Developing a research process procedure for academic and practical management

• Autorzy: Dźwigoł Henryk

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2020.146.5

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: Developing a procedure for the course of the research process for management science and practice. An original procedure for the course of the research process in management and quality sciences was presented. Design/methodology/approach: Based on the analysis of domestic and foreign literature, as well as the model of the research process, five stages have been defined, which should be included in the procedure of the research process. They included: selection of the research subject, determination of the nature of the research, determination of the transparency of the research purpose, selection of the method of conducting the research, determination of the size of the studied sample. Findings: Taking into account the model of the research process, a procedure for conducting research was developed. Research limitations/implications: The developed procedure is a premise for conducting further research in the direction of assigning research methods and techniques to individual elements of the research process stages in management and quality sciences. Selection of appropriate methods and research techniques will translate into the verification of research hypotheses, such as and answers to research questions. Practical implications: First of all, it is important to develop a procedure for the course of the research process for management science and practice, and then, for individual stages of this process, assign appropriate research methods and techniques. Social implications: The author's procedure for the course of the research process presented in this article is a response to how to operationalize phenomena in the sciences on management and quality and thus translate into research related to Industry 4.0. Originality/value: The developed procedure for the course of the research process allows for detailed familiarization and carrying out of scientific research, and in particular for a precise presentation of the characteristics of the tested entity, dispelling doubts regarding the transparency of the conducted research, appropriate description of the method of conducting the research, and determining the size of the research sample.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

research procedure; research methods; research design

PL

procedura badawcza; metody badawcze; projekt badawczy

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: z. 146
• Strony: 61--73
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 31 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Dźwigoł Henryk

• Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Organization and Management

Bibliografia

• 1. Alvesson, M., Kärreman, D. (2007). Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development. The Academy of Management Review, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.5465/ amr.2007.26586822.
• 2. Alvesson, M., Sandberg, J. (2013). Has management studies lost its way? Ideas for more imaginative and innovative research. Journal of Management Studies, 50(1). DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01070.x.
• 3. Apanowicz, J. (2005). Methodological conditions of scientific work. Doctoral dissertations, habilitation theses (Metodologiczne uwarunkowania pracy naukowej. Prace doktorskie, prace habilitacyjne). Difin: Warszawa.
• 4. Babiński, G. (1997). Stages of the research process (Etapy procesu badawczego). In: M. Malikowski, M. Niezgoda (eds.), Empirical research in sociology. Choice of texts (Badania empiryczne w socjologii. Wybór tekstów). WSSG: Tyczyn.
• 5. Bouma, G., Carland, S. (2016). The Research Process. Oxford: New Zealand. https://downloadpdfs.com/v6/preview/?pid=6&offer_id=26&ref_id=40cb34f4a589695de820AQlijJo77W0m_541a0fad_c28f910b&sub1=75033&keyword=the-research-process.pdf.
• 6. Bourke, B. (2014). Positionality: Reflecting on the Research Process. The Qualitative Report, Vol. 19. How To Article. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol19/iss33/3/.
• 7. Cooke, R.B. (2003). Probabilistic risk analysis: foundations and methods. Rep. Cambridge University Press (CUP). https://doi.org/10.2277/0521773202.
• 8. Czakon, W. (2016). Fundamentals of research methodology in management sciences (Podstawy metodologii badań w naukach o zarządzaniu). Nieoczywiste Publishing House: Warszawa. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291343071_Podstawy_metodolo gii_badan w_naukach_o_zarzadzaniu.
• 9. Dul, J., Hak, T. (2016). Case Study Methodology in Business Research. Routledge: New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080552194.
• 10. Dźigoł, H. (2015). Assumptions for building research methodology (Założenia do budowy metodyki badawczej). Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej, seria: Organizacja i Zarządzania, z. 75, Gliwice, 100-108. http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/baztech/element/bwmeta1. element.baztech-a7bb952e-f0e3-453c-afbf-d5aeaa0bd633.
• 11. Dźwigoł, H. (2015). Research workshop in management sciences (Warsztat badawczy w naukach o zarządzaniu). Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskie, seria: Organizacja i Zarzadzanie, z. 83. Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej: Gliwice. http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/ yadda/element/bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171400691.
• 12. Dźwigoł, H. (2018). Modern research processes in management sciences. Methodological and methodical conditions (Współczesne procesy badawcze w naukach o zarządzaniu. Uwarunkowania metodyczne i metodologiczne). PWN: Warszawa.
• 13. Dźwigol, H., Dźwigol-Barosz, M. (2018). Scientific research methodology in management sciences. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej, seria: Organizacja i Zarządzania, z. 118, Gliwice, 119-120. DOI: 10.18371/FCAPTP.V2I25.136508.
• 14. Frankfort-Nachmias, Ch., Nachmias, D. (2001). Research methods in social sciences (Metody badawcze w naukach społecznych). Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka: Poznań. https://docer.pl/doc/xx18vn5.
• 15. Gill, J., Johnson, P. (1997). Research Methods for Managers. SAGE Publications: New Delhi. http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:3xTrEc3HTDAJ: www.corwin.com/upm-data/9617_020256PrelimsPreface.pdf+&cd=2&hl=pl&ct= clnk&gl=pl.
• 16. Gospodarek, T. (2009). Modeling in management sciences based on the method of research programs and representative formalism (Modelowanie w naukach o zarządzaniu oparte na metodzie programów badawczych i formalizmie reprezentatywnym). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego: Wrocław.
• 17. Handfield, R., McLachlin, R., Samson, D. (2002). Effective case research in operations management: a process perspective. Journal of Operations Management, vol. 20, no. 5. DOI: 10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00022-0.
• 18. Johnson, P. (1997). Research Methods for Managers. SAGE Publications: New Delhi; Stuart I., Mc Cutcheon D. DOI: 10.12691/jfa-2-4-3.
• 19. Jonker, J., Pennink, B. (2010). The essence of research methodology. Springer: Berlin. DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-71659-4.
• 20. Kothari, C.R. (2004). Research methodology. Methots & Tehniques. New Age, New Delhi. https://www.academia.edu/33779875/C_R_Kothari_Research_Methodology_Methods_ and_Techniques.
• 21. Mun, J. (2004). Applied Risk Analysis, Moving Beyond Uncertainty in Business. Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New Jersey. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 338035939_Applied_Risk_Analysis_Moving_Beyond_Uncertainty.
• 22. Ngulube, P., Mathipa, E.R., Gumbo, M.T. (2015). Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks in the Social and Management Sciences. Adressing research challenges: Making Headway in developing research. Noordwyk: Mosalia-Masedi. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3210.7680.
• 23. Novikov, A.M., Novikow, D.A. (2013). Research methodology From Philosophy of Science to Research Design. CRC Press. DOI:10.1086/286983.
• 24. Patil, S. (2018). Aditya: Research Methodology in Social Sciences. New India Publishing Agency: Nipa. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305195437_Research_ Methodology_in_Social_Sciences.
• 25. Pervez, G. (2020). Part II – The Research Process. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762427.005.
• 26. Rahi, S. (2017). Research Design and Methods: A Systematic Review of Research Paradigms, Sampling Issues and Instruments Development. International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 6(2), 1-5. DOI: 10.4172/2162-6359.1000403.
• 27. Seuring, A.S. (2008). Assessing the rigor of case study research in supply chain management. Supply Chain Management, 13(2), 128-137. DOI: 10.1108/ 13598540810860967.
• 28. Stuart, I., Mc Cutcheon, D., Handfield, R., McLachlin, R., Samson, D. (2002). Effective case research in operations management: a process perspective. Journal of Operations Management, vol. 20, no. 5. DOI: 10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00022-0.
• 29. Szarucki, M. (2011). Modeling in solving management problems (Modelowanie w rozwiązywaniu problemów zarządzania). In: J. Czekaj, M. Lisiński (eds.), Development of management concepts and methods (Rozwój koncepcji i metod zarządzania). Fundacja Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego: Kraków. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 304704348_Modelowanie_w_rozwiazywaniu_problemow_zarzadzania_Modelling_in_management_problems_solving.
• 30. Tandukar, S. (2018). Business Research Methodology. Grin Verlag: Munich.
• 31. Vincent, A. Jr., Anfara, V.A., Brown, K.M., Mangione, T.L. (2002). Qualitative Analysis on Stage: Making the Research Process More Public. Educational Researcher, vol. 31, no. 7. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X031007028.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).