The effectiveness of gas recovery systems for managing odour from conventional effluent treatment ponds in Palm oil mills in Malaysia

Chung, Andrew Yap Kian; Qamaruz Zaman, Nastaein; Yaacof, Narushikin; Yusoff, Syafinah; Abd Manaf, Fatah Yah; Mohamed Halim, Rohaya; Abd Majid, Rusnani

doi:10.2478/ceer-2019-0025

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

The effectiveness of gas recovery systems for managing odour from conventional effluent treatment ponds in Palm oil mills in Malaysia

Autorzy

Chung Andrew Yap Kian , Qamaruz Zaman Nastaein , Yaacof Narushikin , Yusoff Syafinah , Abd Manaf Fatah Yah , Mohamed Halim Rohaya , Abd Majid Rusnani

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/ceer-2019-0025

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Gas recovery systems at palm oil mills enable the curtailment of uncontrolled greenhouse gas emissions from open anaerobic pond, but can also reduce odour, an aspect which has not yet been substantiated. The objective of this study is to evaluate the odour emission from palm oil mill effluent and the effectiveness of covers and tank digester in reducing odour emission from the open lagoons. Odour samples were obtained from the cooling ponds in conjunction with in-field odour assessment performed on site. Results demonstrated that odour released from open ponding or covered lagoon were almost comparable, ranging from 33,150 – 162,000 OU/m3, and 68,705 – 102,000 OU/m3, respectively. In contrast, odour emission from cooling pond which used tank digester system seemed markedly lower, ranging between 13,000 – 76,000 OU/m3. In fact, the analysis of ambient air close to anaerobic tank digesters proved a reduction of odour emission to the surroundings (with 3.5 OU/m3, weak intensity) compared to open pond (with 2700 OU/m3, strong intensity) or covered lagoon (with 111 OU/m3, distinct intensity). In conclusion, gas recovery systems at palm oil mills should be promoted not only towards the management of greenhouse gaseous, but also as an odour impact management strategy.

Słowa kluczowe

gas recovery systems palm oil mill effluent palm oil mills effluent treatment anaerobic ponds reduce odour reduced gas emission

systemy odzyskiwania gazu ścieki palmowe olejarnie palmowe oczyszczanie ścieków stawy beztlenowe redukcja zapachów redukcja emisji gazów cieplarnianych

Wydawca

Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego

Czasopismo

Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports

Rocznik

2019

Tom

Vol. 29, no. 3

Strony

70--85

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 45 poz., fot., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Chung Andrew Yap Kian

Engineering & Processing Division, Malaysian Palm Oil Board, Bandar Baru Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia

autor

Qamaruz Zaman Nastaein

cenastaein@usm.my

School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
Solid Waste Management Cluster, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Engineering Campus, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

autor

Yaacof Narushikin

School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

autor

Yusoff Syafinah

School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

autor

Abd Manaf Fatah Yah

Engineering & Processing Division, Malaysian Palm Oil Board, Bandar Baru Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia

autor

Mohamed Halim Rohaya

Engineering & Processing Division, Malaysian Palm Oil Board, Bandar Baru Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia

autor

Abd Majid Rusnani

Engineering & Processing Division, Malaysian Palm Oil Board, Bandar Baru Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia

Bibliografia

1. Ahmad, AL, Chong, MF, Bhatia, S and Ismail, S 2006. Drinking water reclamation from palm oil mill effluent (POME) using membrane technology. Desalination, 191(1), 35-44.
2. Ahmad, AL, Ismail, S and Bhatia, S 2003. Water recycling from palm oil mill effluent (POME) using membrane technology. Desalination, 157, 87–95.
3. Awotoye, OO, Dada, AC and Arawomo, GAO 2011. Impact of palm oil processing effluent discharging on the quality of receiving soil and rivers in South Western Nigeria. Journal of Applied Science and Research, 7(2), 11–8.
4. Bello, MM, Nourouzi, MM, Chuah Abdullah, L, Choong, TSY, Koay, YS and Keshani, S 2103. POME is treated for removal of color from biologically treated POME in fixed bed column: Applying wavelet neural network (WNN). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 262, 106–113.
5. Biard, PF, Couvert, A, and amp; Renner, C 2017. Intensification of volatile organic compound absorption in acompact wet scrubber at co-current flow. Chemosphere, 173, 612-621.
6. Bull, M, McIntyre, A, Hakk, D, Allison, G, Redmore, J, Pullen, J, Caird, L, Stoaling, M and Fain, R 2014. IAQM Guidance on the assessment of odour for planning, Institute of Air Quality Management, London. Accessed on 20 April, 2018 at www.iaqm.co.uk/text/guidance/odourguidance-2014.
7. DEFRA 2010. Odour guidance for local authorities. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, United Kingdom.
8. Department of Environment 1974. Environmental Quality Act 1974. Accessed on 13 February, 2018 at https://www.doe.gov.my/portalv1/wpcontent/uploads/2015/01/Environmental_Quality_Act_1974__ACT_127.pdf.
9. Department of Environment 1982. Environmental Quality (Prescribed Premises) (Crude Palm Oil) (Amendment) Regulations 1982. Accessed on 13 March, 2018 at https://www.doe.gov.my/portalv1/wpcontent/uploads/2015/01/Environmental_Quality_Prescribed_Premises_Crude_Palm_Oil_Amendment_Regulations_1982_-_P.U.A_183-82.pdf.
10. Department of Environment (DOE) 1977. Environmental Quality (Prescribed Premises) (Crude Palm Oil) Regulations, 1977. Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad. Accessed on 14 March, 2018 at https://www.doe.gov.my/portalv1/wpcontent/uploads/2015/01/Environment_Quality_Prescribed_Premises_Crude_Palm_Oil_Regulations_1977_P.U.A_342-77.pdf.
11. Dougherty, B, Gray, M, Johnson and Kleber, M 2017. Can Biochar Covers Reduce Emissions from Manure Lagoons While Capturing Nutrients? Journal of Environmental Quality Abstract - Waste Management, 46(3), 659-666.
12. Hassan, MA and Abd-Aziz, S 2015. Waste and Environmental Management in the Malaysian Palm Oil Industry in Palm Oil: Production, Processing, Characterization, and Uses edited by Oi-Ming Lai, Chin-Ping Tan, Casimir C. Akoh. Elsevier, 1 Sep 2015 - Technology & Engineering.
13. Hassan, S, Kee, LS and Al-Kayiem, HH 2013. Experimental study of palm oil mill effluent and oil palm frond waste mixture as an alternative biomass fuel. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 8(6), 703 – 712.
14. Hügle, T and Kiel, HA 2001. Temperature and odour emissions from liquid manure. Landtechnik, 56 (1), 36-37.
15. Hull, C 2009. GHG Lifetimes and GWPs For ozone-depleting substances and their replacements. Manitoba Eco Network. Accessed on 22 March, 2018 at http://climatechangeconnection.org/wpcontent/
uploads/2014/08/GWP_AR4.pdf.
16. Iwuagwu, JO and Ugwuanyi, JO 2014. Treatment and Valorization of Palm Oil Mill Effluent through Production of Food Grade Yeast Biomass. Journal of Waste Management.
17. Kasimon, MN 2017. Resah bau busuk kilang sawit. Sinar Harian. Accessed on 29 February, 2018 at http://www.sinarharian.com.my/edisi/johor/resahbau-busuk-kilangsawit-1.687296.
18. Krishnan, S, Singh, L, Sakinah, M, Thakur, S, Wahid, ZA and Alkasrawi, M 2016. Process enhancement of hydrogen and methane production from palm oil mill effluent using two-stage thermophilic and mesophilic fermentation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41(30), 12888-12898.
19. Kushairi A, Soh Kheang Loh, Azman I, Elina Hishamuddin, Meilina Ong-Abdullah, Zanal Bidin Mohd Noor Izuddin, Razmah G, Shamala Sundram and Ghulam Kadir Ahmad Parveez 2018. Oil Palm Economic Performance in Malaysia and R&D Progress in 2017. Journal of Palm Oil Research Vol. 30(2) June 2018 p. 163-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21894/jopr.2018.0030.
20. Liu, Z, Powers, W and Mukhtar, S 2014. A review of practices and technologies for odor control in swine production facilities. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 30(3), 477-492.
21. Loh, SK, Nasrin, AB, Mohamad Azri, S, Nurul Adela, B, Muzzammil, N, Daryl Jay, T, Stasha Eleanor, RA, Lim, WS, Choo, YM and Kaltschmitt, M 2017. First Report on Malaysia’s experiences and development in biogas capture and utilization from palm oil mill effluent under the Economic Transformation Programme: Current and future perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 74, 1257–1274.
22. Loyon, L, Guiziou, F, Picard, S and Saint-Cast, P 2016. Farm-Scale Applicability of Three Covers (Peat, Polystyrene Balls and Synthetic Sheet Roof) to Reduce Ammonia Emissions from Pig Slurry Storage. Agricultural Sciences, 7, 396-406.
23. Loyon, L, Guiziou, F, Picard, S, Cast, PS 2016. Farm-Scale Applicability of Three Covers (Peat, Polystyrene Balls and Synthetic Sheet Roof) to Reduce Ammonia Emissions from Pig Slurry Storage. Agricultural Sciences, 7, 396-406.
24. Malaysian Palm Oil Board 2011. Malaysia oil palm statistics. Accessed on 10 April, 2018 at http://econ.mpob.gov.my/economy/ei_statistics_content.html
25. Malaysian Palm Oil Board 2012. Oil palm and the environment. Accessed on 10 April, 2018 at http://www.mpob.gov.my/en/palm-info/environment/520-achievements.
26. Malaysian Palm Oil Board 2013. Public consultation on mandatory installation of biogas facilities in palm oil mills. Accessed on 5 April, 2018 http://www.mpob.gov.my/images/stories/pdf/2013/biogas_eng.pdf.
27. Malaysian Palm Oil Board 2015. MPOB E-licensing. License application manual. Accessed on 27 February, 2018 at http://elicense. mpob.gov.my/infos/Panduan.html.
28. Malaysian Palm Oil Board 2016. Malaysian oil palm statistics 2015, 35th ed., MPOB, Ministry of Plantation Industries and Commodities.
29. Mamimin, C, Singkhala, A, Kongjan, P, Suraraksa, B, Prasertsan, P, Imai, T and O-Thong, S 2015. Two-stage thermophilic fermentation and mesophilic methanogen process for biohythane production from palm oil mill effluent. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 40(19), 6319-6328.
30. Ni, JQ, Heber, AJ, Sutton, AL and Kelly, DT 2009. Mechanisms of gas releases from swine wastes. Transactions of the ASABE, 52, 2013-2025.
31. Nicell, JA 2009. Assessment and regulation of odour impacts. Atmospheric Environment 43 (2009) 196-206.
32. Ohimain, EI and Izah, SC 2017. A review of biogas production from palm oil mill effluents using different configurations of bioreactors. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 242–253.
33. Qamaruz Zaman, N, Yusup, Y and Yaacof, N 2016. Verification of Receptor Exposure to Palm Oil Mill Odor Using In-Field Olfactometer with Odor Characteristic. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 54.
34. Qamaruz-Zaman, N, Milke MW 2012. VFA and ammonia from residential food waste as indicators of odor potential. Waste Management, 32(12), 2426-30.
35. Rahman, S and Borhan, MS 2012. Typical odor mitigation technologies for swine production facilities: A review. Journal of Civil Environmental Engineering, 2(4), 117.
36. Rahmat Khamis, MF 2017. Lega kilang tutup, bau pun hilang. Harian Metro. Accessed on 29 February, 2018 at https://www.hmetro.com.my/mutakhir/2017/06/239698/lega-kilang-tutupbau-pun-hilang.
37. Regmi, S Ongwandee, M, Morrison, G, Fitch, M and Surampalli, R 2007. Effectiveness of Porous Covers for Control of Ammonia, Reduced Sulfur Compounds, Total Hydrocarbons, Selected Volatile Organic Compounds, and Odor from Hog Manure Storage Lagoons, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 57(6), 761-768.
38. Schiavon, M, Schiorlin, M, Torretta, V, Brandenburg, R end amp, Ragazzi, M 2017. Non-thermal plasma assisting the biofiltration of volatile organic compounds. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148, 498-508.
39. Stenglein, RM, Clanton, CJ, Schmidt, DR, Jacobson, LD and Janni, KA 2011. Permeable Covers for Odor and Air Pollution Mitigation in Animal Agriculture - A Technical Guide. Air Quality Education in Animal Agriculture. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Accessed on 14 April, 2018 at https://articles.extension.org/sites/default/files/PermeableCovers%20FINAL_0.pdf.
40. Sulaiman, NA 2017. JAS diarah siasat 2 kilang sawit. Khamis. Berita Harian. Accessed on Accessed on 29 February, 2018 at https://www.bharian.com.my/node/255139.
41. Wu, TY, Mohammed, AW, Jahim, JM and Anuar, N 2009. A holistic approach to managing palm oil mill effluent (POME): biotechnological advances in the sustainable reuse of POME. Biotechnology Advances, 27, 40-52.
42. Yaacof, N, Qamaruz Zaman, N and Yusup, Y 2017. Comparison Method of Odour Impact Evaluation Using Calpuff Dispersion Modelling and On-Site Odour Monitoring. Galeri Warisan Kejuruteraan, 1(2), 1-5.
43. Yacob, S, Hassan, MA, Shirai, Y, Wakisaka, M and Subash, S 2006. Baseline study of methane emission from anaerobic ponds of palm oil mill effluent treatment. Science of the Total Environment, 366, 187-96.
44. Zarra T, Reiser M, Naddeo V, Belgiorno V, Kranert M 2014. Odour emissions characterization from wastewater treatment plants by different measurement methods. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 40, 37-42.
45. Zhou, X and Zhang, Q 2003. Measurements of odour and hydrogen sulfide emissions from swine barns. Canadian Biosystems Engineering, 45, 6.13-6.18.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019)

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-d1845339-85c3-49b0-8f24-0208cbe729e9