Impact of the level of providing adaptability of an enterprice's on adaptation process of enterprise to innovation

• Autorzy: Yachmeneva V. , Osmanova Z.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article was dedicated to ensuring the adaptability of the enterprise. As a means of providing adaptability of an enterprice's activity there was suggested resources and their reserves: basic production assets of the enterprise, financial resources, material resources, carriers of knowledge, information and intangible resources of the enterprise. I-level barriers related to unawareness of need to involve the accumulation of resources and reserves resources for the providing adaptability of an enterprice's activity at the level of enterprise management. II-level barriers are associated with resource constraints — lack of resources, resources absence, lack of ability to attract resources and accumulate reserves resources for various reasons III-level barriers are associated with psychological resistance from employees. In the article problems hindering to providing adaptability of an enterprice's activity as barriers of I, II and III levels were presented and characterized. Influence of the level of barriers to providing adaptability of an enterprice's activity is characterized. Effect of the provision level of providing adaptability of an enterprice's activity on such characteristics of adaptation as rate of adaptation, the cost of adaptation, the scope and depth of adaptation is proved and the nature of such effects is investigated.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

adaptation; adaptability; enterprice's activity; providing

• Wydawca: Polish Academy of Sciences, Branch in Lublin
• Czasopismo: ECONTECHMOD : An International Quarterly Journal on Economics of Technology and Modelling Processes
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: Vol. 3, No 2
• Strony: 93--97
• Opis fizyczny: Bobliogr. 29 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Yachmeneva V.

• Managment department, The National Academy of Environmental Protection and Resort Development, Simferopol, Kievskaya street, 181, aud. 311

autor

Osmanova Z.

• Managment department, The National Academy of Environmental Protection and Resort Development, Simferopol, Kievskaya street, 181, aud. 311

Bibliografia

• 1. Chigenkova E. V. 2006. Formirovanie economicheskogo mehanizma adaptasii hozyaystvuyuschego subekta k rynochnoy srede: avtoref. dis. na soiskanie nauch. Stepeni kand. econ. nauk: spec. 08.00.01 "Econovicheskaya teoriya". Moskva, 24. (Rus).
• 2. Chuyko K. S. 2007. Formirovaniye adaptivnosti firmi v usloviah uskoreniya rinochnih izmeneniy: avtoref. dis. na soiskaniye nauch. stepeni kand. ekon. nauk: spets. 08.00.01 "Ekonomichna teoriya", 25. (Rus)
• 3. Fomin V. N. Sovremenniy ekonomicheskiy slovar. [Elektronniy resurs]. — Rezhim dostupa http://www.ebk.net.ua./Book/Ses/u/0612.htm//. (Ukr).
• 4. Hanaliyev G. I. 2005. Adaptatsiyniy protses avtotransportnyh pidpryemstv. Stavropol. Dep. VINITI RAN, Nr 1122-V, 115–121. (Rus).
• 5. Hanaliev G. I. 2006. Razvitiye sistemi upravlinniya adaptatsiyey avtomobilnogo transporta v usloviyah ekonomicheskoy sredi: avtoref. na poluch. Stepeni kand. ekonom. nauk: spets. 08.00.05 "Ekonomika i upravleniya narodnim hozaystvom". Stavropol, 21. (Rus).
• 6. Kozachenko A. V., Ponomarov V. P. and Liashenko O. M. 2003. Ekonomichna bezpieka pidpryemstva: sutnist ta mehanizm zabezpechennia. K.: Libra, 280. (Ukr).
• 7. Kizim N. A. 2007. Adaptivnie modeli v systemah prinyatiya resheniy. H.: VD "INZhEK", 368. (Ukr).
• 8. Ladico I. U. and Sumcov V. G 2004. Zagalniy menegment. Lugansk: Vyd-vо Shidnoukrainskogo natsionalnogo universitetu imeni Volodymyra Dalya, 282. (Ukraine).
• 9. Lashenko O. M. 2011. Kontseptualizatsiya upravlinnya ekonomichnoyu bezpekoyu pidpryemstva. Lugansk: vid-vo SNU im. V. Dalia, 400. (Ukr).
• 10. Lastaev T. T. and А. А. Caygorodsev. 2006. Mehanism agropromyshlenoy integrasii. Vestnic CASSU, Nr 4, 10–12. (Rus).
• 11. Maksimovich A. P. 2004. Programi povisheniya adaptivnosti ekonomicheskoy strukturi munitsipalnogo obrazovaniya: tez. dokl. nauk.-prakt. konf. v 2-kh t. Dni nauki, T.2, 46–47. (Rus).
• 12. Markovich I. 2011. Otsinyuvannya rivnya adaptovanosti promyslovogo pidpryemstva do roboty v globalnyh umovah. Galitskiy ekonomichniy visnik, Nr 4(33), 86–93. (Ukr).
• 13. Minko I. S. Adaptivnost i innovatsii v ekonomicheskih sistemah: [Elektronniy resurs]. — Rezhim dostupa: http://economics.open-mechanics. com/articles/295.pdf. (Rus).
• 14. Ovchinnikova T. I., Gosteva I. V. and Hohlov A. V. 2009. Structurnaya model adaptatsii personala k krisisnym usloviam. Upravlenie personalom, Nr 5, 47–51. (Rus).
• 15. Pastuhova Е. А. Adaptatsiya ekonomicheskoy sistemi k izmeneniyam vneshney sredi. Mezhdunarodniy institut А. Bogdanova Vserossiyskaya Internet-konferentsia: [Elektronniy resurs]. — Rezhym dostupa: www.bogdinst.ru. (Rus).
• 16. Pitaikina I. A. 2006. Zakonomernosti rozvitiya gosudarstvennih unitarnyh predpriyatiy Rosii v rinochnoy ekonomike: avtoref. dis. na soiskaniye nauch. stepeni kand. ekon. nauk: spets. 08.00.01 "Ekonomicheskaya teoriya". Penza, 23. (Rus).
• 17. Pocrovskiy A. V. 2005. Slovar. Socialnaya psihologiya. М.: PER SE, 456. (Rus).
• 18. Samochkin V.N. 2000. Gibkoye razvitiye predpriyatiya: effectivnost i bugetirovanie. М.: Delo, 374. (Rus).
• 19. Smolinska N. V. 2013. Strategic solutions of business innovation-driven growth mainstreaming. Econtechmod. An international quarterly journal, Vol. 02. Nr 4, 89.(Pol).
• 20. Stasuk V. P. 2003. Modeli adaptivnogo upravleniya predpriyatiem. Donesk: DonNU, ООО "Yugo-vostok, Ltd", 224. (Rus).
• 21. Suvorova I. A. Soprotivleniye izmeneniyam: prichini vozniknoveniya i metodi preodoleniya, IKF "ALT", Sankt-Peterbur [Elektronniy resurs]. — Rezhim dostupa: http://www.iteam.ru/ publications/project/section_40/article_2653/ (Rus).
• 22. Voronkova A. E. and Kalyuzhna N. G. 2013. Personal potential of manager as a prerequisite of realization of managerial potential of enterprise. Econtechmod. An international quarterly journal, Vol. 02. Nr 2, 59. (Pol).
• 23. Voronkov D. K. 2010. Potentsial pidpryemstva yak osnova realizatsii zmin v yogo diyalnosti. Kultura narodiv Prichernomorya, Nr 195, 41–44. (Ukr).
• 24. Voronkov D. K. 2010. Upravlinnya zminamy na pidpryemstvi: teoriya ta prykladni aspekty. Kh.: VD "INZhEK", 340. (Ukr).
• 25. Yachmenyova V. M. 2007. Identifikatsia stiykosti diyalnosti promyslovyh pidpryemstv. Simferopol: Dolia, 384. (Ukr).
• 26. Yachmenyova V. M. 2008. Poniatie "adaptatsia" i "adaptivnost": shodstvo i razlichie. Nauchniy vestnik Poltavskogo universiteta potrebitelskoy kooperatsii Ukrainy, Nr 1 (26), 97–103. (Ukr).
• 27. Yachmenyova V. M. and Fedorkina M. S. 2012. Rezervy pidpryiemstva: otsiniuvannia yakosti nematerialnyh resursiv. Simferopol: VD "ARIAL", 266. (Ukr).
• 28. Yachmenyova V. M. and Osmanova Z. O. 2010. Sutnist ponyat "adaptatsia "i" adaptivnost". Visnyk natsіonalnogo unіversytetu "Lvіvska polіtehnіka", Nr 648, 120–126. (Ukr).
• 29. Zagorodniy A.G. and Voznuk G. L. 2005. Finansovo-economichniy slovnic. Lviv: Vydavnistvo Natsіonalnogo unіversytetu "Lvіvska polіtehnіka", 714. (Ukr).