Generalised Choquet Integral Algorithm for Subcontractor Selection in the Textile Industry – A Case Study for Turkey

• Autorzy: Yayla A. Y. , Yildiz A. , Yildiz K.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Ogólny algorytm całkowy Choqueta dla selekcji poddostawców w przemyśle tekstylnym Turcji

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Turkish textile firms work under a heavily competitive atmosphere in terms of prices due to globalisation. Firms have to take into consideration several criteria in order to survive the global market conditions and to maintain profitability. Contractor companies have to select the optimal subcontractor in order to meet these criteria and in business. Therefore the decision to choose subcontractors is of great importance for the success of enterprises. In solving the problem of subcontractor selection, multiple criteria should be considered, for which multi-criteria decision-making methods are used. This paper presents a case study which regards the selection of the optimal subcontractor for a Turkish textile firm. In order to solve the selection problem generalized Choquet integral methodology was used based on a hierarchical decision model. In the conclusion section of the study, optimal subcontractor selection results are presented.

PL

W wyniku globalizacji przedsiębiorstwa tureckie pracują w warunkach zintensyfikowanej konkurencji, w związku z tym muszą brać pod uwagę zróżnicowane kryteria dla utrzymania się na rynku. Dla spełnienia tych kryteriów dostawcy muszą wyselekcjonować odpowiednich poddostawców. Artykuł przedstawia metody odpowiedniego doboru poddostawców w tureckim przemyśle tekstylnym. W tym celu stosuje się ogólny całkowy model Choqueta. W podsumowaniu pracy przedstawiono optymalne metody selekcji poddostawców.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

subcontractor selection; Turkish textile industry; generalised Choquet integral methodology

PL

wybór podwykonawcy; turecki przemysł tekstylny; algorytm całkowy Choqueta

• Wydawca: Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz - Łódzki Instytut Technologiczny
• Czasopismo: Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: Vol. 21, no. 6 (102)
• Strony: 16--21
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 13 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Yayla A. Y.

• Department of Mechanical Education, Technical Education Faculty, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey

autor

Yildiz A.

• Technical Sciences Vocational High School, Automotive Technology Program, Amasya University, Amasya, Turkey

autor

Yildiz K.

• Institute of Science, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey

Bibliografia

• 1. Cebeci U. Fuzzy AHP-Based Decision Support System for Selecting ERP Systems in Textile Industry by Using Balanced Scorecard. Expert Systems with Applications 2009; 36: 8900-8909.
• 2. Kargi VSA, Ozturk A. Subcontractor Selection Using Analytic Hierarchy Process. Business and Economics Research Journal 2012; 3, 3: 121-143.
• 3. Cheng EW, Li H. Contractor Selection Using the Analytic Network Process. Construction Management and Economics 2004; 22: 1021-1032.
• 4. Sonmez M, Yang JB, Holt GD. Addressing the Contractor Selection Problem Using an Evidential Reasoning Approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 2001; 8, 3: 198-210.
• 5. Juan YK, Perng YH, Castro-Lacouture D, Lu KS. Housing Refurbishment Contractors Selection Based on a Hybrid Fuzzy-QFD Approach. Automation in Construction 2009; 18: 139-144.
• 6. Minchin RE, Smith GR. QualityBased Contractor Rating Model for Qualification and Bidding Purposes, Journal of Management in Engineering 2005; 21, 1: 38–43.
• 7. Holt GD, Olomolaiye PO, Harris FC. Factors Infuencing UK Construction Clients’ Choice of Contractor. Building and Environment 1994; 29: 241-248.
• 8. Enyinda CI, Ogbuehi AO, Udo G. A Decision Support Model for Contractor Selection in a Government Procurement Supply Chain: Evidence from an Emerging Market. Journal of Management Policy and Practice 2011; 12, 7: 9-17.
• 9. Grabisch M, Nicolas J. Classification by Fuzzy Integral: Performance and Tests. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1994; 65: 255- 273.
• 10. Chiang JH. Aggregating Membership Values by a Choquet-Fuzzy-Integral Based Operator. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 2000; 11: 367-375.
• 11. Demirel T, Demirel, NÇ, Kahraman C. Multi-Criteria Warehouse Location Selection Using Choquet Integral. Expert Systems with Applications 2010; 37: 3943–3952.
• 12. Tsai HH, Lu IY. The Evaluation of Service Quality Using Generalized Choquet Integral. Information Sciences 2006; 176, 6: 640–663.
• 13. Delgado M, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Martnez L. Combining Numerical and Linguistic Information in Group Decision Making. Information Sciences 1998; 107: 177–194.