PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Comparative assessment of intranasal dressings made of various types of biomaterials, applied after functional endoscopic sinus surgery

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The aim of the study was to make a comparative evaluation of four different types of intranasal dressings made from various types of biomaterials (three original dressings manufactured by various commercial suppliers, and the fourth one, in the form of nasal tamponage by means of a seton in a latex glove finger cot), concerning their efficacy as regards haemostatic action, assessment of postoperative pain, as well as proneness to the occurrence of postoperative adhesions. All patients who were qualified for the study were operated on in the ENT Department, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland, due to chronic bilateral inflammation of the para-nasal sinuses, confirmed by computer tomography of the sinuses. A total of 180 patients were qualified for the study. After surgery, 4 different kinds of intranasal haemostatic dressings were applied. The results were analyzed in three categories: effectiveness in the field of haemostatic activity, postoperative pain assessment (Visual Analog Scale, VAS), and assessment of the tendency to develop postoperative adhesions. Statistical analysis revealed no statistically significant differences between the 4 types of dressings in both haemostatic efficacy (p = 0.97) and the occurrence of postoperative adhesions (p = 0.84). Analysis of the intensity of pain according to the VAS scale indicated that it did not differ between the analyzed groups, both during the application of dressing (mild pain) and on the second day after the operation (medium intensity pain) – p = 0.30 and p = 0.39, respectively. No advantage has been demonstrated for any of the 4 analysed types of intranasal haemostatic dressings over any other. Their properties turn out to be comparable.
Rocznik
Strony
18--22
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 33 poz., wykr., zdj.
Twórcy
autor
  • Department of Laryngology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 20-24 Francuska Str., 40-027 Katowice, Poland
  • Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 18 Medyków Str., 40-752 Katowice, Poland
  • Department of Laryngology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 20-24 Francuska Str., 40-027 Katowice, Poland
autor
  • Department of Laryngology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 20-24 Francuska Str., 40-027 Katowice, Poland
  • Department of Laryngology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 20-24 Francuska Str., 40-027 Katowice, Poland
Bibliografia
  • [1] Fokkens W.J., Lund V.J., Hopkins C., et al.: European Position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps EPOS 2020, Rhinology 58(29) (2020).
  • [2] Côté D.W., Wright E.D.: Triamcinolone-impregnated nasal dressing following endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlledstudy. Laryngoscope 120(6) (2010) 1269-1273.
  • [3] Verim A., Seneldir L., Naiboğlu B., Karaca Ç.T., Külekçi S., et al.: Role of nasal packing in surgical outcome for chronic rhinosinusitiswith polyposis. Laryngoscope 124(7) (2014) 1529-1535.
  • [4] Burduk P.K., Wierzchowska M., Grześkowiak B., et al.: Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction using biodegradable (NasoPore) and non-biodegradable packing, a double-blind, prospective, randomized study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 83(1) (2017) 23-28.
  • [5] Wormald P.J., Boustred R.N., et al.: A prospective single-blind randomized controlled study of use of hyaluronic acid nasal packs in patients after endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol. 20(1) (2006) 7-10.
  • [6] Szczygielski K., Rapiejko P., Wojdas A., Jurkiewicz D.: Use of CMC foam sinus dressing in FESS. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 267(4) (2010) 537-540.
  • [7] Catalano P.J., Payne S., Thong M.: Clinical evaluation of a fully synthetic middle meatal stent for safety and tolerability. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 144(3) (2011) 452-456.
  • [8] Chandra R., Kern R.: Advantages and disadvantages of topical packing in endoscopic sinus surgery. Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 12 (2204) 21-26.
  • [9] Orlandi R., Lanza D.: Is nasal packing necessary following endoscopic sinus surgery? Laryngoscope 114 (2004) 1541-1544.
  • [10] Jurkiewicz D., Rogowski M., et al.: Evaluation of fully biodegradable nasal packings in functional endoscopic sinus surgery – a multicentre study. Polish Journal of Otolaryngology 69(1) (2015) 11-16.
  • [11] Zhou J.C., Zhang J.J., Zhang W., et al.: Efficacy of chitosan dressing on endoscopic sinus surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 274(9) (2017) 3269-3274.
  • [12] Chen J., Wang X., et al.: Influence of hyaluronan nasal dressing on clinical outcome after endoscopic sinus surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Rhinol Allergy 31(4) (2017) 256-259.
  • [13] Liu R., Gong Z.: Effect of chitosan-based gel dressing on wound infection, synechia, and granulations after endoscopic sinus surgery of nasal polyps: A meta-analysis. Int Wound J. 19(8) (2022) 2146-2153.
  • [14] Szczygielski K., Rapiejko P., Wojdas A., Jurkiewicz D.: Use of CMC foam sinus dressing in FESS. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 267(4) (2010) 537-540.
  • [15] Grzeskowiak B., Wierzchowska M., Walorek R., et al.: Steroid vs. antibiotic impregnated absorbable nasal packing for wound healing after endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 85(4) (2019) 473-480.
  • [16] Kumarasamy G., Ramli R.R., Singh H., Abdullah B.: Tualang honey versus steroid impregnated nasal dressing following endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Complement Integr Med. 18(2) (2020) 433-438.
  • [17] Wierzchowska M., Kalińczak-Górna P., et al.: Bioabsorbable dressing impregnated with betamethasone and ciprofloxacin after endoscopic sinus surgery: A randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled study. Ear Nose Throat J. (2021) 1455613211062457.
  • [18] Sow Y.L., Tang I.P., Kho J.P.Y., Prepageran N.: Pilot study comparing steroid-impregnated and non-steroid-impregnated absorbable nasal dressing following endoscopic sinus surgery. Med J Malaysia 73(4) (2018) 244-248.
  • [19] Kühnel T.S., Hosemann WG, Weber R.: Postoperative Versorgung bei Nasennebenhöhleneingriffen [Postoperative treatment following paranasal sinus surgery]. HNO 69(6) (2021) 517-528.
  • [20] Valentine R., Wormald P.J.: Nasal dressings after endoscopic sinus surgery: what and why? Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 18(1) (2010) 44-48.
  • [21] Adriaensen G.F., Lim K.H., Fokkens W.J.: Safety and efficacy of a bioabsorbable fluticasone propionate-eluting sinus dressing in postoperative management of endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 7(8) (2017) 813-820.
  • [22] Hobson C.E., Choby G.W., Wang E.W., Morton S.C., Lee S.: Systematic review and metaanalysis of middle meatal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 29(2) (2015) 135-140.
  • [23] Valentine R., Wormald P.J.: Are routine dissolvable nasal dressings necessary following endoscopic sinus surgery? Laryngoscope. 120(10) (2010) 1920-1921.
  • [24] Shen H., Xiao S.F, Li T.C., et al.:Clinical efficacy of rapid Rhino Stammberger sinus dressing following endoscopic sinus surger]. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 43(10) (2008) 782-785.
  • [25] Piski Z., Gerlinger I., Nepp N., Revesz P., Burian A., et al.: Clinical benefits of polyurethane nasal packing in endoscopic sinus surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 274(3) (2017) 1449-1454.
  • [26] Qu J., Ma J., Zhou B., Huang Q., et al.: Efficacy and safety of pulmicort repulas-impregnated nasal dressing following endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 34(6) (2020) 541-545.
  • [27] Dal T., Bahar S.: The clinical outcomes of using a new crosslinked hyaluronan gel in endoscopic frontal sinus surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 274(9) (2017) 3397-3402.
  • [28] Samarei R., Rasouli J., Mehdikhani F.: Efficacy of triamcinolone acetonide-impregnated Gelfoam nasal pack in management of chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps following endoscopic sinus surgery: a perfectly matched, placebo-controlled trial study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 279(6) (2022) 2915-2924.
  • [29] Kim S.L., Kim S.D., Na H.S., Kim J.W., et al.: The efficacy of cotton ball packing after endoscopic sinus surgery: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Auris Nasus Larynx. 46(5) (2019) 742-747.
  • [30] Huang Z., Zhou B.: Comparison of Absorbable Packing versus No Packing in Wound Healing after Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat. 83(6) (2021) 404-411.
  • [31] Zhang M., Ryan P.J., Shashinder S.: Efficacy of Absorbable Steroid-Impregnated Nasal Packing in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review. Laryngoscope. 131(8) (2021) 1704-1714.
  • [32] Hong S.D., Kim J.H., Dhong H.J., Kim H.Y., et al.: Systemic effects and safety of triamcinolone-impregnated nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized, double-blinded, placebocontrolled study. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 27(5) (2013) 407-410.
  • [33] Wang Y.P., Wang M.C., Chen Y.C., Leu Y.S., Lin H.C., Lee K.S.: The effects of Vaseline gauze strip, Merocel, and Nasopore on the formation of synechiae and excessive granulation tissue in the middle meatus and the incidence of major postoperative bleeding after endoscopic sinus surgery. J Chin Med Assoc. 74(1) (2011) 16-21.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-ceceec23-3569-4f51-b2bd-35a5ea3d9805
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.