PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Investigation of the influence of hydrogel amendment on the retention capacities of green roofs

Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Badanie wpływu dodatku hydrożelu na zdolności retencyjne zielonych dachów
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Progressive economic development as well as urbanisation influence the characteristics of the stormwater runoff. Progressive sealing of drainage basin surface prompts the decrease of rainwater infiltration, thus increasing the runoff intensity. This results in an increase of flood risk. Thus, in urban areas the sustainable urban drainage systems (SUDS) are used in addition to the traditional sewer systems. The examples of SUDS strategy are, inter alia, the roofs covered with vegetation (the green roofs). The paper presents the results of research of retention capacities of 4 diverse green roof models with following growing media: (1) the typical green roof substrate without any additions, (2) the substrate with addition of about 1 % by weight of hydrogel (the cross-linked potassium polyacrylate), (3) the substrate with addition of about 0.25 % by weight of hydrogel, (4) the substrate with addition of expanded clay and perlite. The models did not have the vegetation layers in order to explore only the retention capacities of drainage layers and substrates. The aim of the first part of research was to investigate the retention capacities of green roof models after 1, 2, 6, 8 and 10 antecedent dry days. In the case of 1 and 2 antecedent dry days the best medium retention capacity had green roof model 2 (with substrate with addition of 1 % by weight of hydrogel), and the weakest medium retention capacity had green roof model 1 (without any additions). In the cases of precipitations which occurred after 6 as well as 8 and 10 antecedent dry days the best retention capacity had green roof model 3 (with addition of about 0.25 % by weight of hydrogel). The weakest retention capacity had in these cases green roof model 4 (with addition of expanded clay and perlite). The aim of the second part of research described in the paper was to investigate the retention capacities of green roof models during precipitations that occurred after long antecedent dry periods of time (34, 59 and 106 antecedent dry days). The substrates and drainage layers were air-dry directly before precipitations. The best retention capacity had in this case green roof model 3 (with the substrate with addition of about 0.25 % by weight of hydrogel). The second largest retention capacity had model 2 (with the substrate with addition of about 1 % by weight of hydrogel). The definitely weakest retention capacity had model 4 containing the substrate with addition of expanded clay and perlite. The results may indicate that the efficacy of hydrogel decreased over time probably due to its decay under the influence of solar radiation.
Rocznik
Strony
373--382
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 32 poz., rys., wykr., tab.
Twórcy
autor
  • Institute of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Infrastructure and Environment, Czestochowa University of Technology, ul. Brzeźnicka 60A, 42-200 Czestochowa, phone +48 34 325 09 17
autor
  • Institute of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Infrastructure and Environment, Czestochowa University of Technology, ul. Brzeźnicka 60A, 42-200 Czestochowa, phone +48 34 325 09 17
autor
  • Institute of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Infrastructure and Environment, Czestochowa University of Technology, ul. Brzeźnicka 60A, 42-200 Czestochowa, phone +48 34 325 09 17
autor
  • Institute of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Infrastructure and Environment, Czestochowa University of Technology, ul. Brzeźnicka 60A, 42-200 Czestochowa, phone +48 34 325 09 17
Bibliografia
  • [1] Czemiel-Berndtsson, J. Green roof performance towards management of runoff water quantity and quality: a review. Ecol Eng. 2010;36:351-360. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.12.014.
  • [2] Burszta-Adamiak E. Analysis of the retention capacity of green roofs. J Water Land Dev. 2012;16(I-IV):3-9. http://www.itp.edu.pl/wydawnictwo/journal/16_2012_I_VI/artykuly/Burszta%20Adamiak.pdf.
  • [3] Burszta-Adamiak E, Mrowiec M. Modelling of Green roofs’ hydrologic performance using EPA’s SWMM. Water Sci Technol. 2013;68(1):36-42. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2013.219.
  • [4] USEPA. Protecting Water Quality from Urban Runoff, EPA 841-F-03-003, February 2003. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-10/documents/nps_urban-facts_final.pdf.
  • [5] Malmur R. Transfer reservoir as a new solution for transfer of stormwater to water receivers. ASEE17. E3S Web Conf. 2017;22:00110. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20172200110.
  • [6] Fletcher TD, Shuster W, Hunt WF, Ashley R, Butler D, Arthur S, et al. SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more - The evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban Water J. 2015;12(7):3-20. DOI: 10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314.
  • [7] USEPA. Reducing Stormwater Costs through Low Impact Development (LID) Strategies and Practices, EPA 841-F-07-006, December 2007. http://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1102/ML110270042.pdf.
  • [8] Ociepa E. Sposoby ograniczenia niekorzystnego wpływu zrzutu ścieków opadowych. (Ways of restricting the harmful influence of run-off wastewater). Chem Dydakt Ekol Metrol. 2011;16(1-2):47-50. http://tchie.uni.opole.pl/CDEM11_1-2/CDEM2011_1-2.pdf.
  • [9] Mrowiec M. Wyznaczanie objętości zbiorników infiltracyjnych z zastosowaniem wzorów IDF. (Estimation of required storage volume for retention reservoirs using IDF relationships). Inż Ochr Środ. 2011;14(1):73-86. https://is.pcz.pl/static/pdf/2011/zeszyt1/2011_1_7-Mrowiec.pdf.
  • [10] Mrowiec M. Road runoff management using improved infiltration ponds. Transp Res Proc. 2016;14:2659-2667. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.435.
  • [11] Feng Y, Burian S, Pomeroy C. Potential of green infrastructure to restore predevelopment water budget of a semi-arid urban catchment. J Hydrol. 2016;542:744-755. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.09.044.
  • [12] Johannessen BG, Muthanna TM, Braskerud BC. Detention and retention behavior of four extensive green roofs in three nordic climate zones. Water. 2018;10(6):671. DOI: 10.3390/w10060671.
  • [13] Czemiel-Berndtsson J, Bengtsson L, Jinno K. Runoff water quality from intensive and extensive vegetated roofs. Ecol Eng. 2009;35:369-380. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.09.020.
  • [14] Breuning J, Yanders AC. Introduction to the FLL Guidelines for the Planning, Construction and Maintenance of Green Roofing. 2008 Edition of the Green Roofing Guideline. Green Roof Service LCC. 2012. http://www.greenrooftechnology.com/fll-green-roof-guideline.
  • [15] Shafique M, Kim R, Rafiq M. Green roof benefits, opportunities and challenges - A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2018;90:757-773. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.006.
  • [16] Grant G, Engelback L, Nicholson B, Gedge D, Frith M, Harvey P. Green roofs: their existing status and potential for conserving biodiversity in urban areas. English Nature. Research Report No. 498. 2003. http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/file/132021.
  • [17] Vijayaraghavan K, Joshi UM, Balasubramanian R. A field study to evaluate runoff quality from green roofs. Water Res. 2012;46:1337-1345. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.050.
  • [18] Jaffal I, Ouldboukhitine SA, Belarbi R. A comprehensive study of the impact of green roofs on building energy performance. Renew Energy. 2012;43:157-164. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2011.12.004.
  • [19] Hui SCM, Chan SC. Integration of green roof and solar photovoltaic systems. Proceedings of Joint Symposium 2011: Integrated Building Design in the New Era of Sustainability. Kowloon. Hong Kong; 2011. http://web.hku.hk/~cmhui/JS-2011-samhui_fullpaper01.pdf.
  • [20] Castleton HF, Stovin V, Beck SBM, Davison JB. Green roofs; building energy savings and the potential for retrofit. Energy Build. 2010;42:1582-1591. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.05.004.
  • [21] Emilsson T, Czemiel Berndtsson J, Mattsson JE, Rolf K. Effect of using conventional and controlled release fertilizer on nutrient runoff from various vegetated roof systems. Ecol Eng. 2007;29:260-271. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.01.001.
  • [22] Kirichenko-Babko M, Łagód G, Majerek D, Franus M, Babko R. The effect of landscape on the diversity in urban green areas. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2017;24(4):613-625. DOI: 10.1515/eces-2017-0040.
  • [23] Yang J, Yu Q, Gong P. Quantifying air pollution removal by green roofs in Chicago. Atmos Environ. 2008;42:7266-7273. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.003.
  • [24] Van Renterghem T, Botteldooren D. In-situ measurements of sound propagating over extensive green roofs. Build Environ. 2011;46:729-738. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.10.006.
  • [25] Czemiel-Berndtsson J, Emilsson T, Bengtsson L. The influence of extensive vegetated roofs on runoff water quality. Sci Total Environ. 2006;355:48-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.02.035.
  • [26] Bengtsson L, Grahn L, Olsson J. Hydrological function of a thin extensive green roof in southern Sweden. Nord Hydrol. 2005;36(3):259-268. http://hr.iwaponline.com/content/36/3/259.
  • [27] Getter KL, Rowe DB, Andresen JA. Quantifying the effect of slope on extensive green roof stormwater retention. Ecol Eng. 2007;31:225-231. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.06.004.
  • [28] Mentens J, Raes D, Hermy M. Green roofs as a tool for solving the rainwater runoff problem in the urbanized 21st century? Landscape Urban Plan. 2006;77:217-226. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.010.
  • [29] Young T, Cameron DD, Sorrill J, Edwards T, Phoenix GK. Importance of different components of green roof substrate on plant growth and physiological performance. Urban Forestry Urban Greening. 2014;13:507-516. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2014.04.007.
  • [30] Farrell C, Ang XQ, Rayner JP. Water-retention additives increase plant available water in green roof substrates. Ecol Eng. 2013;52:112-118. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.098.
  • [31] Hüttermann A, Orikiriza LJB, Agaba H. Application of superabsorbent polymers for improving the ecological chemistry of degraded or polluted lands. Clean - Soil Air Water. 2009;37(7):517-526. DOI: 10.1002/clen.200900048.
  • [32] Savi T, Marin M, Boldrin D, Incerti G, Andri S, Nardini A. Green roofs for a drier world: Effects of hydrogel amendment on substrate and plant water status. Sci Total Environ. 2014;490:467-476. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.05.020.
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-d1423029-44ec-4cda-a613-af5f07767901
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.