Information technologies in higher education teaching in the opinions of academic teachers

• Autorzy: Romaniuk Milosz Wawrzyniec , Łukasiewicz-Wieleba Joanna

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/ijet.2024.149608

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article analyzes the opinions of academic teachers on the use of information technologies (ICT) in higher education teaching. Key conclusions from the study indicate the need to ensure a stable Internet connection and access to functional computer equipment and projectors in each classroom. Teachers emphasize the importance of financing the software and its systematic updating. The university's technical support is also important, including quick response to problems and the availability of the technical department. The respondents point out the need to increase the number of training courses on new tools and AI, which will allow for better adaptation to the needs of students. They also point to the need to equip classrooms with equipment for hybrid classes and support students by providing them with laptops and specialized software.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

IT in teaching and learning; higher education; academic teachers

• Wydawca: Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee of Electronics and Telecommunication
• Czasopismo: International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 70, No. 3
• Strony: 773--779
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 36 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Romaniuk Milosz Wawrzyniec

• The Maria Grzegorzewska University

• https://orcid.org/http%3A//orcid.org/0000-0002-1009-8940

autor

Łukasiewicz-Wieleba Joanna

• The Maria Grzegorzewska University

• https://orcid.org/https%3A//orcid.org/0000-0003-2215-1208

Bibliografia

• [1] W. Furmanek, “Nowoczesne technologie w oświacie i edukacji,” Edukacja-Technika-Informatyka 5(2), pp. 15-26, 2014.
• [2] M. Burns, “Technology in Education: Background Paper for 2023 Global Education Monitoring Report,” UNESCO, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16651.98082, 2021.
• [3] M. Plebańska, “Cyfrowa edukacja – potencjał, procesy, modele,” in Edukacja w czasach pandemii wirusa COVID-19, Warszawa, EduAkcja, 2020.
• [4] UNESCO, “Global Education Monitoring Report Summary 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms?,” UNESCO, Paris, 2023.
• [5] J. Pyżalski, “W jaki sposób możliwe były główne edukacyjne relacje w edukacji zdalnej?,” Studia z Teorii Wychowania 3(36), pp. 71-82, 2021.
• [6] M. W. Romaniuk and J. Łukasiewicz-Wieleba, “Zdalna edukacja kryzysowa w APS w okresie pandemii COVID-19,” Warszawa, 2020. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18059.52006
• [7] M. W. Romaniuk and J. Łukasiewicz-Wieleba, “Crisis Remote Education at The Maria Grzegorzewska University During Social Isolation in the Opinions of Academic Teachers,” International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 801-806, 2020. https://doi.org/10.24425/ijet.2020.135673
• [8] R. Tadeusiewicz, E-learning na uczelniach. Koncepcje. Organizacja. Wdrażanie, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 2021.
• [9] M. W. Romaniuk and J. Łukasiewicz-Wieleba, “Crisis Remote Education at The Maria Grzegorzewska University During Social Isolation in the Opinions of Students,” International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 807-812, 2020. https://doi.org/10.24425/ijet.2020.135675
• [10] M. W. Romaniuk and J. Łukasiewicz-Wieleba, “Crisis remote education from the perspective of one-year experience of academic teachers,” International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 213-219, 2021. https://doi.org/10.24425/ijet.2021.135967
• [11] M. Klimowicz, “„Polskie uczelnie w czasie pandemii”: czy zaszła cyfrowa rewolucja?,” SpołTech, Warszawa, 2020.
• [12] M. W. Romaniuk and J. Łukasiewicz-Wieleba, “Academic Lecturers Towards the Students' Examining. Similarities and Differences of Stationary and Remote Exams in the Pandemic Era,” International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 63-68, 2022. https://doi.org/10.24425/ijet.2022.139849
• [13] T. Triyason, A. Tassanaviboon and P. Kanthamanon, “Hybrid Classroom: Designing for the New Normal after COVID-19 Pandemic,” IAIT2020:Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Advances in Information Technology, pp. 1-8, https://doi.org/10.1145/3406601.3406635, 2020.
• [14] M. W. Romaniuk and J. Łukasiewicz-Wieleba, “Hybrid education in higher education on the example of academic teachers' experiences in post-pandemic reality,” International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 489-496, 2022. https://doi.org/10.24425/ijet.2022.141265
• [15] J. Singh, K. Steele and L. Singh, “Combining the Best of Online and Face-to-Face Learning: Hybrid and Blended Learning Approach for COVID- 19, Post Vaccine, & Post-Pandemic World,” Journal of Educational Technology Systems, Vol. 50 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177%2F00472395211047865, 2021.
• [16] J. Pyżalski and W. Poleszak, “Relacje przede wszystkim - nawet jeśli obecnie jedynie zapośredniczone,” in Edukacja w czasach pandemii wirusa COVID-19, Warszawa, EduAkcja, 2020.
• [17] J. Yao, J. Rao, T. Jiang and C. Xiong, “What Role Should Teachers Play in Online Teaching during the COVID-19 Pandemic? Evidence from China,” Science Insights Education Frontiers, 5 (2), pp. 517-524, 2020.
• [18] T. Böttger, G. Ibrahim and B. Vallis, “How the Internet reacted to Covid-19: A perspective from Facebook's Edge Network,” IMC '20: Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference, pp. 34-41, https://doi.org/10.1145/3419394.3423621, 2020.
• [19] H. Baber, “Social interaction and effectiveness of the online learning - A moderating role of maintaining social distance during the pandemic COVID-19,” Asian Education and Development Studies, 11 (1), pp. 159-171, https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-09-2020-0209, 2022.
• [20] M. Sudhir, S. Mascarenhas, J. Isaac, J. Alfroukh and S. A. Rahuman, “Adapting to the need of the hour: Communication skills simulation session using an online platform during COVID-19,” MedEdPublish, 9 (85), https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2020.000085.1, 2020.
• [21] J. Łukasiewicz-Wieleba and M. W. Romaniuk, “Academic Interpersonal Relations during the Pandemic Remote Education in the Opinion of Academic Teachers,” Lubelski Rocznik Pedagogiczny, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 67-81, 2022. https://doi.org/10.17951/lrp.2022.41.3.67-81
• [22] D. Siemieniecka, “Technologie w edukacji 4.0,” Przegląd Badań Edukacyjnych 34, p. 227-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/PBE.2021.027, 2021.
• [23] J. Pyżalski and N. Walter, “Edukacja zdalna w czasie pandemii COVID-19 w Polsce – mapa głównych szans i zagrożeń,” Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza, Poznań, 2021.
• [24] Ł. Tomczyk, “Czego możemy nauczyć się od tych, którzy prowadzą zdalną edukację od dawna?,” in Edukacja w czasach pandemii wirusa COVID-19, Warszawa, EduAkcja, 2020.
• [25] P. Augustyniak, “Autorytet nauczyciela akademickiego - jak budować i utrzymać w nauczaniu zdalnym,” in E-learning na uczelniach. Koncepcje. Organizacja. Wdrażanie, Warszawa, Wydawnictwa Naukowe PWN, 2021.
• [26] M. W. Romaniuk and J. Łukasiewicz-Wieleba, “Zdalna edukacja kryzysowa w APS w okresie pandemii COVID-19. Edukacja hybrydowa.,” Warszawa, 2022. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.30338.35524
• [27] M. W. Romaniuk and J. Łukasiewicz-Wieleba, “Zdalna edukacja kryzysowa w APS w okresie pandemii COVID-19. Proces egzaminowania w trybie zdalnym i stacjonarnym - porównanie,” Warszawa, 2021. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18440.55045
• [28] M. W. Romaniuk and J. Łukasiewicz-Wieleba, “Zdalna edukacja kryzysowa w APS w okresie pandemii COVID-19. Z perspektywy rocznych doświadczeń,” Warszawa, 2021. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10251.62243
• [29] M. W. Romaniuk and J. Łukasiewicz-Wieleba, “Challenges of administering university examinations remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic,” E-Mentor, vol. 3, no. 90, pp. 22-31, 2021. https://doi.org/10.15219/em90.1519
• [30] M. W. Romaniuk and J. Łukasiewicz-Wieleba, “Crisis remote education from the perspective of one-year experience of students,” International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 221-227, 2021. https://doi.org/10.24425/ijet.2021.135968
• [31] M. W. Romaniuk and J. Łukasiewicz-Wieleba, “Hybrid education in higher education on the example of students' experiences in post-pandemic reality,” International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 497-504, 2022. https://doi.org/10.24425/ijet.2022.141266
• [32] M. W. Romaniuk and J. Łukasiewicz-Wieleba, “Remote and Stationary Examinations in the Opinion of Students,” International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 69-75, 2022. https://doi.org/10.24425/ijet.2022.139850
• [33] J. Pyzalski, “W jaki sposób możliwe były główne edukacyjne relacje w edukacji zdalnej?,” Studia z teorii wychowania 3(36), pp. 71-82, 2021.
• [34] A. Siegelman, “lended, hybrid, and flipped courses: What’s the difference?,” Center for the Advancement of Teaching, pp. URL: https://teaching.temple.edu/edvice-exchange/2019/11/blended-hybrid-and-flipped-courses-what%E2, 80, 2019.
• [35] J. Pyżalski, “W jaki sposób możliwe były główne edukacyjne relacje w edukacji zdalnej?,” Studia z Teorii Wychowania, 12 (3(36)), pp. 71-82, 2021.
• [36] N. Hussain, B. Nawaz, S. Nasir, N. Kiani and M. Hussain, “Positive Teacher-Student Relationship and Teachers Experience - A Teacher's Perspective,” Global Journal of Management and Business Research Interdisciplinary, 13 (3), 2013.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).