Comparison of results of ACL reconstruction using LARS method and autogenous ST/GR graft

• Autorzy: Płocki Jędrzej , Pelikan Piotr , Bejer Agnieszka , Granek Arkadiusz , Krawczyk-Suszek Marlena , Kotela Ireneusz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5277/ABB-01306-2019-02

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The objective of the study was assessment of the function of the knee joint after ACL reconstruction using the LARS method and autogenous graft. The study was of a retrospective character and included 96 patients who had undergone reconstruction of the torn ACL. The study was conducted within 36–48 months after surgery. Methods: In order to compare the results of the ACL reconstruction performed with 2 types of grafts, the following instruments were used: Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, SF 36v2 questionnaire for assessment of health-related quality of life, and Biodex System 4 for isokinetic muscle testing. Results: No differences in the evaluation of the quality of life measured using SF 36v2 questionnaire were observed between the LARS and ST GR groups. Using the Lysholm Scale, the distribution of knee function scores was compared according to the type of surgery. There are no grounds to confirm the differences in the distribution of knee function scores considering the type of graft ( p = 0.756). Isokinetic test showed a significant weakening of muscle strength in the operated limb, compared to the strength of the healthy limb. Conclusions: The type of graft used for ACL reconstruction does not exert an effect on the quality of life of patients or the level of their knee joint function. Extensor and flexor muscles strength of the knee joint was lower in the operated limb, irrespective of the type of graft used. Weak relationships were observed between the level of knee joint function and extensor muscle strength of this joint.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

knee; ACL reconstruction; LARS; knee function; arthroscopy

PL

kolano; wiązadło; LARS; artroskopia

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej
• Czasopismo: Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 21, no. 1
• Strony: 113--119
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 28 poz., tab

Twórcy

autor

Płocki Jędrzej

• Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Information Technology and Management, Rzeszów, Poland

autor

Pelikan Piotr

• Department of Physiology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland

autor

Bejer Agnieszka

• Department of Medicine, Institute of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland

autor

Granek Arkadiusz

• Biomechanics Laboratory, St. Alexander Hospital in Kielce, Kielce, Poland.

autor

Krawczyk-Suszek Marlena

• Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Information Technology and Management, Rzeszów, Poland

autor

Kotela Ireneusz

• Department of Rehabilitation in Disease of the Locomotor, Institute of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University (JKU), Kielce, Poland
• Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Clinic of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Central ClinicalHospital of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] BALTACI G., YILMAZ G., ATAY A.O., The outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed and rehabilitated knees versus healthy knees: a functional comparison, Acta Orthop. Traumatol. Turc., 2012, 46, 186–195, DOI:10.3944/AOTT.2012.2366.
• [2] BARENIUS B., NORDLANDER M., PONZER S., TIDERMARK J., ERIKSSON K., Quality of Life and Clinical Outcome After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Patellar Tendon Graft or Quadrupled Semitendinosus Graft An 8-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial, Am. J. Sports Med., 2010, 38, 1533–1541.
• [3] BUSIJA L., OSBORNE R.H., NILSDOTTER A., BUCHBINDER R., ROOS E.M., Magnitude and meaningfulness of change in SF-36 scores in four types of orthopedic surgery, Health Qual. Life Outcomes, 2008, 6, 55–67.
• [4] CHEN J., GU A., JIANG H., ZHANG W., YU X., A comparison of acute and chronic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using LARS artificial ligaments: a randomized prospective study with a 5-year follow-up, Arthroscopy Sports Med.,m2015, 135, 95–102.
• [5] DE JONG S.N., VAN CASPEL D.R., VAN HAEFF M.J., SARIS D.B., Functional assessment and muscle strength before and after reconstruction of chronic anterior cruciate ligament lesions, Arthroscopy, 2007, 23, 21–28.
• [6] FALCONER T.M., TUSAK L., BREIDAHL W.H., ANNEAR P., The Lars augmented 4-tunnel hastring “hybrid” aclr graft construction allows accelerated rehabilitation without knee laxitym – case series of 111 patients after 2 years, Journal of Musculoskeletal Research, 2015, 18(04), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218957715500207
• [7] GÄBLER C., SCHMIDT R., SCHURZ M., ORTHNER S., VÉCSEI V., The Introduction of an Artificial Ligament for Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament. A Department’s Critical Review of Complications and Problems, Osteo. Trauma Care, 2006, 14, 51–53.
• [8] GAO K., CHEN S., WANG L., ZHANG W., KANG Y., DONG Q., ZHOU H., LI L., Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with LARS artificial ligament: a multicenter study with 3- to 5-year follow-up, Arthroscopy, 2010, 26, 515–523.
• [9] HART J.M., KUENZE CH.M., DIDUCH D.R., INGERSOLL C.D., Quadriceps Muscle Function after Rehabilitation with Cryotherapy in Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, J. Athl. Train., 2014, 49, 733–739.
• [10] HIEMSTRA L.A., WEBBER S., MACDONALD P.B., KRIELLAARS D.J., Contralateral limb strength deficits after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a hamstring tendon graft, Clin. Biomech., 2007, 22, 543–550.
• [11] HUANG J.M., LIU H.Y., CHEN F.R., JIAN G.J., CHEN Q., WANG Z.M., KANG Y.F., Characteristics of bone tunnel changes after ACL reconstruction using Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System artificial ligament, Chin. Med. J., 2012, 125, 3961–3965.
• [12] KNAPIK J.J., BAUMAN C.L., JONES B.H., HARRIS J., VAUGHAN L., Preseason strength and flexibility imbalances associated with athletic injuries in female collegiate athletes, Am. J. Sports Med., 1991, 1, 76–81.
• [13] KRÓLIKOWSKA A., SIKORSKI Ł., CZAMARA A., REICHERT P., Are the knee extensor and flexor muscles isokinetic parameters affected by the duration of postoperative physiotherapy supervision in patients eight months after ACL reconstruction with the use of semitendinosus and gracilis tendons autograft? Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics, 2018 20, 3, 89–100, DOI: 10.5277/ABB-01149-2018-02
• [14] LAVOIE P., FLETCHER J., DUVAL N., Patient satisfaction needs as related to knee stability and objective findings after ACL reconstruction using the LARS artificial ligament, Knee, 2000, 7, 157–163.
• [15] LEE D.Y., KARIM S.A., CHANG H.C., Return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction – a review of patients with minimum 5-year follow-up, Ann. Acad. Med. Singapore, 2008, 37, 273–278.
• [16] MACHOTKA Z., SCARBOROUGH I., DUNCAN W., KUMAR S., PERRATON L., Anterior cruciate ligament repair with LARS (ligament advanced reinforcement system): a systematic review, Sports Med. Arthrosc. Rehabil. Ther. Technol., 2010, 7, 29–39.
• [17] NAU T., LAVOIE P., DUVAL N., A new generation of artificial ligaments in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Two-year follow-up of a randomised trial, J. Bone Joint Surg. Br., 2002, 84, 356–360.
• [18] OGRODZKA-CIECHANOWICZ K., CZECHOWSKA D., CHWAŁA W., ŚLUSARSKI J., GĄDEK A., Stabilometric indicators as an element of verifying rehabilitation of patients before and after reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament, Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics, 2018, 20(1), 101–107, DOI:10.5277/ABB-01005-2017-02,
• [19] OH S.J., KIM J.G., LIM S.K., Relationship between Isokinetic Strengths, Subjective Knee Scores, and Functional Performance after ACL Reconstruction, Indian J. Science Technol., 2015, 8, 390–396.
• [20] PARCHI P.D., GIANLUCA C., DOLFI L., BALUGANTI A., PIOLANTI N., CHIELLINI F., LISANTI M., Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with LARS™ artificial ligament results at a mean follow-up of eight years, Int. Orthop., 2013, 37, 1567–1574.
• [21] PAULOS L.E., ROSENBERG T.D., GREWE S.R., TEARSE D.S., BECK C.L., The gore-tex anterior cruciate ligament prosthesis: a long-term follow-up, Am. J. Sports Med., 1992, 20, 245–252.
• [22] PŁOCKI J., KOTELA I., BEJER A., PELIKAN P., GRANEK A., KRAWCZYK-SUSZEK M., Assessment of postural stability in patients after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with LARS and autogenous graft, Acta Bioeng. Biomech., 2018, 20(4), DOI: 10.5277/ABB-01204-2018-02,
• [23] SEBASTIANI E., PENNESI E., PLACELLA G., MANFREDA F., SPEZIALI A., TEI M., POTALIVO G., CERULLI G., Clinical, instrumental and biomechanical 10-year follow-up of patient who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the LARS synthetic ligament, J. Orthopaed. Traumatol., 2013, 14(suppl 1), 71, doi: 10.1007/s10195-013-0264-9.
• [24] SHAERF D.A., PASTIDES P.S., SARRAF K.M., WILLIS-OWEN C.A., Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction best practice: A review of graft choice, World J. Orthop., 2014, 18, 23–29.
• [25] SHERVEGAR S., NAGARAJ P., GROVER A., GANESH N., RAVOOF A., Functional Outcome Following Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction with Rigid Fix: A Retrospective Observational Study, Arch. Bone Jt. Surg., 2015, 3, 264–268.
• [26] SOKOŁOWSKI A., Estymacja i testowanie hipotez, [In:] Statistica w badaniach naukowych i nauczaniu statystyki, Wyd. StatSoft Polska, Kraków 2010, 25–60.
• [27] THOMAS A.C., VILLWOCK M., WOJTYS E.M., PALMIERI--SMITH R.M., Lower Extremity Muscle Strength After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Reconstruction, J. Athl. Train, 2013, 48, 610–620.
• [28] WOODS G.A., INDELICATO P.A., PREVOT T.J., The Gore-Tex anterior cruciate ligament prosthesis: two vs. three years results, Am. J. Sports Med., 1991, 19, 48–55.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).