w Afryce Południowej w okresie 1985Q1-2018Q4. Badanie to budzi obawy dotyczące potencjalnego podwójnego wpływu ryzyka geopolitycznego i globalizacji na środowisko. Odchodzimy od istniejących badań, które wykorzystują podejście do średniej przyczynowości, które nie uwzględnia możliwej zależności w warunkowym ogonie rozkładu serii. Aby zbadać, czy istnieje związek przyczynowy między szeregami, korzystamy z Trostera (2018) Grangera bezprzyczynowości w kwantylach warunkowych, która oddaje wzorzec przyczynowości w różnych kwantylach. Wyniki empiryczne pokazują, że istnieje związek przyczynowo-skutkowy sprzężenia zwrotnego między ryzykiem geopolitycznym a emisjami CO2 . W większości kwantyli obserwuje się również przyczynowość sprzężenia zwrotnego między globalizacją a emisjami CO2 . Znajdujemy dwukierunkowy związek przyczynowy Grangera między ryzykiem geopolitycznym a degradacją środowiska oraz między globalizacją a degradacją środowiska. Globalizacja i ryzyko geopolityczne negatywnie wpływają na degradację środowiska. Doszliśmy do wniosku, że degradacja środowiska nie jest spowodowana między innymi globalizacją i ryzykiem geopolitycznym w RPA, ale także innymi sugestiami politycznymi.
Wydawca
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
207--215
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 39 poz., fig., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- School of Business, Westcliff University, Irvine, California, United States (United States)
autor
- School of Business, Westcliff University, Irvine, California, United States (United States)
autor
- Research Department, Central Bank of Nigeria, Abuja, Nigeria (Nigeria)
autor
- School of Business, Westcliff University, Irvine, California, United States (United States)
- Cyprus International University, Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Science (Cyprus)
Bibliografia
- 1. ABUBAKAR L., SALEMCITY A. J., ABASS O. K., OLAJUYIN A. M., 2021, The impacts of COVID-19 on environmental sustainability: A brief study in world context, Bioresource Technology Reports, 15: 100713. Google Scholar
- 2. ADEBAYO T. S., AKADIRI S. S., AKPAN U., ALADENIKA B., 2022, Asymmetric effect of financial globalization on carbon emissions in G7 countries: Fresh insight from quantile-on-quantile regression, Energy & Environment, https://doi.org/0958305X221084290. Google Scholar
- 3. AKADIRI S. S., ADEBAYO T. S., 2021, Asymmetric nexus among financial globalization, non-renewable energy, renewable energy use, economic growth, and carbon emissions: impact on environmental sustainability targets in India, Environmental Science and Pollution Research: 1-13. Google Scholar
- 4. AKADIRI S. S., ALOLA A. A., BEKUN F. V., ETOKAKPAN M. U., 2020, Does electricity consumption and globalization increase pollutant emissions? Implications for environmental sustainability target for China, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(20): 25450-25460. Google Scholar
- 5. AKADIRI S. S., LASISI T. T., UZUNER G., AKADIRI A. C., 2020, Examining the causal impacts of tourism, globalization, economic growth and carbon emissions in tourism island territories: bootstrap panel Granger causality analysis, Current Issues in Tourism, 23(4): 470-484. Google Scholar
- 6. ADEBAYO T. S., AKADIRI S. S., AKANNI E. O., SADIQ-BAMGBOPA Y., 2022, Does political risk drive environ-mental degradation in BRICS countries? Evidence from method of moments quantile regression, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(21): 32287-32297. Google Scholar
- 7. ANSER M. K., SYED Q. R., APERGIS N., 2021, Does geopolitical risk escalate CO2 emissions? Evidence from the BRICS countries, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(35): 48011-48021. Google Scholar
- 8. ALOCH M. A., OZTURK I., BEKUN F. V., KHAN, D., 2021, Modelling the dynamic linkage between financial development, energy innovation, and environmental quality: Does globalization matter?, Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1): 176-184. Google Scholar
- 9. BROOCK W. A., SCHEINKMAN J. A., DECHERT W. D., LEBARON B., 1996, A test for independence based on the correlation dimension, Econometric reviews, 15(3): 197-235. Google Scholar
- 10. CALDARA D., IACOVIELLO M., 2018, Measuring geopolitical risk, FRB International Finance Discussion Paper, (1222). Google Scholar
- 11. CLEVELAND W. S., 1979, Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots, Journal of the American statistical association, 74(368): 829-836. Google Scholar
- 12. ENGLE R. F., GRANGER C. W., 1987, Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society: 251-276. Google Scholar
- 13. FAROOQ S., OZTURK I., MAJEED M. T., AKRAM R., 2022, Globalization and CO2 emissions in the presence of EKC: A global panel data analysis, Gondwana Research, 106: 367-378. Google Scholar
- 14. GÜNGÖR H., ABU-GOODMAN M., OLANIPEKUN I. O., USMAN O., 2021, Testing the environmental Kuznets curve with structural breaks: The role of globalization, energy use, and regulatory quality in South Africa, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(16): 20772-20783. Google Scholar
- 15. GRANGER C. W., 1969, Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society: 424-438. Google Scholar
- 16. GYGLI S., HAELG F., POTRAFKE N., STURM J. E., 2018, The KOF globalisation index-revisited. Google Scholar
- 17. JIAO Y., XIAO X., BAO X., 2022, Economic policy uncertainty, geopolitical risks, energy output and ecological foot-print – Empirical evidence from China, Energy Reports, 8: 324-334. Google Scholar
- 18. KOENKER R., BASSETT J.R.G., 1978, Regression quantiles. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society: 33-50. Google Scholar
- 19. LE H. P., OZTURK I., 2020, The impacts of globalization, financial development, government expenditures, and institutional quality on CO2 emissions in the presence of environmental Kuznets curve, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(18): 22680-22697. Google Scholar
- 20. LEE C. C., OLASEHINDE‐WILLIAMS G., AKADIRI S. S., 2021, Geopolitical risk and tourism: Evidence from dynamic heterogeneous panel models, International Journal of Tourism Research, 23(1): 26-38. Google Scholar
- 21. MISHRA P., PANDEY C. M., SINGH U., GUPTA A., SAHU C., KESHRI A., 2019, Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data, Annals of cardiac anaesthesia, 22(1): 67. Google Scholar
- 22. RAFINDADI A. A., 2016, Does the need for economic growth influence energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Nigeria? Evidence from the innovation accounting test, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62: 1209-1225. Google Scholar
- 23. RAFINDADI A. A., OZTURK I., 2017, Dynamic effects of financial development, trade openness and economic growth on energy consumption: Evidence from South Africa, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 7(3): 74-85. Google Scholar
- 24. RAFINDADI A. A., USMAN O., 2019, Globalization, energy use, and environmental degradation in South Africa: Startling empirical evidence from the Maki-cointegration test, Journal of Environmental Management, 244: 265-275. Google Scholar
- 25. RITI J. S., SHU Y., RITI M. K. J., 2022, Geopolitical risk and environmental degradation in BRICS: Aggregation bias and policy inference, Energy Policy, 166: 113010. Google Scholar
- 26. SAINT AKADIRI S., ALKAWFI M. M., UĞURAL S., AKADIRI A. C., 2019, Towards achieving environmental sustainability target in Italy. The role of energy, real income and globalization, Science of the Total Environment, 671: 1293-1301. Google Scholar
- 27. SAINT AKADIRI S., ALOLA A. A., AKADIRI A. C., 2019, The role of globalization, real income, tourism in environ-mental sustainability target. Evidence from Turkey, Science of the Total Environment, 687: 423-432. Google Scholar
- 28. SAINT AKADIRI S., ELUWOLE K. K., AKADIRI A. C., AVCI T., 2020, Does causality between geopolitical risk, tourism and economic growth matter? Evidence from Turkey, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 43: 273-277. Google Scholar
- 29. SALAHUDDIN M., ALI M., VINK N., GOW J., 2019, The effects of urbanization and globalization on CO2 emissions: evidence from the Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(3): 2699-2709. Google Scholar
- 30. SIM N., ZHOU H., 2015, Oil prices, US stock return, and the dependence between their quantiles, Journal of Banking & Finance, 55: 1-8. Google Scholar
- 31. STONE C. J., 1977, Consistent nonparametric regression, The annals of statistics, 595-620. Google Scholar
- 32. SWEIDAN O. D., 2021, Is the geopolitical risk an incentive or obstacle to renewable energy deployment? Evidence from a panel analysis, Renewable Energy, 178: 377-384. Google Scholar
- 33. TIWARI A. K., DAS D., DUTTA A., 2019, Geopolitical risk, economic policy uncertainty and tourist arrivals: Evidence from a developing country, Tourism Management, 75: 323-327. Google Scholar
- 34. TROSTER V., 2018, Testing for Granger-causality in quantiles, Econometric Reviews, 37(8): 850-866. Google Scholar
- 35. USMAN O., AKADIRI S. S., ADESHOLA I., 2020, Role of renewable energy and globalization on ecological footprint in the USA: Implications for environmental sustainability, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(24): 30681-30693. Google Scholar
- 36. UZUNER G., AKADIRI S. S., LASISI T. T., 2020, The asymmetric relationship between globalization, tourism, CO2 emissions, and economic growth in Turkey: Implications for environmental policy making, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(26): 32742-32753. Google Scholar
- 37. WANG X., WU Y., XU W., 2019, Geopolitical risk and investment, SSRN 3305739. Google Scholar
- 38. XIAO Z., 2009, Functional-coefficient cointegration models, Journal of Econometrics, 152(2): 81-92. Google Scholar
- 39. ZHAO W., ZHONG, R., SOHAIL, S., MAJEED, M. T., ULLAH, S., 2021, Geopolitical risks, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions in BRICS: An asymmetric analysis, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(29): 39668-39679. Google Scholar
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-d37c87d9-f915-4bda-b6d2-1931661e435b