Smart City index based on topsis method

• Autorzy: Sojda Adam

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2020.148.52

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The construction of rankings is an important element of city assessment consistent with the Smart City concept. New rankings appear periodically. New sets of variables or concepts for ranking are proposed. The article is part of this trend. Design/methodology/approach: The article combines the hierarchical structure of areas and indicators used in Smart City assessment with the concept of multidimensional assessment of facilities using the TOPSIS method. Findings: Assessment of the possibility of using the presented method to evaluate both individual areas of the city operation combined with an overall assessment. Originality/value: The most important achievement of this article is the proposal of the concept of city evaluation using the TOPSIS (SCI2T) method. An assessment of selected cities based on the proposed method is also presented.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

smart city; TOPSIS method; linear ordering

PL

smart city; metoda TOPSIS; porządkowanie liniowe

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: z. 148
• Strony: 709--718
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 9 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Sojda Adam

• Silesian University of Technology, Zabrze

Bibliografia

• 1. Ahvenniemi, H., Huovila, A., Pinto-Seppä, I., & Airaksinen, M. (2017). What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities? Cities. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/ j.cities.2016.09.009.
• 2. Aletà, N.B., Alonso, C.M., & Ruiz, R.M.A. (2017). Smart Mobility and Smart Environment in the Spanish cities. Transportation Research Procedia. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.trpro.2017.05.084.
• 3. Bakıcı, T., Almirall, E., & Wareham, J. (2013). A Smart City Initiative: the Case of Barcelona. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4(2), 135-148. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/ s13132-012-0084-9.
• 5. EC (n.a.) (2007). Smart cities: ranking of European mid-sized cities. Digital Agenda for Europe, October, 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(98)00050-X.
• 7. Hollands, R.G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City, 12(3), 303-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810802479126.
• 9. Kukuła, K. (2012). Propozycja budowy rankingu obiektów z wykorzystaniem cech ilościowych oraz jakościowych. Metody Ilościowe w Badaniach Ekonomicznych.
• 11. Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., Deakin, M., Nijkamp, P., Kourtit, K., & Farouh, H. (2011). An Advanced Triple-Helix Network Model for Smart Cities Performance. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61350-453-6.ch004.
• 13. Sojda, A., & Wolny, M. (2020). The impact of standardisation method on Smart City ranking. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series. https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2020.142.6.
• 15. Szczech-Pietkiewicz, E. (2015). Smart city – próba definicji i pomiaru. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego We Wrocławiu, 391. https://doi.org/10.15611/pn. 2015.391.07.

Uwagi

Błędna numeracja bibliografii.