Comparative numerical analysis of different strengthening systems of historical brick arches

• Autorzy: Zielińska M.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/ijame-2017-0032

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article presents a comparative numerical analysis of various ways to strengthen historical brick arches. Five ways of strengthening brick arches with steel tie-rods have been proposed. Two of these involve the use of braces wrapped around pillars supporting the arch connected with a tie-rod; the other two ways involve the use of the tie-rods with welded metal sheets of different sizes; the latter involves the use of a tie-rod glued with the use of an epoxy adhesive. The collected data were compared with the reference model of the arch left without any interference. The results make it possible to evaluate the effectiveness of the methods by comparing displacements in the vertical and horizontal direction and stresses. The article indicates the direction of proper planning and design of the arch strengthening in brick structures in historical buildings.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

historical buildings; brick arches; modal analysis; FEM

PL

historyczne budynki; analiza modalna; łuk ceglany

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego
• Czasopismo: International Journal of Applied Mechanics and Engineering
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: Vol. 22, no. 2
• Strony: 483--491
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 11 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Zielińska M.

• Department of Technical Bases of Architectural Design, Faculty of Architecture Department of Mechanics of Materials, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering Department of Technical Bases of Architectural Design, Faculty of Architecture Gdansk University of Technology Narutowicza str. 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, POLAND

Bibliografia

• [1] Palkowski S. (2012): Buckling of parabolic arches with hangers and tie. – Engineering Structures, vol.44, pp.128–132.
• [2] Rzeszotarski A., Orłowicz R. and Nowak R. (2009): Causes of damages and repairs in antique brick vaults. – Conservation News, vol.26, pp.260-269.
• [3] Jasieńko J. and Rapp P. (2003): Reinforcement of the structure of the vault above the nave of the Church in Poznan (part I). (in Polish) – Conservation News, vol.13, pp.40-54.
• [4] Jasieńko J. and Raszczuk K. (2011): Strengthening of the rotating dome in latitudinal direction. – Conservation News, vol.30, pp.142-151.
• [5] Collini L., Fagiani R., Garziera R., Riabova K. and Vanali M. (2015): Load and effectiveness of the tie-rods of an ancient Dome: Technical and historical aspects. – Journal of Cultural Heritage, vol.16, pp.597-601.
• [6] Nowak R. and Orłowicz R.(2009): Mechanisms of brick arched lintels damage. – Conservation News, vol.26, pp.253-259.
• [7] Ural A., Firat F.K., Tugrulelci S. and Kara M.E. (2016): Experimental and numerical study on effectiveness of various tie-rod system in brick arches. – Engineering Structures, vol.110, pp. 209-221.
• [8] Calderini C., Lagomarsino S., Rossi M., De Canio G., Mongelli M.L. and Roselli I. (2015): Shaking table tests of an arch-pillars system and design of strengthening by the use of tie-rods. – Bull Earthquake Eng, vol.13, pp.279-297.
• [9] Pisani M.A. (2016): Theoretical approach to the evaluation of the load-carrying capacity of the tie rod anchor system in a masonry wall. – Engineering Structures, vol.124, pp.85-95.
• [10] Matkowski Z., Jasieńko J. and Bednarz Ł. (2004): Steel bindings - technology useful in stiffening the walls of historic buildings with richly decorated facades. (in Polish) – Conservation News, vol.15, pp.68-76.
• [11] Rababeha S, Al Qablanb H. and El-Mashalehb M. (2013): Utilization of tie-beams for strengthening stone masonry arches in Nabataean construction. – Journal of Architectural Conservation, vol.19, No.2, pp.118-30.