The features of female entrepreneurship development in Kazakhstan : an analytical survey

• Autorzy: Onyusheva Irina , Meyer Natanya

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2020.21.1.20

Warianty tytułu

PL

Cechy rozwoju przedsiębiorczości kobiet w Kazachstanie : analityczna ankieta

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The given article is devoted to the contemporary concepts of female entrepreneurship and its features, particularly the case of Kazakhstan as the leading developing country of Central Asia. The importance of female entrepreneurship development has been highlighted as a key economic factor forming the innovation potential of the modern economy resulting in stable economic growth within a country. The research methodology of this paper is based on conducting a historical retrospective, comparative analysis of existing patterns of macroeconomic development, political and social issues in the context of the female entrepreneurship formation and development. It also implemented problematic analyses, systematic vision, causes and consequences analysis and expert assessment, interviewing and broad online survey. The methodology of the research is based on both primary and secondary data collected and processed. Taking into account the specifics and key problems female entrepreneurs face, possible solutions and recommendations on how to improve the current social and economic situation to unleash the female entrepreneurship potential of Kazakhstan are proposed.

PL

Niniejszy artykuł poświęcony jest współczesnym koncepcjom przedsiębiorczości kobiet i ich cechom, w szczególności przypadkowi Kazachstanu jako wiodącego rozwijającego się kraju Azji Środkowej. Znaczenie rozwoju przedsiębiorczości kobiet zostało podkreślone jako kluczowy czynnik ekonomiczny kształtujący potencjał innowacyjny nowoczesnej gospodarki, powodujący stabilny wzrost gospodarczy w kraju. Metodologia badań tego artykułu opiera się na przeprowadzeniu historycznej retrospektywnej analizy porównawczej istniejących wzorców rozwoju makroekonomicznego, zagadnień politycznych i społecznych w kontekście kształtowania i rozwoju przedsiębiorczości kobiet. Wdrożono także analizy problematyczne, systematyczne widzenie, analizę przyczyn i konsekwencji oraz ocenę ekspertów, wywiady i szeroką ankietę internetową. Metodologia badań opiera się zarówno na pierwotnych, jak i wtórnych danych zebranych i przetworzonych. Biorąc pod uwagę specyfikę i kluczowe problemy, przed którymi stają kobiety-przedsiębiorcy, proponuje się możliwe rozwiązania i zalecenia dotyczące poprawy obecnej sytuacji społeczno-ekonomicznej w celu uwolnienia potencjału przedsiębiorczości kobiet w Kazachstanie.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

female entrepreneurship; business women; features; development; barriers; Kazakhstan

PL

przedsiębiorczość kobiet; kobiety biznesu; cechy; rozwój; bariery; Kazachstan

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 21, No. 1
• Strony: 265--282
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 44 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Onyusheva Irina

• Turan University Almaty, Kazakhstan
• Stamford International University, Bangkok, Thailand

autor

Meyer Natanya

• DHET-NRF South African Research Chair in Entrepreneurship Education, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, South Africa

Bibliografia

• 1. Aaltio, I., Wang, Q. (2016). Making sense of women entrepreneurship research: a qualitative meta-analytical review. In: 61st ICSB 2016 World Conference, New York, USA, 15-18 June 2016: Proceedings, 1-19.
• 2. Ács, Z.J., Szerb, L., Lloyd, A. (2017). The Global Entrepreneurship Index 2018. Washington, D.C.: The Global Entrepreneurship and Development Institute, 72-88.
• 3. Andriuta, X., Kartašova, J. (2013). Female entrepreneurship patterns: A theoretical comparative study. Verslo Sistemos ir Ekonomika Business Systems and Economics, 3(2), 187-195.
• 4. Brush, C.G., Bruin, A., Welter, F. (2009). A gender aware framework for women's entrepreneurship. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 1 (1), 8-24.
• 5. Bula, H.O. (2012). Evolution and theories of entrepreneurship: a critical review on the Kenyan perspective. International Journal of Business and Commerce, 1(11), 81-96.
• 6. Cantillon, R. (1755 [1959]). Essai sur la nature du commerce in général (Essay on the Nature of Trade in General) London: Frank Cass and Co., Ltd. Translated and republished in 1959.
• 7. Carlen, J. (2016). A Brief History of Entrepreneurship. The Pioneers, Profiteers, and Racketeers Who Shaped Our World, Columbia University Press, 256.zf
• 8. DAMU. (2014). Annual Report of DAMU Entrepreneurship Development Fund, 2014, Available at: https://damu.kz/upload/iblock/d2b/GodovoyOtchetFondDamuZa2014God.pdf, Accessed on: 01.10.2019.
• 9. DAMU. (2015). Annual Report of DAMU Entrepreneurship Development Fund, 2015, Available at: https://damu.kz/upload/iblock/0b0/GodovoyOtchetAOFondRazvitiyaPredprinimatelstvaDamu_Za2015God.pdf, Accessed on: 01.10.2019.
• 10. DAMU. (2016). Annual Report of DAMU Entrepreneurship Development Fund, 2016, Available at: https://damu.kz/upload/iblock/3aa/DAMU_AR_2016_RU_0911_spread.pdf, Accessed on: 01.10.2019.
• 11. DAMU. (2017). Annual Report of DAMU Entrepreneurship Development Fund, 2017, Available at: https://damu.kz/upload/iblock/3aa/DAMU_AR_2017_RU_0911_spread.pdf, Accessed on: 01.10.2019.
• 12. DAMU. (2018). Annual Report of DAMU Entrepreneurship Development Fund - , 2018, Available at: https://damu.kz/upload/iblock/3aa/DAMU_AR_2018_RU_0911_spread.pdf, Accessed on: 01.10.2019.
• 13. De Bruin, A., Brush, C.G., Welter F. (2007). Advancing a framework for coherent research on women’s entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(3), 323-339.
• 14. Enterprise Surveys. (2017). Kazakhstan 2017, Available at: http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/data/exploreeconomies/2017/kazakhstan#2, Accessed on: 01.10.2019.
• 15. European Union. (2018). Gender Research of the European Union on Central Asia, 2018, Available at: https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/kz_report_executive_summary_ru.pdf, Accessed on: 01.10.2019.
• 16. Galonska, T. (2015). Female entrepreneurs and their use of business models: thesis. Aarhus: Aarhus university, 65.
• 17. GEM Consortium. (2017). Country profiles: Kazakhstan https://www.gemconsortium.org/economy-profiles/kazakhstan Accessed on: 2 March 2020.
• 18. Gupta, S., Pingali, Р.L., Pinstrup-Andersen P. (2017). Women’s empowerment in Indian agriculture: does market orientation of farming systems matter? Food Sec., 9, 1447-1463.
• 19. Hashemi, N.F., Mazdeh, M.M., Razeghi, A., Rahimian, A. (2011). Formulating and choosing strategies using SWOT analysis and QSPM matrix: a case study of Hamadan glass company. Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Computers & Industrial Engineering, Los Angeles, 366-371.
• 20. Hayek, F.A. (1931). Richard Cantillon, Journal of Libertarian Studies, 7(2).
• 21. Heer, C. (1928). Social Aspects of the Business Cycle. By Dorothy Swaine Thomas. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 7(2), 322-324.
• 22. Kalenova, S., Onyusheva, I., Yerubayeva, G. (2017). The Contemporary State of Eco-Economy of Kazakhstan: Problems and Solutions. International Journal of Ecological Economics and Statistics, 38(2), 114-123.
• 23. Meyer N. (2018). South African female entrepreneurs’ intention to remain in business, Vanderbijlpark: North-West University (Doctoral thesis).
• 24. Meyer, D.F. (2014). Local government’s role in the creation of an enabling developmental environment. Administratio Publica, 22 (1), 24-46.
• 25. Meyer, D.F., Meyer, N., Neethling, J.R. (2016). Perceptions of business owners on service delivery and the creation of an enabling environment. Administratio Publica, 24(3), 52-73.
• 26. Meyer, N. (2019). South African female entrepreneurs’ business styles and its influence on various entrepreneurial factors. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 7(2), 25-35.
• 27. National Statistical Review, (2018). Women and Men of Kazakhstan 2013-2017: Statistical Review, 2018, Astana, 86.
• 28. OECD, (2016a). Gender equality in the «Three Es» in the Asia/Pacific Region. Available at: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/8114171ec005.pdf?expires=1464400445&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=AA2CD88D76694B1591FAF95AA8C10D24. Accessed on: 25.08.2019.
• 29. OECD. (2016b). Women’s Entrepreneurship: Issues and Policies, 2016, Paris: OECD, 72-74.
• 30. Okafor, C., Amalu, R. (2010). Entrepreneurial motivations as determinants of women entrepreneurship challenges. Petroleum-Gas University of Ploiesti bulletin. Economic Sciences Series, 62 (2), 67-77.
• 31. Onyusheva, I., Thammashote, L., Kot, S. (2018). ASEAN: Problems of Regional Integration. Espacios Journal, 39(36), 2-6.
• 32. Pines, A.M., Lerner, M., Schwartz, D. (2010). Gender differences in entrepreneurship: Equality, diversity and inclusion in times of global crisis. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 29 (2), 186-198.
• 33. Schumpeter, J.A. (1981). History of Economic Analysis. New York.
• 34. Seilbekova, S., Nurbekova, Z. (2017). Theoretical Backgrounds and Features of Women Entrepreneurship in Kazakhstan, Central Asian Economic Review, 4(51), 34-42.
• 35. Semenova, Y. (2010). Gender Asymmetry of Russian Entrepreneurship. News of Saratov University, 10 (4), 6-8.
• 36. Sospeter, N.G., Rwelamila, P.D., Nchimbi, M., Masoud, M. (2014). Review of theory and practice literature on women entrepreneurship in the Tanzanian construction industry: establishing the missing link. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 19(2), 75-85.
• 37. Sztompka, P. (2005). Sociology of Social Changes, Moscow, 252-288.
• 38. Sytnyk, N., Onyusheva, I., Holynskyy, Y. (2019). The Managerial Issues of State Budgets Execution: The Case of Ukraine and Kazakhstan. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(1), 445-463.
• 39. Vaněk, М., Mikoláš, М., Žváková, K. (2016). Evaluation methods of SWOT analysis. GeoScience Engineering, 2, 23-31.
• 40. Verheul, I., van Stel, A., Thurik, R., (2006). Explaining female and male entrepreneurship at the country level. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 18, 151-183.
• 41. Yadav, V., Unni, J. (2016). Women entrepreneurship: research review and future directions. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 6(12), 1-18.
• 42. Yordanova, D., Tarrazon, M. (2010). Gender differences in entrepreneurial intentions: evidence from Bulgaria. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 15 (3), 245-261.
• 43. Zhussupova, Z., Onyusheva, I., El-Hodiri, M. (2018). Corporate governance and firm value of Kazakhstani companies in the conditions of economic instability. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 17(2), 235-245.
• 44. Znaniecki, F. (1934). The Method of Sociology, New York.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).