Diversity of Aquatic Molluscs in a Heterogenous Section of a Medium-Sized Lowland River-Floodplain System: An Example of Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis

• Autorzy: Jurkiewicz-Karnkowska E.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.3161/15052249PJE2015.63.4.008

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Natural river-floodplain systems are heterogenous mosaics of lotic and lentic habitats subjected to dynamic temporal changes connected with hydrological regime, which promote high biological diversity. Mollusc assemblages of three habitat types within 10 km section of the lower course of the Liwiec River (East Poland) — the main river channel (MC), the secondary channel (SC) and remnants of the former river channel (FC), were compared to find if they were structured by heterogeneity resulting from hydrological connectivity and disturbance intensity related to it. The influence of selected qualitative environmental variables was also analysed. The investigations were carried out at 19 sites during late spring and late summer in the years 2012–2014, molluscs were sampled from approximately 1 m² of the bottom with a hand net, and from macrophytes with a frame. Rich aquatic malacofauna (36 species including 22 gastropods and 14 bivalves) was found within the study area including three species of special interest: Anisus vorticulus (Troschel), Unio crassus Phillipsson and Anodonta cygnea (L.). Bivalves Sphaerium corneum (L.) and Pisidium spp dominated within MC, in SC a few common and ubiquitous species (mainly snails) prevailed, pulmonate snails and some small bivalves of the genus Pisidium were the most numerous molluscs within FC. Principal Component Analysis revealed that current velocity, channel width, bottom sediments and macrophyte abundance were important environmental factors structuring mollusc assemblages. Considerable variation in species composition (β diversity), especially between the main river channel and two other habitat types (β²) was found. The highest values of mean species richness, Shannon true diversity and Shannon index found in the secondary channel were in accordance with intermediate disturbance hypothesis.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

aquatic molluscs; diversity; Liwiec River; spatial heterogeneity; fresh waters; Anisus vorticulus (Troschel); Unio crassus Phillipsson

PL

mięczaki wodne; różnorodność; rzeka Liwiec; zróżnicowanie przestrzenne; wody słodkie; zatoczek łamliwy; skójka gruboskorupowa

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 63, nr 4
• Strony: 559--572
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 52 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Jurkiewicz-Karnkowska E.

• Siedlce University, Faculty of Natural Science, B. Prusa str. 12, 08-110 Siedlce

Bibliografia

• 1. Amoros C., Bornette G. 2002 — Connectivity and biocomplexity in waterbodies of riverine floodplains — Freshw. Biol. 47: 761–776.
• 2. Beran L. 2013 — Freshwater molluscs of the Dyje (Thaya) River and its tributaries — the role of these water bodies in expansion of alien species and as a refuge for endangered gastropods and bivalves — Folia Malacologica, 21: 143–160.
• 3. Castella E., Richardot-Coulet M., Roux C., Richoux P. 1991 — Aquatic macroinvertebrate assemblages of two contrasting floodplains: the Rhône and Ain rivers, France — Regul. Rivers, 6: 289–300.
• 4. Catalogue of life: Dynamic checklist. 2015.www.catalogueoflife.org./dynamicchecklist.php
• 5. Colwell R.K. 2004 — EstimateS: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species from Samples. Version 8.0. Available athttp://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates
• 6. Connell J.H. 1978 — Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs — Science, 199: 1302–1310.
• 7. Costil K., Clement B. 1996 — Relationship between freshwater gastropods and plant communities reflecting various trophic levels — Hydrobiologia, 321: 7–16.
• 8. Copp G.H. 1991 — Typology of aquatic habitats in the Great Ouse, a small regulated lowland river — Regul. Rivers, 6: 125–134.
• 9. Czarnecka H. 2005 — [Atlas of hydrographic division of Poland] — IMGW,Warszawa (in Polish).
• 10. Foeckler F., Diepolder U., Deichner O. 1991 — Water mollusc communities and bioindication of lower Salzach floodplain waters — Regul. Rivers, 6: 301–312.
• 11. Foeckler F., Kretschmer W., Deichner O., Schmidt H. 1994 —Bioindication of former floodplain waters of the lower Salzach River (Bavaria) by macroinvertebrate communitities — Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 25: 1618–1623.
• 12. Foggo A., Rundle S.D., Bilton D.T. 2003 — The net result: evaluating species richness extrapolation techniques for littoral pond invertebrates — Freshw. Biol. 48: 1756–1764.
• 13. Fruget J.F. 1992 — Ecology of the Lower Rhône after 200 years of human influence: a review — Regul. Rivers, 7: 233–246.
• 14. Fruget J.F. 1994 — Invertebrate communities in a regulated floodplain of the middle Rhône River — Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 25: 1549–1554.
• 15. Gallardo B., Dodélec S., Paillex A., Arscott D.B., Sheldon F., Zilli F., Mérigoux S., Castella E., Comín F.A. 2014 — Response of benthic macroinvertebrates to gradients in hydrological connectivity: a comparison of temperate, sub-tropical, Mediterranean and semiarid river floodplains — Fresw. Biol. 59: 630–648.
• 16. Gallardo B., Garcia M., Cabezas Á., González E., González M., Ciancarelli C., Comín F.A. 2008 — Macroinvertebrate patterns along environmental gradients and hydrological connectivity within a regulated river-floodplain — Aquat. Sci. 70: 248–258.
• 17. Gotelli N., Colwell R.K. 2001 — Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness — Ecol. Lett. 4: 379–391.
• 18. Hortal J., Borges P.A.V., Gaspar C. 2006 — Evaluating the performance of species richness estimators: sensitivity to sample grain size — J. Anim. Ecol. 75: 274–287.
• 19. Jost L. 2006 — Entropy and diversity — Oikos, 113: 363–375.
• 20. Junk W.J., Bayley P.B., Sparks R.E. 1989 — The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems — Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 106:110–127.
• 21. Jurkiewicz-Karnkowska E. 2008 — Aquatic mollusc communities in riparian sites of different size, hydrological connectivity and succession stage — Pol. J. Ecol. 56: 99–118.
• 22. Jurkiewicz-Karnkowska E. 2009 — Diversity of aquatic malacofauna within a floodplain of a large lowland river (lower Bug River, eastern Poland) — J. Moll. Studies, 75: 223–234.
• 23. Jurkiewicz-Karnkowska E. 2014 — Sampling intensity in biodiversity assessment: malacofauna of selected floodplain water bodies — Folia Malacologica, 22: 21–30.
• 24. Korycińska M. 2002 — Molluscs of the Liwiec River (South Podlasie and Middle Mazovian lowlands) — Folia Malacologica, 10: 17–23.
• 25. Królak E., Korycińska M. 2008 — Taxonomic composition of macroinvertebrates in the Liwiec River and its tributaries (Central and Eastern Poland) on the basis of chosen physical and chemical parameters of water and season — Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 17: 39–50.
• 26. Lake P.S. 2000 — Disturbance, patchiness, and diversity in streams — J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 19: 573–592.
• 27. Lande R. 1996 — Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities — Oikos, 76: 5–13.
• 28. Lewin I. 2014 — Mollusc communities of lowland rivers and oxbow lakes in agricultural areas with anthropogenically elevated nutrient concentrations— Folia Malacologica, 22: 87–159.
• 29. Loreau M. 2000 — Are communities saturated? On the relationship between α, β and γ diversity — Ecol. Lett. 3: 73–76.
• 30. Marchese M., Ezurra De Drago I. 1992 — Benthos of the lotic environments in the Middle Parana River system — transverse zonation — Hydrobiologia, 237: 1–13.
• 31. Obrdlik P., Falkner G., Castella E. 1995 — Biodiversity of Gastropoda in European floodplains — Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 101: 339–356.
• 32. Obrdlik P., Fuchs U. 1991 — Surface water connection and the macrozoobenthos of two types of floodplains on the upper Rhine — Regul. Rivers, 6: 279v288.
• 33. Piechocki A. 1969 — [Molluscs of the Grabia River and its floodplain] — Frag. Faun. 15: 111–197 (in Polish).
• 34. Piechocki A. 1979 — [Molluscs. Snails. Freshwater fauna of Poland], 7 — PWN, Warszawa-Poznań (in Polish).
• 35. Piechocki A. 1981 — [Contemporary and sub-fossil molluscs of Świętokrzyskie Mountains] — Acta Univ. Lodziensis, Łódź, 177 pp. (in Polish).
• 36. Piechocki A., Dyduch-Falniowska A. 1993 — [Molluscs. Bivalves. Freshwater fauna of Poland], 7A — PWN, Warszawa, (in Polish).
• 37. Pliūraité V., Kesminas V. 2004 — Species composition of macroinvertebrates in medium-sized Lithuanian rivers — Acta Zool. Lithuanica, 14: 10–25.
• 38. Richardot-Coulet M., Castella E., Castella C. 1987 — Classification and succession of former channels of French Upper Rhône alluvial plain using Mollusca — Regul. Rivers, 1: 111–127.
• 39. Reckendorfer W. Baranyi C., Funk A., Schiemer F. 2006 — Floodplain restoration by reinforcing hydrological connectivity: expected effects on aquatic mollusk communities — J. Appl. Ecol. 43: 474–484.
• 40. Robson B.J., Clay C.J. 2005 — Local and regional macroinvertebrate diversity in the wetlands of a cleared agricultural landscape in south-western Victoria, Australia — Aquat. Conserv. 15: 403–414.
• 41. Soberón J., Jiménez R., Golubov J., Koleff P. 2007 — Assessing completeness of biodiversity databases at different spatial scales — Ecography, 30: 152–160.
• 42. Statzner B., Higler B. 1986 — Stream hydraulics as a major determinant of benthic invertebrate zonation patterns — Freshw. Biol. 16: 127–139.
• 43. Thiere G., Milenkovski S., Lindgren P.E., Sahlén G., Berglund O., Weisner S.E.B. 2009 — Wetland creation in agricultural landscapes: Biodiversity benefits on local and regional scales — Biol. Conserv. 142:964–973.
• 44. Tockner K., Malard F., Ward J.V. 2000 — An extension of the flood pulse concept — Hydrol. Process. 14: 2861–2883.
• 45. Tockner K., Schiemer F., Baumgartner C., Kum G., Weigand E., Zweimueller I., Ward J.V. 1999 — The Danube Restoration Project: species diversity patterns across connectivity gradients in the floodplain system — Regul. Rivers, 15: 245–258.
• 46. Townsend C.R., Scarsbrook M.R., Dolédec S. 1997 — The intermediate disturbance hypothesis, refugia and biodiversity in streams — Limnol. Oceanogr. 48: 938–949.
• 47. Van Den Brink F.W.B., Van Der Velde G. 1991 — Macrozoobenthos of floodplain waters of the rivers Rhine and Meuse in the Netherlands: a structural and functional analysis in relation to hydrology — Regul. Rivers, 6: 265–277.
• 48. Veech J.A., Summerville K.S., Crist T.O., Gering J.C. 2002 — The additive partitioning of species diversity: recent revival of an old idea — Oikos, 99: 3–9.
• 49. Weigand E., Stadler F. 2000 — Die aquatischen Mollusken der Regelsbrunner Au — Abh. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Osterreich, 31: 99–124.
• 50. Ward J.V., Tockner K., Arscott D.B., Claret C. 2002 — Riverine landscape diversity — Freshw. Biol. 47: 517–539.
• 51. Whittaker R.H. 1972 — Evolution and measurement of species diversity — Taxon, 21: 213–251.
• 52. Zilli F.L., Matchese M.R. 2011 — Patterns in macroinvertebrate assemblages at different spatial scales. Implications of hydrological connectivity in a large floodplain river — Hydrobiologia, 663: 245–257.