PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

The Influence of Brand on Consumer Quality Assessment of Clothes: A Case Study of the Polish Market

Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
This article presents the results of research carried out based on consumer assessment of the quality of clothing using sensory analysis. The study aimed to determine the role of the brand and information about it in assessing product quality and identify the quality parameters that distinguish brands of a similar quality level. An attempt was also made to classify popular brands of clothing available on the Polish market based on the parameters that determine their quality. A significant impact of the brand name on the sensory assessment of clothes’ quality has been reported. The study has shown that assessors attribute higher rating values to quality features when they know the product brand; moreover, the brand and its information shortens the assessment time, which may suggest that it simplifies and facilitates consumers’ decision-making process. The result analysis has led to the identification of three groups of the factors determining the quality of clothing products: fabric composition, workmanship, and all other variables. It has also led to the separation of three clusters, characterized by different levels of product quality, for which sets of features distinguishing a given category were determined.
Rocznik
Strony
216--224
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 29 poz.
Twórcy
  • Department of Non-Food Product Quality and Safety, Cracow University of Economics, Cracow, Rakowicka 27, 31-510 Kraków, Poland
autor
  • Department of Non-Food Product Quality and Safety, Cracow University of Economics, Cracow, Rakowicka 27, 31-510 Kraków, Poland
Bibliografia
  • [1] Palmowska, M., Karasek, J. (2019). Raport: Rynek mody w Polsce, Wyzwania. Retrieved February 8, 2020. Website: https://home.kpmg/pl/pl/home/insights/2019/11/raport-kpmg-pt-rynek-mody-w-polsce-wyzwania.html.
  • [2] Rudnicka, A. (2014). Raport z badań. Moda w 2050 roku, Łódź: Centrum Strategii i Rozwoju Impact. Retrieved December 15, 2019. Web site: https://docplayer.pl/7138634-Moda-w-2050-roku-raport-z-badanopracowanie-agata-rudnicka.html.
  • [3] Bartkowiak, P., Sojkin, B. (2015). Wyznaczniki decyzji zakupowych towarów konsumpcyjnych mieszkańców Poznania i Wielkopolski. Ruch Prawniczy. Ekonomiczny I Socjologiczny: Problemy rozwoju współczesnego miasta, 77(1), 327-348.
  • [4] Liczmańska, K., Konarski, S. (2013). Determinanty lojalności konsumenckiej na przykładzie województwa kujawsko-pomorskiego. In: Wiśniewska, A. (Ed.). Kształtowanie lojalności konsumenckiej. Wyższa Szkoła Promocji (Warszawa). pp. 17-29.
  • [5] Saricam, C. A. A., Kalaoglu, F. (2012). Determination of the priorities of customer requirements and quality in apparel retail industry. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(16), 242-250.
  • [6] Salerno-Kochan, R. (2008). Consumer approach to the quality and safety of textile products. Part 1. Quality of textile products from the point of view of consumers. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe, 16(4), 8-12.
  • [7] Swinker, M. E., Hines, J. D. (2006). Understanding consumers’ perception of clothing quality: A multidimensional approach. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(2), 218-223.
  • [8] Davis, L. L. (1985). Effects of physical quality and brand labeling on perceptions of clothing quality. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61(2), 671-677.
  • [9] Kim, K., Takatera, M., Zhu, Ch., Tsuyoshi, O. (2015). Comparison of Japanese and Chinese clothing evaluations by experts taking into account marketability. AUTEX Research Journal, 15(1), 67-76.
  • [10] Hines, J. D., Swinker, M. E. (2001). Knowledge: A variable in evaluating clothing quality. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 25(1), 72-76.
  • [11] Hoeffler, S., Keller, K. L. (2003). The marketing advantages of strong brands. Journal of Brand Management, 10(6), 421-445.
  • [12] Liczmańska, K. (2015). Kluczowe czynniki determinujące zachowania konsumenckie na przykładzie mieszkańców województwa kujawsko-pomorskiego, Problemy Zarządzania, Finansów i Marketingu, 41(2), 107-118.
  • [13] Hustvedt, G., Bernard, J. C. (2010). Effects of social responsibility labelling and brand on willingness to pay for apparel. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34(6), 619-626.
  • [14] Maran, K., Badrinarayana, J., Kumar, P. (2017). A study on branded apparels customers purchase behawior with reference to India. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 15(21), 215-221.
  • [15] Su, J., Tong, X. (2016). Brand personality, consumer satisfaction and loyalty: A perspective from denim jeans brands. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 44(4), 427-446.
  • [16] Maehle, N., Otnes, C., Supphellen, M. (2011). Consumers’ perceptions of the dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 10, 290-303.
  • [17] Hoyer, W. D., Brown, S. P. (1990). Effects of brand awareness on choice for a common, repeat-purchase product. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 141-148.
  • [18] Davis, L. L. (1987). Consumer use of label information in ratings of clothing quality and clothing fashionability. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 6(1), 8-14.
  • [19] Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
  • [20] ISO 11136. (2014). Sensory analysis – Methodology - General guidance for conducting h hedonic tests with consumers in a controlled area.
  • [21] Stachowiak-Krzyżan, M., Ankiel, M. (2019). Behaviours of young consumers in a virtual environment on the example of the fashion industry, w: Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio H Oeconomia, 53(1), 89-97.
  • [22] Millan, E., Wright, L. T. (2018). Gender effects on consumers’ symbolic and hedonic preferences and actual clothing consumption in the Czech Republic. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(5), 478-488.
  • [23] Szot, M. (2016). Handel detaliczny odzieżą i obuwiem w Polsce. Analiza rynku i prognozy rozwoju na lata 2016-2021, PMR Consulting & Research, Retrieved January 10, 2020. Web site: https://marketingprzykawie.pl/espresso/po-odziez-najczesciej-wybieramy-sie-do-markowychsklepow-raport-pmr/.
  • [24] Wiemy, jaka jest najpopularniejsza marka odzieżowa w Polsce! Retrieved May15, 2019. Web site: https://www.glamour.pl/artykul/wiemy-jaka-jest-najpopularniejszamarka-odziezowa-w-polsce-190326063706.
  • [25] Kerviler, G., Rodriguez, C. M. (2019). Luxury brand experiences and relationship quality for Millennials: The role of self-expansion. Journal of Business Research, 102, 250-262.
  • [26] Kall, J. (2016). Silna marka. Istota i kreowanie. PWE (Warszawa).
  • [27] Elliot, R., Percy, L. (2007). Strategic brand management. Oxford University Press (New York).
  • [28] Goldsmith, R. E., Flynn, R. L., Clark, R. A. (2012). Motivators of market Mavenism in the retail environment. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19(4), 390-397.
  • [29] Forsythe, S. M. (1991). Effect of private, designer, and national brand names on shoppers’ perception of apparel quality and price. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 9(2), 1-6.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-ce081851-4061-481c-b04a-a65213f559e1
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.