Knowledge management at Ukrainian industrial enterprises in the context of innovative development

• Autorzy: Illiashenko Sergii , Shypulina Yuliia , Illiashenko Nataliia , Gryshchenko Olena , Derykolenko Anna

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/emj-2020-0018

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The research aimed to identify promising areas and outline problems associated with the transition of Ukrainian industrial enterprises towards advanced innovative development based on information and knowledge and to formulate recommendations for improving the knowledge management and commercialisation at these enterprises. The study used several methods for analysis, including a literature review; system, structural and statistical analyses; SWOT analysis; the inference method; and interpretation. The research efforts resulted in systemised major sources of knowledge in an enterprise and types of their utilisation. The performed analysis found the key ways to obtain and commercialise knowledge used by Ukrainian industrial enterprises. The results were compared with data of the EU countries. The analysis produced strengths and weaknesses of the existing knowledge management system used in Ukrainian enterprises. Strengths: growth in the number of enterprises producing new knowledge and implementing marketing and organisational innovations; intensified patent activity; and a rational structure of innovation-active enterprises by their size. Weaknesses: the new knowledge structure does not meet the needs of enterprises; an insignificant and unstable share of innovation-active enterprises in the total number of firms; and insignificant sales volumes of patents. The research revealed that Ukrainian enterprises had the potential ability to produce and commercialise new knowledge effectively and to use it as the basis to form, strengthen and implement relative competitive advantages, which would contribute to the innovative growth of the Ukrainian economy as a whole. Recommendations were designed for the formation of prerequisites necessary to improve the efficiency of knowledge management in the context of conditions required for the innovative development of domestic enterprises. The obtained results can be used as an information base for evaluating the system of knowledge production and commercialisation at Ukrainian enterprises to enhance the management and identify promising areas for innovative development.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

knowledge production; knowledge commercialisation; knowledge management in industrial enterprises; innovative development; knowledge economy

PL

produkcja wiedzy; komercjalizacja wiedzy; innowacyjny rozwój; gospodarka oparta na wiedzy

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Białostockiej
• Czasopismo: Engineering Management in Production and Services
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 12, no. 3
• Strony: 43--56
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 46 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Illiashenko Sergii

• National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”, Ukraine
• University of Economics and Humanities, Poland

autor

Shypulina Yuliia

• National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”, Ukraine

autor

Illiashenko Nataliia

• National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”, Ukraine

autor

Gryshchenko Olena

• Sumy State Pedagogical University, Ukraine

autor

Derykolenko Anna

• Sumy State University, Ukraine

Bibliografia

• Aymen R. A., Alhamzah, A., & Bilal, B. (2019). A MultiLevel Study of Influence Knowledge Management Small and Medium Enterprises. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(1), 21-31.
• Bandarian, R. (2007). Evaluation of commercial potential of a new technology at the early stage of development with fuzzy logic. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 2(4), 73-85.
• Bilovodska, О. А. (2018). Marketynhova polityka rozpodilu innovatsiynoyi produktsiyi promyslovykh pidpryy- emstv [Marketing policy of distribution of innovative products of industrial enterprises]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Centr uchbovoi literatury.
• Blanc, B. L., & Bouillon, J. L. (2012). Organizational devices for knowledge management: Proposal for a crossover perspective between knowledge sciences and communication sciences. VINE: The journal of information and knowledge management systems, 42(3/4), 382-395. doi: 10.1108/03055721211267503
• Borjigen, C. (2015). Mass collaborative knowledge management: Towards the next generation of knowledge management studies. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 49(3), 325-342.
• BreakFast (2016). Ukraina v Globalnom reytinge innovatsiy [Ukraine in the Global ranking of innovations]. Retrieved from http://www.break-fast.com.ua/ukrainav-mirovom-rejtinge-innovacij/
• Bučková, J. (2015). Corporate culture as an important factor in the implementation of knowledge management. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 3(3), 51-61.
• Downs J. B., Hossfeld, O., & Velamuri, V. K. (2019). The EC‐ LQO five‐factor framework: An alternative lens for business model innovation in highly knowledge‐intensive industries. Managerial and Decision Economics, 40(3), 309-320.
• European Innovation Scoreboard (2016). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards_en
• European Innovation Scoreboard (2018). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards_en
• Eurostat (2019). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat
• Fini, R., Rasmussen, E., Siegel, D., & Wiklund, J. (2018). Rethinking the Commercialization of Public Science: From Entrepreneurial Outcomes to Societal Impacts. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1). doi: 10.5465/amp.2017.0206
• Fitri, H., Nugraha, A. T., Hakimah, Y., & Manihuruk, Ch. (2019). Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge and Competency Through Intellectual Capital. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(2), 132-141. doi: 10.17512/pjms.2019.19.2.11
• Formánek, I. (2015). Knowledge management as an important part of strategic management. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 3(3), 45-50.
• Ibidunni, A. S., Olokundun, M. A., Motilewa, D. B., Atolagbe, T. M., & Osibanjo, O. A. (2018). Group-tacit knowledge and organisational effectiveness: analysis of effects using a mixed method approach. Business: Theory and Practice, 19, 135-145. doi: 10.3846/ btp.2018.14
• Illiashenko, N. S. (2019). Upravlinnya vyperedzhayuchym innovatsiynym rozvytkom promyslovykh pidpryyemstv [Management of advanced innovative development of industrial enterprises]. Sumy, Ukraine: Trytoria.
• Illiashenko, S., & Rot-Sierov, Y. (2016). Knowledge as a factor of organization’s competitive benefits: prospects for Ukraine. Economic Annals-ХХ, 156(1-2), 49-53.
• Industriya 4.0 v Ukrayini (2018). Industriya 4.0 v mashynobuduvanni. Stan v Ukrayini ta perspektyvy rozvytku [Industry 4.0 in machine-building industry. State of Ukraine and prospects for development]. Retrieved from https://industry4-0-ukraine.com.ua/
• Informator (2019). Bloomberg nazvav novu pozytsiyu Ukrayiny u reytynhu naybilʹsh innovatsiynykh ekonomik svitu [Bloomberg has announced Ukraine’s new ranking in the rating of the most innovative economies in the world]. Retrieved from https://informator.news/bloomberg-nazvav-novu-pozytsiyu-ukrajinyu-rejtynhu-najbilsh-innovatsijnyh-ekonomik-svitu/
• Instytut ekonomichnykh doslidzhenʹ ta politychnykh konsulʹtatsiy (2016). Shchorichna otsinka dilovoho klimatu [Annual assessment of the business climate]. Retrieved from http://www.ier.com.ua/ua/sme_development/ABCA?pid=6494
• Khedhaouria, A. & Jamal, A. (2015). Sourcing knowledge for innovation: knowledge reuse and creation in project teams. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(5), 932-948.
• Kovtunenko, Yu. V. (2012). Osoblyvosti orhanizatsiyi protsesu komertsializatsiyi innovatsiynykh rozrobok vysokotekhnolohichnykh pidpryyemstv [Organization features of the commercialization process of high-tech enterprises’ innovations]. Pratsi Odesʹkoho politekhnichnoho universytetu, 2(39), 313-317.
• Kuzmin A. E., & Kostsyk R. S. (2013). Vybir metodiv komertsializatsii innovatsiinoi produktsii pidpryiemstv [The choice of commercialization methods of enterprises innovative products]. Ekonomika ta derzhava, 9, 6-8.
• Landry, R., & Amara, N. (2012). Elucidation and enhancement of knowledge and technology transfer business models. VINE: The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 42(1), 94-116. doi: 10.1108/03055721211207789.
• Maceika, A., & Jančiauskas, B. (2012). Innovative knowledge: its origin, detachment and usage in production practice. Business: Theory and Practice, 13(3), 228- 233. doi: 10.3846/btp.2012.24
• Majewska, M., & Szulczyńska, U. (2014). Methods and Practices of Tacit Knowledge Sharing Within an Enterprise: an Empirical Investigation. Oeconomia Copernicana, 5(2), 35-48. doi: 10.12775/OeC.2014.012
• Mardania, A., Nikoosokhanb, S., Moradib, M., & Doustarb, M. (2018). The Relationship Between Knowledge Management and Innovation Performance. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 29(1), 12-26.
• Markman, G. D., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2008). Research and Technology Commercialization. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1401-1423.
• Massingham, P. (2014). An evaluation of knowledge management tools: Part 1 – managing knowledge resources. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(6), 1075-1100. doi: 10.1108/JKM-11-2013-0449
• Naqshbandib, M. M., & Jasimuddin, S. M. (2018). Knowledge-oriented leadership and open innovation: Role of knowledge management capability in Francebased multinationals. International Business Review, 27(3), 701-713.
• Olefirenko, O. M. (2016). Komertsializatsiya innovatsiy yak obyektyvnyy chynnyk efektyvnoho funktsionuvan- nya promyslovoho pidpryyemstva [Commercialization of innovations as an objective factor of effective functioning of an industrial enterprise]. Skhidna Yevropa: ekonomika, biznes ta upravlinnya, 5(05), 179-183.
• Olefirenko, O. M. (2017). Upravlinnya komertsializatsiyeyu innovatsiy promyslovykh pidpryyemstv: aspekty zbutovoyi polityky [Management of commercialization of innovations of industrial enterprises: aspects of sales policy]. Sumy, Ukraine: Trytoria.
• Prokopenko, O., Holmberg, R., & Omelyanenko, V. (2018). Information and communication technologies support for the participation of universities in innovation networks (comparative study). Innovative Marketing, 14(3), 17-29.
• Ringel, M., Manly, J., & Möller, C. (2018). The Most Innovative Companies 2018. Retrieved from https://www. bcg.com/publications/collections/most-innovativecompanies-2018
• Rot-Sierov, Ye. V. (2016). Rol i mistse znan u komertsializatsiyi innovatsiy yak instrumentu realizatsiyi potentsialu pidpryyemstva [The role and place of knowledge in the commercialization of innovations as a tool for realization of enterprise potential]. Prychornomorsʹki ekonomichni studiyi, 12(2), 33-37.
• Shypulina, Yu. S. (2017). Upravlinnya rozvytkom innovatsiynoyi kulʹtury promyslovykh pidpryyemstv [Management of development of innovative culture of industrial enterprises]. Sumy, Ukraine: TOV “Trytoria”.
• Soskin, O. I. (2014). Narodnyy kapitalizm: ekonomichna model dlya Ukrayiny [People’s capitalism: an economic model for Ukraine]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Vydavnyctvo “IST”.
• Stankiewicz, J. S., & Moczulska, M. (2015). The involvement of employees in knowledge management in the light of the research results. Oeconomia Copernicana, 6(2), 37-51. doi: 10.12775/OeC.2015.011
• State Statistics Service of Ukraine [Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrayiny] (2019). Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/
• The Global Innovation Index (2019). Retrieved from https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/analysisindicator.
• Turkey: WIPO Releases (2018). World Intellectual Property Indicators Report. Retrieved from http://www. mondaq.com/turkey/x/782720/Trademark/WIPO+ Releases+2018+World+Intellectual+Property+Indic ators+Report
• Ukrstat (2018). Naukova ta innovatsiyna diyalnist Ukrayiny: statystychnyy zbirnyk [Scientific and innovative activity of Ukraine: statistical yearbook]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrayiny. Retrieved from https://ukrstat.org/uk/druk/publicat/kat_u/2018/zb/09/zb_nauka_2017.pdf
• Ukrstat (2019). Naukova ta innovatsiyna diyalnist Ukrayiny: statystychnyy zbirnyk [Scientific and innovative activity of Ukraine: statistical yearbook]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrayiny. Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/ publicat/kat_u/2019/zb/09/zb_nauka_2018.pdf
• World Intellectual Property Organization (2019). Retrieved from https://www3.wipo.int/ipstats/keysearch.htm?keyId=231
• Yahiaei, M., & Hasanzadeh, A. (2018). Presentation a technology commercialization model in ICT knowledge base companies. Investment Knowledge, 7(26), 63-82.
• Zahra, S. A., Kaul, A., & Bolívar-Ramos, M. T. (2018). Why Corporate Science Commercialization Fails: Integrating Diverse Perspectives. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1). Retrieved from https:// journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/amp.2016.0132