PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Powiadomienia systemowe
  • Sesja wygasła!
Tytuł artykułu

Differentiated project and technology maturity in an organization - a case study

Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Purpose: The main research objective is to identify the differentiation in project maturity and technological sophistication within a single organization. On this basis, the article also aims to identify improvement areas contributing positively to entire organization's project maturity consistent with the PMMM model, including the use of appropriate information technology in project management. Design/methodology/approach: To accomplish the research objective, bibliometric analysis and literature review methods, as well as opinion surveys, were used. The empirical part is based on a case study involving a project maturity model questionnaire and an in-depth interview covering the IT tools employed in project management. Findings: Significant differences have been identified within the organization with regard to the levels of project maturity across its various departments. These differences have also been observed with respect to the IT tools used in project management. Departments within the organization as well as relevant project management areas have been identified, which, if properly managed, will contribute positively to the organization's level of project maturity, including its use of appropriate information technology. Research limitations/implications: The limitations of the study arise from the case study method itself, which limits the conclusions to the case analyzed. Project management praxis, nonetheless, indicates prevalence of differentiation in project maturity levels and applied information technology within a single organization. Future research should focus on the search for the causes of, and the patterns governing, this phenomenon, in order to formulate assumptions regarding a strategy capable of levelling the differences and moving the entire organization to higher levels of project maturity. Practical implications: The issue of organizational heterogeneity, in terms of project maturity and the IT tools used in project management, has drawn the attention of business and project management practitioners to the need for multi-pronged measurement of project maturity and technological sophistication in organizations. Only such measurement allows for targeted management of key areas in need of improvement, to bring the entire organization to a higher level of project maturity. Originality/value: The article fills an important cognitive gap, by highlighting the need for, and indicating the benefits of, examining the areas of project maturity and exploring the use of IT across different parts of an organization. The results may be of relevance to both the researchers searching for enablers of higher project-maturity levels as well as organizations seeking a strategic approach to raising the level of project maturity and achieving IT governance.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
617--635
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 67 poz.
Twórcy
  • University of Gdańsk, Faculty of Management, Department of Business Informatics
Bibliografia
  • 1. Albrecht, J.C., Spang, K. (2014). Linking the benefits of project management maturity to project complexity. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, Vol. 7, pp. 285-301, doi: 10.1108/IJMPB-08-2013-0040
  • 2. Albrecht, J.C., Spang, K. (2016). Disassembling and reassembling project management maturity. Project Management Journal, Vol. 47, Iss. 5, pp. 18-35, doi: 10.1177/875697281604700503
  • 3. Angara, J., Prasad, S., Sridevi, G. (2020). DevOps Project Management Tools for Sprint Planning, Estimation and Execution Maturity. Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 20, Iss. 2, pp. 79-92, doi: 10.2478/cait-2020-0018
  • 4. Aydin, M.N., Dilan, E. (2017). Project Management Method Adoption: A Service Industry Case Study. International Journal of Information Technology Project Management, Vol. 8, pp. 17-33, doi: 10.4018/IJITPM.2017040102
  • 5. Bach, MP., Zoroja, J., Celjo, A. (2017). An extension of the technology acceptance model for business intelligence systems: project management maturity perspective. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, Vol. 5, Iss. 2, pp. 5-21, doi: 10.12821/ijispm050201
  • 6. Badea, G., Badea, AC., David, V. (2014). Advantages of using it solutions in land surveying and cadastral project management. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management. SGEM, Vol. 2, Iss. 2, pp. 27-34.
  • 7. Barclay, C., Osei-Bryson, K.A. (2010). An Exploration of Knowledge Management Practices in IT Projects: A Case Study Approach. Conference: Sustainable IT Collaboration Around the Globe. 16th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2010, Lima, Peru.
  • 8. Besner, C., Hobbs, B. (2008). Discriminating contexts and project management best practices on innovative and noninnovative projects. Project Management Journal, Vol 39, Iss. 1, suppl, pp. 123-134, doi: 10.1002/ pmj.20064
  • 9. Bjelica, D., Mihic, M., Petrovic, D. (2020). Enhancing IT Project Management Maturity Assessment. In: N. Mladenović, A. Sifaleras, M. Kuzmanović (Eds.), Advances in Operational Research in the Balkans (pp. 221-236). Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Cham: Springer, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-21990-1_13
  • 10. Bolat, B., Kusdemir, A., Uslu, I.C., Temur, G.T. (2017). An Assessment for IT Project Maturity Levels. International Journal of Information Technology Project Management, Vol. 8, Iss. 2, pp. 1-16, doi: 10.4018/IJITPM.2017040101
  • 11. Breytenbach, J., Villiers, C.D., Jordaan, M. (2013). Communities in control of their own integrated technology development processes. Information Technology for Development, Vol. 19, pp. 133-150, doi: 10.1080/02681102.2012.714348
  • 12. Bushuyev, S.D., Verenych, O. (2018). Organizational Maturity and Project: Program and Portfolio Success. In: Developing Organizational Maturity for Effective Project Management, doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-3197-5.CH006
  • 13. Carden, L.L., Brace, C. (2022). Project Management Office (PMO): Using Projects as Strategies for Managing Organizational and Human Resources. International Journal of Information Technology Project Management, Vol. 13, pp. 1-13, doi: 10.4018/ijitpm.290419
  • 14. Cassanelli, A.N., Fernández-Sánchez, G., Guiridlian, M. (2017). Principal Researcher and Project Manager: Who Should Drive R&D Projects? R&D Management, Vol. 47, Iss. 2, doi: 10.1111/radm.12213
  • 15. Centralny Ośrodek Informatyki (2020). Cyfryzacja to nasza wspólna sprawa. Centrum Kompetencyjne. Warszawa: POPC Wsparcie.
  • 16. Chen, C.-H., Li, S.-H., Hwang, M., Tzeng, J.-R. (2011). A study on the integration of QFD-PMMM in cloud computing system quality. ICIC Express Letters, Vol. 5, Iss. 4A, pp. 1037-1043.
  • 17. Correia, A., Agua, P.B. (2023). Innovation, strategy, and transformation frameworks for the modern enterprise. USA: IGI Global, p. 429.
  • 18. Crnkovic, J., Ross, P., Desai, S. (2005). Software support for the classical, contemporary and future Project Management. WMSCI 2005 - The 9th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, Proceedings, No. 1, pp. 267-272.
  • 19. Derenskaya, Y. (2017). Organizational Project Management Maturity. Baltic Journal Of Economic Studies, Vol. 3, Iss. 2, pp. 25-32, doi: 10.30525/2256-0742/2017-3-2-25-32
  • 20. Dey, P.K., De, D., Soni, V. (2018). MANAGING THE CHALLENGES OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT: A case study of the oil industry. In: Indian Business: Understanding a Rapidly Emerging Economy. Taylor & Francis, doi: 10.4324/9781315268422
  • 21. Dooley, K., Subra, A., Anderson, J. (2001). Maturity and its impact on new product development project performance. Res. Eng. Design, Vol. 13, Iss. 1, pp. 23-29, doi: 10.1007/s001630100003
  • 22. Fajsi, A., Moraca, S., Milosavljevic, M., Medic, N. (2022). Project Management Maturity and Business Excellence in the Context of Industry 4.0. Processes, No. 10(6), 1155, doi: 10.3390/pr10061155
  • 23. Gomes, J., Romao, M. (2012). How benefits management helps Balanced Scorecard to deal with business dynamic environments. Tourism and Management Studies Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 129-138.
  • 24. Gomes, J., Romao, M. (2015). Maturity, Benefits and Project Management Shaping Project Success. In: A. Rocha, A. Correia, S. Costanzo, L. Reis (Eds.), New Contributions in Information Systems and Technologies. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 353 (pp. 435-448). Cham: Springer, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-16486-1_43
  • 25. Guan, W.H., Li, Z.F., Liu, X.Z., Toshihiro, I. (2004). Project management maturity model: Concept, research and applications. Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering, Vol. 1-2.
  • 26. Hamadameen, A.O., Hassan, N. (2018). A compromise solution for the fully fuzzy multiobjective linear programming problems. IEEE Access, Vol. 6. pp. 43696-43711, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2863566
  • 27. Hamilton, A. (2004). Project management reform: a public body case study. Municipal Engineer, Vol. 157, pp. 199-207, doi: 10.1680/MUEN.2004.157.3.199
  • 28. Hassan, N., Hamzah, H.H.M., Zain, S.M.M. (2013). A goal programming approach for rubber production in Malaysia. American-Eurasian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, Vol. 7, Iss. 2, pp. 50-53.
  • 29. Hassan, N., Safiai, S., Raduan, N.H.M., Ayop, Z. (2012a). Goal programming formulation in nutrient management for chilli plantation in Sungai Buloh, Malaysia. Advances in Environmental Biology, Vol. 6, Iss. 12, pp. 4008-4012.
  • 30. Hassan, N., Siew, L.W., Shen, S.Y. (2012b). Portfolio decision analysis with maximin criterion in the malaysian stock market. Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 6, Iss. 110, pp. 5483-5486.
  • 31. Hillson, D. (2003). Assessing organisational project management capability. Journal of Facilities Management, Vol. 2, pp. 298-311, doi: 10.1108/14725960410808276
  • 32. Ilin, I.V., Lyovina, A.I., Antipin, A.R. (2016). Business Architecture Development and Process and Project Maturity. In: Emerging Trends in Information Systems: Recent Innovations, Results and Experience, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-23929-3_5
  • 33. Irfan, M., Hassan, M., Hassan, N. (2019). The Effect of Project Management Capabilities on Project Success in Pakistan: An Empirical Investigation. IEEE Access, Vol. 7, pp. 39417-39431, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2906851
  • 34. Jamaluddin, R., Chin, C.M.M., Lee, C.W. (2010). Understanding the requirements for project management maturity models: Awareness of the ICT industry in Malaysia. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. Macao, China, pp. 1573-1577, doi: 10.1109/IEEM.2010.5674174
  • 35. Kaya, Y., Iyigun, I. (2001). A case study: assessment of R&D project management maturity and improvement in project management process. PICMET '01. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol.1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37199), pp. 562-569, doi: 10.1109/PICMET.2001.952238
  • 36. Kerzner, H. (2001). Strategic Planning for Project Management Using a Project Management Maturity Model. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  • 37. Kerzner, H. (2002). Strategic Planning for Project Management using a Project Management Maturity Model. Hoboken, New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  • 38. Koekemoer, S., Von Solms, R. (2017). IT Project Management Maturity in South African Municipalities. IST-Africa Week Conference (IST-AFRICA 2017), pp. 1-9, doi: 10.23919/ISTAFRICA.2017.8102369
  • 39. Liao, R.H., Chen, H., Sun, C.Q., Sun, Y.M. (2022). An Exploratory Study on Two-Dimensional Project Management Maturity Model. Engineering Management Journal, Vol. 35, Iss. 2, pp. 1-15, doi: 10.1080/10429247.2022.2154093
  • 40. López, A.J., Galindres, C., Ruiz, P.A. (2016). Project maturity evaluation model for SMEs from the software development sub-sector. AD-minister, pp. 147-162, doi: 10.17230/AD-MINISTER.29.7
  • 41. Motaleb, O. (2017). A model of risk response development for managing delays in construction projects. International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Vol. 9, pp. 133-153, doi: 10.1504/IJPOM.2017.10006032
  • 42. Mullaly, M. (2014). If maturity is the answer, then exactly what was the question? International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, Vol. 7, pp. 169-185, doi: 10.1108/IJMPB-09-2013-0047
  • 43. Nasruddin, H., Bushra, A.H. (2012). Mathematical modelling approach to the management of recreational tourism activities at Wetland Putrajaya. Sains Malaysiana, Vol. 41, Iss. 9, pp. 1155-1161.
  • 44. Neves, L.A., Nunes, L.E., Corrêa, V.A., Rezende, M.C. (2013). Application of the Prado - Project Management Maturity Model at a R&D Institution of the Brazilian Federal Government. Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management, Vol. 5, pp. 459-465, doi: 10.5028/jatm.v5i4.272
  • 45. Nhlengethwa, N., Van der Lingen, E. (2014). Case study on project management at a mineral sand organization. Proceedings of PICMET '14 Conference: Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology; Infrastructure and Service Integration, pp. 2524-2529.
  • 46. Nikolaenko, V., Sidorov, A. (2023). Assessment of Project Management Maturity Models Strengths and Weaknesses. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, No. 16(2), 121, doi: 10.3390/jrfm16020121
  • 47. Obeidat, M., North, M.M. (2014). A Comparative Review of Information Technology Project Management in Private and Public Sector Organisations. International Management Revie, Vol. 10, Iss. 1, pp. 55-62.
  • 48. Pasian, B., Sankaran, S., Boydell, S.P. (2012). Project management maturity: a critical analysis of existing and emergent factors. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, Vol. 5, pp. 146-157, doi: 10.1108/17538371211192946
  • 49. Payette, J., Anegbe, E., Caceres, E., Muegge, S. (2015). Secure by Design: Cybersecurity Extensions to Project Management Maturity Models for Critical Infrastructure Projects. Technology Innovation Management Review, Vol. 5, Iss. 6, pp. 26-34, doi: 10.22215/timreview/904
  • 50. Permana, V., Sucahyo, Y.G., Gandhi, A. (2017). Measuring information technology project management maturity level: A case study from a project based organization in Indonesia. International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI), pp. 342-347, doi: 10.1109/ICITSI.2017.8267968
  • 51. Ramabulana, T. (2015). Skilled Councillors Hold the Key to a Successful Municipal Turnaround Strategy. Voice of Local Government, Jun, pp. 14-15.
  • 52. Rwelamila, P.D., Phungula, M.G. (2009). Managing the complexity of public private partnerships initiatives: How mature are South African public institutions? Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM 2009 - Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference, pp. 445-454.
  • 53. Sanchez, F., Micaëlli, J., Bonjour, É., Monticolo, D. (2019). A Step for Improving the Transition Between Traditional Project Management to Agile Project Management Using a Project Management Maturity Model. The Journal of Modern Project Management, Vol. 7, pp. 88-105, doi: 10.19255/JMPM01906
  • 54. Sargent, W.H., Ferreira, G.A. (2018). Strategies to improve project management maturity. In: Developing Organizational Maturity for Effective Project Management - Advances in Logistics, Operations, and Management Science, pp. 279-295, doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-3197-5.ch014
  • 55. Silva, D., Pinto, J.A., Gomes, P., Ramalho, F. (2016). How's ICT Project Management Going in Portugal? In: Project Management: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1097-1119). Management Association (Ed.), IGI Global, doi: 0.4018/978-1-5225-0196-1.ch053
  • 56. Sokhanvar, S., Matthews, J., Yarlagadda, P.K. (2014). Importance of Knowledge Management Processes in a Project-based organization: A Case Study of Research Enterprise. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 97, pp. 1825-1830, doi: 10.1016/J.PROENG. 2014.12.336
  • 57. Trocki, M. (2023). The place and role of governance in organization management. Studia i Prace Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów, No. 193, pp. 121-136.
  • 58. Trocki, M., Juchniewicz, M. (2022). Ład projektowy organizacji (project governance). Koncepcje, problem, rozwiązania. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
  • 59. Vrecko, I., Barilovic, Z., Božicev, M. (2015). The role of IT departments in the enhancement of banks' project management. Informatologia, Vol. 48, Iss. 3-4, pp. 123-134.
  • 60. Wazed, M.A., Ahmed, S. (2009). Project management maturity model (PMMM) in developing on-line statistical process control software: An integrated approach. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, Vol. 5, Iss. 11, pp. 1904-1914.
  • 61. Weidemann, D. (2017). Project Management Maturity Level in the Context of PPM Solutions. Handel Wewnętrzny, Vol. 3, Iss. 368 (tom II), pp. 136-145.
  • 62. Wojciechowska, A. (2023). Evaluation of design maturity models for usability in the it industry. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series, No. 170, pp. 629-646, doi: 10.29119/1641-3466.2023.170.38
  • 63. Woźniak, M., Sliż, P. (2023). The impact of project excellence on the level of project maturity of an organization. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series, No. 169, pp. 759-782, doi: 10.29119/1641-3466.2023.169.45
  • 64. Yakoot, M.S., Salem, A.M., Mahmoud, O. (2023). Measuring Maturity of Well Integrity Management - Analysis of Well Integrity in Brownfield Using Maturity Models for Prolonged Well Lifecyle. Society of Petroleum Engineers - Gas and Oil Technology Showcase and Conference, GOTS 2023, Dubai, doi: 10.2118/214054-MS
  • 65. Yang, L.R., Chen, J.H., Wang, H.W. (2012). Assessing impacts of information technology on project success through knowledge management practice. Automation in Construction, No. 22, pp. 182-191, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.016
  • 66. Yang, X., Wang, X. (2009). Study on the management maturity model of high-tech venturing project based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Second International Conference on Future Information Technology and Management Engineering, Sanya, China, pp. 486-489, doi: 10.1109/FITME.2009.127
  • 67. Yen, W.W., Peng, Y.K., Gee Y.S. (2016). A case study assessment of project management maturity level in the Malaysia's IT industry. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp. 361-371.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-d073de3a-33c9-4bfd-8885-411119590232
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.