Going all in or spreading your bet: a configurational perspective on open innovation interaction channels in production sectors

• Autorzy: McPhillips Marita , Tegtmeier Silke , Nikitina Tatjana

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.30657/pea.2024.30.18

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Using different interaction channels within open innovation partnerships holds the potential to enhance the chance of success in production sectors. However, our comprehension of how open innovation partnerships are affected by varying combinations of interaction channels, and how this corelates with their level of open innovation output, remains limited. There are discrepancies in the current literature regarding the individual and combined effects of open innovation interaction channels. Our study aims to resolve these inconsistencies by using a configurational perspective, which allows for the identifi-cation of multiple successful pathways. Employing fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) to a dataset of European open innovation partnerships in production sectors, we uncover specific combinations of interaction channels that explain high levels of innovation outcomes. Subse-quently, we distinguish between two successful pathways. Notably, we observe that the relationship between interaction channels is causally complex, high engagement in open innovation may not guar-antee favorable innovation outcomes. This finding highlights the intricate causal dynamics at play. Thus, our study is a significant step toward reconciling the disparate perspectives in the literature concerning the impact of interaction channels on open innovation output.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

open innovation; fuzzy set QCA; production section; innovation partnership; interaction channel

PL

otwarta innowacja; zbiór rozmyty QCA; sekcja produkcyjna; partnerstwo innowacyjne; kanał interakcji

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Stowarzyszenia Menedżerów Jakości i Produkcji
• Czasopismo: Production Engineering Archives
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 30, Iss. 2
• Strony: 191--203
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 91 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

McPhillips Marita

• Faculty of Management and Economics, Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1181-669X

autor

Tegtmeier Silke

• Department of Technology and Innovation, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2807-5779

autor

Nikitina Tatjana

• Faculty of Engineering Economics and Management, Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4111-7411

Bibliografia

• 1. Adner, R., Kapoor, R., 2010. Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306–333. DOI: 10.1002/smj.821
• 2. Afuah,A., Tucci,C.L., 2012. Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. AcademyofManagementReview, 37(3), 355-375. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2010.0146
• 3. Audretsch, B. D., Belitski, M., 2023. The limits to open innovation and its impact on innovation performance. Technovation, 119, 102519. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102519
• 4. Bacon, E. C., Williams, M. D., 2022. Deconstructing the ivory tower: identi-fying challenges of university-industry ecosystem partnerships. Review of Managerial Science, 16(1), 113-134. DOI: 10.1007/s11846-020-00436-7
• 5. Baldwin, C. Y., Woodard, C. J., 2009. The architecture of platforms: A uni-fied view. Platforms, markets and innovation, 32, 19-44.
• 6. Barbosa, A.P.F.P.L., Salerno,M.S., Nascimento,P.T.deS., Albala,A., Ma-ranzato,F.P., Tamoschus,D., 2021. Configurations of project manage-ment practices to enhance the performance of open innovation R&D pro-jects.InternationalJournal of Project Management, 39(2), 128–138. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.06.005
• 7. Beck, S., Bergenholtz, C., Bogers, M., Brasseur, T.-M., Conradsen, M. L., Di Marco, D., Distel, A. P., Dobusch, L., Dörler, D., Effert, A., 2022. The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisa-tion approach. Industry and Innovation, 29(2), 136-185.
• 8. Benlian, A., Hilkert, D., Hess, T., 2015. How open is this platform? The mean-ing and measurement of platform openness from the complementors’ per-spective. Journal of Information Technology, 30(3), 209-228. DOI: 10.1057/jit.2015.6
• 9. Bertello, A., De Bernardi, P., Ricciardi, F., 2023. Open innovation: status quo and quo vadis - an analysis of a research field. Review of Managerial Science. DOI: 10.1007/s11846-023-00655-8
• 10. Bigliardi, B., Ferraro, G., Filippelli, S., Galati, F., 2020. The past, present and future of open innovation. In European Journal of Innovation Manage-ment. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. DOI: 10.1108/EJIM-10-2019-0296
• 11. Bogers, M., Afuah, A., Bastian, B., 2010. Users as Innovators: A Review, Critique, and Future Research Directions. Journal of Management, 36(4), 857–875. DOI: 10.1177/0149206309353944
• 12. Bogers,M., Foss,N.J., Lyngsie,J., 2018. The “Human” Side of Open Innova-tion: The Role of Employee Diversity in Firm-Level Open Innovation Capabilities. Journal of World Business, 53(5), 741-758.
• 13. Bogers, M., Zobel, A.-K., Afuah, A., Almirall, E., Brunswicker, S., Dahlander, L., Frederiksen, L., Gawer, A., Gruber, M., Haefliger, S., Hagedoorn, J., Hilgers, D., Laursen, K., Magnusson, M. G., Majchrzak, A., McCarthy, I. P., Moeslein, K. M., Nambisan, S., Piller, F. T., … Ter Wal, A. L. J., 2017. The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis. In-dustry and Innovation, 24(1), 8–40. DOI: 10.1080/13662716. 2016.1240068
• 14. Boudreau,K., 2010. Open Platform Strategies and Innovation: Granting Ac-cess vs. Devolving Control. Management Science, 56(10), 1849-1872. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1100.1215
• 15. Boudreau,K., 2010. Open Platform Strategies and Innovation: Granting Ac-cess vs. Devolving Control. Management Science, 56(10), 1849–1872. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1100.1215
• 16. Bradonjic, P., Franke, N., Lüthje, C., 2019. Decision-makers’ underestima-tion of user innovation. Research Policy, 48(6), 1354-1361. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.020
• 17. Brunswicker, S., Vanhaverbeke, W., 2015. Open Innovation in Small and Me-dium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs): External Knowledge Sourcing Strate-gies and Internal Organizational Facilitators. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4), 1241-1263. DOI: 10.1111/jsbm.12120
• 18. Cabrilo, S., Dahms, S., Mutuc, E., Marlin, J., 2020. The role of IT practices in facilitating relational and trust capital for superior innovation perfor-mance: the case of Taiwanese companies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21(5), 753-779. DOI: 10.1108/jic-07-2019-0182
• 19. Cenamor, J., Frishammar, J., 2021. Openness in platform ecosystems: Inno-vation strategies for complementary products. Research Policy, 50, 104148.
• 20. Chesbrough, H., 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology.Harvard Business School Press.
• 21. hesbrough, H., Bogers, M., 2014. Explicating Open Innovation. In New Frontiers in Open Innovation, 3–28, Oxford University Press
• 22. Chesbrough, H., Crowther, A. K., 2006. Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R and D Management, 36(3), 229–236. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00428.x
• 23. Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J., 2014. New frontiers in open innovation. Oxford University Press.m
• 24. Christensen, I., Karlsson, C., 2019. Open innovation and the effects of Crowdsourcing in a pharma ecosystem. Journalof Innovation & Knowledge, 4(4), 240–247. DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2018.03.008
• 25. Coad, A., Nightingale, P., Stilgoe, J., Vezzani, A., 2021. Editorial: the dark side of innovation. Industry and Innovation, 28(1), 102-112. DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2020.1818555
• 26. Cui, T., Ye, J. H., Tan, C. H., 2022. Information technology in open innovation: A resource orchestration perspective. Information & Management, 59(8), 103699. DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2022.103699
• 27. D’Este, P., Guy, F., Iammarino, S., 2013. Shaping the formation of university industry research collaborations: what type of proximity does really matter? Journal of Economic Geography, 13(4), 537–558. DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lbs010
• 28. Dahlander, L., Gann, D. M., Wallin, M. W., 2021. How open is innovation? A retrospective and ideas forward. Research Policy, 50(4), 104218.
• 29. Dodgson, M., 2020. The Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management
• 30. Estellés-Arolas, E., González-Ladrón-de-Guevara, F., 2012. Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition. Journal of Information Science, 38(2), 189–200. DOI: 10.1177/0165551512437638
• 31. Fiss, P. C., 2011. Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
• 32. Fiss, P. C., 2011. Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393-420. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
• 33. Gligor, D., Gölgeci, İ., Rêgo, C., Russo, I., Bozkurt, S., Pohlen, T., … & Garg, V., 2021. Examining the use of fsqca in b2b marketing research: benefits, current state and agenda for future research. Journal of Business and In-dustrial Marketing, 37(7), 1542-1552. DOI: 10.1108/jbim-09-2020-0436
• 34. Greco, M., Grimaldi, M., Cricelli, L., 2016. An analysis of the open innovation effect on firm performance. European Management Journal, 34(5), 501–516. DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2016.02.008v
• 35. Hagedoorn, J., Zobel, A.-K., 2015. The role of contracts and intellectual prop-erty rights in open innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(9) DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2015.1056134
• 36. Hilgers, D., Ihl, C., 2010. Citizensourcing: Applying the concept of open in-novation to the public sector. International Journal of Public Participation, 4(1).
• 37. Holgersson, M., Baldwin, C. Y., Chesbrough, H., Bogers, M. L. A. M., 2022. The forces of ecosystem evolution. California Management Review, 64(3), 5–23.
• 38. Hossain, M., Kauranen, I., 2016. Open innovation in SMEs: a systematic lit-erature review. Journal of Strategy and Management, 9(1), 58–73. DOI: 10.1108/JSMA-08-2014-0072
• 39. Howells, J., Ramlogan, R., Cheng, S., 2012. Universities in an open innova-tion system: a UK perspective. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 18(4), 440–456. DOI: 10.1108/13552551211239483
• 40. Huber, F., Wainwright, T., Rentocchini, F., 2020. Open data for open innova-tion: managing absorptive capacity in SMEs. R&D Management, 50(1), 31–46. DOI: 10.1111/radm.12347
• 41. Isckia, T., De Reuver, M., Lescop, D., 2020. Orchestrating platform ecosys-tems: the interplay of innovation and business development subsystems. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 197-223.
• 42. Kumar,S., Sahoo,S., Lim,W.M., Kraus,S., Bamel,U., 2022. Fuzzy-set quali-tative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management re-search: A contemporary overview. Technological Forecastingand Social-Change, 178, 121599. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121599
• 43. Kusa, R., Duda, J., Suder, M., 2021. Explaining SME performance with fsQCA: The role of entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneur motivation, and opportunity perception. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge.
• 44. Lauritzen, G.D., Karafyllia, M., 2018. Perspective: Leveraging Open Innova-tion through Paradox. Journal of Product Innovation Management.
• 45. Laursen,K., Salter,A., 2006. Open for Innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance Among UK Manufacturing Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131-150.
• 46. Laursen,K., Salter,A., 2014. Open for Innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance Among UK Manufacturing Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 35(5), 707-721.
• 47. Laursen,K., Salter,A., Somaya,D., 2022. Complementarities and tensions be-tween appropriability and open innovation: An overview of prior research and future opportunities. In Hand bookof Ope Innovation Oxford Univer-sity Press (OUP.
• 48. Lee, Y., Fong, E., Barney, J. B., Hawk, A., 2019. Why do experts solve com-plex problems using open innovation? Evidence from the US pharmaceutical industry. California Management Review, 62(1), 144-166.
• 49. Lichtenthaler, U., 2010. Intellectual property and open innovation: an empirical analysis. International Journal of Technology Management, 52(3/4), 372–391. DOI: 10.1504/IJTM.2010.035981
• 50. Majchrzak, A., Malhotra, A., 2020. What Is Crowdsourcing for Innovation? BT - Unleashing the Crowd: Collaborative Solutions to Wicked Business and Societal Problems (A. Majchrzak & A. Malhotra (eds.); 3-46, Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-25557-2_
• 51. Majchrzak, A., Bogers, M. L. A. M., Chesbrough, H., Holgersson, M., 2023. Creating and Capturing Value from Open Innovation: Humans, Firms, Platforms, and Ecosystems. California Management Review, 65(2)
• 52. Marzi,G., Fakhar Manesh,M., Caputo,A., Pellegrini,M.M., Vlačić,B., 2023. Do or do not. Cognitive configurations affecting open innovation adop-tion inSMEs. Technovation, 119, 102585. DOI: 10.1016/j.technova-tion.2022.102585
• 53. Mignon, S., Ayerbe, C., Dubouloz, S., Robert, M. & West, J., 2020. Managerial Innovation and Management of Open Innovation. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 32, 3-12. DOI: 10.3917/jie.032.0003
• 54. Milagres, R., Burcharth, A., 2019. Knowledge transfer in interorganizational partnerships: what do we know? Business Process Management Journal, 25(1), 27–68. DOI: 10.1108/BPMJ-06-2017-0175
• 55. Nguyen, T. P. T., Huang, F., Tian, X., 2023. Intellectual property protection need as a driver for open innovation: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Technovation, 123, 102714. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102714
• 56. Ogink, R. H. A. J., Goossen, M. C., Romme, A. G. L., Akkermans, H., 2023. Mechanisms in open innovation: A review and synthesis of the literature. Technovation, 119, 102621. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102621
• 57. Olk,P., West,J., 2020. The relationship of industry structure to open innovation: cooperative value creation in pharmaceutical consortia.R&D Management, 50(1),116–135.
• 58. Ooms, W., Piepenbrink, R., 2021. Open innovation for wicked problems: Us-ing proximity to overcome barriers. California Management Review, 63(2), 62–100.
• 59. Oyemomi, O., Liu, S., Neaga, I., Chen, H., Nakpodia, F., 2019. How cultural impact on knowledge sharing contributes to organizational performance: using the fsqca approach. Journal of Business Research, 94, 313-319. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.027
• 60. Parida, V., Westerberg, M., Frishammar, J., 2012. Inbound Open Innovation Activities in High-Tech SMEs: The Impact on Innovation Performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 283–309.
• 61. Perkmann,M., Tartari,V., McKelvey,M., Autio,E., Broström,A., D’Este,P., Fini,R., Geuna,A., Grimaldi,R., Hughes,A., Krabel,S., Kitson,M., Llerena,P., Lissoni,F., Salter,A., Sobrero,M., 2013. Academic engage-ment and commercialization: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442.
• 62. Piezunka, H., Dahlander, L., 2014. Distant Search, Narrow Attention: How Crowding Alters Organizations’ Filtering of Suggestions in Crowdsourc-ing. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 856–880. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2012.0458
• 63. Piller, F., West, J., 2014. Firms, users, and innovation. New Frontiers in Open Innovation, 29(1), 29–49.
• 64. Pollok, P., Lüttgens, D., Piller, F. T., 2019. How Firms Develop Capabilities for Crowdsourcing to Increase Open Innovation Performance: The Inter-play between Organizational Roles and Knowledge Processes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(4), 412–441. DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12485
• 65. Pundziene,A., Sermontyte-Baniule,R., Rialp-Criado,J., Chesbrough,H., 2023. Indirect effect of open innovation on clinical and economic value creation in digital healthcare: A comparative study of European countries. Journal of Business Research, 159, 113701. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113701
• 66. Radziwon, A., Bogers, M., 2019. Open innovation in SMEs: Exploring inter-organizational relationships in an ecosystem. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 573–587. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.021
• 67. Radziwon, A., Chesbrough, H., West, J., Vanhaverbeke, W., 2023. The Future of Open Innovation. In Chesbrough, H., Radziwon, A., Vanhaverbeke, W. & West, J. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Open Innovation. Oxford University Press. Chapter 57.
• 68. Ragin,C.C., 2014. The comparative method:Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California Press.
• 69. Rauter, R., Globocnik, D., Perl-Vorbach, E., Baumgartner, R. J., 2019. Open innovationand its effects on economic and sustainability innovation per-formance. Journalo Innovation&Knowledge, 4(4), 226–233. DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2018.03.004
• 70. Ritala, P., Almpanopoulou, A., 2017. In defense of ‘eco’ in innovation eco-system. Technovation, 60, 39-42.
• 71. Robaczewska, J., Vanhaverbeke, W., Lorenz, A., 2019. Applying open innovation strategies in the context of a regional innovation ecosystem: The case of Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Global Transitions, 1, 120–131.
• 72. Rasoolimanesh, S., Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M., Olya, H., 2021. The combined use of symmetric and asymmetric approaches: partial least squaresstructural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(5), 1571-1592. DOI: 10.1108/ijchm-10-2020-1164
• 73. Sadiq, S., Indulska, M., 2017. Open data: Quality over quantity. International Journal of Information Management, 37(3), 150–154. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.01.003
• 74. Saridakis, C., Zaefarian, G., Ganotakis, P., Angelidou, S., 2022. A step-by-step guide of (fuzzy set) qualitative comparative analysis: From theory to practice via an implementation in a B2B context. Industrial Marketing-Management, 107, 92–107. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.09.026
• 75. Schaffers, H., Komninos, N., Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Nilsson, M., Oliveira, A., 2011. Smart cities and the future internet: Towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation, 431-446, Springer Berlin Heidelberg
• 76. Schneider, C. Q., Wagemann,C.(2012. Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press.
• 77. Scuotto,V., Beatrice,O., Valentina,C., Nicotra,M., Di Gioia,L., Farina Briamonte,M., 2020. Uncovering the micro-foundations of knowledge sharing in open innovation partnerships: An intention-based perspective of technology transfer. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 152, 119906. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119906
• 78. Sedita, S. R., Grandinetti, R., 2023. Beyond R&D: a configurational approach to open innovation in the Veneto region. European Planning Studies, 31(5), 1050–1069. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2022.2114316
• 79. Seidel, V. P., Langner, B., Sims, J., 2016. Dominant communities and dominant designs: Community-based innovation in the context of the technol-ogy life cycle. Strategic Organization, 15(2), 220–241. DOI: 10.1177/1476127016653726
• 80. Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Gilbert, B. A., 2011. Resource or-chestration to create competitive advantage: Breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. Journal of Management, 37(5), 0–1412. DOI: 10.1177/0149206310385695
• 81. Stefan, I., Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., Vanhaverbeke, W., Oikarinen, E.-L., 2022. The dark side of open innovation: Individual affective responses as hidden tolls of the paradox of openness. Journal of Business Research, 138, 360–373. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.028
• 82. Steinmo,M., Rasmussen,E., 2018).The interplay of cognitive and relational social capital dimensions in university-industry collaboration: Overcom-ing the experience barrier. Research Policy, 47(10), 1964–1974. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.004
• 83. Suominen, A., Seppänen, M., Dedehayir, O., 2019. A bibliometric review on innovation systems and ecosystems: a research agenda. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(2), 335-360.
• 84. Tang, S., Liao, S., Wang, L., Chen, W., Guo, Z., 2022. A configurational anal-ysis of small and medium-sized enterprises’ radical innovations: the per-spective of dynamic capabilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.784738
• 85. Teece, D. J., 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research policy, 15(6), 285-305.
• 86. Von Hippel,E., 2009. Democratizing innovation: the evolving phenomenon of user innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 1(1), 29-40.
• 87. West,J., Bogers,M., 2014. Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: Are-view of research on open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 814–831. DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12125
• 88. West,J., Lakhani,K. R., 2008. Getting Clear About Communities in Open In-novation. Industry and Innovation, 15(2), 223–231. DOI: 10.1080/13662710802033734
• 89. West, J., Olk, P., 2023. Distributed Governance of a Complex Ecosystem: How R&D Consortia Orchestrate the Alzheimer’s Knowledge Ecosys-tem. California Management Review, 65(2), 93–128.
• 90. Xie, X., Wu, Y., Martínez, J. M. G., 2023. More is not always better: Reconciling the dilemma of R&D collaboration in high-tech industries in transition economies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 190, 122422. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122422
• 91. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., 2014. Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 17–29. DOI: DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.04.003

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).