Analiza polityki otwartego nieba i jednolitej przestrzeni przewozów kolejowych w Unii Europejskiej

• Autorzy: Miecznikowski S. , Tłoczyński D.

Warianty tytułu

EN

An analysis of single European sky and single European railway area in the EU

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

Niewątpliwie wspólną cechą transportu lotniczego i kolejowego jest ich duży udział w przewozach pasażerskich w Europie. Funkcjonowanie tych dwóch gałęzi transportu oparte jest na współpracy wielu interesariuszy, których efektem jest oferta podażowa – siatka połączeń kolejowych i lotniczych. Oprócz konkurencji pomiędzy wskazanymi rynkami, podmioty występujące na tych rynkach prowadzą szereg działań zmierzających do współpracy w ramach przewozów komplementarnych. Komisja Europejska wyznaczyła wspólne cele dla obydwy sektorów, którymi są wzrost efektywności przewozów i konkurencyjności poprzez eliminację granic państwowych. Przeanalizowano obydwa sektory z punktu widzenia ich perspektyw rozwoju, określono występujące różnice, które głównie sprowadzają się do zarządzania infrastrukturą. Transport lotniczy rozwija się zgodnie z kierunkami wytyczonymi przez Komisję Europejską, dotyczy to także przyznawania tras dla pociągów dużych prędkości. Brak jest natomiast efektywności i konkurencyjności dla kolei tradycyjnych, w których występuje monopol wirtualny kolei państwowych.

EN

Air and rail transportation systems are characterized by important common features: they serve a significant share of passengers traffic in Europe; they functioning relies on the cooperation of many stakeholders operating a fixed timetable, often in competing objectives; and they have been characterized by a quite a fragmented development following national borders. For these systems, the European Commission envisages a common future in terms of an increase of efficiency and elimination of national borders. We analyse of the two systems in perspective of their common development and underline the main existing differences linking to the management of the infrastructure. The air transport is moving in the direction indicated by the European Commission, as well as the rail transportation for what concerns international train paths for high speed train. However, a substantial separation still exists between conventional rail transportation systems of different countries.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

transport kolejowy; transport lotniczy; Otwarte Europejskie Niebo; Jednolita Europejskaj Przestrzeń Kolejowa; przestrzeń powietrzna

EN

rail; air transport; European Open Sky; Single European Railway; airspace

• Wydawca: Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz - Poznański Instytut Technologiczny
• Czasopismo: Logistyka
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: nr 3
• Strony: 4353--4366
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 69 poz., wykr., pełen tekst na CD

Twórcy

autor

Miecznikowski S.

• Katedra Rynku Transportowego Uniwersytet Gdański, 81-824 Sopot, ul. Armii Krajowej 119/121

autor

Tłoczyński D.

• Katedra Rynku Transportowego Uniwersytet Gdański, 81-824 Sopot, ul. Armii Krajowej 119/121

Bibliografia

• 1. Adler N., Nash C., Pels E., High speed rail and air transport competition: game engineering as a tool for cost benefit analysis. Transportation Research Part B. Methodological 2010, nr 44.
• 2. Air and Rail Competition and Complementarity. Final Report, DG Tren.
• 3. Babic D., Kalic M., Airline route network expansion: modeling the benefits of slot purchases. Journal of Air Transport Management 2012, nr 23.
• 4. Ball M., Barhart C., Nemhauser G., Adoni A., Handbooks in operation research and manegement science. Air Transportation: Irregular Operation and Control Elesevier 2007, nr 14, Oxford United Kingdom.
• 5. Ball M., Barnhard C., Nemhauser G., Odoni G., Handbooks in operation research and management science. Air Transportation: Irregular Operations and Control. 14 Elsevier Oxford 2007.
• 6. Barnhardt C., Belobaba P., Odoni A., Applications of operations research in the air transport industry. Transportation Science 2003, nr 37.
• 7. Barnhardt C., Fearing D., Odoni A., Demand and capacity management in air transportation. EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistic 2012.
• 8. Bersimas D., Lulli G., Odoni A., An integer optimalisation approach to large scale air traffic flow management. Operational Reseach 2011, nr 46.
• 9. Burkolter D., Capacity of Railways in Stations Area. Using Petri Nets PhD Thesis Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich 2005.
• 10. Button K., Airports as multimodal interchange nodes. European Conference of Ministers of Transport. CEMT/RE/TR (2003)1, Paris 2003.
• 11. Caimi G., Chudak F., Fuchsberger M., Laumanns M., Zenklusen R., A new resource- constrained multicommodity flow model for conflict-free train routing and scheduling. Transportation Science 2011, nr 45.
• 12. Caimi G., Fuchsberger M., Laumanns M., Lüthl M., A model predictive control approach to descrete-time rescheduling in complex central railway station approach. Computer& Operation Research 2012, nr 39.
• 13. Castelli L., Debels P, Ukovich W., Route charging policies for the central European cross-border upper airspace. Journal of Air Transport Management 2005, nr 11.
• 14. Castelli L., Labbe M., Violin A., A network pricing formulation for the revenue maximization of Europe air navigation service providers. Transport Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 2013, nr 33.
• 15. Castelli L., Pellegrini P., Presenti R., Airport slot allocation in Europe: economic efficiency and fairness. International Journal of Reveneu Management 2012, nr 6.
• 16. Castelli L., Pesenti R., Ranieri A., The design of a market mechanism to allocate air traffic flow management slots. Transport Research Part C 2011, nr 19.
• 17. Castelli L., Presenti R., Rainieri A., The design of a market mechanism to allocate air traffic flow management slots. Transportation Reseach Part C 2005, nr 19.
• 18. Castelli L., Presenti R., Schiratii S., Ukovich W., Study of an impact of innovating route charge schemes considering act and airlines new perspectives. Final Report of the Project: Innovative Route Charging Schemes. CARE- INO 2001-2003.
• 19. Chen B., Cheng H., A review of the applications of the agent technology in traffic and transportation systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation System 2010, nr 11.
• 20. Corman F., D’ Adriano A., Paciarelli D., Pranzo M., Evaluation of green wave policy in real time railway traffic management. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 2009, nr 17.
• 21. D’Ariano A., Pistelli M., Paciarelli D., Aircraft retiming and rerouting in vicinity of airports. IET Inteligent Transport Systems Journal 2012, nr 6.
• 22. D’ariano A., Pranzo M., An advanced real time train dispatching system for minimizing the propagation of delays in dispatching area under severe disturbances. Network and Spatial Economics 2009, nr 9.
• 23. Davidsson P., Henesey L, Ramstedt L., Törnquest J., Wernstedt W., An analisys of the agent basis approaches to transport logistics. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging technologies 2005, nr 13.
• 24. Dell ‘Olmo P., Lulli G., A dynamic programming approach for the airport capacity allocation problem. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics 2003, nr 14.
• 25. Delorme X., Gandibleux X., Rodriguez J., Graps for set packing problems. European Journal of Operations Research 2004, nr 153.
• 26. Delorme X., Rodriguez J., Gandibleux X., Heuristics for railway infrastructure saturation. [w:] Zagoliagis C (ED) Electronics Notes in Theoretical Computer Sciencies. Elsevier 2001.
• 27. Dobruszkes F., High –speed rail and air transport competition in western Europe: a supply –oriented perspective. Transport policy 2011, nr 18.
• 28. Doganis R., The Airport Business. Routledge, London - New York 1992.
• 29. Dyrektywa Rady 87/601, Decyzja Rady 87/602.
• 30. Ehrenberger S., Fisher M., Study on the potential usage of high speed trains in Europe [w:] Rail technology Review Special, TZ-Verlag & Print GmbH 2011.
• 31. Eurocontrol Experimantal Centre 2011, European ATS Route Network (ARN) Version 6 Implementation.
• 32. Eurocontrol Experimental Centre, 2009. Eurocontrol Specification on Data Link Service.
• 33. Eurocontrol Experimental Centre. Long –Term Forecast: IFR Flight Movement 2008-2030, v1.0. Forecast Prepared as a Part of Challenges of Growth 2008 Project, Brussels 2008 , Belgium.
• 34. European Commission 1993. Council Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 of 18 January 1993 on Common rules for the allocation of slots at the Community Airports.
• 35. European Commission 1999. COM (1999) 0614. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. The Creation of the Single European Sky.
• 36. European Commission 2010 a. COM (2010) 0475. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Establishing a Single European Railway Area. Repeal Directives 91/440 EEC 95/18/EC Recast.
• 37. European Commission 2010b. Commission Regulation (EU) 1191/2010 Amending Regulation (EC) No 1794/2006 Laying Down a Common Charging Scheme for Air Navigation Services.
• 38. European Commission 2011a. Commission Regulation (EU) No 1332/2011 of 16 December 2010 Amending Regulation 1794/2006 Laying Down a Common Charging Scheme for Air Navigation Services.
• 39. European Commission, 2012b. Directive 2009/12/EC of the European Parlament and the Council of 11 March 2009 on airport charges.
• 40. Henke R., Lammering T., E. Anton, Impact of an innovative quite regional aircraft on the air transportation system. Journal of Aircraft 2010, nr 47.
• 41. Hinston J., Aigoin G., Delahaye D., Hansman R., Puechemorel S., Introducing structural considerations into complexity metrics. Air Traffic Control Quaterly 2002, nr 10.
• 42. Hoffman R., Ball M., A comparison of formulation for the single-airport ground holding problem with banking constraints. Operation Research 2000, nr 48.
• 43. Ibanez G., Rus G. Eds, Competition in the Railway Industry. An International Comparative Analysis, MPG Books Ltx. Bodmin, Cornwall 2006, United Kingdom.
• 44. Kösters D., Study on the Usage of Declared Capacity at Major German airport. Berlin 2007.
• 45. Libardo A., Pelegrini P., Salerno G., Capacity in railway junctions and optimal route management. RAILROAD 2011.
• 46. Lindner T., Applicability of the analytical UIC Code 406 compression method for evaluating line and station capacity. Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management 2011, nr 1.
• 47. Manning C., Mills S., Fox C., Mogilka H., Using Air Traffic Control Taskload Measures and Communications Events to Predict Subjective Workload. Report DOT/FAA/ Office of Aerospace Medicine 2002.
• 48. Nash C., European rail reform and passengers services - the next steps. Research Transport Economics 2010, nr 29.
• 49. Nash C., Passenger railway reform in the last 20 years – European experience reconsidered. Research in Transport Economics 2008, nr 22.
• 50. Pellegrini P. , Castelli L., Pesenti R., Metaheuristic algoritms for the simultaneous slot allocation problem. IET Inteligent Transport system 2012, nr 6a.
• 51. Pellegrini P., Castelli L., Rodriguez J., Secondary trading of airport slots as a combinatorial exchange. Transportation Research Part E Logistic and Transportation Review 2012, nr 48b.
• 52. Raffarin M., Congestion in European Airspace- a pricing solution? Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 2004, nr 38.
• 53. Rassenti S., Smith V., Bulfin R., A combination auction mechanism for airport time slot allocation. Bell Journal of Economics 2004, nr 13.
• 54. Rodriguez J., A constraint programming model for real time train scheduling at junctions. Transportation Research Part B 2007, nr 41.
• 55. Rozporządzenia Rady nr 2407/92, 2408/92, 2409/92, 2410/92, 2411/92.
• 56. Rozporządzenia Rady Nr 3975/87 oraz 3976/87, OJ 1987, L 374/1.
• 57. Rozporządzenia Rady nr 3975/87, 3976/87,
• 58. Rozporządzenie Rady Nr 2344/90, OJ 1990, L 217/15.
• 59. Rozporządzenie Rady Nr 2410/92, OJ 1992, L 240/18.
• 60. Rozporządzenie Rady Nr 2411/92, OJ 1992, L 240/19.
• 61. SESAR Consortium 2008 Milestone Deliverable D1: Air Transport Framework. The Current Situation.
• 62. Sherali H., Hill J., McCrea M., Trani A., Integrating slot exchange safety, capacity and equity mechanisms within an airspace flow program. Transportation Science 2011, nr 45.
• 63. Sherali H., Staats R., Trani A., An airspace planning and collaborative decision - making model: part 1 probalistic conflicts, Workload and equity considerations. Transportation Science 2003, nr 37.
• 64. Sherali H., Staats R., Trani A., An airspace planning and collaborative decision- making model: part II cost model, Data consideration and computations. Transportation Science 2006, nr 40.
• 65. Soomer M., Franx G., Scheduling aircraft landing using airlines’ preferences. European Journal of Operation Research 2008, nr 190.
• 66. Starke D., European Airports and Airliners: evolving relationship and the regulatory implications. Journal of Air Transport Management 2012, nr 21.
• 67. Traktat Rzymski Art. 85 i 86
• 68. U.I.C. International Union of Railway 2004, Leaflet 406 „capacity”.
• 69. Vossen E., Hoffman R., Mukherjee A., Air traffic flow manegement [w:] C. Barnardt, B. Smith ed. Quantitive Problem Solving Methods in the Airline Industry. International Series in Operation Research & Management Science 2012, nr 169, Springel Nowell Massechussets US.