Estimating of efficiency based on different modes of transportation for OECD countries : bootstrap DEA

Manavgat, Gökçe; Demirci, Ayhan

doi:10.17270/J.LOG.001116

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Estimating of efficiency based on different modes of transportation for OECD countries : bootstrap DEA

Autorzy

Manavgat Gökçe , Demirci Ayhan

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17270/J.LOG.001116

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Background: The purpose of this study is to compare transportation efficiency across four modes of transport for OECD countries, considering key operational factors affecting efficiency, as well as environmental and economic perspectives. Methods: This study employs the bootstrap Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach to evaluate the performance of OECD countries' transportation sectors. Bias-corrected efficiency scores are used to ensure more robust and consistent results in cross-country comparisons. Results: The findings reveal that the most efficient countries vary by transport mode (road, sea, rail, and air). Road transport exhibits the lowest average efficiency score among OECD countries, while rail transport exhibits the highest. For road transport, Canada, France, and the United Kingdom have high-efficiency scores with low bias values, while Iceland attains a bias-corrected full efficiency score without bias. In maritime transportation, Canada, Australia, Finland, and Germany achieve high-efficiency scores. For rail transport, the most efficient countries are Australia, Canada, Greece, and Luxembourg, while for air transport, Canada, Chile, and Latvia exhibit high-efficiency bias-corrected scores. The study also identifies that reducing carbon emissions and increasing infrastructure investments are key factors influencing efficiency scores. Conclusion: To enhance transportation efficiency, particularly in road transport, priority should be given to investments that promote intermodal transport and improve system integration. Additionally, incorporating sustainability and environmental practices can significantly improve efficiency across all modes.

Słowa kluczowe

transportation efficiency bootstrap DEA road maritime railway airway OECD

efektywność transportu DEA droga morski droga kolejowa droga powietrzna OECD

Wydawca

Wyższa Szkoła Logistyki

Czasopismo

LogForum

Rocznik

2024

Tom

Vol. 20, no. 4

Strony

515--535

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 52 poz., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Manavgat Gökçe

gokce.manavgat@toros.edu.tr

Faculty of Economics, Administrative and Social Sciences, Toros University Mersin, Turkey

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3729-835X

autor

Demirci Ayhan

ayhan.demirci@toros.edu.tr

Faculty of Economics, Administrative and Social Sciences, Toros University Mersin, Turkey

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3788-4586

Bibliografia

1. Acciaro, M., & Wilmsmeier, G., 2015. Energy efficiency in maritime logistics chains. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 17, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2015.11.002
2. Akbar, U., Khan, M. A., Akmal, M., Tóth Naárné, É. Z., & Oláh, J., 2020. Trade-offs for the optimal energy efficiency of road transportation: Domestic cases in developing countries. Energies, 13(24), 6538. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13246538
3. Alonso, A., Monzón, A., & Cascajo, R., 2015. Comparative analysis of passenger transport sustainability in European cities. Ecological Indicators, 48, 578-592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.022
4. Bakker, S., Dematera Contreras, K., Kappiantari, M., Tuan, N. A., Guillen, M. D., Gunthawong, G., ... & Van Maarseveen, M., 2017. Low-carbon transport policy in four ASEAN countries: Developments in Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam. Sustainability, 9(7), 1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.022
5. Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., & Qian, N. 2020., On the road: Access to transportation infrastructure and economic growth in China. Journal of Development Economics, 145, 102442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102442
6. Banister, D., 2012. Transport and economic development: reviewing the evidence. Transport Reviews, 32(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2011.603283
7. Benamara, H., Hoffmann, J., & Youssef, F., 2019. Maritime transport: The sustainability imperative. Sustainable shipping: A Cross-Disciplinary View, 1-31.
8. Boame, A. K., 2004. The technical efficiency of Canadian urban transit systems. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 40(5), 401-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2003.09.002
9. Braconier, H., M. Pisu & Bloch D., 2013. "The Performance of Road Transport Infrastructure and its Links to Policies", OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1016, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5k4ddxjvpfr5-en.
10. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E., 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research, 2(6), 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
11. Chen, C. M., Du, J., Huo, J., & Zhu, J., 2012. Undesirable factors in integer-valued DEA: Evaluating the operational efficiencies of city bus systems considering safety records. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 330-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.040
12. Churchill, S. A., Inekwe, J., Ivanovski, K., & Smyth., R, 2021. Transport infrastructure and CO2 emissions in the OECD over the long run. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 95, 102857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102857
13. Ehsani, M., Ahmadi, A., & Fadai, D., 2016. Modeling of vehicle fuel consumption and carbon dioxide emission in road transport. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, 1638-1648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.062
14. Geller, H., Harrington, P., Rosenfeld, A. H., Tanishima, S., & Unander, F., 2006. Polices for increasing energy efficiency: Thirty years of experience in OECD countries. Energy policy, 34(5), 556-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.010
15. Greene, D. L., & Wegener, M., 1997. Sustainable transport. Journal of transport geography, 5(3), 177-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568310701517265
16. Halim, R. A., Kirstein, L., Merk, O., & Martinez, L. M., 2018. Decarbonization pathways for international maritime transport: A model-based policy impact assessment. Sustainability, 10(7), 2243. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072243
17. Holden, E., G. Gilpin, & D. Banister., 2019. Sustainable Mobility at Thirty. Sustainability 11 (7): 1965. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071965
18. Hussain, Z., Xia, Z., & Li, Y., 2023. Estimating sustainable transport efficiency and socioeconomic factors: application of non-parametric approach. Transportation Letters, 15(7), 685-697. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2022.2082004
19. International Transport Forum. (2021). ITF transport outlook 2021. OECD Publishing.
20. ITF (2023), ITF Transport Outlook 2023, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/b6cc9ad5-en.
21. Jarboui, S., Pascal, F., & Younes, B., 2013. Public road transport efficiency: A stochastic frontier analysis. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 13(5), 64-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570-6672(13)60123-3
22. Kammoun, R., & Abdennadher, C., 2022. Seaport efficiency and competitiveness in European seaports. Transport Policy, 121, 113-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.04.003
23. Khurshid, A., Khan, K., & Cifuentes-Faura, J., 2023. 2030 Agenda of sustainable transport: Can current progress lead towards carbon neutrality? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 122, 103869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103869
24. lo Storto, C., & Evangelista, P., 2023. Infrastructure efficiency, logistics quality and environmental impact of land logistics systems in the EU: A DEA-based dynamic mapping. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 46, 100814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2022.100814
25. MacNeil, J. L., Adams, M., & Walker, T. R., 2021. Development of framework for improved sustainability in the Canadian Port Sector. Sustainability, 13(21), 11980. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111980
26. Manavgat, G., Demirci, A., Korkmaz, O., & Koluman, A., 2023. Global Scale Integrated Logistics Performance Analysis and Its Spillover Effect. LogForum, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2023.826
27. Marchetti, D., & Wanke, P, 2017., Brazil's rail freight transport: Efficiency analysis using two-stage DEA and cluster-driven public policies. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 59, 26-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2016.10.005
28. Marshall, S., 2012. The challenge of sustainable transport. In Planning for a Sustainable Future (pp. 131-147). Routledge.
29. Martí, L., Martín, J. C., & Puertas, R., 2017. A DEA-logistics performance index. Journal of Applied Economics, 20(1), 169-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1514-0326(17)30008-9
30. Mo, F., & Wang, D., 2019. Environmental sustainability of road transport in OECD countries. Energies, 12(18), 3525. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12183525
31. Morrell, P., 2007. An evaluation of possible EU air transport emissions trading scheme allocation methods. Energy Policy, 35(11), 5562-5570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.05.025
32. Nijkamp, P., 1994. Roads toward Environmentally Sustainable Transport. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract 28: 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/0965-8564(94)90002-7
33. Nõmmela, K., & Kõrbe Kaare, K., 2022. Maritime policy design framework with ESG performance approach: case of Estonia. Economies, 10(4), 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10040088
34. OECD (2014). The Cost of Air Pollution: Health Impacts of Road Transport; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Paris, France, 2014.
35. Ogryzek, M., Adamska-Kmieć, D., & Klimach, A., 2020. Sustainable transport: An efficient transportation network—Case study. Sustainability, 12(19), 8274. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198274
36. Oum, T. H., & Yu, C., 1994. Economic efficiency of railways and implications for public policy: a comparative study of the OECD countries' railways. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 121-138. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20053031
37. Savolainen, V. V., & Hilmola, O. P., 2009. The relative technical efficiency of European transportation systems concerning air transport and railways. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 11(1-2), 19-42. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBPM.2009.023799
38. Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W., 1998. Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Management Science, 44(1), 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.1.49
39. Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W., 2000. A general methodology for bootstrapping in non-parametric frontier models. Journal of Applied Statistics, 27(6), 779-802. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664760050081951
40. Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W., 2002. Non-parametric tests of returns to scale. European Journal of Operational Research, 139(1), 115-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00167-9
41. Sow, O., Oukil, A., Ndiaye, B. M., & Marcos, A., 2016. Efficiency analysis of public transportation subunits using DEA and Bootstrap Approaches–Dakar Dem Dikk case study. Journal of Mathematics Research, 8(6), 114-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jmr.v8n6p114
42. Steg, L., & Gifford, R., 2005. Sustainable transportation and quality of life. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(1), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.11.003
43. Sueyoshi, T., & Wang, D., 2014. Radial and non-radial approaches for environmental assessment by data envelopment analysis: Corporate sustainability and effective investment for technology innovation. Energy Economics, 45, 537-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.07.024
44. Ulkhaq, M. M., 2024., Logistics performance measurement: A data envelopment analysis using the logistics performance index 2018 data. In Data-Driven Technologies and Artificial Intelligence in Supply Chain (pp. 58-76). CRC Press.
45. UN (2015). Technical Working group on transport. Analysis of the transport relevance of each of the 17 SDGs; UN: New York, NY, USA,
46. UN (2021). Sustainable transport, sustainable development. Interagency report for second Global Sustainable Transport Conference.
47. UNECE, I. (2012). Intelligent Transport Systems for Sustainable Mobility. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
48. Van Fan, Y., Perry, S., Klemeš, J. J., & Lee, C. T., 2018. A review on air emissions assessment: Transportation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 194, 673-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.151
49. Wallace, I., 1974. The relationship between freight transport organization and industrial linkage in Britain. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 25-43. https://doi.org/10.2307/621514
50. Wanke, P., & Barros, C. P., 2016. New evidence on the determinants of efficiency at Brazilian ports: a bootstrapped DEA analysis. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 8(3), 250-272. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTL.2016.076240
51. Yen, B. T., Mulley, C., & Yeh, C. J., 2023. Performance evaluation for demand responsive transport services: A two-stage bootstrap-DEA and ordinary least square approach. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 46, 100869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2022.100869
52. Zachariadis, T., (2005). Assessing policies towards sustainable transport in Europe: an integrated model. Energy Policy, 33(12), 1509-1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.01.008

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-d07a1f58-8241-49a8-b645-245a153497bc