Multi-criteria Decision Making Using Hybrid methods for Supplier Selection in the Clothing Industry

• Autorzy: Lahdhiri Mourad , Babay Amel , Jmali Mohamed

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/ftee-2022-0004

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Supplier selection and evaluation are among the most critical issues in supply chain management, affecting companies’ performance because of the important role of suppliers in the chain’s profitability. For this reason, it is important for companies to have an objective methodology to evaluate and choose an appropriate supplier based on convenient criteria in a competitive market. Determination of a convenient supplier selection is a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. In the literature, several applications of the MCDM methods for supplier evaluation and selection can be found; however, research studies in the clothing industry are still limited. Indeed, apparel supply chain managers have to consider their supplier-related decisions to reduce risks affecting the company’s performance. This study aims to fill this gap by providing apparel manufacturers with different hybrid models for selecting the best supplier. According to a literature review and questionnaire conducted, the main criteria related to supplier selection were identified and determined. Then, the analytic hierarchy process method was performed to determine the criteria’s weights, and then suppliers were ranked using hybrid multicriteria decision-making models (AHP-TOPSIS, AHP-WSM, and AHP-WPM) to select the suitable one in the apparel chain. This research methodology can be considered useful for apparel companies and other industries.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

multi-criteria decision-making; MCDM; supplier selection; AHP-TOPSIS; AHP-WPM; AHP-WSM; apparel supply chain

• Wydawca: Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz - Łódzki Instytut Technologiczny
• Czasopismo: Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 30, no. 2
• Strony: 23--34
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr 39 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Lahdhiri Mourad

• Laboratory of Textile Engineering (LGtex), ISET Ksar Hellal, University of Monastir, Ksar Hellal, 5070, Tunisia
• National Engineering School, University of Monastir, Monastir 5019, Tunisia

autor

Babay Amel

• Laboratory of Textile Engineering (LGtex), ISET Ksar Hellal, University of Monastir, Ksar Hellal, 5070, Tunisia
• Department of Textile Engineering, Higher Institute of Technological Studies, ISET Ksar Hellal, Tunisia

autor

Jmali Mohamed

• Laboratory of Textile Engineering (LGtex), ISET Ksar Hellal, University of Monastir, Ksar Hellal, 5070, Tunisia
• Department of Textile Engineering, Higher Institute of Technological Studies, ISET Ksar Hellal, Tunisia

Bibliografia

• 1. Yildiz Aytac, Yalya A.Yesim. Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods for Supplier Selection: A Literature Review. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering 2015; 26(2): 158-177.
• 2. Schramm Vanessa Batista, Cabral Luciana Priscila Barros, Et Schramm Fernano. Approaches for Supporting Sustainble Supplier Selection- A Literature Review. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020: 123089.
• 3. Ho William, Xu Xiaowei, Dey Prasanta K. Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approaches for Supplier Evaluation and Selection: A Literature Review. European Journal of Operational Research 2010; 202(1): 16-24.
• 4. Narasmhan Ram, Talluri Srinivas, Mahapatra Santosh K. Multiproduct, Multi-Criteria Model for Supplier Selection with Product Life‐Cycle Considerations. Decision Sciences 2006; 37(4): 577-603.
• 5. Chen Yuh-Jen. Structured Methodology for Supplier Selection and Evaluation in a Supply Chain. Information Sciences 2011; 181(9): 1651-1670.
• 6. Ozkok Beyza Ahlatcioglu, Tiryaki Fatma. A Compensatory Fuzzy Approach to Multi-Objective Linear Supplier Selection Problem with Multiple-Item. Expert Systems with Applications 2011; 38(9): 11363-11368.
• 7. Guarnieri Patricia, Trojan Flavio. Decision Making on Supplier Selection Based on Social, Ethical, and Environmental Criteria: A Study In The Textile Industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2019; 141: 347-361.
• 8. PERCIN Selcuk. An Application of the Integrated AHP‐PGP Model in Supplier Selection. Measuring Business Excellence 2006.
• 9. Kull Thomas J, Talluri Srinivas. A Supply Risk Reduction Model Using Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making. IEEE Transactions on Engineering management 2008; 55(3): 409-419.
• 10. Mendoza Abraham, Santiago Eduardo, Ravindran A Ravi. A Three-Phase Multi-Criteria Method to the Supplier Selection Problem. International Journal of Industrial Engineering 2008; 15 (2): 195-210.
• 11. Sasi Jayaram C, Digalwar Abhijeet K. Application of AHP and TOPSIS Method for Supplier Selection Between India & China in the Textile Industry. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology 2015; 2 (4): 1730-1738.
• 12. Amindoust Atefeh, Saghafinia. Textile Supplier Selection In Sustainable Supply Chain Using a Modular Fuzzy Inference System Model. The Journal of the Textile Institute 2017; 108 (7): 1250-1258.
• 13. Lahdhiri Mourad, Babay Amel, Jmali Mohamed. Development of Subcontractor Selection Models Using Fuzzy and AHP Methods in the Apparel Industry Supply Chain. Autex Research Journal 2020.
• 14. Wang Chia-Nan, and al. Multi-Criteria Decision Model for the Selection of Suppliers in the Textile Industry. Symmetry 2020; 12(6): 979.
• 15. Nakiboglu Gulsun, Bulgurcu Berna. Supplier Selection in a Turkish Textile Company by Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy Decision-Making. The Journal of the Textile Institute 2020: 1-11.
• 16. Safa Mahdi SHAHI, Arash HAAS, Carl T, et al. Supplier Selection Process in an Integrated Construction Materials Management Model. Automation in Construction 2014; 48: 64-73.
• 17. Gencer Cevriye, Gurpinar Didem. Analytic Network Process in Supplier Selection: A Case Study in an Electronic Firm. Applied Mathematical Modelling 2007; 31: 2475-2486.
• 18. Kuo Renjieh J, Yu C Wang, Fangchih C Tien. Integration of Artificial Neural Network and MADA Methods for Green Supplier Selection. Journal of Cleaner Production 2010; 18(12): 1161-1170.
• 19. Abdel-Basset Mohamed, Mai Mohamed, Florentin Smarandache. A Hybrid Neutrosophic Group ANP-TOPSIS Framework for Supplier Selection Problems. Symmetry 2018: 10(6): 226.
• 20. Onder Emrah, Sundus D A G. Combining Analytical Hierarchy Process and TOPSIS Approaches for Supplier Selection in a Cable Company. Journal of Business, Economics And Finance 2013; 2(2): 56-74.
• 21. Nazari-Shirkouhi Salman, et al. Supplier Selection and Order Allocation Problem Using a Two-Phase Fuzzy Multi-Objective Linear Programming. Applied Mathematical Modelling 2013; 37(22): 9308-9323.
• 22. Arabsheybani Amir, Mohammad Mahdi Paydar, Abdul Sattar Safaei. An Integrated Fuzzy MOORA Method and FMEA Technique for Sustainable Supplier Selection Considering Quantity Discounts and Supplier’s Risk. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018; 190: 577-591.
• 23. Demir Leyla, et al. A Green Supplier Evaluation System Based on a New Multi-Criteria Sorting Method: VIKORSORT. Expert Systems with Applications 2018; 114: 479-487.
• 24. Barla Semra Birgün. A Case Study of Supplier Selection for Lean Supply by Using a Mathematical Model. Logistics Information Management 2003.
• 25. Ha Sung Ho, Ramayya Krishnan. A Hybrid Approach To Supplier Selection for the Maintenance of a Competitive Supply Chain. Expert Systems with Applications 2008; 34(2): 1303-1311.
• 26. Moheb-Alizadeh Hadi, Robert Handfield. Sustainable Supplier Selection and Order Allocation: A Novel Multi-Objective Programming Model with a Hybrid Solution Approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2019; 129: 192-209.
• 27. Chamodrakas Ioannis, Batis D, Drakoulis Martakos. Supplier Selection in Electronic Market Places using Satisficing and Fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications 2010; 37(1): 490-498.
• 28. Bottani Eleonora, Antonio Rizzi. An Adapted Multi-Criteria Approach to Suppliers and Products Selection—An Application Oriented to Lead-Time Reduction. International Journal of Production Economics 2008; 111(2): 763-781.
• 29. Saaty Thomas L, Kirti Peniwati. Group Decision Making: Drawing Out and Reconciling Differences. RWS publications 2013.
• 30. Hwang Ching-Lai, Kwangsun Yoon. Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision-Making. Multiple Attribute Decision-Making. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 1981; 58-191.
• 31. Yoon Kwangsun. A Reconciliation Among Discrete Compromise Solutions. Journal of the Operational Research Society 1987; 38 (3): 277-286.
• 32. Hwang Ching-Lai, Young-Jou Lai, Ting-Yun Liu. A New Approach for Multiple Objective Decision Making. Computers & Operations Research 1993; 20 (8): 889-899.
• 33. Fishburn Peter C. Letter to the Editor—Additive Utilities with Incomplete Product Sets: Application To Priorities And Assignments. Operations Research 1967; 15(3): 537-542.
• 34. Mohd Safian, Edie Ezwan, Abdul Hadi Nawawi. The Evolution of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) as a Decision Making Tool in Property Sectors 2011.
• 35. Weber Charles A, Current John R, Benton W C. Vendor Selection Criteria and Methods. European Journal of Operational Research 1991; 50(1): 2-18.
• 36. Luthra Sunil, et al. An Integrated Framework for Sustainable Supplier Selection and Evaluation in Supply Chains. Journal of Cleaner Production 2017; 140: 1686-1698.
• 37. Çebi Ferhan, Demet Bayraktar. An Integrated Approach For Supplier Selection. Logistics Information Management 2003.
• 38. Nair Anand, Jayanth Jayaram, Ajay Das. Strategic Purchasing Participation, Supplier Selection, Supplier Evaluation and Purchasing Performance. International Journal of Production Research 2015; 53(20): 6263-6278.
• 39. Tooranloo Hossein Sayyadi, Asiyeh Iranpour. Supplier Selection and Evaluation Using Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy AHP Method. International Journal of Procurement Management 2017; 10(5): 539-554.